logo
Trump's Expanding Travel Ban Could Dampen U.S. Tourism In A World Cup Year

Trump's Expanding Travel Ban Could Dampen U.S. Tourism In A World Cup Year

Forbes5 hours ago

As the Trump administration considers significantly expanding the travel ban to more than four dozen countries, World Cup host cities in the United States that were banking on filling half their stadiums and hotels with foreign visitors could lose big.
The Trump administration is mulling adding 36 nations to the 12 countries already on the travel ban list, according to a memo signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, The Washington Post reported over the weekend.
The ban prevents non-U.S. residents, primarily from the Middle East and Africa, from visiting the U.S. due to what the administration calls national security concerns and public safety.
New countries potentially facing a full or a partial ban if they do not address the administration's concerns within the next 60 days are: Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cote D'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Ethiopia, Egypt, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Malawi, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, South Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia, and Zimbabwe—joining the original 12 banned countries of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.
The World Cup qualification process is still ongoing for some confederations, including UEFA (Europe) and CAF (Africa).
The travel ban has a key carve out for international athletes traveling to the U.S. for sports events like the World Cup in 2026 and Olympics in 2028—but not for soccer supporters from banned countries.
The Féderation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) projects that World Cup 2026 will drive $30.5 billion in economic output in the U.S., predicated on the assumption the U.S. will see an 'influx of visitors.'
FIFA has told World Cup host cities to expect a 50/50 split between domestic and international visitors.
A memo from U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio sent Saturday to U.S. diplomats said 36 nations were being given 60 days to meet new benchmarks and requirements established by the State Department, according to the Post's report. The countries were given a deadline of 8 a.m. Wednesday to provide an initial action plan. Among the unattained benchmarks reportedly identified in the memo included countries that had 'no competent or cooperative central government authority to produce reliable identity documents or other civil documents' or 'widespread government fraud.' Some countries landed on the list because they had large numbers of citizens who overstayed their visas in the U.S., according to the memo. 'The Department of State is committed to protecting our nation and its citizens by upholding the highest standards of national security and public safety through our visa process,' an agency spokesperson told Forbes, adding that the State Department 'does not comment on internal deliberations or communications, but we are constantly reevaluating policies to ensure the safety of Americans and that foreign nationals follow our laws.'
FIFA's projections that World Cup 2026 will drive $30.5 billion in economic output in the U.S., according to an analysis from FIFA and OpenEconomics (OE), is predicated on the assumption the U.S. will see an 'influx of visitors' from foreign countries to fill stadiums and hotels. Philadelphia projects the six matches it hosts next summer will draw 500,000 visitors who will fill more than 100,000 hotel rooms and drive $305 million in direct tourism spending and $770 million in total economic impact, Meg Kane, chief executive of Philadelphia's World Cup organizing committee, told Forbes. Kansas City is also hosting six matches—four group stage matches, a round of 32, and then a quarter final, 'which is really important from both a tourism standpoint and a global visibility standpoint,' Pam Kramer, chief executive officer of KC2026, the nonprofit organization leading the city's World Cup planning, told Forbes. Kramer said Kansas City is expecting to draw 650,000 visitors over the course of the tournament and an estimated $653 million in direct event impact. The other nine U.S.-based World Cup host cities are: Atlanta, Boston, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York/New Jersey, San Francisco Bay Area and Seattle.
Based on FIFA guidance, host cities like Philadelphia and Kansas City are expecting a 50/50 split between domestic and international travelers. Before speaking with Forbes, neither Kane nor Kramer was aware the government was mulling an expansion of the travel ban, but both stressed the importance of staying nimble in an uncertain environment. Kane said her organization's job is to provide a terrific World Cup experience 'to however many fans come' to Philadelphia. 'We really focus on that, because the fact is that there is always a level of international uncertainty that comes with hosting any major international sporting event. There are geopolitical issues that we cannot see around the corner that may impact the tournament in 2026.' Kramer said her team in Kansas City is used to 'operating with a high degree of uncertainty in general,' adding that the tournament is still a year away. 'A year is, well, it feels very short. But it's also quite a bit of time when you think about it from a global perspective.'
The U.S. Travel Association (USTA) was thrilled when President Trump created a White House task force for FIFA World Cup 2026 in March, saying the tournament could draw millions of visitors 'if we build the right processes.' But some tourism experts say the Trump administration has damaged the U.S. brand with unwelcoming messaging and policies, particularly President Trump's tariffs, imperialistic rhetoric and viral headlines of foreigners with legal tourist visas and green cards being detained by U.S. immigration officials. Those factors are 'stacking up as significant hurdles for the U.S. travel industry' and 'setting international travel back several years,' Adam Sacks, president of Tourism Economics, a nonpartisan Oxford Economics company tracking tourism statistics, told Forbes in March. Since Trump took office, the U.S. has seen a dramatic downturn in inbound international tourism, with a projected 8.7% drop in U.S. international arrivals for 2025, according to the latest forecast from Tourism Economics. Visits from Canada (-20.2%) and Western Europe (-5.8%) show the sharpest declines.
$3.6 billion. That's the estimated economic boost to World Cup host cities' economies generated by guests staying at Airbnb properties during the tournament next summer, according to company projections.
0.5%. That's the portion of annual inbound visitors to the U.S. coming from countries currently affected by the recent policy announcement, according to the USTA. 'We are focused on driving millions of new visitors and strengthening our economy by solving longtime shortcomings with visas, customs, and an outdated air traffic control system. America's 250th birthday, the 2026 FIFA World Cup and 2028 Olympic Games present America with a unique opportunity to cement itself as the global travel destination of choice,' a USTA spokesperson told Forbes via email.
Athletes playing on teams representing countries on the banned list will get a carve out. According to President Trump's June 4 executive order, the travel ban includes an exception for 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the Secretary of State.' The directive notes that exceptions are at the discretion of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has yet to provide a full list of sports events that qualify.
Some Sports Events Will Escape Trump Travel Ban—But Only Marco Rubio Gets To Decide (Forbes)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate GOP hits roadblocks in push to pass Trump's tax and spending bill by July 4
Senate GOP hits roadblocks in push to pass Trump's tax and spending bill by July 4

CNN

time20 minutes ago

  • CNN

Senate GOP hits roadblocks in push to pass Trump's tax and spending bill by July 4

Top Senate Republicans are running into some resistance from several key senators about the details of President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' potentially complicating plans to deliver that package by their own July 4 deadline. Hours after unveiling central tenets of the Senate GOP's measure, at least one GOP senator – conservative Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin – said he is currently opposed to the bill, saying it doesn't do enough to control US spending. He added there's 'no way' the bill can be fixed in time to pass by July 4. 'Not by July 4th. No way. We haven't had the discussions we need,' Johnson said. Two more GOP senators were noncommittal on the bill but raised issues with one major piece of it – a crackdown on the so-called provider tax that some states rely on to help fund their Medicaid programs. Those included Sens. Josh Hawley of Missouri and Susan Collins of Maine. Hawley said he was taken 'completely off-guard' by the change to the provider tax rate in the Senate version of Trump's bill. 'This is a major departure from the House framework. This took me totally by surprise,' Hawley told reporters after he stepped out of a meeting on the bill with his fellow Republican senators. Collins confirmed to reporters that she also has problems with the provider tax, but declined to go into the details of the bill. Asked if she had been consulted throughout the process and had been listened to, she said: 'Sometimes yes and sometimes no.' And it's not just those three: Sen. Rick Scott of Florida wouldn't say he is a yes, signaling he wants to see even more reforms to Medicaid. And Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, too, was noncommittal, saying, 'I'm still reading.' The early reactions from those senators previews a tricky battle ahead for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who can afford to lose only three GOP votes on Trump's final tax and spending bill. Thune and his leadership team must satisfy their hard-right members, like Johnson and Scott, without losing equally vocal Republicans like Hawley, who has vowed to tank any bill that cuts Medicaid benefits. GOP leaders are racing to put their bill on the floor next week, eager to deliver Trump a win on tax breaks, spending cuts and additional military money, particularly as he faces a quickly escalating international crisis in the Middle East. But multiple rank-and-file Republicans are eager to make their own changes to Trump's bill, aware that the giant policy measure may be their only chance to get their own priorities passed. Ultimately, GOP leaders are betting that there aren't enough Republicans in their chamber willing to defy Trump and that they will get the votes they need, even if it takes more time. 'Everybody's got an opinion, and I think it's gonna be that way right up until we vote,' Sen. John Hoeven of North Dakota told reporters.

Boca Juniors, Benfica draw 2-2 in Club World Cup match that includes 3 red cards, 22 fouls
Boca Juniors, Benfica draw 2-2 in Club World Cup match that includes 3 red cards, 22 fouls

Associated Press

time20 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Boca Juniors, Benfica draw 2-2 in Club World Cup match that includes 3 red cards, 22 fouls

MIAMI GARDENS, Fla. (AP) — Boca Juniors scored twice in the first half and Benfica countered with a penalty kick in first-half extra time and a goal in the 84th minute as the teams drew 2-2 in a heated game the included three red cards in a Club World Cup Group C match Monday. Boca Juniors played in a home-like environment with the Argentine club's supporters making up most of the 55,574 crowd at Hard Rock Stadium against one of Portugal's premier teams. Heavily armed police were present at checkpoints to ensure order for a Boca supporters' group that is extremely fierce and passionate. But, most of the rough action was on the field, not in the stands, as the game included the three red cards — two for Boca — four yellow cards and 22 fouls, including 14 by Benfica. Boca scored on a cross and a corner — both from the left side — in the first half. Miguel Merentiel scored in the 21st minute and Rodrigo Battaglia in the 27th. Just before added time was announced in the first half, a penalty kick was awarded to Benfica by center referee Cesar Ramos after a VAR review on a foul by Carlos Palacios on Nicolás Otamendi. Angel Di María converted the kick to cut the deficit to a goal. Otamendi scored the tying goal on a header in the 84th minute. Key moment Otamendi's front post header helped Benfica salvage a point. Takeaways Boca Juniors, after underperforming last season in the Argentina first division and disappointing in the CONMEBOL Copa Libertadores, used the support of their fans to fuel them and earn a point in group play. Their second match, against Bayern Munich in Miami on Friday, will prove to be a more challenging game. Benfica, which was imprecise in its play and gave the ball away many times unprovoked, will take on the only semi-professional team in the Club World Cup, Auckland City, which was badly beaten by Bayern. ___ AP soccer:

How Much Have Baggage Fees Airlines Changed Since 2024?
How Much Have Baggage Fees Airlines Changed Since 2024?

Forbes

time21 minutes ago

  • Forbes

How Much Have Baggage Fees Airlines Changed Since 2024?

Major U.S. airlines have started charging at least $5 more for checked bags since the beginning of 2024. This increase was to help offset rising costs and also help generate more revenue. Consequently, these price changes can alter which is your best flight option and require more research time. Below are the current fees and corresponding changes (listed alphabetically). CHICAGO, ILLINOIS - MAY 27: Passengers retrieve luggage from a baggage carousel after arriving at Midway Airport on a Southwest Airlines flight on May 27, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois. Beginning tomorrow, Southwest Airlines will begin to charge most passengers $35 for their first checked bag and $45 for their second, ending its longstanding free checked bag policy. (Photo by) Getty Images On January 2, 2025, Alaska Airlines upped its first and second checked bag fees to $35 and $45, respectively. The rate is the same whether you pay the fee online or at the airport. You previously paid $30 (first bag) and $40 (second bag). In November 2024, American Airlines increased its first checked bag fee by $5 for domestic basic economy and main cabin flights within the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. You now pay $35 when paying the fee online or $40 at the airport. Second bags now cost a flat $45 for most routes in either bottom-tier ticket class. Delta increased its first and second checked bag fees in March 2024 by $5. You now pay $35 for the first checked bag and $45 for the second checked bag on domestic flights. These fees apply to the Delta Main Basic, Delta Main, and Delta Comfort fare classes. In April 2024, JetBlue pivoted to multi-tiered pricing. In addition to being a first or subsequent checked bag, your fee also depends on whether it's peak or non-peak season, and how close to check-in you pay your fee. Blue, Blue Basic, and Blue Plus pay the following fees: More Than 24 Hours Before Departure (Off-Peak): Within 24 Hours of Departure (Off-Peak): More Than 24 Hours Before Departure (Peak): Within 24 Hours of Departure (Peak): Prices include a $10 savings per bag when you pay your domestic itinerary fees at least 24 hours before departure. The savings discount is $5 per bag for transatlantic flights. These fee increases are approximately $10 above the previous base rate. United Airlines increased its checked bag fee by $5 in most markets for departures on or after February 24, 2024. Prepaying for your suitcases at least 24 hours before takeoff saves money. Domestic flights have the accompanying baggage charges: Shocking most flyers and discount airline enthusiasts, Southwest Airlines ditched its long-time two-bag-fly-for-free policy. Since May 28, 2025, most fares incur the following fees: One personal item and a carry-on bag are still complimentary with all fare classes. You automatically avoid both fees by purchasing the top-tier Business Select® Fare or by being a Rapid Rewards® A-List Preferred Member. A-List members and Rapid Rewards credit card customers can waive the first checked bag fee. The precise fee waivers differ by airline, although everyday travel hacks include: Moreover, due to strict European Union carry-on standards, U.S.-based airlines may also be tightening the maximum allowable carry-on dimensions to select destinations. These are the first major fee changes since 2018 when the legacy airlines last increased their baggage fees. Be sure to check the latest fee schedules and luggage policies to avoid any surprises at airport check-in. Most airlines have a baggage fee calculator to estimate your costs for domestic and international flights before booking a flight. Related Articles:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store