Coalition ‘unable to articulate' a clear message in campaign
Political strategist and adviser Yaron Finkelstein discusses the future of the Liberal Party following a crushing defeat in the recent Australian federal election.
'This campaign was unable to articulate something clear and distinct as to why someone might vote for you,' Mr Finkelstein told Sky News Australia.
'People need to challenge themselves about, is this more than just a very bad campaign and inaccurate polling?
'I think we saw a catastrophic failure on the research and polling.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australians must not follow Trump's road to ruin
It would appear as through Parnell McGuinness (' JD Vance chastised Europeans on free speech. He wasn't wrong ', June 8) and similar-minded conservative commentators such as Sky News After Dark, are continuing on their ideologically driven warpaths oblivious to the voice of the Australian people as expressed in the May 3 election. While these media darlings of the right still want to rant and rave and feed each other's egos with negativity, doom and gloom, the great mass of Australians are getting on with life, comfortable with their government which is safe, stable, secure and focused on traditional Australian positive values of a fair go, kindness and friendliness. To become relevant again and play a meaningful role in modern Australia, the right-wing media needs to jettison these antagonistic Trump-like approaches which were clearly rejected by the Australian people. Warren Marks, Richmond (Tas) Parnell Palme McGuinness warns against the suppression of ideas, quoting the US vice president's controversial advice to the Munich Security Conference in February that 'governments must listen to and respect their citizens'. However, she, like JD Vance, can't resist cherry-picking just which ideas and citizen groups are worthy of respect. She uses the case of the phrase 'identified as' being currently questioned and 'no longer [deemed] acceptable' by some activists, as an example of 'groups trying to control public conversation'. But is this really a 'kind of slippery censorship', or just the progression of an idea so it more accurately conveys the lived experience of a group? Wasn't JD Vance's speech realistically more of an attempt to control? It's a shame Palme McGuinness sabotages her own argument, adopts the culture war cover, and portrays progressive ideas as threats. Everyone counts, Parnell. Kerrie Wehbe, Blacktown EVs not for me After 60 years of driving, I recently explored the hybrid option (' The sweet spot: How to get the most out of your super and the pension', June 8). I currently drive a diesel SUV, and being a self-funded retiree, I receive no government pension. I spend about $100 per fortnight on fuel. The hybrid currently comes with no spare wheel and no tow-bar, which I need to tow my boat. The changeover figure is $12,000 in the dealer's favour. The cost of a one-off tow-bar is an extra $2000, and a spare wheel costs a couple of hundred more. That equates to about six years' driving if I continue to use diesel. There is no government incentive for me to change. Free rego for all EV-driving retirees might sway me. I think I will stay with my diesel as I am not that green. David Sayers, Gwandalan Undeserved reward This just brings discredit to the whole honours system (' Politicians, scientists and costume designer feature in King's awards ', June 8). The highest honours go to those who have already achieved a higher role in society, often just for doing what that job requires. Isn't achieving that position (and the salary that goes with it) reward enough? Meanwhile, those who make a real sacrifice and give true service to others might receive a lower honour (when nominated), if any at all. In the case of the honour given to Scott Morrison, one hopes that it is primarily because most ex-PMs have historically received a similar award. Otherwise, it wouldn't seem to be merited. The citation says it's for 'his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic and his key role in the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal'. Doesn't that come with the job of being PM? His role in the pandemic overlooks the refusal to require those already wealthy to pay back JobKeeper payments for which they were ultimately found to be ineligible, the 'stroll-out' of vaccines, and the needless antagonism of China over the pandemic's origins (which damaged Australia's trade). And the value of the AUKUS deal remains questionable. And then there are the multiple ministries, robo-debt, claims to not hold a hose, and statements that women protesters were lucky not to be shot. I predict that this will prompt many other letters to the editor.
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Three-pronged attack': Australia's commercial defence future analysed
Defence industry specialist Brent Clark discusses Australia's national defence future. 'Obviously, the Australian government has a three-pronged attack on this,' Mr Clark told Sky News host Ed Boyd. 'There are a variety of steps that each company must do to each of those elements, if you're a supplier that is different to being a company that wishes to be a builder, as such. 'I would suggest quite heavily that Australian companies are investing in infrastructure, skills, capabilities.'
9 News
3 hours ago
- 9 News
Albanese suggests some Olympic sports could be held outside of Brisbane
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here BREAKING Australian killed, another injured in Bali villa shooting incident Anthony Albanese has cast doubt over some of Brisbane's Olympic venues for 2032. Speaking on the Two Good Sports podcast on Friday, the PM suggested some sports could be played out of Sydney. "Are we really going to do rowing in Rockhampton on the Fitzroy River? When there are some pretty good facilities in Penrith?" Albanese asked. Speaking on the Two Good Sports podcast on Friday, the PM suggested some sports could be played out of Sydney. (Nine) Albanese hinted that some events could be on the move, less than three months after the reveal of Queensland's 2032 vision. "It might be that you can't just do everything in one spot," he said. The Queensland government begs to differ, rejecting calls to move rowing from the Fitzroy River in Rockhampton. "That is the plan; they are the venues. The plan is not changing," State Housing Minister Sam O'Connor said. While the Prime Minister's comments may have opened the door to changes to the Olympic plan, Tennis Queensland is sticking firm with its plans for a substantial upgrade at Pat Rafter Arena, including a new 3000-seat indoor arena. "The Premier confirmed in March that Olympic and Paralympic tennis will be played in Brisbane, and we've had productive discussions since," Tennis Queensland said in a statement. The housing minister also rubbished claims that a venue spat could put the joint $7 billion funding agreement at risk. Anthony Albanese has cast doubt over some of Brisbane's Olympic venues for 2032. (Nine) "I'm not going to buy into those hypotheticals, we have a plan, we have a great plan," O'Connor said. Rowing Queensland Chief Executive Anthea O'Loughlin said the body welcomed the PM's engagement in the discussion about rowing's location. "We support the decision to keep rowing in Queensland and look forward to continued discussion on legacy, value and long-term benefit to the sport." "We continue to engage and support the State Government, the Brisbane 2032 Organising Committee and other key stakeholders to ensure rowing is delivered to international standards and leaves a meaningful legacy for our sport in Queensland." CONTACT US
