logo
I'm a white woman. Here's how white men lie about their climb to the top.

I'm a white woman. Here's how white men lie about their climb to the top.

USA Today29-03-2025

I'm a white woman. Here's how white men lie about their climb to the top. | Opinion If you are any kind of 'successful' woman in academia or industry, you likely benefited from affirmative action whether you are aware of it or not. White men are shown the ladder from birth.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Dolphins welcome NASA astronauts back to Earth
A pod of dolphins welcomed astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore back to Earth after an unplanned 280 days in space.
Janet Petro, NASA's acting administrator, wrote the following about diversity, equity and inclusion in a memo on Jan. 22: 'These programs divided Americans by race, wasted taxpayer dollars, and resulted in shameful discrimination.'
Relevant things about me:
I am a white woman. I grew up in a low socioeconomic status family from Appalachia. I am a first-generation college student. I am a smart, hardworking American.
Despite #4, I had very little chance of going to graduate school thanks to #1-3.
If not for the McNair Scholars Program, I would not be an associate professor with 30 peer-reviewed publications in my field today. I am a proud beneficiary of affirmative action.
Women benefit from affirmative action
We all know women who are recipients of affirmative action.
If you are any kind of "successful" woman in academia or industry, you likely benefited from affirmative action whether you are aware of it or not.
This has nothing to do with how smart women are, how hard we work, how qualified we are. It has to do with the fact that powerful men have not wanted us in their spaces. Women and minorities have been forcefully and sometimes violently barred from the traditional spheres of wealth and influence. Affirmative action is one way to correct the wrongful exclusion that has occurred throughout history.
People will say, 'But talented white men are being passed over for less qualified women and minorities.'
Others have done a better job at unpacking that faulty logic, so I want to focus on this: Those white men had help, too.
Opinion: You think Republicans realize they've started hurting the wrong people?
White men lie about 'the ladder'
Today, no one climbs the ladder unless someone before them made the ladder, gave them access to the ladder and demonstrated how to use the ladder. White men are shown the ladder from birth.
They are shown how to climb it successfully. They can even block other people's access to it.
Women and minorities aren't privy to the ladder from birth. Sometimes people forget to tell us about it. Sometimes they don't teach us how to use it. Sometimes people actively hide the ladder from us.
Worst yet, they may lie and tell us it doesn't even exist.
We ask, and they say, 'What ladder, you silly girl?'
Your Turn: As a white man, DEI means I get passed over. It's time to eliminate it. | Opinion Forum
White men have been lying about climbing the ladder on their own. They are not successful due to talent, but because they have the access and support necessary to climb, and fewer active barriers.
White men have been getting affirmative action all along from other white men. What the rest of us have been asking for, fighting for, is the same access to and support to climb the ladder.
I don't know if Janet Petro has personally benefited from affirmative action, but she was in only the second graduating class from West Point to contain any women in 1981. For her to oppose DEI programs is hypocritical and it shows a deep ignorance of the history that has made affirmative action necessary.
Kira Bailey is a West Virginia native and associate professor of psychology and neuroscience at Ohio Wesleyan University. Her path to earning a Ph.D. began as a McNair Scholar at Concord University, class of 2007. This column originally appeared in the Columbus Dispatch.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia awaits American decision on AUKUS nuclear submarine pact
Australia awaits American decision on AUKUS nuclear submarine pact

UPI

time3 minutes ago

  • UPI

Australia awaits American decision on AUKUS nuclear submarine pact

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at Naval Base Point Loma in San Diego, Calif. in March of 2023. File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI | License Photo June 12 (UPI) -- Australian Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles announced Thursday he feels that the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal which connects with the United Kingdom and United States, will continue after the Trump administration reviews the pact. "I am very confident this is going to happen," he told ABC News, as he believes AUKUS is of strategic interest to all three nations. The Pentagon has expressed that the 2021 deal is being reassessed to make sure it's a fit with President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda before he meets with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at the G7 summit taking place in Canada next week. U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth also had met with Marles, who is also Australia's Minister for Defense, earlier this month and recommended Australia increase its defense spending to 3.5 percent of its GDP. Albanese said in a press conference Tuesday that he thinks "that Australia should decide what we spend on Australia's defense" when asked about a defense spending boost, while not directly addressing if he would risk losing the AUKUS deal over that decision as questioned. The Pentagon review is being led by U.S. Under Secretary of Defense Elbridge Colby, who in the past has been critical of the deal made under the Biden administration to arm Australia with nuclear subs that use advanced American and British technology. "In principle it's a great idea," Colby posted to X about AUKUS in August of 2024," but added he's "agnostic" about the program. However, Colby also posted that day he was "convinced we should focus on Asia, readying for a war with China" in order to avoid it. Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Lin Jian announced Thursday in a press conference when asked about his nation's opinion on the possibility of an end to AUKUS that China opposes "manufacturing bloc confrontation and anything that amplifies the risk of nuclear proliferation and exacerbates arms race."

New megabill text revives land sales, axes IRA funding
New megabill text revives land sales, axes IRA funding

E&E News

time7 minutes ago

  • E&E News

New megabill text revives land sales, axes IRA funding

The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee's portion of Republicans' party-line bill proposes to sell off certain public lands and repeal billions of dollars for energy programs in Democrats' 2022 climate law. The committee's proposal, unveiled Wednesday evening, contains many of the provisions in the House-passed H.R. 1, the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill Act' — including ones that would target the Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office or charge a one-time fee to speed up permitting for some natural gas projects. But there are some significant differences. Most notable is a new section favored by Chair Mike Lee (R-Utah) to revive the sale of public lands, reigniting a firestorm of opposition from advocates. The provision goes further than an abandoned proposal in the House, encompassing Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service lands across 11 Western states. Advertisement ENR's text comes as the Senate is racing to tweak and quickly vote on tax, energy and national security legislation after the House approved its version last month. Republicans are working through the reconciliation process, which will allow them to skirt the Senate filibuster and pass the budget-focused bill with simple majorities.

Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ
Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee are pushing for an investigation into top Justice Department official Ed Martin over his stated plans to "shame" political opponents of President Donald Trump who he's unable to charge criminally, as well as a host of other politically charged matters Martin has publicly pledged to pursue in his new position. "I write to express my grave concern about Ed Martin's stated intention to abuse his new roles as lead of the so-called 'Weaponization Working Group' you constituted at the Department of Justice (DOJ) and as DOJ's Pardon Attorney," Sen. Dick Durbin, the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, said in a letter transmitted to the Justice Department, which was first obtained by ABC News. "Following his disgraceful tenure as Interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Mr. Martin apparently plans to continue his misconduct in his new roles at DOJ." The DOJ did not immediately respond to an ABC News request for comment on the letter. MORE: Ed Martin, Trump's DOJ pardon attorney, says he'll review Biden's outgoing pardons Martin's controversial tenure as the interim U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C., in the opening months of Trump's presidency thrust the office into turmoil and led several Senate Republicans to state publicly they wouldn't support his permanent confirmation in the role. But once the White House announced they were pulling Martin's nomination, Trump said Martin would instead be appointed to several top positions working out of DOJ's main headquarters -- serving as an associate deputy attorney general, the U.S. pardon attorney and director of the so-called "Weaponization Working Group." Martin celebrated the news on his X account, posting 'Eagle Unleashed,' and in various interviews celebrated what he described as a mandate from Trump directly to target the alleged 'weaponization' of the department under the Biden administration. 'It's classic Donald Trump, right? That somebody tries to block him and block his pick, and he decides to double down,' Martin told Breitbart News last month. 'This is probably the greatest job I could ever envision.' MORE: Trump US attorney nominee distances himself from antisemitic Jan. 6 rioter he once praised In a news conference announcing his departure from the D.C. U.S. Attorney's Office, Martin confirmed he planned to launch a probe of last-minute pardons issued by former President Joe Biden just before he left office -- and suggested that officials he's unable to charge would instead be publicly "shamed." "There are some really bad actors, some people that did some really bad things to the American people," Martin said. "And if they can be charged, we'll charge them. But if they can't be charged, we will name them ... And in a culture that respects shame, they should be people that are shamed. And that's a fact. That's the way things work. And so that's how I believe the job operates." The approach would directly conflict with longstanding DOJ policy that prohibits prosecutors from naming or disparaging individuals who they don't intend to charge criminally. When asked about that policy by ABC News during the news conference, Martin said he would "have to look at what the provision you're referring to, to see -- we want to square ourselves with doing the things correctly." The letter from Senate Democrats said Martin's statements "are a brazen admission that Mr. Martin plans to systematically violate the Justice Manual's prohibition on extrajudicial statements by shaming uncharged parties for nakedly partisan reasons. Weaponizing DOJ in this manner will further undermine the public's trust in the department in irreparable ways." MORE: Bondi, as new AG, launches 'Weaponization Working Group' to review officials who investigated Trump In his early days as pardon attorney, Martin said he advised the president in his pardon of former Virginia county sheriff Scott Jenkins, who had been sentenced to ten years in prison for a federal bribery conviction. "No MAGA left behind," Martin posted on X in response to the pardon. Durbin's letter further cited reports Martin has "personally advocated" fast-tracking pardons for members of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers who were convicted of seditious conspiracy stemming from their roles leading up to the attack on the Capitol, after President Trump initially opted to commute their sentences in his sweeping clemency action for the nearly 1600 individuals charged in connection with Jan. 6. Durbin's letter requests Bondi provide a host of records related to Martin's appointment and early days as head of the Weaponization Working Group and Pardon Attorney's Office. It's unclear whether DOJ will ultimately respond to Durbin's demands given Democrats' minority position on the committee. Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store