Israel-US attack on Iran: The price of Netanyahu's forever wars
Israel's decision to attack Iran cannot be interpreted through any rational lens. It directly contradicts Israel's longstanding military doctrine, which was built on short, decisive operations aimed at securing tangible strategic goals - a doctrine rooted in Israel's inherent geographic, economic and demographic vulnerabilities.
What we are witnessing now is a fundamental shift: the abandonment of strategic realism in favour of a theology-driven war without end.
The transformation is stark. Israel is evolving from a western-backed colonial project seeking international legitimacy, into a messianic colonial enterprise that thrives on perpetual war. The growing use of religious rhetoric and the enlistment of God into the logic of war underscore this systemic change.
On Sunday, Washington joined Israel's war on Iran as it carried out attacks on Iranian nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Donald Trump described the strikes as 'very successful'.
Iranian officials confirmed that parts of nuclear sites were struck, including Fordow, the secretive Iranian nuclear enrichment facility buried half a kilometre under a mountain near the city of Qom.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised what he called a "bold decision" by Trump to bomb Iran's nuclear sites, saying it would "change history."
Following the US strikes, Netanyahu now faces a profound internal challenge. His secular opposition, who once backed his military ventures, are questioning why they must sacrifice their quality of life for the sake of endless conflict.
At the same time, Netanyahu is eroding the democratic space for the Jewish public in order to maintain the momentum of his militarised agenda. The internal front, not Iran, may become his toughest battlefield.
One of the most bizarre but telling decisions has been the imposed restrictions of Israeli citizens' freedom of movement, including the closure of Ben Gurion Airport for outbound travel, coupled with a warning from the National Security Council discouraging reentry via Jordan or Egypt.
Although flights still depart from Israel, they are largely reserved for tourists and foreign residents, while citizens are effectively trapped. This move has an unmistakable internal political logic: it disproportionately impacts middle-class opposition voters who can afford long-term travel abroad, while Likud's working-class base, largely from the periphery, remains unaffected.
Moving money
Meanwhile, since the outbreak of the war on Gaza - and even earlier, during Israel's judicial overhaul - many Israelis have opted to move money overseas, with a financial services firm reporting in March a 50 percent increase in the number of Israelis seeking to exchange and transfer money overseas.
Since October 2023, there has reportedly been a seven-fold rise in money transfers from Israel to other countries, with around $5.6bn moved out of the country that year alone.
For Netanyahu, these financial shifts must be alarming. For years, he has championed the idea that Israel could only maintain its highly equipped military through a strong economy. Yet his ultra-Orthodox coalition partners contribute little in this regard, while his messianic allies push for more wars and territorial expansion.
Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war
Ironically, the segments of society that sustain the Israeli economy are the ones most opposed to Netanyahu's government. But they have not opposed his wars: rather, they continue to support Israel's military actions, while attempting to preserve a western standard of living.
Their inability - or refusal - to critically examine the Zionist ethos that taught them the world is inherently antisemitic, and that they must live by the sword, has allowed Netanyahu and his allies to exploit their economic power. In doing so, they've helped accelerate Israel's descent into a messianic state, emboldening racist policies and a Jewish supremacist ideology.
This is Netanyahu's vision for Israel: an ethno-religious, free-market state in permanent conflict with its neighbours, sowing destruction wherever it extends its reach
This dynamic is now visible amid the conflict with Iran, with multiple documented cases where Jewish Israelis have denied Palestinian citizens - and even foreign workers - access to bomb shelters during missile attacks.
This is Netanyahu's vision for Israel: an ethno-religious, free-market state in permanent conflict with its neighbours, sowing destruction wherever it extends its reach, while actively destabilising the surrounding region. Ironically, this echoes Israel's critiques of Iran.
Those Israelis who do understand the consequences of this war are already feeling them. The financial impacts range from damage to private property, to the broader repercussions of shutting down Israel's civilian economy and transitioning to an emergency economy, in which only essential businesses and institutions continue to operate.
On one hand, this creates economic uncertainty and mounting concern; on the other, it is happening under psychological pressure and a genuine fear of Iranian missile attacks.
Temporary stability
Although the Israeli economy continues to show resilience, Israeli analysts are warning that this stability is temporary. If Israel does not return to its doctrine of short, decisive wars, its financial resources will be depleted, and the economy will suffer long-term damage.
While the number of Iranian missiles that have successfully struck Israeli territory is relatively small, each impact brings serious consequences, rendering entire residential blocks uninhabitable. In the Israeli context, where the real-estate market is among the most expensive in the world, even limited damage carries outsized economic implications.
On a personal level, I can attest to a real and unfamiliar fear of Iranian missiles - a fear that neither Palestinian citizens of Israel nor Jewish Israelis have experienced before. It is producing widespread panic and deep concern.
The Turkish public asks: After Israel's attack on Iran, are we next? Read More »
Many families are now homeless, yet still saddled with mortgage debt. So when reports emerged of Israelis attempting to flee to Cyprus via private yachts, it came as no surprise.
The fantasy of sipping espresso in Tel Aviv while Gaza burns has collapsed. Living in a messianic state that wages perpetual war carries psychological and financial costs, even for those who once enjoyed its benefits.
There is now a widespread belief that Netanyahu will not stop with Iran. Escalations involving Pakistan or Turkey are no longer far-fetched. Israeli think-tanks are already laying the groundwork to justify future confrontations with Ankara, portraying them as inevitable.
To the rational observer, this is madness. But this is the reality of Israel today: a state that has dragged the global economy into its war games, ignited regional tensions, and invoked God to justify destruction. Secular Israelis who supported Netanyahu's wars now have the privilege of planning their escape, while Palestinians continue to pay the price - not only for Israeli policy, but for the West's enduring complicity in legitimising it.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
20 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
Putin says he is worried when asked if he is concerned world is heading towards World War Three
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that he was worried when asked if he was concerned that the world was heading towards World War Three. Putin, speaking at an economic forum in St Petersburg, said there was a lot of potential for conflict in the world and that it was growing. He mentioned Russia's own war in Ukraine, the conflict between Israel and Iran, and said he was concerned by what was happening around nuclear facilities in Iran where Russian specialists are building two new nuclear reactors for Tehran. "It is disturbing. I am speaking without any irony, without any jokes. Of course, there is a lot of conflict potential, it is growing, and it is right under our noses, and it affects us directly," said Putin. "And this requires, of course, not only our careful attention to the events taking place, but also the search for solutions, the search for solutions, preferably by peaceful means, in all directions."
Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Sheltering in a bunker, Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei names potential successors
[Editor's Note: Follow our live blog for real-time updates on the latest developments in the Israel-Iran conflict.] Wary of assassination, Iran's supreme leader mostly speaks with his commanders through a trusted aide now, suspending electronic communications to make it harder to find him, three Iranian officials familiar with his emergency war plans say. Ensconced in a bunker, the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has picked an array of replacements down his chain of military command in case more of his valued lieutenants are killed in strikes by Israel or the United States, which dropped bombs on three nuclear sites in Iran on Saturday. The attack, which President Donald Trump announced Saturday night, brings the US military directly into Israel's war with Iran after days of uncertainty about whether he would intervene in the conflict, and marks the first time since the 1979 Islamic Revolution that the United States has sent its Air Force to strike major facilities inside the country, an act of war. And in a remarkable move, the Iranian officials add, Khamenei has even named three senior clerics as candidates to succeed him should he be killed as well — perhaps the most telling illustration of the precarious moment he and his three-decade rule are facing. Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp Channels. Khamenei has taken an extraordinary series of steps to preserve the Islamic Republic ever since Israel launched a series of surprise attacks June 13. In only a few days, the Israeli attacks have been more intense and have caused more damage in Tehran than Saddam Hussein did in his entire eight-year war against Iran. Iran appears to have overcome its initial shock, reorganising enough to launch daily counterstrikes of its own on Israel. Iran's top officials are also quietly making preparations for a wide range of outcomes as the war intensifies, according to the Iranian officials, who insisted on anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly about the ayatollah's plans. Peering inside Iran's closely guarded leadership can be difficult, but its chain of command still seems to be functioning, despite being hit hard, and there are no obvious signs of dissent in the political ranks, according to the officials and to diplomats in Iran. Khamenei, 86, is aware that either Israel or the United States could try to assassinate him, an end he would view as martyrdom, the officials said. Given the possibility, the ayatollah has made the unusual decision to instruct his nation's Assembly of Experts, the clerical body responsible for appointing the supreme leader, to choose his successor swiftly from the three names he has provided.
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
US attacks Iran: What are the nuclear contamination risks from Iranian sites?
[Editor's Note: Follow our live blog for real-time updates on the latest developments in the Israel-Iran conflict.] President Donald Trump said Iran's main nuclear sites had been "obliterated" in military strikes overnight, including on the deeply buried Fordow facility, as the US joined attacks launched by Israel on June 13. Experts have said military strikes on Iran's uranium enrichment facilities pose limited risks of contamination, and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said on Sunday no increased off-site radiation levels had been reported following the US attacks. Which Iranian nuclear sites have been hit so far? The US military struck sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Trump said Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities had been "completely and totally obliterated". The attacks follow previously announced Israeli attacks on nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan, Arak and Tehran itself. Israel says it aims to stop Iran building a nuclear bomb and the US says Tehran would not be allowed to get such weapons. Iran denies ever seeking nuclear arms. The international nuclear watchdog IAEA has previously reported damage to the uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, the nuclear complex at Isfahan that includes the Uranium Conversion Facility and to centrifuge production facilities in Karaj and Tehran. Israel has also attacked Arak, also known as Khondab. The IAEA said Israeli military strikes hit the Khondab Heavy Water Research Reactor, which was under construction and had not begun operating, and damaged the nearby plant that makes heavy water. The IAEA said it was not operational and contained no nuclear material, so there were no radiological effects. Heavy-water reactors can be used to produce plutonium which, like enriched uranium, can be used to make an atom bomb. What risks do these strikes pose? Speaking to Reuters before the US strikes took place, experts said Israel's attacks had posed limited contamination risks so far. Darya Dolzikova, a senior research fellow at London think-tank RUSI, said attacks on facilities at the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle — the stages where uranium is prepared for use in a reactor — pose primarily chemical, not radiological risks. At enrichment facilities, UF6, or uranium hexafluoride, is the concern. "When UF6 interacts with water vapour in the air, it produces harmful chemicals," she said. "In low winds, much of the material can be expected to settle in the vicinity of the facility; in high winds, the material will travel farther, but is also likely to disperse more widely. The risk of harmful chemicals being dispersed is lower for underground facilities." Simon Bennett, who leads the civil safety and security unit at the University of Leicester in Britain, said risks to the environment were minimal when subterranean facilities are hit because you are "burying nuclear material in possibly thousands of tonnes of concrete, earth and rock". James Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said that before uranium goes into a nuclear reactor it is barely radioactive. "The chemical form uranium hexafluoride is toxic ... but it actually doesn't tend to travel large distances and it's barely radioactive," he added. Attacks on enrichment facilities were "unlikely to cause significant off-site consequences", he said, while stating his opposition to Israel's campaign. What about nuclear reactors? The major concern would be a strike on Iran's nuclear reactor at Bushehr on the Gulf coast. Fears of catastrophe rippled through the Gulf on June 19 when the Israeli military said it had struck a site in Bushehr, only to say later that the announcement was a mistake. Israel says it wants to avoid any nuclear disaster. Richard Wakeford, honorary professor of epidemiology at the University of Manchester, said that while contamination from attacks on enrichment facilities would be "mainly a chemical problem" for the surrounding areas, extensive damage to large power reactors "is a different story". Radioactive elements would be released either through a plume of volatile materials or into the sea, he added. Acton of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace said an attack on Bushehr "could cause an absolute radiological catastrophe". Why are Gulf states especially worried? For Gulf states, the impact of any strike on Bushehr would be worsened by the potential contamination of Gulf waters, jeopardising a critical source of desalinated potable water. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is on high alert to monitor for any possible environmental contamination after the attacks, said a source with knowledge of the matter. There have been no signs of radiological contamination so far, the source said, adding that the GCC had emergency plans in place in case of a threat to water and food security in the Gulf. In the United Arab Emirates, desalinated water accounts for more than 80 per cent of drinking water, while Bahrain became fully reliant on desalinated water in 2016, with 100 per cent of groundwater reserved for contingency plans, authorities say. Qatar is also 100 per cent dependent on desalinated water. In Saudi Arabia, a much larger nation with a greater reserve of natural groundwater, about 50 per cent of the water supply came from desalinated water as of 2023, according to the General Authority for Statistics. While some Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia, Oman and the UAE have access to more than one sea to draw water from, Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait are crowded along the shoreline of the Gulf with no other coastline. "If a natural disaster, oil spill, or even a targeted attack were to disrupt a desalination plant, hundreds of thousands could lose access to freshwater almost instantly," said Nidal Hilal, professor of engineering and director of New York University Abu Dhabi's Water Research Center. "Coastal desalination plants are especially vulnerable to regional hazards like oil spills and potential nuclear contamination," he said.
