Now we are six: G7 leaders try to salvage their summit after Trump's early exit
Advertisement
Trump left the summit in the Canadian Rocky Mountain resort of Kananaskis a day early late Monday, saying: 'I have to be back, very important.' It came as conflict between Israel and Iran intensifies and the U.S. leader declared that Tehran should be evacuated 'immediately' — while also expressing optimism about a deal to stop the violence.
Before leaving, Trump joined the other leaders in issuing a statement saying Iran 'can never have a nuclear weapon' and calling for a 'de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza.' Getting unanimity — even on a short and broadly worded statement — was a modest measure of success for the group.
At the summit, Trump warned that Tehran needs to curb its nuclear program before it's 'too late.' He said Iranian leaders would 'like to talk' but they had already had 60 days to reach an agreement on their nuclear ambitions and failed to do so before the Israeli aerial assault began. 'They have to make a deal,' he said.
Advertisement
Asked what it would take for the U.S. to get involved in the conflict militarily, Trump said Monday morning, 'I don't want to talk about that.'
But by Monday afternoon, Trump warned ominously on social media, 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' Shortly after that, Trump decided to leave the summit and skip a series of Tuesday meetings that would address the war in Ukraine and trade issues.
The sudden departure only heightened the drama of a world that seems on verge of several firestorms. Trump already has imposed severe tariffs on multiple nations that risk a global economic slowdown. There has been little progress on settling the wars in Ukraine and Gaza.
Trump's stance on Ukraine puts him fundamentally at odds with the other G7 leaders, who back Ukraine and are clear that Russia is the aggressor in the war.
The U.S. president on Monday suggested there would have been no war if G7 members hadn't expelled Putin from the organization in 2014 for annexing Crimea.
Trump on Monday demurred when asked if he supported Russia, saying 'I only care about saving lives.'
With talks on ending the war at an impasse, Starmer said Britain and other G7 members were slapping new tariffs on Russia in a bid to get it to the ceasefire negotiating table. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is due to attend the summit Tuesday at Carney's invitation, along with other leaders including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and NATO chief Mark Rutte.
Advertisement
Trump declined to join in the sanctions on Russia, saying he would wait until Europe did so first.
'When I sanction a country that costs the U.S. a lot of money, a tremendous amount of money,' he said.
Trump had been scheduled before his departure to meet with Zelenskyy and with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum.
On the Middle East, Merz told reporters that Germany was planning to draw up a final communique proposal on the Israel-Iran conflict that will stress that 'Iran must under no circumstances be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons-capable material.'
Trump also seemed to put a greater priority on addressing his grievances with other nations' trade policies than on collaboration with G7 allies. The U.S. president has imposed 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum as well as 25% tariffs on autos. Trump is also charging a 10% tax on imports from most countries, though he could raise rates on July 9, after the 90-day negotiating period set by him would expire.
He announced with Starmer that they had signed a trade framework Monday that was previously announced in May, with Trump saying that British trade was 'very well protected' because 'I like them, that's why. That's their ultimate protection.'
Associated Press writers Will Weissert in Banff, Alberta, and Josh Boak in Calgary, Alberta, contributed to this story.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What is the Quds Force, the elite Iranian unit Israel has been targeting in airstrikes?
The Quds Force is an elite unit within Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards. It has been among the key targets of Israel's recent airstrikes. The Quds is likely to take a central role in the Iranian response to Israel, making its tactics and access to weaponry a key question. In the extensive airstrikes that began late last week, Israel has targeted the assets and leadership of the Quds Force, an elite unit of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or IRGC. On Monday, The Israel Defense Forces said it had targeted Quds Force command centers in Tehran during the previous night. It later added that the facilities it struck were used to plan "terrorist attacks against the State of Israel using the proxies of the Iranian Regime in the Middle East." The IDF said its airstrikes had killed the chief and deputy leader of the Quds Force intelligence department, along with other senior military figures. It said the command centers were "completely destroyed." The targeting potentially points to a significant new focus of Israel's ongoing "Operation Rising Lion," beyond trying to take out Iran's nuclear facilities and conventional military capabilities. The Quds Force is a powerful and shadowy linkage between Iran and Israel's closer foes: Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. The Quds Force, an arm of soldiers specializing in covert foreign actions, has long been involved in operations aimed at expanding Iran's regional power. It reports directly to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Iranian supreme leader. The unit has been at the center of Israel's yearslong shadow war with Iran, which finally spilled into the open last year. It is likely to take a central role in any Iranian response to Israel's attacks, making its tactics and access to weaponry a key question. The reach of the Quds Force has long been an area of concern for Israel. Founded after the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the group takes its name from the Arabic word for Jerusalem, the site of the Al-Aqsa mosque, and long a flash point in regional tensions. The Quds Force has provided weapons, training, and money to militias across the Middle East that comprise Iran's so-called "Axis of Resistance," including Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis in Yemen. Following Hamas' October 7, 2023, terror attacks on Israel, Iran-backed Houthi rebels launched attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea, disrupting one of the world's most important trade routes. Israel and Hezbollah also spent months trading cross-border fire. In Iraq, the Quds Force has close ties with Shia militias that battled US forces after the 2004 invasion and helped arm the groups with improvised explosive devices that killed hundreds of US service personnel. Quds Force leader Qassem Soleimani, an iconic figure in Iran, was assassinated by a US airstrike in Baghdad in 2020. Iran retaliated by launching missiles at American forces in Iraq. The Quds Force also helped to bolster the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad in the wake of the Syrian revolution in 2012. Assad was deposed last year by rebels who seized control of the war-torn country. When it comes to soldiers, the Quds Force is estimated to be about 17,000 to 21,000 strong. In addition, the IRGC, under which the Quds Force operates, is in charge of Iran's ballistic missile arsenal and has its own naval and other units that are separate from Tehran's regular military. The two operate in tandem. It also plays a leading part in internal security and oversees a volunteer paramilitary that beats and kills the regime's opponents. The US Office of the Director of National Intelligence said last year that "Iran has the largest inventory of ballistic missiles in the region and continues to emphasize improving the accuracy, lethality, and reliability of these systems." Israel said its attacks that killed the Quds Force leaders in Tehran on Sunday killed four officials, including the head of the Revolutionary Guard intelligence division and his deputy. Israeli fighter jets have also targeted IRGC personnel and infrastructure. There are conflicting reports about whether Esmail Qaani, the Quds Force commander, remains alive. With the IRGC central to Iran's foreign operations and controlling key parts of its arsenal, Israel appears to be aiming at the heart of Iran's military apparatus. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As Trump shatters ethics norms with a Qatari jet and a $499 smartphone, experts lament Biden's ‘failure' to pass reforms
Ethics watchdogs rarely mince words about President Donald Trump. They've called him the most corrupt and conflicted president in US history. And since he returned to the White House, they've watched with horror as he privately dined with wealthy investors for his personal memecoin fund, brazenly accepted a $400 million luxury airplane from Qatar and purged inspectors general from federal agencies. Adding to their long list of gripes, the president's company announced Monday that it was launching Trump Mobile, a wireless service with monthly plans and a $499 smartphone, which would be regulated by many of the federal agencies now run by Trump appointees. That has led to soul-searching among Washington, DC's self-appointed ethics watchdogs at advocacy groups and think tanks, who are wondering how this could've been prevented. Some have championed liberal causes for years; others aren't beholden to either party but are stunned by Trump's sea-change to the ethics landscape. While they primarily hold Trump responsible for his own actions, they're increasingly concluding that former President Joe Biden also deserves some of the blame. 'The single biggest failure of the Biden administration was that he and Congress didn't pass any post-Watergate-style reforms,' said Dylan Hedtler-Gaudette, director of government affairs at the nonpartisan Project on Government Oversight. 'President Biden had zero interest in doing that, and congressional Democrats didn't have much interest.' Many of these experts, including Biden allies, say much more could've been done to get legislation across the finish line when Democrats had unified control in DC. House Democrats passed a landmark ethics and democracy bill in late 2021, but it languished. It would've banned officials from taking foreign money (as Trump has with his memecoin). It would've tightened the rules for who can serve as acting leaders at federal agencies (a loophole Trump used to install loyalists). It would've protected civil servants from being reclassified and fired (which Trump is trying to do). it would've added job protections for inspectors general (Trump summarily fired more than a dozen in January). And it would've added transparency to the pardon process (which Trump has wielded to reward allies). But one former Biden administration official faulted Trump alone. 'Blaming Biden when Trump breaches ethical norms is a prime example of the Democratic Party's problem right now,' the former Biden administration official told CNN. 'The suggestion is that the previous administration should have passed more laws? They're not following the current ones. The reality is, there is no way to Trump-proof the government.' In response to CNN's questions about Trump breaking ethics norms, White House spokesman Harrison Fields said Trump is 'restoring the integrity of the Executive Branch' and claimed Trump's administration is the 'most transparent in American history.' The Office of Government Ethics didn't respond to requests for comment about how Trump is avoiding conflicts of interests. (In February, Trump fired the Biden-appointed director of the agency, who was confirmed in December by the Senate in a party-line vote.) The Trump Organization rolled out a new ethics pledge in January. Attorneys for the company said Trump won't be involved in managing his real estate empire, that they won't pursue new deals with foreign governments, and that an outside adviser would review all major deals – including deals with foreign businesses that will be allowed to continue. Trump took these steps voluntarily, 'to avoid even the appearance of any conflict,' the lawyers wrote, even though some federal ethics laws don't apply to the president, and 'neither federal law nor the United States Constitution prohibits any President from continuing to own, operate and/or manage their businesses' while in the White House. Presidents have limited time and political capital to enact their agenda. Some outside experts said it was clear that Biden prioritized other landmark laws – on Covid-19 relief, health care, climate change, infrastructure and gun control – instead of ethics reforms. 'That should have been the low-hanging fruit for Congress and the president when there was unified control,' said Daniel Weiner of the left-leaning Brennan Center for Justice. Hedtler-Gaudette said that during strategy sessions about reforms, Biden White House officials would often say they were doing their part by 'promoting a culture of compliance' by adhering to ethics laws. 'But compliance means you're complying with the weak set of laws that are already on the books,' Hedtler-Gaudette said, 'and not improving them.' House Democrats did pass the Protecting Our Democracy Act in December 2021, but the Democratic-run Senate never took action on the legislation. (Ten Republicans would've needed to cross party lines to break a filibuster for the Senate to even consider the bill.) 'The Biden administration did not put its weight behind that, and those sorts of reforms really need the buy-in of the administration,' Weiner said. 'It should've been a priority.' A former Democratic Hill staffer, who requested anonymity to speak candidly, said ethics bills 'fell by the wayside' under Biden to make space for more pressing national needs. 'We were still in the worst parts of the pandemic. There were a lot of critical, in-your-face issues that needed to be fixed,' they said. 'We had just defeated Trump, and it was difficult for Democrats to wrap their heads around the fact that he could really come back. These ethics bills would've moved up the priority list if we had internalized that possibility.' Donald Sherman, the top lawyer at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, a liberal-leaning watchdog group, said Trump has redefined what the mainstream deems acceptable. 'Government corruption isn't unique to one political party,' Sherman said. 'But Trump is singular in shifting the Overton window so far, in breaking rules that most people in government could never even imagine breaking, that it's impossible to ignore.' CREW calls itself nonpartisan and has filed ethics complaints in the past against top Democrats, including under Biden. But like many 'good government' groups, it has increasingly adopted a staunch anti-Trump posture, as he keeps pushing the limits. In that vein, CREW led the unsuccessful effort to remove Trump from the 2024 ballot based on the Constitution's 'insurrectionist ban.' These watchdog groups are looking back longingly to when Trump's power was at its nadir. Trump's approval rating tanked after the January 6, 2021, insurrection. And when Biden was sworn in, Democrats had unified control of Washington for the first time in a decade. In those early weeks of the Biden era, a bipartisan House majority voted to impeach Trump, and a bipartisan Senate majority supported the effort, though it fell short of the 67 senators needed for conviction. 'The period after January 6, in the first years of President Biden's term, was an example of a missed opportunity,' Sherman said. 'This is a glaring moment now, because the corruption of President Trump's first term has predictably escalated.'
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China's Cosco Eyes Stake in MSC-BlackRock Panama Ports Deal
Cosco Shipping could potentially be a new partner in the deal that would transfer two ports on the sides of the Panama Canal to Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) and BlackRock. China's largest container shipping company is one of multiple Chinese state-backed companies that is in discussion to invest in the consortium to buy more than 40 ports from port operator CK Hutchison Holdings, according to a report from Bloomberg. More from Sourcing Journal Apparel Tariffs Climbed to Historic Highs in April China-to-US Freight Rates 'No Longer Surging'-Is it All Downhill from Here? Trump Touts Higher Duty Rate for Chinese Imports Under New Trade Deal The addition of Chinese investors emerged as a potential option as the current iteration of the deal has hit regulatory roadblocks in the country amid a power struggle with the U.S. over influence on the trade artery. The Panama Canal Authority acknowledged the sale could put the waterway's neutrality at risk. China's antitrust body is currently probing the deal after reports that President Xi Jinping was unhappy with the port sale by Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison. It is unclear what stake Cosco would have if a port deal took place, or what ports it would gain control over. The deal itself followed President Donald Trump's rhetoric that the U.S. should 'take back' the canal, partly due to Washington's worries that Hutchison's ownership of the adjacent ports poses national security concerns for U.S. trade interests. But according to the Bloomberg report, the idea to include Chinese investors in the MSC/BlackRock consortium came to be after high-stakes tariff negotiations in Switzerland concluded last month between Chinese and U.S. officials. Cosco's—or any other Chinese company's—involvement could still sound off some bells due to their state-owned status, according to analysis by Drewry provided after a webinar on the deal held Thursday. 'This will be problematic in many jurisdictions, for example Cosco was limited to taking only a 24.99 percent stake in Container Terminal Tollerort in Hamburg' in 2021, Drewry said. A previous Financial Times report from early June indicates that Hutchison is also considering exploring a sale of some or all of its remaining 10 ports in greater China in a separate deal as a way to appease the U.S. and China. 'We would expect that if sold that both Cosco Shipping Ports and China Merchants Ports would be likely candidates, but there may be competition concerns here given existing strength of these companies in the Chinese port sector,' according to Drewry. A 145-day period for exclusive talks between Hutchison and the consortium ends in late July. The parties have already missed an initial goal of signing an agreement on the Panama part of the deal by early April. If a deal goes through as initially planned, it would cost $22.8 billion for the ports to switch hands, with CK Hutchison netting more than $19 billion in cash from the transaction. MSC would be the lead investor in this acquisition through its Terminal Investment Limited (TIL) terminal operator subsidiary, various reports have said. The ocean freight giant is setting itself up as the dominant figure across container shipping and port terminals if a tentative deal to acquire the Panama ports clears approval. But that remains a big if—and a resolution isn't going to come quick. 'We're going to be talking about this deal for at least a year, if not longer, while it makes its way through regulatory approvals,' said Eleanor Hadland, senior associate of ports and terminals at Drewry, during the webinar. An approved deal would thrust MSC into the position of largest global terminal operator worldwide, up from its rank of seventh in 2023, Drewry said. When including the 43 ports from Hutchison, which comprise 199 berths in 23 countries, MSC would have a terminal capacity of 196 million 20-foot equivalent units (TEUs), giving the firm equity interest in more than 15 percent of global capacity. 'While it's unlikely that MSC/TIL will be allowed to take over all of Hutchison's assets due to market concentration concerns from the relevant competition authorities, it's also unlikely that this would make a large enough dent in the combined portfolio to affect this final outcome of going up to first place in the rankings,' said Eirik Hooper, senior associate of ports and terminals at Drewry. The MSC shakeup would spark an uptrend of 'hybrid' global terminal operators (GTOs), Hooper pointed out. For the first time, three hybrid operators would be represented among the top five GTOs, including MSC, Cosco (fourth) and Maersk (fifth) through its APM Terminals division. Hooper acknowledged the risks of consolidation within the industry, namely for liners without terminal-operating capacity, noting that the larger ports will typically see greater alignment between ownership of the terminal and the customer base of the terminal. However, these carriers can still reap benefits in a hybrid-dominated environment, he said. 'In small-medium ports, even where terminals are operated by a hybrid GTO, they are catering to all liners calling at the port. While this may sound less than ideal, terminal service agreements specify the berth windows, productivity and price therefore minimizing the risk of 'preferential treatment' for aligned carriers,' Hooper said. 'In some markets, the investment by a hybrid operator may be motivated to improve service levels for their own shipping services, but equipment upgrades and service level improvements will benefit all users.' Sign in to access your portfolio
