Better paternity leave wouldn't just help Daddy
I'm so pleased that paternity leave is getting some air time and there is a campaign to increase it (The Guardian view on paternity leave: campaigners are right to demand more, 5 May). Probably in part because I follow the Pregnant Then Screwed campaigns, my husband and I have discussed this in depth. He is now due to be taking a full six months of shared parental leave from his workplace this year.
With our first baby, he was at home but working self‑employed, so had no benefits. I suffered with postnatal depression, and struggled with breastfeeding and the anxiety of trying to do it all right.
This time, we are so looking forward to having six months off together as a family. My husband will be able to bond with the baby and be the supportive father to our toddler, with no mental pressure to have to be doing something else. It's going to be so different!
We know we are the outliers – none of our friends have done this or seem inclined to. A big part is the women still want 12 months and worry that they have to go back early if they share the time. The men also maybe haven't understood all their rights.
I will be taking 12 months, but it is a matter of juggling workplace policies and is not very easy to navigate. I just wanted to share that this is possible. You can have it all. You can take 12 months as the woman, and you can have your partner with you for longer than two weeks. And it could be wonderful for you both.Leila FroudBath
• I'm so very sorry to hear that fathers are finding it unattractive to take two weeks of paternity leave when compensated at the statutory £187.18 a week. Do let me remind you that this is the same country which pays a woman a mere £6.38 an hour (six weeks of pay at 90% of her salary, which on average in the UK is roughly £700 a week, plus 33 weeks of maternity pay at that princely £187.18/week), half of the national minimum wage, for giving up her career for 39 weeks to instead work at delivering and nurturing a future taxpayer.
This is not to mention the physical and emotional cost of working 'as normal' through the previous 40 weeks of her pregnancy, the soft impact on her career of taking nine months of leave, and the financial cost to the family of putting that child into nursery at eight or nine months old so the mother can return to her £700-a-week job. And this is before we factor in the weeks of unpaid leave or holiday she will take to cover illnesses, and the impact on her career of needing the flexibility to work around inflexible nursery hours.
Perhaps if we paid women properly for their labour, men would find it easier to sacrifice their full earnings for two short weeks in order to become more fully engaged parents.Alison SmithLondon
• I read your article on the proposed 'dad strike' regarding the pathetic paternity entitlement in the UK while visiting my son, partner and kids in Oslo (British men urged to join 'Dad strike' calling for more paternity leave, 1 May). My son is on four months' paid paternity leave and his partner has recently returned to work after eight months' paid maternity leave. Yes, let me repeat, four months, paid.
On taking one of my grandchildren to the barnehage (nursery), I am struck by the number of young men having responsibility for their young kids. This is how it should be. It's really wonderful and it also enables many women to work full time.
The Labour government is clearly unpopular, as confirmed by the local elections, and a second term is unlikely unless a radical change of direction occurs. This should include significant improvements in paternity rights.Jol MiskinSheffield
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
8 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Air India Crash: Former Gujarat CM Vijay Rupani, 52 British nationals among passengers on board AI171
By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 12, 2025, 15:23 IST A tragic new layer has emerged in the Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner crash that occurred shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport on June 12, 2025. According to passenger manifest reports, former Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani was among those on board the ill-fated flight AI171, which was en route to London Gatwick. TV9 Gujarati first reported Rupani's name appearing in the official passenger list, raising grave concerns about his safety. However, no official confirmation has been issued yet regarding his status. In another critical development, sources have confirmed that 52 British nationals were also on board the aircraft. The flight was carrying 242 individuals in total, including two pilots and ten cabin crew members. The aircraft gave a MAYDAY signal shortly after takeoff at 1:39 PM IST before crashing outside the airport perimeter in the Meghani Nagar locality. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) stated that the aircraft was under the command of Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, a veteran pilot with over 8,200 flying hours, assisted by First Officer Clive Kundar, who had 1,100 hours of experience. The crash has prompted an immediate suspension of operations at Ahmedabad Airport. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has asked Home Minister Amit Shah and Civil Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu to rush to the site and coordinate emergency responses. With black smoke engulfing the crash site and rescue operations ongoing, authorities are yet to confirm the total number of survivors. The passenger list, now circulating in media circles, is under official verification. Further updates are expected from Air India and the Ministry of Civil Aviation as investigations continue. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Russian War Losses Pass Grim 1-Million Milestone
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russian casualties fighting against Ukraine have surpassed 1 million, according to Kyiv's military, as ceasefire negotiations yield little progress and Moscow ramps up its summer offensive. Why It Matters Moscow is known for what have been dubbed "meat assaults," or using waves of many soldiers—often lacking sufficient training or adequate equipment—to attack Ukrainian positions. Casualty counts, as reported by Kyiv, have typically spiked during prolonged attacks on fortified Ukrainian positions, such as on the Donetsk cities of Bakhmut and Avdiivka. What To Know Moscow has sustained 1,000,340 casualties since the Kremlin launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Kyiv's General Staff said on Thursday. One million Russian soldiers being killed or injured is a "stunning and grisly milestone," the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) said earlier this month The figures from Ukraine's General Staff are very difficult to independently verify, but statistics published by Kyiv are frequently cited by Western officials. The British government put Russia's likely total casualty count since February 2022 at 920,000 back in April. Experts caution that enemy casualty counts published by each side during a conflict are typically inflated. Ukraine does not disclose its own casualties. "Even if you're on the ground, it's very difficult for you to count casualties," said Marina Miron, a postdoctoral researcher with the War Studies Department at King's College London. A weapon of psychological warfare for both sides, tallies of those killed or injured don't take into account the missing, Miron told Newsweek. Newsweek has reached out to the Russian Defense Ministry for comment via email. Composite image of a shrine to a fallen soldier and Russian President Vladimir Putin bowing his head in front of a wreath held by soldiers. Composite image of a shrine to a fallen soldier and Russian President Vladimir Putin bowing his head in front of a wreath held by soldiers. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty Independent Russian outlet Mediazona and the BBC's Russian service, which jointly compile a list of named deceased soldiers, said a confirmed figure of 1,762 troops had been killed between May 23 and June 6, bringing the total tally of Russian fighters known to have died in the war to 111,387. The true tally will be far higher, the outlets note, as many deaths in combat are not made public. Russia controls roughly a fifth of Ukraine, and has intensified its attacks in the country's east, as well as close to the northeastern city of Sumy in recent weeks. Moscow has said its troops reached the western border of Ukraine's battered Donetsk region, and have started an "offensive" in neighboring Dnipropetrovsk. The Kremlin said on Monday it was attempting to carve out a "buffer zone." Western and Ukrainian analysts said Russia has advanced close to the village of Horikhove, roughly a mile from the Dnipropetrovsk border. Moscow has claimed to have annexed Donetsk and Luhansk—two regions collectively known as the Donbas—along with the southern Zaporizhzhia and Kherson oblasts of Ukraine. The Kremlin has controlled Crimea, the peninsula to the south of mainland Ukraine, since it seized the territory from Kyiv in 2014. Dnipropetrovsk has not been annexed by Russian decree. Andriy Kovalenko, an official with Ukraine's National Security and Defense Council, said on Monday that Russia's statements about a Dnipropetrovsk offensive were "not true." He later said on Wednesday Moscow's military had "tried to send attack aircraft" to the Dnipropetrovsk border, which he claimed were "destroyed." Advances in Donetsk, Luhansk, the northeastern Kharkiv region and elsewhere across Ukraine have come at an eye-watering cost for Russia. Moscow has seized a "paltry" 5,000 square kilometers (almost 2,000 square miles) of the country since January 2024, equivalent to about 1 percent of Ukraine, according to the CSIS think tank. Russia initially swept up 120,000 square kilometers of Ukrainian territory in the first five weeks of its invasion, the think tank said. The CSIS put the number of Russian soldiers killed in the invasion at up to 250,000, a demonstration of what it called Russian President Vladimir Putin's "blatant disregard for his soldiers." The Kremlin leader is "afraid that sooner or later someone in Russia might start asking questions like: '[In the name of what he had sacrificed a million or more people?'" said Oleksandr Merezhko, the chair of Ukraine's parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee. "This fear is one of the reasons why he is doubling down on his aggressive war efforts," Merezhko told Newsweek. Russian fatalities in Ukraine since its tanks rolled into the country in February 2022 are 15 times higher than the losses the Soviet Union sustained in Afghanistan, and 10 times those of the brutal conflict in Chechnya, the CSIS said. "For Russia, the end justifies the means," an anonymous former Russian defense official told The Guardian newspaper in October. "Before the war, such casualties would have seemed unimaginable," they added. "Now, it appears that the generals hardly care as long as they meet Putin's demands." Kyiv said Moscow sustained more than 628,000 of the million reported casualties in the past year and a half. Throughout 2022, just over 106,000 people were killed or injured—equivalent to 340 people on average each day, the general staff said. This more than doubled in 2023 to 693 daily casualties on average, the military said. In 2024, it surged to an average of 1,177 people per day. Figures from Ukraine's authorities for the first half of 2025 put the average number of daily Russian casualties at 1,286. The number of Russian soldiers killed or wounded on the battlefield in 2025 had exceeded 200,000 by the start of June, the Ukrainian military said. U.K. intelligence assessed in mid-April Russia that had sustained roughly 138,000 casualties fighting Ukraine up until that point in 2025. On several occasions in late 2024, Ukraine said Russia had suffered more than 2,000 casualties in the space of 24 hours. At the start of that year, Moscow seized the Ukrainian stronghold of Avdiivka, then setting its sights on the Donetsk cities of Pokrovsk and Toretsk and slowing inching westward. Russia also battled a Ukrainian incursion into the Russian Kursk region from August 2024 until March 2025. What People Are Saying Regarding the difference between the BBC and Independent Russian outlet Mediazona's tally of 111,387 confirmed Russian deaths in Ukraine over the course of the war and the far higher unconfirmed figure, Emily Ferris, a senior research fellow with the Royal United Services Institute, an influential British defense think tank, told Newsweek: "Either way, it's a significant chunk of the male population. There's no denying it." What Happens Next Analysts say Russia will likely be able to continue its war effort against Ukraine, with has a much smaller pool of possible recruits, despite the purported casualty figures. The Russian government has offered attractive salaries for contract soldiers, and has two rounds of military conscription each year, said Ferris. But it will want to avoid another mobilization, which previously proved deeply unpopular, Ferris added. Moscow declared a partial mobilization of 300,000 reservists in September 2022.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump to enact key parts of US-UK trade deal within days
Donald Trump is poised to sign off crucial parts of the US-UK trade deal that will deliver lower tariffs for British car exports to America Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
