logo
Microsoft says it squashed malware that infected 394,000 Windows computers

Microsoft says it squashed malware that infected 394,000 Windows computers

USA Today21-05-2025

Microsoft says it squashed malware that infected 394,000 Windows computers
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Microsoft's AI language interpreter could be boon for cybercriminals
A new AI language interpreter unveiled by Microsoft is sparking concern among cybersecurity experts.
Straight Arrow News
Microsoft said on Wednesday, May 21 its Digital Crimes Unit partnered with law enforcement and cybersecurity agencies to disrupt an information-stealing malware that infected hundreds of thousands of Windows computers in the last two months.
The unit filed a legal action against Lumma Stealer last week after it found 394,000 Windows computers globally infected with the malware between March 16 and May 16, Windows said in a statement on its blog, calling it a "favored" malware used by criminals to steal passwords, credit cards, bank accounts and cryptocurrency wallets.
"Typically, the goal of Lumma operators is to monetize stolen information or conduct further exploitation for various purposes," Microsoft said. "Lumma is easy to distribute, difficult to detect, and can be programmed to bypass certain security defenses, making it a go-to tool for cybercriminals and online threat actors."
Cybersecurity: FBI says these 13 old internet routers are vulnerable to attacks. Is yours on the list?
The investigative unit helped in the "takedown, suspension, and blocking of malicious domains that formed the backbone of Lumma's infrastructure," after it was granted a court order by the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Georgia, the blog said.
The U.S. Department of Justice assisted, Microsoft said, taking control of Lumma's central command structure and disrupting the marketplaces where the tool was sold. Europol's European Cybercrime Center and Japan's Cybercrime Control Center also aided in dismantling Lumma infrastructure, which has "severed communications between the malicious tool and victims," according to the blog post.
The Department of Justice said on Wednesday it seized five internet domains used by malicious cyber actors to operate the Lumma malware service. The FBI's Dallas Field Office is investigating the case, according to Reuters.
"The growth and resilience of Lumma Stealer highlight the broader evolution of cybercrime and underscores the need for layered defenses and industry collaboration to counter threats," Microsoft said in a separate blog post on the malware.
Contributing: Reuters.
Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@usatoday.com and on X @KathrynPlmr.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It's Official – a Handheld Xbox is Coming This Fall
It's Official – a Handheld Xbox is Coming This Fall

Hypebeast

time17 minutes ago

  • Hypebeast

It's Official – a Handheld Xbox is Coming This Fall

Microsoft'slong-rumored entry intohandheld gamingfinally has a release window: holiday 2025. The tech giant today unveiled two new devices – theROG Xbox AllyandROG Xbox Ally X– developed in partnership withASUSand created with both casual and more serious gamers in mind. The upcomingXboxhandhelds have been 'built from the ground up,' according to ASUS, with Microsoft adding that it has 'dedicated years' to get to this point. Designed with Xbox players in mind they feature contoured grips 'inspired by Xbox Wireless Controllers' that should feel instantly familiar in-hand, together with ergonomics the brands promise will provide 'all-day comfort.' They share a 7-inch, 16:9, 1080p touchscreen IPS display with FreeSync Premium and a 120Hz refresh rate. They also both feature Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.4, the same button layout and overall dimensions, but the similarities end there. TheROG Xbox Ally– the cheaper of the two, though final pricing isn't confirmed – runs on AMD's 'Ryzen Z2 A' processor, has 16GB RAM and a 512GB internal storage, and though capable of outputting 1080p, Microsoft says this model is targeted at 720p gaming owing to its less powerful specs. It includes a 60Wh battery and two USB 3.2 Type-C ports. Meanwhile, the more powerfulROG Xbox Ally Xruns on AMD's improved 'Ryzen Z2 Extreme' processor, features 8GB more RAM (24GB in total) and double the internal storage with a 1TB SSD. It also includes a larger 80Wh battery and one of its Type-C ports is the faster USB 4 kind. Both models, however, feature microSD card readers, allowing users to upgrade their storage easily. Like ASUS' originalROG AllyandROG Ally Xbefore them, the newly announcedROG Xbox AllyandROG Xbox Ally Xare still – technically speaking –gaming PCsrunning Windows under the hood. But unlike the originals, they're set to launch with a completely new front-end developed specifically for handheld gaming. In other words, instead of booting into the standard, not-so-gamer-friendly Windows interface like a regular PC, the new devices will launch into a custom interface designed by Xbox's own engineers – a 'full-screen [Xbox] experience' that Microsoft says has been 'optimized specifically for handheld gaming.' The updated user interface (UI) isn't just a visual refresh, though, and it's not only about improving user experience (UX). Instead, the software tweaks – subtle on the surface – are designed to help the system better leverage its hardware for improved performance across the board: by stripping out some of the backend processes typical of a standard Windows machine, the new Xbox handhelds will have more RAM and other computing power at their disposal. Microsoft and ASUS have not confirmed a release date or final pricing as of yet, but stay tuned for more information as we get it. In the meantime, check out the official trailer below.

This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market
This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market

Dario Amodei, CEO of the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, published a guest essay in The New York Times Thursday arguing against a proposed 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation. Amodei argues that a patchwork of regulations would be better than no regulation whatsoever. Skepticism is warranted whenever the head of an incumbent firm calls for more regulation, and this case is no different. If Amodei gets his way, Anthropic would face less competition—to the detriment of AI innovation, AI security, and the consumer. Amodei's op-ed came in a response to a provision of the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which would prevent any states, cities, and counties from enforcing any regulation that specifically targets AI models, AI systems, or automated decision systems for 10 years. Senate Republicans have amended the clause from a simple requirement to a condition for receiving federal broadband funds, in order to comply with the Byrd Rule, which in Politico's words "blocks anything but budgetary issues from inclusion in reconciliation." Amodei begins by describing how, in a recent stress test conducted at his company, a chatbot threatened an experimenter to forward evidence of his adultery to his wife unless he withdrew plans to shut the AI down. The CEO also raises more tangible concerns, such as reports that a version of Google's Gemini model is "approaching a point where it could help people carry out cyberattacks." Matthew Mittelsteadt, a technology fellow at the Cato Institute, tells Reason that the stress test was "very contrived" and that "there are no AI systems where you must prompt it to turn it off." You can just turn it off. He also acknowledges that, while there is "a real cybersecurity danger [of] AI being used to spot and exploit cyber-vulnerabilities, it can also be used to spot and patch" them. Outside of cyberspace and in, well, actual space, Amodei sounds the alarm that AI could acquire the ability "to produce biological and other weapons." But there's nothing new about that: Knowledge and reasoning, organic or artificial—ultimately wielded by people in either case—can be used to cause problems as well as to solve them. An AI that can model three-dimensional protein structures to create cures for previously untreatable diseases can also create virulent, lethal pathogens. Amodei recognizes the double-edged nature of AI and says voluntary model evaluation and publication are insufficient to ensure that benefits outweigh costs. Instead of a 10-year moratorium, Amodei calls on the White House and Congress to work together on a transparency standard for AI companies. In lieu of federal testing standards, Amodei says state laws should pick up the slack without being "overly prescriptive or burdensome." But that caveat is exactly the kind of wishful thinking Amodei indicts proponents of the moratorium for: Not only would 50 state transparency laws be burdensome, says Mittelsteadt, but they could "actually make models less legible." Neil Chilson of the Abundance Institute also inveighed against Amodei's call for state-level regulation, which is much more onerous than Amodei suggests. "The leading state proposals…include audit requirements, algorithmic assessments, consumer disclosures, and some even have criminal penalties," Chilson tweeted, so "the real debate isn't 'transparency vs. nothing,' but 'transparency-only federal floor vs. intrusive state regimes with audits, liability, and even criminal sanctions.'" Mittelsteadt thinks national transparency regulation is "absolutely the way to go." But how the U.S. chooses to regulate AI might not have much bearing on Skynet-doomsday scenarios, because, while America leads the way in AI, it's not the only player in the game. "If bad actors abroad create Amodei's theoretical 'kill everyone bot,' no [American] law will matter," says Mittelsteadt. But such a law can "stand in the way of good actors using these tools for defense." Amodei is not the only CEO of a leading AI company to call for regulation. In 2023, Sam Altman, co-founder and then-CEO of Open AI, called on lawmakers to consider "intergovernmental oversight mechanisms and standard-setting" of AI. In both cases and in any others that come along, the public should beware of calls for AI regulation that will foreclose market entry, protect incumbent firms' profits from being bid away by competitors, and reduce the incentives to maintain market share the benign way: through innovation and product differentiation. The post This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market appeared first on

Committee explores nuclear solutions to AI demand
Committee explores nuclear solutions to AI demand

E&E News

time21 minutes ago

  • E&E News

Committee explores nuclear solutions to AI demand

House Science, Space and Technology Committee lawmakers will meet this week to discuss how nuclear energy could help meet a projected surge in demand from artificial intelligence operations. The Energy Subcommittee hearing — to be led by Chair Randy Weber (R-Texas) — continues Republicans' early focus and significant concern regarding supply and demand in the 119th Congress. They believe baseload energy sources, such as nuclear and fossil fuels, need to be built at a rapid pace to offset a surge in intermittent, renewable energy generation that could put grid reliability at risk. Indeed, transmission providers are forecasting an 8.2 percent growth in electricity load over the next five years primarily due to AI data center proliferation. That's equivalent to hooking up nearly 50 million homes to the grid by 2029. Advertisement But whether nuclear energy can actually meet that demand remains a point of debate among energy and policy experts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store