
Music playlist that can boost your focus
A playlist of instrumental music with a 'strong rhythm' and 'simple tonality' can help people boost their mood and productivity, particularly while performing demanding tasks, a groundbreaking new study suggests. While a large number of studies point to music's widespread effect on emotions, its influence on human cognition isn't completely clear. However, many commercial music platforms advertise content claiming it could support or improve focus and concentration. But the effects of such content largely remain untested, say researchers from the New York University's Music and Audio Research Laboratory (MARL).
In the latest study, scientists compared the effects of four different sets of music on the mood and performance of nearly 200 participants during a cognitively demanding test called the 'flanker task'. The psychology experiment measures the ability of people to focus on a central stimulus, relayed along with a 'flanking' signal. This surrounding stimulus is either matching the target or incongruent to it, requiring participants to focus and respond only to the central target. Four groups of participants with about 50 individuals each performed the flanker task as they listened to four different types of music, including those advertised to support 'work flow' and 'deep focus'.
These two music types were mainly selected as they exhibit pronounced differences in musical features expected to drive behaviour despite similar marketing, researchers say. Scientists also compared the effects of popular hit music and office ambience noise on the participants' test outcomes. These included a lyrical song from an American music magazine's 'Hot 100' playlist, and a sample of 'calm office noise'. The special 'work flow' music in the study was sourced from a similarly named playlist in a music therapy app – characterised by strong rhythm, simple tonality, moderate dynamism, and a distributed spectral energy below 6000 hertz.
On the contrary, the 'deep focus' music was found to be 'relatively minimalistic' with a weaker rhythm and slower tempo, and a more reserved dynamism.
'Neither work flow nor deep focus music had lyrics,' scientists added.
'Groups were well-balanced in terms of basic demographics, musical training, sensitivity to musical reward, basal mental health status, and stimulus volume,' they said.
In the task, participants were presented with a stimulus consisting of a central 'right- or left-pointing arrow' flanked by 'arrows pointing either in the same direction (congruent condition), the opposite direction (incongruent condition), squares (neutral condition), or crosses (no-go condition).' They had to respond to the direction of the arrow in the middle by pressing the corresponding arrow key on the keyboard 'as soon as possible'. In another set of tests, the correct response was to refrain from responding.
'Each participant completed 72 test trials — 18 per condition, half with the centre arrow pointing right, half with it pointing left,' the study noted. Scientists found that listening to work flow music had significant improvements in participants' self reported mood from before to after the flanker task. The effect of work flow music on mood was also observed to be independent of variation in participants' self-reported levels of anxiety, depression, or stress over the past week.
'This suggests that work flow music may be effective for mood management even when people are suffering from emotional distress,' researchers wrote.
Participants listening to work flow music also responded 'more quickly over time', the study noted. 'This suggests that work flow music may be useful for people losing focus due to high levels of anxiety,' researchers concluded.
'Tiktok Music' Is Changing The Music Industry: Citing a limitation of the study, they said while each participant group was comparable in terms of their demographics, and music-related as well as mental health variables, there may have been unnoticed group-level differences. However, the findings are still consistent with a large body of research showing that listening to music can have beneficial effects on cognition including verbal learning, memory, as well as attention, scientists said. 'We show that instrumental music intentionally composed to support focus and concentration during work — comprising strong rhythm, simple tonality, broad spectral energy, and moderate dynamism — improves mood and increases processing speed during a cognitively demanding task,' they wrote.
'This work has real-world implications for providing the general population with effective and affordable strategies to regulate mood and performance during routine work tasks,' researchers concluded.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
31 more Palestinians killed by Israel fire near aid centre
The Gaza civil defence agency said 31 people were killed and "about 200" wounded Wednesday when Israeli troops fired on people waiting to enter a food distribution centre. "We transported at least 31 martyrs and about 200 wounded as a result of Israeli tank and drone fire on thousands of citizens... on their way to receive food from the American aid centre," civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal told the media. The Israeli army did not immediately respond to an AFP request for comment. Earlier, Palestinians desperately trying to access aid in Gaza came under fire again on Tuesday, killing 36 people and wounding 207, the Palestinian Health Ministry said. At least 163 people have been killed and 1,495 wounded in a number of shootings near aid sites run by the Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). In southern Gaza, at least eight people were killed while trying to obtain aid around Rafah, according to Nasser Hospital. In northern Gaza, two men and a child were killed and at least 130 were wounded on Tuesday, according to Nader Garghoun, a spokesperson for the Al Awda Hospital, which received the casualties. He said most were being treated for gunshot wounds. Additionally, three Palestinian medics were killed in an Israeli strike Tuesday in Gaza City, according to the health ministry. Mohammed Abu Hussein, a resident of the nearby built-up Bureij refugee camp, said Israeli drones and tanks opened fire, and that he saw five people wounded by gunshots. Abed Haniyah, another witness, said Israeli forces opened fire 'indiscriminately' as thousands of people were attempting to reach the food site. 'What happens every day is humiliation,' he said. 'Every day, people are killed just trying to get food for their children.' NABLUS VIOLENCE: At least two Palestinians were killed on Tuesday as Israel launched a large-scale military operation in the occupied West Bank city of Nablus, the Palestinian health ministry and the Israeli army said. The Palestinian health ministry said authorities had been informed by Israel of the deaths of Nidal Amira, 40, and Khaled Amira, 35. It did not specify whether the two were related. A journalist said dozens of military vehicles entered Nablus's historic centre shortly after midnight (2100 GMT Monday). A curfew had been announced over loudspeakers the day before. At a major square outside the old city, young men and boys gathered on Tuesday to burn tyres. The Palestine Red Crescent Society said that during the Israeli raid, at least three people were injured from bullet shrapnel, four from 'physical assault', and dozens more from tear gas inhalation. It added that ambulances were blocked from entering the old city, obstructing the work of medical teams. The northern West Bank, where Nablus is located, has been the target of a major Israeli offensive since late January. Agencies


Gulf Today
6 days ago
- Gulf Today
Are you guilty of wellness bypassing? Probably
Sam Parker, The Independent I once lived a perfect day. It started with sitting cross-legged by an open window for 30 minutes of meditation, with morning light beaming vitamin D directly into my face. After that, it was time to stretch: one, two, three sun salutations, timing the movement of my limbs to long, deep breaths. In the shower, I slowly turned the warm water to cold in order to flood my system with endorphins, before stepping out and repeating a round of positive affirmations into the mirror. In the evening, I chewed my dinner mindfully before switching on the TV. Then, two hours before bed, I put away all my screens and lit some candles. By the flickering flames, I wrote down all my worries in a journal and bullet-pointed how I'd tackle them the next day, before listing the multitudinous reasons I had in my life to be deeply, truly grateful. With eight full hours left before I needed to be up again, I lay down on my pillow, closed my eyes, took a round of deep, calming breaths and finally... panicked. The lure of the wellness industry can be incredibly strong, particularly if you suffer from anxiety. All my life I had experienced periods of vague, oppressive dread that could make entire weeks a misery, and in recent years, it had started to feel like the solution was only ever one more swipe away. My algorithm served up an endless well of gurus advocating journalling or diaphragmatic breathing or running in your underwear through the frozen tundras of Norway. I dabbled in all of it (OK, not the Norway one), figuring if I just landed on the perfectly optimised mental health routine, I'd banish my doom for good. The fact that no combination of these activities seemed to work made me quietly fear I might be broken, that anxiety was simply my lot in life. In 1984, the American psychotherapist John Welwood coined the phrase 'spiritual bypassing'. He used it to describe people in the hippie movement who used then-exotic practices like yoga and meditation as a substitute for working on deeper problems with their mental health. There is a 'widespread tendency', he warned, 'to use spiritual ideas and practices to sidestep or avoid facing unresolved emotional issues (and) psychological wounds'. Welwood believed psychology and spiritualism could complement each other, but said he saw too many people trying to shortcut their way to inner peace and 'rise above the raw and messy side of [their] humanness before (they) have fully faced and made peace with it'. Fifty years on, we are now living in an age of wellness bypassing. The global wellness industry is worth $5.6 trillion, buoyed by an endless tide of Instagram-friendly self-care tips often presented as quick fixes for low moods, depression or anxiety. In many cases, the science backing them is spurious at best. An investigation published by The Guardian last week found that more than 50 per cent of the top trending videos offering mental health advice on TikTok contain misinformation. These spanned misleading claims about the powers of saffron and magnesium glycinate to dubious methods promising to 'heal trauma within an hour'. One theory posited that you can reduce anxiety by eating an orange in the shower (surely only true if you're anxious about having sticky fingers while you eat fruit). Jevin D West is the co-author of a book called Calling Bullshit: The Art of Scepticism in a Date-Driven World and leads research teams attempting to fight back against misinformation online. Health and wellness, West tells me, is the biggest problem area of all. 'Nothing comes even close to its ability to attract people's attention and convince them to let their guard down,' he says. 'There is the outright disinformation, of course, that has an intentional element. But a huge part of what we've seen is misleading content. Maybe it has some elements of truth. It might even be citing relevant science. But often, it's about an area there isn't much research on.' Take shilajit, for example, the tar-like supplement purported to boost testosterone. West's number one piece of advice for consuming online content is an oldie but a goodie: if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Healing your decades-old family trauma by 'cozymaxxing' is probably not going to cut it. But he acknowledges that, even for savvy social media users, this can be incredibly difficult to follow. 'Because we want to be convinced,' he says. 'We want that elixir that can fix this emotional issue we might have. We want to believe.' We also want to belong.


Gulf Today
7 days ago
- Gulf Today
Arizona's water is vanishing before AI gets a crack at it
Mark Gongloff, Tribune News Service While we worry about the growing threat of robots guzzling up America's groundwater, we can't ignore the risk that cows will consume it all first. A new study by researchers at Arizona State University put the depth of our water problem in perspective. It found that groundwater in the lower Colorado River basin — a region filling up with both data centres for artificial intelligence and alfalfa farms to feed cows — is being depleted far more quickly than surface water from reservoirs such as Lake Mead and Lake Powell, which are also vanishing rapidly. Nearly 28 million acre-feet of water has disappeared from aquifers since 2003, satellite measurements suggest, compared with about 14 million acre-feet from surface reservoirs. The vast majority of this water was underneath Arizona, 60% of which is suffering from extreme drought after its hottest, driest stretch in recorded history. One acre-foot of water is enough to flood an acre of land, or one American football field, with a foot of water. Twenty-eight million acre-feet is roughly the entire capacity of Lake Mead, the biggest reservoir in the US, which provides water for 20 million Americans. The actual Lake Mead receives a lot more attention. The white 'bathtub ring' showing how far its water line has fallen — it's at just 32% of capacity as of this writing — has long demonstrated that a notoriously dry region is getting even thirstier as the planet heats up and droughts become more frequent and intense. But quietly, below the ground, one entire Lake Mead has already disappeared. It will take millennia to replenish. 'People used to say the Colorado River was the lifeblood of the Southwest US,' Arizona State professor Jay Famiglietti, the study's senior author, told me. 'Now it's the groundwater. We need to make sure we take precautions to sustain that groundwater for multiple generations in the future.' The report comes at a time of growing alarm about the water and power demands of the AI boom. Every time you ask a robot to write your Ethics 101 term paper or generate one of those brainrot videos all the kids are watching these days, a data center somewhere takes a drink (essentially). Water is used to cool the servers cooking up this slop, and it's also used in generating the electricity that powers those massive computers. A study last year by the University of California, Riverside, for the Washington Post estimated that one 100-word email written by ChatGPT consumes more than a 16-ounce bottle of water. By 2028, US data centers could swallow 74 billion gallons of water per year, up from less than 6 billion in 2014, according to a December study by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. And those servers are thirstier depending on where they're situated. In Arizona, that same 100-word email would consume about two bottles of water, according to the Post/UC Riverside study. Unfortunately, Arizona and other desert locales are prime real estate for data centers. The Grand Canyon State is home to 26 new server farms built or planned since 2022, according to Bloomberg News, joining hundreds of others cropping up in areas of the U.S. under high water stress, as defined by the nonprofit World Resources Institute. Friendly regulation, abundant empty land, low humidity and a relative lack of natural disasters (unless you count flesh-searing heat) help explain Arizona's allure to server farmers. They also help explain its allure to farmer farmers — whose runaway water use makes AI look as water-stingy as a Dune Fremen in comparison. Arizona farms used about 4 billion gallons of water every day, on average, between 2010 and 2020, according to a U.S. Geological Survey report, or nearly 1.5 trillion gallons a year, accounting for 72% of the state's total water use. Those 74 billion gallons that US data centers might drink in 2028 wouldn't keep Arizona farms in business for a month. (Heck, golf-course irrigation in Maricopa County alone used nearly 31 billion gallons in 2015, according to that USGS report.) And most of this water is used to grow food for cows. A study last year in the journal Communications Earth & Environment found nearly a third of all Colorado River water use — about 6.24 million acre-feet per year, on average, or nearly a quarter of one whole Lake Mead — irrigated alfalfa and grass hay between 2000 and 2019. All other crops used just 3.85 million acre-feet, roughly matching the water used by cities. All that hay is used to feed beef and dairy cows. And about a fifth of it grown in seven Western states is exported to China, Japan, Saudi Arabia and other countries, according to a 2023 study by University of Arizona researchers. In other words, we are literally exporting our dwindling water supply. Pumping groundwater makes the land above it sink. A study earlier this month in the journal Nature found that the 28 most populous U.S. cities were sinking to some degree or another, mostly because of groundwater depletion. They have nothing on Arizona, parts of which have fallen as much as 18 feet over several decades as the water disappeared beneath them. Wells have gone dry, and giant fissures have opened in the land, wrecking homes and infrastructure. Despite all the damage their pumping wreaks, farmers and the politicians supporting them fight furiously for their right to keep doing it. Though Arizona has some sound water-management practices, including designated water-management areas that have helped stop the bleeding in Phoenix, Tucson and other places, most of the state's groundwater is still unregulated. When Governor Katie Hobbs proposed creating a new management area in the Willcox Basin in the southeast corner of the state, where the land is sinking by 3 ½ inches a year, the farmers protested. To Hobbs' credit, she created the management area anyway. Now the locals are fighting a proposal to cut their groundwater use by 50% in 50 years. President Donald Trump has made matters worse by freezing $4 billion in Inflation Reduction Act funding earmarked for protecting the Colorado River. Securing the water supply of millions of Americans in one the fastest-growing regions in the country deserves more research and funding, not less. Other possible solutions include encouraging farmers to fallow their land, transition to less-thirsty crops or sell their water rights to urban developers. And of course, Americans could always stand to eat much less beef. As for those robots, they might have an easier time using less water. Microsoft Corp. already has plans for data centers that consume none at all. Competitors will probably want to follow suit, if only to calm a growing backlash. And if we must live with AI, then maybe we can at least get it to figure out how to spend less water on cows.