
OPEC must squeeze US shale much more to win oil price war: Bousso
LONDON - Oil drillers in the U.S. shale heartland are slowing down operations, a sign that OPEC's high-stakes price war is starting to pay off, but Saudi Arabia will need to exert a lot more pain to make a lasting impact on market share. U.S. oil producers upended the global market in the early 2010s, as the innovative 'fracking' drilling technique allowed them to tap vast onshore shale formations. Consequently, the United States, long the world's top oil consumer, became its leading producer as of 2018. It currently pumps around 13.5 million barrels per day, around 13% of world supplies.
The rising tide of U.S. oil has long irked the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, which has seen its market share steadily erode over the past two decades. Saudi Arabia, OPEC's de-facto leader, in 2014 sought to curb surging U.S. output by flooding the market with cheap oil. This effort bankrupted a number of shale producers, but it only temporarily paused the country's ascent as companies adapted to lower prices and the industry consolidated.
PRICE WAR REDUX
Riyadh and its allies, a group known as OPEC+, are now giving it another go. They surprised the market earlier this year by announcing that they would rapidly unwind 2.2 million bpd of production cuts introduced in 2024. The group is expected to announce further increases in production later this week.
Benchmark U.S. oil prices have dropped by nearly a quarter since January to around $61 a barrel in response to OPEC+'s strategy as well as concerns over U.S. President Donald Trump's trade wars. At these prices, many shale wells are not profitable, as frackers require an oil price of between $61 and $70 a barrel to expand production, according to a survey conducted by the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank.
And sure enough, nimble frackers have already responded by paring back drilling activities to conserve cash. The number of U.S. onshore oil drilling rigs dropped by eight to 465 last week, the lowest since November 2021, according to energy services firm Baker Hughes.
Crucially, drillers in the Permian Basin in West Texas and eastern New Mexico, which accounts for nearly half of U.S. production, cut three rigs, bringing the total down to 279, also the lowest since November 2021.
Crude production from new Permian wells, a measure of productivity, slightly improved in April, but that was largely offset by declines in other basins.
And multiple indicators suggest activity is set to decelerate further.
Importantly, Frac Spread Count, which measures the number of crews actively performing hydraulic fracturing, has seen a 28% annual drop to 186, according to energy consultancy Primary Vision, an indication that production could fall sharply in the coming months. Another measure to watch is drilled but uncompleted wells (DUCs), or partially completed wells that can start production quickly, offering operators flexibility to withhold production until market conditions improve. DUCs have risen by 11% since December 2024 to 975 in the Permian Basin.
DOWN BUT NOT OUT
While the latest data on shale drilling activity suggests U.S. production will continue to slow, it is far from falling off a cliff. The U.S. Energy Information Administration reduced in May its forecasts for U.S. production in 2025 and 2026 by around 100,000 bpd to 13.4 million bpd and 13.5 million bpd, respectively, compared with 13.2 million bpd last year. Production in the Permian Basin is forecast to average 6.51 million bpd in 2025, down from its previous estimate of 6.58 million bpd. But that would still mark a significant increase from 6.3 million bpd in 2024. OPEC+ may find it even harder to have a sustainable impact now than it did in 2014 as the U.S. shale landscape is significantly different from a decade ago. True, 15 years of intensive oil and gas drilling have depleted a large chunk of the most profitable shale acreage.
However, shale drillers have in recent years adopted much stricter spending discipline, focusing on returning value to shareholders in contrast with last decade's focus on growing production. Independent U.S. oil and gas producers have so far reduced their planned 2025 spending commitments by an aggregate 4% to $60 billion, while output is expected to remain largely flat, according to consultancy RBN Energy. Also, production today is concentrated in the hands of far fewer companies, such as Exxon Mobil and Chevron. These energy majors have developed highly efficient drilling techniques and boast strong balance sheets that leave them better equipped to withstand the OPEC assault. Current oil prices are therefore likely to temporarily curb U.S. production but not lead to the type of sharp deceleration seen in 2014. OPEC+ will therefore need to deepen and extend its price war for many months if it seeks to fundamentally change the oil production balance of power.
Want to receive my column in your inbox every Thursday, along with additional energy insights and trending stories? Sign up for my Power Up newsletter here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Zawya
27 minutes ago
- Zawya
GameChange Solar expands Saudi Arabia manufacturing capacity to 6 GW to support growing solar demand
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia/PRNewswire/ -- GameChange Solar, a leading global supplier of solar tracker and fixed-tilt racking technology, today announced the expansion of its regional manufacturing capacity in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to 6 GW annually, doubling its volume. The expansion is expected to be completed by September 2025, with the facility continuing to produce GameChange Solar's advanced Genius Tracker™ systems for utility-scale projects. The increased capacity supports the Kingdom's ambitions under Vision 2030 to become a leading hub for renewable energy, while meeting national requirements for up to 70% local content. With this expansion, GameChange Solar strengthens its ability to supply high-quality tracker systems for projects across Saudi Arabia, in compliance with local sourcing mandates. "Our decision to scale up reflects the demand we are experiencing in Saudi Arabia and our readiness to meet it. The facility is already operational, and this expansion gives us the capacity to move faster on the large-scale projects coming up in the region. We're building locally, staying close to our customers, and preparing for what's next. This is a long-term commitment, not just to supply equipment, but to be part of Saudi Arabia's energy future," said Jason Wang, Vice President – China & SEA at GameChange Solar. GameChange Solar's Genius Tracker™ system, now in its tenth year, is engineered for high performance in desert conditions, offering durability, ease of installation, and operational efficiency. Over the past decade, it has evolved into an industry-leading solution, with over 40 GW deployed across 26 countries and six continents. For more information about the company and its solar tracking solutions, visit About GameChange Solar GameChange Solar is the third largest global provider of solar tracker solutions used in utility-scale and ground-mounted distributed generation solar projects around the world. We have delivered over 43 GW of solar tracker and fixed tilt systems that combine fast installation, bankable quality, and unbeatable value through superior engineering, innovative design, and high-volume manufacturing. Our products enable solar panels at power plants to follow the sun's movement across the sky and optimize plant performance while protecting the array from damaging weather conditions. Media Contact Nisha Wadhwani Lead – Marketing, GameChange Solar Logo - SOURCE GameChange Solar


The National
31 minutes ago
- The National
There's a less popular reason why Opec+ is unwinding oil cuts - and it's not the US
At the weekend the group of eight Opec+ oil producers decided to continue their sped-up path towards unwinding their so called 'voluntary cuts' in July by adding another 411,000 barrels per day of output. The result: oil prices rose by about 3 per cent when markets opened on Monday. So, what led to this contradictory reaction and what does it mean for the group's policy in the months to come? This seemingly counterintuitive price reaction, which saw Brent trade above $65 a barrel, was partly driven by earlier market speculation that the group might opt for a more aggressive production hike. This led to a brief sell-off before the weekend. Once the expected 411,000 bpd increase was confirmed, market sentiment shifted positively. Additionally, concerns over potential supply disruptions from Canadian wildfires added upward pressure to prices. According to delegates, the price surge was well-received within the group, particularly by members wary of further declines. However, the direction of future policy remains uncertain. Opec+ has emphasised that its August strategy will be shaped by evolving market conditions, with all options – ranging from continuing the current path to more conservative adjustments – on the table. Opec+ policy Given that this is the third accelerated increase by Opec+ to unwind the 2.2 million bpd voluntary cuts, there's misconception over why the group is doing this. Common reasons cited include the need for Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states to appease US President Donald Trump and his call for $50 oil, or the shift in policy from defending prices to going after market. Both these explanations receive pushback from officials. The driver behind the policy, which often doesn't gain traction due to its less glamorous appeal compared to a US political dynamic, is keeping cohesion within the group. Leading members within that Opec+ eight realised that lack of compliance from Russia, Iraq and Kazakhstan to their production quotas was starting to contribute to a stock build. So, for the other members to sit on their laurels and do nothing was no longer an option. To restore a sense of fairness, an orderly plan to return the barrels gradually was needed to avoid a free-for-all situation that would drown the market in supply. Historical precedent supports this approach. The 2020 oil price war, which started when Russia declined a proposed production cut, ultimately led to the largest cut in Opec+ history – 10 million bpd – and a renewed commitment to group co-operation. Ensuring compliance is also essential to preserving Opec+'s market credibility, particularly if future conditions necessitate a pause or new round of cuts. This weekend's discussions underscored this point, as Russia and Oman advocated for pausing the planned increases. However, consensus was quickly reached to proceed with the 411,000 bpd surge, which was the only formal alternative discussed. Production outlook At present, there appears to be limited support for pausing or deepening production cuts. However, if rising inventories or weakening demand become evident, a smaller increase or even a temporary pause could be considered. Contrary to the misconception by many traders and observers in the market, oil prices dropping to $40 or $50 a barrel is not a level that would please any of the Opec+ producers, let alone the wider industry. Therefore, this idea that the alliance supports a crash in oil prices does not hold. Looking at the here and now of the current policy, which involves increments of 411,000 bpd for the months of May, June and July, it presents a good window for the group to reinstate output as demand during these hot summer months rises − which in turn would buffer the impact of the increase. Summer driving season in the northern hemisphere and Hajj season in Saudi Arabia are further demand pockets that would absorb the additional barrels. Looking ahead, Moscow's influence may play a larger role in shaping decisions. Still, for now, all members appear committed to preserving the alliance, recognising its value in maintaining market stability. The late Opec secretary general Mohammed Barkindo once described members of Opec+ being in a 'catholic marriage'--binding and enduring. Another Opec+ official once openly told me that many marriages are not perfect, but the spouses stay 'because of the kids … and in Opec's case it's because of the oil.'


Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Markets anxious as 'new cold war' turns hot: Mike Dolan
LONDON - As military spending ramps up around the world and countries rush to ringfence critical industries, political rhetoric appears to have darkened from one sketching geopolitical risks to outright preparation for war. Whether global markets should take more note is a moot point. Investors are already preoccupied with a full-blown trade war, which has aggravated international tensions and is much like the latest ratchet in U.S. steel and aluminium tariffs. But it is not hard to find the 'safety' trades thriving. Gold is less than 2% from a record close set a month ago, having climbed almost 30% so far this year. The Swiss franc , also up almost 10% this year, is pushing higher too. Most obvious of all is the nearly 50% rise in European defence stocks since January. Safety trades that have not barked are just as interesting. The dollar's haven status has been undermined by U.S. trade and tax worries and President Donald Trump's domestic institutional upheavals. And government bonds are pressured precisely because the additional defence spending associated with another generational arms race is exaggerating outsized post-pandemic debt loads even more. Global government debt indexes remain in the red for 2025. "Elevated geopolitical risk affects issuers through multiple transmission mechanisms," credit rating firm Fitch said on Friday, adding it "put upward pressure on defence spending, making fiscal consolidation more challenging for certain sovereigns." WAR DRUMBEAT But at whatever part of the market risk dial you put world war worries, there is no doubt the temperature has risen. Even in the last few days, the language surrounding future major power conflicts has been alarming. Goading Asian allies to match European moves to boost military spending, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth warned on Saturday that Chinese military moves to take Taiwan were "imminent". "There's no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent," Hegseth said, adding that any attempt by China to secure Taiwan militarily "would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world". Beijing reacted angrily and said Hegseth "vilified China with defamatory allegations". But senior U.S. officials have repeatedly briefed that they believe Chinese President Xi Jinping has ordered his military to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027, even if they say no direct decision appears to have been made. Back in Europe, the drum beat about the need to lift military spending is even louder, more fearful of a threat from Russia. Nearly a trillion euros ($1.14 trillion) of extra German and European-wide defence spending have been earmarked this year. Only last week, Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Germany and its NATO partners were prepared to defend every inch of the alliance's territory. "Anyone who threatens an ally must know that the entire alliance will jointly defend every inch of NATO territory," Merz said on Thursday at a military ceremony in Vilnius to mark the establishment of a German brigade in Lithuania. Britain's strategic defence review on Monday also addressed threats from Russia, nuclear risks and cyberattacks by outlining investment in drones and digital warfare. But the plan also expands the UK's fleet of attack submarines, which are nuclear-powered but carry conventional weapons, and will spend 15 billion pounds ($20.3 billion) by 2029 on replacement of nuclear warheads for its main nuclear fleet. And again, the rhetoric was alarming. "We are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, so we must be ready to fight and win," Prime Minister Keir Starmer. 'NEW COLD WAR' TURNS HOT If securing the funding needs political alarm, then maybe that explains some of the high-octane public relations. But there is no shortage of deeply entrenched conflicts raging across the globe and threatening to spill over to varying degrees. Multilateral solutions seem distant as the globe breaks in the blocs. Even with negotiators exploring a ceasefire in Istanbul, Ukraine's forces made an extraordinary move this weekend to attack strategic bomber aircraft at bases deep inside Russia. Israel's devastation of Gaza in reprisal for the 2023 massacres by Hamas shows no sign of ending. More than 30 more Palestinians were killed and nearly 170 injured on Sunday near a food distribution site. Reports continued to circulate last week that Israel is threatening to disrupt nuclear talks between Washington and Tehran by striking Iran's nuclear facilities. And nuclear-armed India and Pakistan have just stepped back from another tense border conflict that marked the fiercest fighting in decades. The expansion of 'hot' conflicts is a mounting concern in political circles, with extraordinary territorial claims thrown into the mix. Trump's public ambition to take over Panama and Greenland have jarred allies, with the latter being part of rivalry over access to rare minerals and also amid strategic plays for the Arctic. Even J.P. Morgan boss Jamie Dimon gets the drift, reportedly telling Barron's last week the United States should not be stockpiling Bitcoin, but instead be stockpiling "guns, bullets, tanks, planes, drones, you know, rare earths." That the world is a dangerous place is not in doubt. A world at war is a different proposition. A worse case scenario is that tariff wars are just the opening act. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters ($1 = 0.8738 euros) (By Mike Dolan; Editing by Kirsten Donovan and Richard Chang)