
Law vs. chaos: How Americans can resist Trump's power grab
Advertisement
Meanwhile, Trump's Justice Department is conducting a
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
It's cruel. It's grim. It's demoralizing and infuriating.
But it's also unconstitutional and illegal.
I've heard from readers who ask if that even matters anymore. Can't Trump and those aiding in his tyrannical actions simply ignore Congress and the courts if they try to serve as a check on his blatant attempt to expand his authority far beyond the bounds of the Constitution?
The answer is, not if 'We, the People' say he can't.
Some of the administration's lawless actions have been brushed back by court rulings. An attempt to unlawfully impound funding appropriated by Congress was temporary
A plethora of other legal challenges have been filed. But it's important to remember that they did not appear out of the ether. They were brought by people: members of the federal workforce, labor organizations, activists, doctors, retirees, state officials acting on behalf of citizens, and many more. These are people who give our government and its laws force and authority, not Trump and certainly not Musk. There is a reason why the first three words of our Constitution are 'We, the People.'
Advertisement
The bases of these legal challenges are myriad and at times esoteric, but they are still important in understanding just how out of bounds the administration has been acting — and how groundbreaking the pushback has been.
Let's start with the Constitution itself, because that's where a blockbuster class action suit brought by
'Plaintiffs reasonably fear that all of parts of this list might be published by allies of President Trump, thus placing themselves and their families in immediate danger of retribution by now pardoned and at-large Jan. 6 convicted felons,' the
Other lawsuits, including those brought by
Advertisement
That law empowers courts to strike down agency actions that are done in an arbitrary or capricious manner, and done contrary to law. Describing the actions of Trump and Musk as arbitrary, capricious, and lawless is an understatement.
These are just a few of the flurry of legal actions underway. I know they can be just as dizzying and difficult to understand as Trump's actions. But it's important to know that the power of our laws not come from the paper that a court ruling is written on. It's from you, me, and everyone who stands up and demands that those words have effect. And that is what is happening. It may be a slow, painful, and imperfect process. But it has been one that has helped our nation function for nearly 250 years.
So, does the law matter?
Yes, if We, the People, say it does. And so we say.
This is an excerpt from
, a newsletter about the Supreme Court from columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Kimberly Atkins Stohr is a columnist for the Globe. She may be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stocks rally as Trump-Musk feud cools down
Stocks rally as Trump-Musk feud cools down originally appeared on TheStreet. Crypto stocks bounced back on June 7 as both President Donald Trump and Tesla (Nasdaq: TSLA) boss Elon Musk retreated from their big, ugly feud from the previous day. Strategy (Nasdaq: MSTR), which had dipped around 6% yesterday, was trading at $375.01 at press time, up 1.69% a day. Helmed by Michael Saylor, the company is the largest public Bitcoin treasury company. The largest U.S. crypto exchange Coinbase (Nasdaq: COIN) had slipped as much as 10% the day before. The stock, which made it to the much-coveted spot on the S&P 500 in May, was trading at $254.31, up 4% a day. The crypto and stock trading exchange Robinhood (Nasdaq: HOOD) dipped around 8% on the day of the feud. It was trading at $76.24, up 5% a day. The story of Bitcoin miners was no different as the two men engaged in a heated public exchange over social media and press briefings on June 6. MARA Holdings (MARA) fell as much as 7% yesterday but was trading at $15.93, up 7.02% a day. Hut 8 Group (HUT) had similarly slipped by 7% the day before but rallied an impressive 14.83% to trade at $18.74. HIVE Digital (Nasdaq: HIVE) had slid around 9% yesterday and made the same recovery of 9% today to trade at $2.0042. Bitdeer (Nasdaq: BTDR) had also slipped 9% and successfully recovered by 11% to trade at $14.07 today. Notably, the stablecoin issuer Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL) made an impressive debut on the day of the feud. CRCL was trading at $116.07 at press time, up 40% a day. Musk, who quit the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) by the end of May, has been criticizing Trump's "big, beautiful bill" since then. The disagreement escalated into an ugly public exchange the previous day that shook the markets. Stocks rally as Trump-Musk feud cools down first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio


New York Post
30 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump boasts of ‘big win' over AP as court allows WH to ban access after ‘Gulf of America' spat
President Trump celebrated a 'big win' Friday after a court ruled that his administration can ban the Associated Press from entering the Oval Office and other restricted areas. 'Big WIN over AP today,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'They refused to state the facts or the Truth on the GULF OF AMERICA. FAKE NEWS!!!' Advertisement The 2-1 ruling in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia comes months after the White House barred an Associated Press reporter from the Oval Office in protest of the outlet's style guidance on the Gulf of America. The outlet manages the 'Associated Press Stylebook,' which is widely used by media publications across the country for guidance on abbreviations, spelling, references and more. The AP has refrained from updating its style guide to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, as mandated by Trump's executive order, arguing that the body of water has been called the Gulf of Mexico for 'more than 400 years' and other international groups have not acknowledged the change. Advertisement 'VICTORY! As we've said all along, the Associated Press is not guaranteed special access to cover President Trump in the Oval Office, aboard Air Force One, and in other sensitive locations,' White House press secretary Karoline Levitt posted to X following the ruling. 'Thousands of other journalists have never been afforded the opportunity to cover the President in these privileged spaces. Moving forward, we will continue to expand access to new media so that more people can cover the most transparent President in American history rather than just the failing legacy media. 'And by the way @AP, it's still the Gulf of America.' 'We are disappointed in the court's decision and are reviewing our options,' a spokesperson for AP told CNN.


San Francisco Chronicle
38 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Panama's president appeals to a higher power as nearly 2 months of protests roil nation
PANAMA CITY (AP) — Panama's José Raúl Mulino appealed to a higher power on Friday, calling in an archbishop and a rabbi to deliver a message to striking banana workers after nearly two months of social protest that have roiled the country. Mulino has said he won't reverse controversial changes to Panama's social security system, courts have deemed the strike illegal and top banana Chiquita Brands fired nearly 5,000 striking workers last month in Panama's western Bocas del Toro province. But nothing has stopped the protests. So at his weekly news briefing Friday, Mulino said he had met with Archbishop José Domingo Ulloa and one of Panama's leading Jewish figures, Rabbi Gustavo Kraselnik, to enlist them as intermediaries. He gave Ulloa a personal letter to bring to Francisco Smith, leader of the striking banana workers' union. In the letter, Mulino said, he committed to send proposed legislation to the Congress that would be favorable for the country's banana sector, above all its workers. But he conditioned the proposal on former workers lifting their protest. There was precedent for the maneuver. In 2022, Ulloa brokered a dialogue that eased protests over the high cost of fuel and food. In 2018, Ulloa mediated a dispute between parts of the government. Smith, secretary general of the Banana Industry Workers Union, had said earlier Friday before Mulino's announcement that he was open to dialogue. Union leaders planned to travel to the capital Monday to meet with the president of the National Assembly and present a list of demands. He insisted, however, that changes be made to the social security reform. Smith, who has led the protest in western Bocas del Toro province, has said the social security reform passed in March threatens the special privileges laid out for banana workers in another law, covering things like subsidies and labor protections. The impact has been acute. Chiquita Brands said last month they had lost at least $75 million before announcing a temporary halt to their operations in Panama. Demonstrations have not been limited to the banana workers, to Bocas del Toro or even to the social security changes. At various times teachers, construction workers and students have protested as well. On Thursday, border police clashed with protesters who had blocked a highway in eastern Darien province, leaving injured on both sides.