logo
161 Indian nationals arrive in Delhi from Israel under Operation Sindhu: MEA

161 Indian nationals arrive in Delhi from Israel under Operation Sindhu: MEA

India Gazette4 hours ago

New Delhi [India], June 24 (ANI): As many as 161 Indian nationals arrived in Delhi from Israel under Operation Sindhu on Tuesday. Union Minister of State (MoS) for External Affairs, Pabitra Margherita, welcomed them at the airport.
Ministry of External Affairs official spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal stated that the Israel leg of Operation Sindhu started on June 23. Jaiswal emphasised that the safety and security of Indian nationals abroad remain the government's highest priority.
In a post on X, Jaiswal stated, 'The Israel leg of #OperationSindhu began on June 23, 2025, bringing home the first group of 161 Indian nationals from Israel. They safely arrived in New Delhi today at 0820 hrs from Amman, Jordan. At the airport, MoS @PmargrheritaBJP received them. The safety and security of Indian nationals abroad remains the highest priority for the Government.'
https://x.com/MEAIndia/status/1937360729570435305
Amid the ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran, the Indian Government has launched Operation Sindhu to evacuate from Israel those Indian nationals who wish to leave. MEA stated that their travel from Israel to India would be facilitated by land borders and, thereafter, by air to India.
Meanwhile, 292 Indian nationals were evacuated from Iran on a special flight that arrived in New Delhi from Mashhad on Tuesday. In a post on X, Randhir Jaiswal wrote, '292 Indian nationals were evacuated from Iran on a special flight that arrived in New Delhi from Mashhad at 0330 hrs on 24th June.'
The conflict between Israel and Iran began on June 13 when the former launched a massive airstrike on Iranian military and nuclear sites, code-named 'Operation Rising Lion'. In retaliation, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) initiated a large-scale drone and missile campaign called 'Operation True Promise 3', targeting Israeli fighter jet fuel production facilities and energy supply centres.
Tensions escalated further after the US conducted precision airstrikes early Sunday morning on three key Iranian nuclear facilities under 'Operation Midnight Hammer'. Iran retaliated by launching multiple missiles at US military installations in Qatar and Iraq, including the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, the largest US military base in the region, CNN reported. (ANI)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Stop Fighting Iran': How Netanyahu 'SUCCUMBED' To Trump Phone Call After Qatar Attack
'Stop Fighting Iran': How Netanyahu 'SUCCUMBED' To Trump Phone Call After Qatar Attack

Time of India

time41 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Stop Fighting Iran': How Netanyahu 'SUCCUMBED' To Trump Phone Call After Qatar Attack

/ Jun 24, 2025, 02:55PM IST A report by Axios says US President Donald Trump has been making efforts to achieve a ceasefire between Iran and Israel since the US military struck three nuclear facilities– Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan– in Iran on June 22. The report revealed that Iran had sent a message to the Trump administration via Qatar before it attacked an Al-Udeid airbase. Meanwhile, the US president refused to retaliate against the Iranian attack and instead sought negotiations for a truce. Trump also wants to resume nuclear talks with Tehran, the report adds.

Corporate India has a caste problem. And it is time to talk about it
Corporate India has a caste problem. And it is time to talk about it

Indian Express

time42 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Corporate India has a caste problem. And it is time to talk about it

On June 23, the Indian aviation industry was again in the news, however, for all the wrong reasons. Reports started coming in of an IndiGo pilot trainee alleging caste based discrimination by his bosses. An FIR has been filed, and a police investigation is underway. Meanwhile, IndiGo has strongly refuted such claims, saying it stands for 'zero-tolerance policy towards any form of discrimination'. The investigation will take its own course, but it opens the avenue to talk about a much larger issue: Corporate India's caste problem. Post the 1990s, when the private sector started to expand immensely owing to policy changes, it was primarily the Savarna entrepreneurs who benefited greatly. Among them, the rise of Bania capital within India Inc has been mapped extensively. However, this has been perceived as an organic development, born out of inherent merit, developed in some sort of 'casteless vacuum'. However, the material realities of labour and capital are intrinsically caste-coded. The overrepresentation of communities in some sectors of the economy is directly and (often) proportionally related to the absence of other communities in the same. Babasaheb Ambedkar had analysed caste as not just a system of division of labour, but rather a division of labourers. Within corporate India, this division and categorisation of labourers is starkly visible. In the last decade or so, even as corporate culture internationally veered towards 'Diversity, Equity, Inclusion', also known as DEI practices, India Inc has remained caste-blind. Not just within corporate structures and the industry, but even within allied ecosystems — from B-schools to market commentators, journalists, and podcasters — there has been no serious or critical conversation on caste as a key variable in business management and planning. This is very surprising because most of the real economy is based on kinship networks and 'contacts' which often overlap with political funding and are ultimately mediated through caste connections. In the absence of any meaningful discourse on these intersections, the corporate understanding of Indian market realities remains stunted, myopic and unsuited for Indian needs, as it frequently over-fixates on some socio-cultural segments while invisibilising large swathes. India's commerce minister, Piyush Goyal's recent comments on the lopsided nature of startup/business priorities of corporate India also seem to suggest the same. The minister's comments stirred up a debate. Most business leaders responded with a litany of complaints against the government itself and lamented the business challenges they faced. While there is certainly a lot of validity in their collective grievance, very few actually acknowledged that there was a 'priority gap'. Fewer still tried to analyse why the 'gaze' of India Inc remains limited only to a very small range of business models, often urban-situated and catering usually to high-net-worth individuals. Even as every B-school teaches its MBAs to 'think outside the box' and all industry captains talk ad nauseum about innovation — it seems that in the last 30 years no one has realistically found a way to innovatively create value for large sections of Indian masses outside those wealthy urban enclaves (almost always populated by other wealthy Savarnas like themselves). It may well be because of the lack of diversity in their leadership, in the one-dimensional, non-diverse pedagogy (in spaces of training) that celebrates itself as ground-breaking and inventive. India Inc, despite three decades of neoliberalisation, remains a social formation that is run by Savarnas, for other Savarnas and trained by Savarnas. This total ubiquity of Savarna-ness renders corporate culture in its own shape, where the omnipresent becomes the invisible. As per David Foster Wallace's allegory about the fish swimming in water does not 'see' the water, the caste stratified codes of corporate India become invisible to Savarnas within it. But almost immediately, it manifests to folks who come from different socio-cultural realities, often in hostile and contradictory ways. So much so that for many marginalised people, to survive and move ahead in India Inc, they have to internalise and validate Savarna idioms of business success. Whether it is the casteist ad campaign run by Zomato, Narayan Murthy's work-life balance ideas or Swiggy's decision for veg-only fleets (rescinded upon backlash) — that is how you emerge with statements or decisions. And on occasion, where friction within teams emerges, inherent, embedded caste prejudices come to the fore in ways that are traumatic for caste-marginalised people but may seem totally normal or par-for-the-course to other Savarnas. It remains to be seen whether this is the case in the aforementioned IndiGo matter. Irrespective of how the matter unfolds, these types of flashpoints remain an unspoken reality for the minority caste-marginalised professionals working in top positions. In most cases, one stays silent and compliant, and internalises the bias as the structure itself is coded in the vocabulary of the dominant caste. At a time when a strong online campaign is emerging against caste-based reservation among educated, elite Savarnas, it is perhaps time for India Inc to reflect upon itself and give shape to the unfulfilled promise of diversity and consider reservations in the private sector as an innovative, bold and progressive step in bridging market reforms, nation-building mandates as well as dignity to all working professionals. The writer is Associate Dean at Woxsen University, Hyderabad. His latest book is Meet the Savarnas: Indian Millennials Whose Mediocrity Broke Everything

Netanyahu agrees to ceasefire with Iran: Will Donald Trump-brokered ceasefire survive rising tensions & failed nuclear talks?
Netanyahu agrees to ceasefire with Iran: Will Donald Trump-brokered ceasefire survive rising tensions & failed nuclear talks?

Time of India

time44 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Netanyahu agrees to ceasefire with Iran: Will Donald Trump-brokered ceasefire survive rising tensions & failed nuclear talks?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has confirmed that Israel has agreed to a ceasefire with Iran, stating that all the objectives of the military operation were met. The 12-day conflict saw Israel target key elements of Iran's military and nuclear programs. Netanyahu thanked the U.S. President Donald Trump for proposing the ceasefire and for his continued support of Israel's security interests. Israel says war objectives are met Netanyahu told Israel's security cabinet that the operation against Iran had achieved its main objectives. These included damaging Iran's nuclear and missile programs, striking military leadership and government targets, and gaining air dominance over Tehran. 'We have reached our goals. Israel will respond forcefully to any breach of the ceasefire,' Netanyahu said. Trump's role in mediating the ceasefire According to a senior White House official, Donald Trump personally led the talks with Netanyahu on Monday. The ceasefire was confirmed shortly after those discussions. Simultaneously, U.S. Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and special envoy Steve Witkoff held communications with Iranian officials—some directly and others through indirect channels. US President Donald Trump | Credit: X Trump later announced that a "complete and total" ceasefire between Israel and Iran would begin within hours, despite earlier threats of further escalation from both sides. Events leading to the ceasefire announcement The sequence of events began when Iran fired missiles at a U.S. air base. No casualties were reported. This came in response to U.S. airstrikes that dropped 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs on Iran's underground nuclear facilities. The White House official stated that Trump reacted quickly to the escalation, instructing his team to initiate conversations with both Iran and Israel. 'Get me Bibi. We're going to make peace,' Trump reportedly said. Although the U.S. had held talks with Iran multiple times in the weeks leading up to the airstrikes, negotiations fell apart due to Iran's refusal to stop uranium enrichment, as reported by Reuters. Trump balances pressure with restraint Trump had initially announced on June 19 that he would decide on the use of American military force within two weeks. However, by June 21, he had authorized the strikes. The decision to attack Iranian nuclear sites marked a major shift from Trump's previous stance against deep foreign military involvement. The official said Trump was careful to keep U.S. interests at the forefront and wanted to avoid prolonged entanglement. 'He has shown restraint while making U.S. priorities clear,' the official noted. For more news and current affairs from around the world, please visit Indiatimes News.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store