logo
14-1: US vetoes UN Security Council's Gaza ceasefire resolution as crisis deepens

14-1: US vetoes UN Security Council's Gaza ceasefire resolution as crisis deepens

India Todaya day ago

The United States on Wednesday cast the lone vote against a United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolution demanding an 'immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire' in Gaza, blocking the measure as the humanitarian crisis deepens in the war-torn enclave.The draft resolution, which also called for unrestricted humanitarian aid access across Gaza, received support from the other 14 members of the council, a striking show of global consensus. But the US, wielding its veto power, halted its passage.advertisement"The United States has been clear: We would not support any measure that fails to condemn Hamas and does not call for Hamas to disarm and leave Gaza," Acting US Ambassador to the UN Dorothy Shea told the council before the vote, arguing that it would also undermine US-led efforts to broker a ceasefire.
The veto underscores Washington's steadfast support for Israel, its closest ally and largest military aid recipient in the Middle East, even as pressure mounts internationally to halt the war.The Security Council vote came as Israel pushes ahead with an offensive in Gaza after ending a two-month truce in March. Gaza health authorities said Israeli strikes killed 45 people on Wednesday, while Israel said a soldier died in fighting.More than 2 million people remain trapped in the densely populated strip, with famine looming and essential supplies critically low — despite Israel lifting an 11-week blockade last month.advertisement'We want peace, but peace cannot mean letting Hamas regroup and rearm,' Shea said. 'This resolution did not meet that threshold.'Israel has rejected calls for an unconditional or permanent ceasefire, saying Hamas cannot stay in Gaza. Israel's UN Ambassador Danny Danon told the council members who voted in favor of the draft: "You chose appeasement and submission. You chose a road that does not lead to peace. Only to more terror."Hamas condemned the US veto, describing it as showing "the US administration's blind bias" towards Israel.The draft Security Council resolution had also demanded the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and others.Trending Reel

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lebanese army warns Israeli airstrikes might force it to freeze cooperation with ceasefire committee
Lebanese army warns Israeli airstrikes might force it to freeze cooperation with ceasefire committee

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Lebanese army warns Israeli airstrikes might force it to freeze cooperation with ceasefire committee

The Lebanese army condemned Friday Israel's airstrikes on suburbs of Beirut, warning that such attacks are weakening the role of Lebanon's armed forces that might eventually suspend cooperation with the committee monitoring the truce that ended the Israel-Hezbollah war. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The army statement came hours after the Israeli military struck several buildings in Beirut's southern suburbs that it said held underground facilities used by for drone production. The strikes, preceded by an Israeli warning to evacuate several buildings, came on the eve of Eid al-Adha, a Muslim holiday. The Lebanese army said it started coordinating with the committee observing the ceasefire after Israel's military issued its warning and sent patrols to the areas that were to be struck to search them. It added that Israel rejected the suggestion. The US-led committee that has been supervising the ceasefire that ended the 14-month Israel-Hezbollah war in November is made up of Lebanon, Israel, France, the US and the UN peacekeeping forces in Lebanon known as UNIFIL. "The Israeli enemy violations of the deal and its refusal to respond to the committee is weakening the role of the committee and the army," the Lebanese army said in its statement. It added such attacks by Israel could lead the army to freeze its cooperation with the committee "when it comes to searching posts." Since the Israel-Hezbollah war ended, Israel has carried out nearly daily airstrikes on parts of Lebanon targeting Hezbollah operatives. Beirut's southern suburbs were struck on several occasions since then. The conflict between Hezbollah and Israel began on Oct. 8, 2023, when the Lebanese militant group began launching rockets across the border in support of its ally, Hamas, in Gaza. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Israel responded with airstrikes and shelling and the two were quickly locked in a low-level conflict that continued for nearly a year before escalating into full-scale war in September 2024. It killed more than 4,000 people in Lebanon, including hundreds of civilians, while the Lebanese government said in April that Israeli strikes had killed another 190 people and wounded 485 since the ceasefire agreement. There has been increasing pressure on Hezbollah, both domestic and international, to give up its remaining arsenal, but officials with the group have said they will not do so until Israel stops its airstrikes and withdraws from five points it is still occupying along the border in southern Lebanon. Hezbollah says that it has ended its military presence along the border with Israel south of the Litani River, in accordance with terms of the ceasefire deal.

Trump Travel Ban Explained: Which Countries Are Most Impacted And Why
Trump Travel Ban Explained: Which Countries Are Most Impacted And Why

NDTV

time44 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Trump Travel Ban Explained: Which Countries Are Most Impacted And Why

New Delhi: US President Donald Trump has imposed a ban on citizens from 12 countries, along with entry restrictions on nationals from seven other nations, citing national security and immigration enforcement concerns. The US President signed the executive order on June 4, nearly five months after taking office for the second term, and it will come into effect on June 9. List of banned countries The travel ban has been divided into two categories: a complete ban and a partial ban. Trump has imposed a full entry ban on 12 countries - Afghanistan, Myanmar, the Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Iran, Libya, Sudan, Yemen, Eritrea, and Somalia. The complete travel ban means the citizens of the aforementioned countries cannot enter the US at all irrespective of the reason and purpose. He said that these countries don't respect US immigration rules. Most countries on the list denied taking their citizens back and most of the people from here overstayed their visas, he said. The partial ban means people having certain types of visas, such as immigrant visas, B-1 business visas, B-2 tourism visas, combined business and tourism visas, F student visas, M vocational training visas, and J exchange visitor visas, are barred from entering the US. Only people holding H-1B work visas are allowed to enter the US. Partial restrictions apply to seven countries - Burundi, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, Cuba, and Venezuela. Who is exempt from the ban? There are several people exempt from the ban. Those are: 1. Green card holders and legal permanent residents. 2. People having dual citizenship, one of the US and another of the banned countries. 3. Athletes, coaches and teams travelling for a global sporting event such as the World Cup or the Olympics. 4. Iranians from an ethnic or religious minority fleeing prosecution. 5. Foreign nationals who have worked for the US government for at least 15 years, along with their families and children. 6. Those who were admitted to the US as refugees or granted asylum prior to the ban's implementation. 7. People with US family members who apply for visas in connection to their spouses, children or parents. 8. Foreign officials and diplomats on official visits. 9. Those who are just visiting the UN headquarters in New York for business purposes. 10. Official trips to the US by representatives of NATO and international organizations. 11. Afghans with Afghan special immigrant visas who were employed by the US or its allies in Afghanistan. Does it impact you? If you're from one of the countries on the list New visas are not valid for entry into the US from the 12 nations that are completely banned. The seven partially restricted nations may not be able to provide some visas, such as green cards and immigrant visas. Athletes, diplomats, dual citizens, green card holders, and refugees admitted prior to June 9, 2025, may be eligible for exemptions. If you're in the US already Existing visas are acknowledged and holders of valid green cards or visas are safe. If you intend to work or travel Applications from the 12 nations that are completely prohibited will not be accepted. People from the seven nations that are partially banned can experience delays or specific limitations.

Iranians react to new Trump travel ban as tensions are high between nations
Iranians react to new Trump travel ban as tensions are high between nations

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Iranians react to new Trump travel ban as tensions are high between nations

People walk past a state-sponsored anti-US mural painted on the wall of the former US Embassy in Tehran (Image credit: AP) Iranians again face a US travel ban imposed by President Donald Trump , with the decision drawing anger, frustration and some shrugs given the decades of tensions between the countries. Trump imposed a similar ban during his first term before withdrawing America unilaterally from Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, under which Iran drastically limited its program in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. But when he returned to the White House and began seeking a new deal with Iran, it saw the country's rial currency improve and stocks rise, but worries have grown as its government appears poised to reject an initial American proposal. The travel ban has further darkened that mood and led Iranians to fear Trump will lump the nations' 80 million people alongside of its theocratic government even after he's repeatedly praised them while seeking a deal. "Now I understand that Trump is against all Iranians, and his attitude is not limited to the government," said Asghar Nejati, a 31-year-old man working in a Tehran pharmacy. Even in the years after the 1979 Islamic Revolution and subsequent US Embassy hostage crisis, Iranian students traveled to the US to attend universities. Between 2018 to 2024, an average of around 10,000 Iranian students went to the US annually. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo Estimates suggest some 1 million Iranian-origin people live in the US today. Mehrnoush Alipour, a 37-year-old graphic designer, said the nations could have better relations if they could spoke to each other in softer tones. "This is another foolish decision. Trump cannot reach his goals by imposing pressures on ordinary Iranians," she said. "The two nations can have better relation through openings, not restrictions." Bank teller Mahdieh Naderi said Trump was lashing out over his frustrationed efforts to reach ceasefires in the Israel-Hamas war and the Russia-Ukraine war. "Trump just expressed his anger about his failed plans," Naderi said. "He is complaining about the Chinese and others who are living in the US, too." Some said interest in the US was already waning before the latest ban. "Over the past years, two of my grandchildren went to Canada to continue their education there," said Mohammad Ali Niaraki, 75. "Iranians are not limited in immigration and they are not as interested to go to the US as they were decades ago. Iranians prefer Canada, as well as neighbouring countries with flourishing economies like the (United Arab) Emirates." But others pointed out that high-ranking government officials have children living or working in the US, despite the tensions. "It's fine, but if he also kicks out the children of officials who live there it would be very nice," said a man who just gave his name as Mehdi. "We can't afford traveling to the US, almost 80 per cent of us can't. But if he kicks out those who are already there it would be much better." Tehran resident Mehri Soltani offered rare support for Trump's decision. "Those who have family members in the US, it's their right to go, but a bunch of bad people and terrorists and murderers want to go there as well," he said. "So his policy is correct. He's doing the right thing."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store