What does cultural resistance look like in Canada?
There was a clear shift north of the border when U.S. President Donald Trump began to talk about his plan to levy tariffs on Canada.
To start, politicians at all levels of government urged citizens to buy local, and buy Canadian. Then, fans began booing the American anthem at hockey and basketball games. Now, there's another front to this brewing culture war: the music, movies, and TV we choose to consume.
Today on Commotion, author and arts leader Jesse Wente joins host Elamin Abdelmahmoud to discuss how, in this current moment of U.S. politics, Canadians can think about the pillars of our national cultural identity.
WATCH | Today's episode on YouTube:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
40 minutes ago
- CTV News
Elon Musk backs off from feud with Trump, saying he regrets social media posts that ‘went too far'
U.S. President Donald Trump, right, speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci]) Elon Musk stepped back from his explosive feud with U.S. President Donald Trump, writing on X that he regrets some of his posts about his onetime ally and that they went 'too far.' Early Wednesday morning, he posted 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.' Musk's break with a president whom he spent hundreds of millions of dollars to elect appeared to put an end to his influence in the White House and prompted concerns about effects on his companies. As a major government contractor, Musk's businesses could be particularly vulnerable to retribution, and Trump has already threatened to cut Musk's contracts. Musk earlier deleted a post in which he claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the president's association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Meanwhile, other posts that irritated Trump, including ones in which Musk called the spending bill an 'abomination' and claimed credit for Trump's election victory, remained live. On Sunday, Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker that he has no desire to repair their relationship and warned that Musk could face ' serious consequences ' if he tries to help Democrats in upcoming elections. The Associated Press
National Observer
40 minutes ago
- National Observer
If Carney wants to build, he should go big on a Youth Climate Corps
When our delegation of Youth Climate Corps (YCC) organizers met Mark Carney outside the Liberal caucus retreat in Nanaimo in 2024, Canada was a different place. To remind the Liberal Party of their promise made in the 2024 federal budget to hold consultations on a YCC, we staged a lemonade stand to 'raise' the $1 billion needed for a Canada-wide program to put thousands of young people to work confronting the climate emergency — the defining crisis of our lives. This fun stunt gained the attention of Carney — then just an economic advisor to the Liberals — and Members of Parliament, who reassured us a YCC would be established. We couldn't have predicted the political whirlwind that would follow just months later, resulting in former prime minister Justin Trudeau's resignation and Mark Carney's election to the position. Though the Liberals won, the results of the federal election show a persistent disconnect between the governing party and young Canadians. In a rightward shift among youth, the Conservatives won the student vote. If the Liberals want to earn back the trust of young people, they must make a compelling and inspiring offer, and the Youth Climate Corps represents just that, but only if it is a genuinely bold invitation. The crises we face call for more than a precarious pilot program After years of youth advocacy, the YCC was finally featured on most major party platforms: the New Democrats, Greens, and re-elected Liberals. This win is a testament to the dedicated and inspiring advocacy of Canadian youth across the country. But the 'pilot' program proposed by the Liberals is far too modest, and sends mixed signals about whether they truly understand the severity of the crises we face. As the Liberal platform states, 'Building Canada strong starts with our workers.' We agree. That's why they must scale up their inadequate promise and create the ambitious and visionary climate corps that Canada desperately needs. The YCC pilot envisioned in the Liberal platform is too small and susceptible to dismantling by future governments. Some conservative pundits have been calling for the 'Muskification' of Canada, advocating for our very own Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). To combat MAGA-style politics from entering Canada, an innovative and courageous program, like the YCC, must be protected and built right from the beginning, with human rights and Indigenous leadership at its core. If the Liberals want to earn back the trust of young people, they must make a compelling and inspiring offer, and the Youth Climate Corps represents just that, write Bushra Asghar, Erin Blondeau, Lea Mary Movelle and Juan Vargas Alba Late in his term, President Joe Biden launched an American Climate Corps, only to have President Trump terminate it as soon as he took office. We can't repeat the same mistakes as the United States. How a Youth Climate Corps would work The YCC should offer well-paid jobs and training for people 35 and under, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, building renewable energy, restoring ecosystems, and responding to climate disasters. The program would offer positions which include but are not limited to work, such as building retrofits, green construction, conservation, strengthening local food systems and supporting municipalities in developing and implementing their climate action plans. It would create accessible, barrier-free opportunities for young people, prioritizing underserved, undervalued and under-resourced communities. Young people would be empowered to enter the workforce with living wages and union representation, combatting the distressing rise in the youth unemployment rate. Indigenous sovereignty, rights and leadership would guide the way. But for a program like this to work, it needs to be big. If built right and in adherence to our campaign principles, the YCC would create at least 20,000 jobs across Canada in the first year, and grow with demand each year thereafter. If Carney wants to 'build, baby build,' then we need a well-trained and prepared workforce to get the job done. Polling shows the majority of Canadians across every demographic support the idea of a YCC, and 15 per cent of people under 35 are excited and ready to enlist immediately. The Liberal Party must reckon with the reality that young men are turning to the political right after feeling abandoned by the Liberals, yet a huge majority of young men are excited about the idea of a YCC. To Prime Minister Mark Carney: You have expressed your ambition to 'build things we've never imagined, at a speed we've never seen.' Now is your opportunity to establish a transformative, large-scale Youth Climate Corps, and watch as we strengthen this nation without leaving anyone behind. Erin Blondeau is the communications director at the Climate Emergency Unit, an independent journalist and a human rights and climate justice organizer. Bushra Asghar is the co-director of the national Youth Climate Corps campaign and a human rights and climate justice organizer.
Ottawa Citizen
an hour ago
- Ottawa Citizen
MacDonald: Canada must stop neglecting its spy agencies if it wants better defence
Article content Prime Minister Mark Carney has pledged to meet Canada's NATO obligation to invest two per cent of GDP in defence by the end of the year. But at a time of growing political instability, it's important to remember that soldiers are not the only ones protecting Canada. Article content Working in the shadows, Canada has a civilian army of more than 6,400 intelligence practitioners in the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and the Canadian Security Establishment (CSE) — both with headquarters in Ottawa, where most of their staff are — working around the clock to keep us safe. Unfortunately, according to a Public Safety Canada survey in 2021, 54 per cent of Canadians don't know what they do. Also, despite the vital role they play in Canada's defence, their budgets are not included in NATO's calculation of Canada's defence spending. Article content Article content Article content There are some important reasons for that, but it comes at a cost. Article content For one, it can create a political disincentive to invest in domestic intelligence — although, for Canada, that's nothing new. Of the countries that form the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing network, only New Zealand spends less than Canada on its intelligence agencies. Australia, meanwhile, with two-thirds the population, spends 22 per cent more ($2.2 billion Cdn) than Canada ($1.8 billion). Article content All this is dwarfed by the United States, of course, which had a budget of $104 billion Cdn for civilian intelligence in 2024. Article content Canada can't hope to come anywhere close to that anytime soon, but neither should it be complacent. Article content The fact is, with President Donald Trump's threats to annex Canada, tariffs, foreign interference, rampant disinformation and misinformation, and growing political unrest, the military isn't enough. Canada needs intelligence specialists who can effectively monitor and disrupt threats of all kinds, at home and abroad, wherever they come from, before they become headlines. Article content Article content There's a practical reason NATO doesn't include civilian intelligence spending in its calculation of a country's defence spending, of course: the classified nature of the spending makes it hard to standardize across countries. Article content Article content But this technical barrier can have real strategic consequences, unintentionally discouraging critical investments in non-military intelligence capabilities and even contributing to a lack of public awareness, respect and understanding for the work intelligence agencies do. Article content In countries such as Canada that are under political pressure to meet NATO's two-per-cent GDP defence spending target (Canada hasn't spent two-per-cent of GDP on defence since 1988), the problem is compounded. If Canada is already struggling to meet the target, why spend money on intelligence that doesn't count, when the military is underfunded too?
