Europe's top diplomat rejects Pentagon chief's call that it limits role in Asia

The Star

2 days ago

SINGAPORE: Europe's top diplomat Kaja Kallas (pic) has rejected calls from the United States that the continent should limit its role in Asia, saying that the security theatres of the Indo-Pacific and Europe are intimately connected.
US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth had suggested at the Shangri-La Dialogue that allies in Europe focus on security in Europe, so that Washington could focus on Asia.
In response to a question at the security forum organised by the International Institute for Strategic Studies on what role Europe's militaries should play in Asia, Hegseth said initially that it could be 'useful' that China takes into account the presence of other countries in the region.
But, he added, the US 'would much prefer that the overwhelming balance of European investment be on that continent'. This, he said, will allow the superpower to use its 'comparative advantage as an Indo-Pacific nation to support our partners here'.
Speaking to The Straits Times on May 31 hours after the Pentagon chief's speech, Kallas pushes back against this notion.
'It's an illusion that these security theatres of Indo-Pacific and Europe are not interlinked,' the vice-president of the European Commission says, citing North Korea's involvement in Russia's invasion of Ukraine through its soldiers and weaponry, and China's 'enabling' of the Russian war effort through the provision of critical dual-use goods – something that the Asian power denies.
'Great powers maybe think that they don't need anybody; everybody needs them instead.
'But I think in these times, everybody needs everyone. We need to work together – the big powers too,' she adds, saying that she had made her views known to Hegseth after his speech.
It is six months to the day that Kallas became Europe's top diplomat.
And in that half-year, she has had to steer the 27-country bloc through Ukraine's war with Russia – now into its fourth year; fending charges of sitting on its hands over the deepening horrors in Gaza; and perhaps most traumatic of all for the Europeans, an unprecedented rupture in the transatlantic alliance after Donald Trump occupied the White House.
Current American leaders – from President Trump to his key lieutenants – have handled Europe with barely concealed antipathy and distaste at times, making clear that the relationship which has been undergirded by links in almost every way conceivable since the end of World War II is up for review.
Asked about the toughest thing she's had to navigate since she became the European Union's No. 2 – and thus its high representative for foreign affairs and security policy – on Dec 1, 2024, and Kallas says without hesitation: 'To be very frank with you, the biggest challenge has been that the strong alliance that we have had with the Americans is somewhat changing.'
Kallas, who turns 48 in June, was Estonia's first female prime minister – a role she held from 2021 to 2024 – before she resigned to assume her current position, taking over from Spain's Josep Borrell.
Being prime minister was 'a walk in the park' compared with what she does now, having to corral the EU's 27 countries from Germany to Hungary – all of which have their own views on foreign matters. Getting a majority is hard. Unanimity is near impossible.
One of the most important issues confronting the bloc today is its China policy.
Reeling from the shock of long-time ally the US ripping up the trade playbook – Europe was hit by a 20 per cent 'reciprocal tariff' before Trump called for a pause, and 25 per cent tariffs on auto, steel and aluminium imports – some European leaders want a pivot towards China, and to find common cause in open global trade.
Leaders from countries such as Spain and France have made recent trips to Beijing, as has Kallas' boss, European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen.
But Kallas flags 'two big worries with China' – its role in Russia's war in Ukraine, and what she calls 'coercive economic practices' – the dumping of cheap Chinese goods in Europe. She runs through other concerns: Chinese-flagged ships that damage subsea cables in the Baltic Sea and cyber attacks that she says were conducted by Chinese companies on the Czech Republic.
'So these are not good signs. China is saying that they want good, strong relations with us Europeans. And then we say, if we are your friends, why are you doing these things to friends, or why are you helping those who are not our friends, like Russia?
'But there are, of course, different views as well on how to proceed with China,' she adds. 'We have very divergent views. As long as we have divergent views, then we are weaker.
'So this needs some contemplation on our side, how we see our relationship developing.'
She refuses to be drawn into whether the bloc has developed a more pro-China tilt in the last six months. Later in June, she and the EU's 27 foreign ministers are meeting to see how they can work on a common position on China. The last such meeting was in June 2023.
'I think a lot has changed in the meantime,' she says wryly.
One big change has been how the US has positioned itself in the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Trump has appeared to side with Moscow against Europe's strategic interests, inducing fears that Washington may throw Ukraine – and Europe – under the bus in a bid to end the war.
But on May 29, Trump signalled that he would set a two-week deadline for Russian President Vladimir Putin to demonstrate his seriousness about ending the war.
Asked whether he believed Putin intended to do so, a frustrated-sounding Trump told reporters: 'I'll let you know in about two weeks. We're going to find out whether or not he's tapping us along or not. And if he is, we'll respond a little bit differently.'
But the mercurial Trump has had a track record of walking back on what he's said, and when asked if she thinks he is serious this time, Kallas gives little away but for a tiny grimace. She says simply: 'It has been now over two months since Ukraine agreed to an unconditional ceasefire. If you want the killing to stop, then you should put the pressure on the one who's doing the killing.'
For its part, Europe is putting together its 18th package of sanctions, which Kallas says will focus on banking and energy fuelling Russia's war chest. These steps could include lowering the price cap for Russian oil and disconnecting more Russian banks from the Swift international payment system.
It was also in recent weeks that Europe, along with the UK, has taken the lead to ratchet up pressure on Israel over the war in Gaza, with Kallas announcing on May 20 that the bloc will be reviewing preferential trade arrangements with Tel Aviv, under the EU-Israel Association Agreement.
Observers say that this could finally be an inflection point in the response of the EU – Israel's biggest trading partner – to the nearly 20-month war. The EU-Israel association pact includes a human rights clause, Article 2, that is now being reviewed. It states that human rights and respect for international law are legally 'essential elements' of the agreement.
What has been the turning point for Europe, Kallas says, was the blockade of humanitarian aid, mostly European-funded.
'The loss of life is untenable, and we have been conveying these messages to our Israeli counterparts as well. So we are working on that review, and also proposing next steps, and at the same time talking to Israelis all the time to really stop this, also putting pressure on Hamas to have the ceasefire.'
A suspension of the preferential trade benefits requires a qualified majority – 15 of 27 EU states voting in favour; while harsher steps – such as sanctions on Israel – require unanimity. On how much time the EU will give the Israelis, before taking action, she demurs: 'You know, we have also 27 countries with very different views.
'But that we actually agreed on the review of Article 2 – that means that Israel is losing friends.' - The Straits Times/ANN