logo
US, allies accuse N Korea, Russia of violating UN sanctions in arms deals

US, allies accuse N Korea, Russia of violating UN sanctions in arms deals

The United States and 10 allies on Thursday said the military cooperation between Russia and North Korea flagrantly violates UN sanctions and has helped Moscow increase its missile strikes on Ukrainian cities.
They made the accusations in their first report since joining forces to monitor sanctions against North Korea after Russia vetoed a resolution in March 2024 to continue the monitoring by a UN Security Council panel of experts.
It had been issuing reports of Pyongyang's sanctions violations since 2010.
The 29-page report produced by the Multilateral Sanctions Monitoring Team -- comprising the US, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, South Korea and the United Kingdom -- said the evidence it gathered demonstrates that North Korea and Russia have engaged in myriad unlawful activities explicitly prohibited by UN sanctions resolutions.
It said North Korea has transferred arms and related materiel by sea, air and rail, including artillery, ballistic missiles and combat vehicles, for Russia's use in the war in Ukraine.
Russia has transferred air defence systems to North Korea, and its forces trained the North's troops deployed to support Russia's war, the team said.
And Moscow also has supplied refined petroleum products to Pyongyang in far excess of the yearly cap under UN sanctions, and has maintained corresponding banking relations with the North in violation of sanctions.
The 11 countries said this unlawful cooperation has contributed to Moscow's ability to increase its missile attacks against Ukrainian cities including targeted strikes against critical civilian infrastructure".
The cooperation has also provided resources for North Korea to fund its military and banned ballistic missile programmes, and it allowed the more than 11,000 troops Pyongyang has deployed to Russia since October 2024 to gain first-hand military experience, the team said.
There was no immediate response from the Russian Mission to the United Nations to a request for comment on the report.
The report covers the period between January 1, 2024, and April 30, 2025, and points to evidence that Russia and North Korea intend to further deepen their military cooperation for at least the foreseeable future.
It cites an unnamed country in the team reporting that Russian-flagged cargo vessels delivered as many as 9 million rounds of ammunition for artillery and multiple rocket launchers from North Korea to Russia in 2024.
The report includes images of containers, which the team says were from North Korean and Russian ports, and an ammunition dump in Russia.
Citing an unnamed team member, the report says North Korea last year transferred at least 100 ballistic missiles to Russia, which were launched into Ukraine to destroy civilian infrastructure and terrorize populated areas such as Kyiv and Zaporizhzhia".
It also transferred elements of three brigade sets of heavy artillery", the report said.
It includes images of a North Korean 170 mm self-propelled gun that it said was being transported through Russia, and North Korean multiple rocket launcher ammunition and an anti-tank missile it said were found in Ukraine.
The team said in a joint statement that it will continue to monitor implementation of UN resolutions and raise awareness of ongoing attempts to violate and evade UN sanctions".
It urged North Korea to engage in meaningful diplomacy".
The Security Council imposed sanctions after North Korea's first nuclear test explosion in 2006 and tightened them over the years in a total of 10 resolutions seeking -- so far unsuccessfully -- to cut funds and curb its nuclear and ballistic missile programmes.
The last sanctions resolution was adopted by the council in December 2017.
China and Russia vetoed a US-sponsored resolution in May 2022 that would have imposed new sanctions over a spate of intercontinental ballistic missile launches, and have blocked all other UN action against North Korea.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shashi Tharoor's loyalty keeps colliding with Congress scepticism—while his global stature grows
Shashi Tharoor's loyalty keeps colliding with Congress scepticism—while his global stature grows

The Print

time35 minutes ago

  • The Print

Shashi Tharoor's loyalty keeps colliding with Congress scepticism—while his global stature grows

India did eventually nominate him, albeit after a delay, for the position in mid-2006. Tharoor lost to Ban Ki-moon of South Korea, whose government mounted an aggressive campaign for its candidate. It was, however, the United States that emerged as the biggest stumbling block to Tharoor's candidacy. Having served in various capacities at the UN since 1978, Tharoor felt that his 'entire working life had seemed like a preparation' for the organisation's top post. Yet, he had no reason to believe that New Delhi was ready to back such a bid on his behalf, at least not at the time. New Delhi: 'Would you be interested in contesting for the post of (UN) Secretary-General?' It's a question that then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh asked Shashi Tharoor in New York in 2005. Tharoor, who was serving as the United Nations Under-Secretary-General, would later admit that Singh's question caught him a little off guard. 'Three factors—the bilateral relationship with Korea, a perception of a lack of conviction on India's part, and the Bush Administration's desire not to repeat the Kofi Annan experiment of a 'strong' Secretary-General—combined to ensure the US veto that scuttled my candidacy,' he wrote in Open magazine in 2016. Two decades later, in a classic twist of irony, Tharoor finds himself embroiled in a controversy tinged with diplomatic hues. The same Congress party that once championed his bid for the highest seat in global diplomacy is now glum over the Centre naming him as the leader of a multi-party delegation visiting various world capitals on Operation Sindoor. This is why Shashi Tharoor is ThePrint's Newsmaker of the Week. Also read: Shashi Tharoor is hot property for everyone but Rahul Gandhi Shashi Tharoor in Congress—a saga of mistrust His UN battle lost in 2006, Tharoor started spending more time in India and found a home in the Congress party, which offered him the post of Minister of State for External Affairs after his first Lok Sabha victory from Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, in the 2009 general elections. Tharoor continues to retain the seat, winning four elections on the trot. In 2015, Tharoor claimed that when he was still considering his options after the UN stint, he had also received offers to join the BJP and the Left. But he chose the Congress because, as he explained in 2009, 'I have nothing economically in common with the ideology of the Left and Communist parties. Those who have followed my writing for years know that I have nothing in common with the communalism that has been unfortunately encouraged by people associated with the Bharatiya Janata Party… and that basically means the Congress party.' Nevertheless, Tharoor's loyalty to the Congress has remained suspect in the eyes of a section of party leaders from the beginning. His words of praise for Narendra Modi just days after the Congress' drubbing in the 2014 general elections marked the beginning of a series of statements over the last decade that cemented this perception. In a HuffPost article, Tharoor wrote that just as Modi 'remade himself from a hate-figure into an avatar of modernity and progress, he is seeking to remake the BJP from a vehicle of Hindu chauvinism to a natural party of governance.' He continued: 'For an opposition member of Parliament like myself, it would be churlish not to acknowledge Modi 2.0's inclusive outreach and to welcome his more conciliatory statements and actions. The moment he says or does something divisive or sectarian in the Modi 1.0 mould, however, we will resist him robustly. India's people, and its pluralist democracy, deserve no less.' Following criticism from his party colleagues, Tharoor reaffirmed his commitment to the Congress and the principles of secularism in a letter to the party's communication department. 'By praising him (Modi) for specific things, we help frame public expectation of his continued behaviour and raise the bar against which we will judge him in future,' he wrote. However, it did little to dispel the growing perception of Tharoor as a misfit within the Congress. As Congress general secretary (communications) Jairam Ramesh told a press huddle last month, 'Congress mein hona aur Congress ka hona mein zameen aasman ka antar hai' (There is a major difference between being in the Congress and being of the Congress). At the same time, the Congress leadership agrees that any disciplinary action against Tharoor will likely backfire. 'His popular appeal, especially in urban India, is not lost on the party,' a senior Congress leader told ThePrint when asked whether the party was considering action against Tharoor. His standing has also risen at a time when Kerala, his home state, is heading to the polls in less than a year. Also read: Shashi Tharoor has always disliked 'statist Congress'. He's ridiculed Indira, Sanjay, Sonia Tharoor's remarks—fact-checked by Congress As it is, a section of the party close to the Congress high command was miffed with Tharoor for accepting the Centre's invitation to lead a multi-party delegation on Operation Sindoor without first seeking the leadership's concurrence. His public statements during the trip have only deepened the rift. On 29 May, addressing a gathering of the Indian community in Panama, Tharoor said that in 2016 'for the first time, India breached the Line of Control between India and Pakistan to conduct a surgical strike on a terror base.' 'Even during the Kargil War, we had not crossed the LoC; in Uri we did. Then came the attack in Pulwama…this time we crossed not only the LoC but [also] the international border and we struck terrorist headquarters in Balakot.' 'And let me say to you that this is going to be the new normal. The PM has made it very clear that Operation Sindoor was necessary because these terrorists came and wiped the sindoor off the foreheads of 26 women,' he said. These remarks riled up the Congress leadership so much so that it endorsed statements by party functionary Udit Raj, known for his controversial remarks, that Tharoor should consider becoming a BJP spokesperson. Tharoor hit back, dismissing such critics as 'zealots' and 'trolls'. Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera, considered close to Rahul Gandhi, promptly produced excerpts from Tharoor's own book to highlight the contradiction in his position. In his 2018 book The Paradoxical Prime Minister, Tharoor had pointed out that the Congress, while in the government, had authorised many cross-border surgical strikes, but did not exploit them politically—an assertion that countered his statement that India under Modi crossed the LoC 'for the first time' in 2016. 'The shameless exploitation of the 2016 'surgical strikes' along the Line of Control with Pakistan, and of a military raid in hot pursuit of rebels in Myanmar, as a party election tool — something the Congress had never done despite having authorized several such strikes earlier — marked a particularly disgraceful dilution of the principle that national security issues require both discretion and non-partisanship,' Tharoor wrote in the book. Currently in Colombia, Tharoor is yet to respond to Khera. However, a tweet made by him in 2018 to introduce his book remains instructive. 'My new book, THE PARADOXICAL PRIME MINISTER, is more than just a 400-page exercise in floccinaucinihilipilification,' Tharoor had posted, emphasising that the book was more than just a critique of the prime minister. Perhaps Khera should take note. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)

All-party delegations show India's unified stance against terrorism worldwide: A look at top 10 developments
All-party delegations show India's unified stance against terrorism worldwide: A look at top 10 developments

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

All-party delegations show India's unified stance against terrorism worldwide: A look at top 10 developments

The seven delegations from India are on a visit to key partner countries, comprising members of the UN Security Council, to showcase 'India's national consensus' and firm approach to combating terrorism in all forms, stating a strong message of zero-tolerance against terrorism after Operation Sindoor which launched in Pakistan, PoJK on May 7. MPs like Shashi Tharoor, INC, Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad, BJP, Shri Sanjay Kumar Jha, JDU, Shri Baijayant Panda, BJP, Kanimozhi Karunanidhi, DMK, Supriya Sule, NCP, Shrikant Eknath Shinde, Shiv Sena are leading the seven delegations. On Thursday, all party delegations met with global leaders and nearly two dozen ambassadors, who unanimously condemned terrorism in all its forms and emphasised the urgent need for united international efforts to combat this threat. Colombia has formally retracted its earlier statement that expressed condolences to Pakistan following India's Operation Sindoor. 'I expressed India's concerns regarding Colombia's May 8 statement. The Minister assured us of its withdrawal and reaffirmed support for our position. The Vice Minister graciously confirmed that the statement we had raised concerns about has been withdrawn. She also conveyed that Colombia fully understands India's position, which we deeply appreciate," Tharoor stated. 2. BJP MP Baijayant Jay Panda says, 'Taking forward India's zero-tolerance approach to terrorism & strengthening India-Algeria ties. We began engagements in Algeria with a detailed briefing by Ambassador Dr. Swati V. Kulkarni, covering the strong India-Algeria relationship, shared concerns on terrorism, and the global message of #OperationSindoor. #IndiaAgainstTerror.' 3. MP Kanimozhi, leading an all-party delegation to Latvia on Friday (local time), highlighted India's unity in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack, declaring that 'nothing is going to divide us anymore', ANI reported. 4. Sierra Leone was the first country whose parliament held a moment of silence to honour the victims of the recent Pahalgam terror attack, Shiv Sena MP Shrikant shared. He said, 'Wherever we go, people condemn that attack and the perpetrators. Sierra Leone is the first country where the parliament observed a moment of silence for those who lost their lives (in the Pahalgam terror attack).' 5. On Friday (local time), Prasad responded to Pakistani nationals who chanted anti-India slogans outside a venue hosting an Indian parliamentary delegation in Copenhagen, stating that they had come out of "desperation" and urged people to "ignore them with impunity." 6. On Saturday, the delegation led by Sule met with former Ethiopian Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn to discuss bilateral cooperation, regional development, and the global fight against terrorism. 7. In Jakarta on Thursday, the delegation led by MP Sanjay Kumar Jha engaged with ambassadors from 20 friendly nations, who unequivocally condemned terrorism in all its forms and stressed the urgent need for a unified global response to combat this threat, PTI reported. 8. In Riyadh on Thursday, the Indian delegation led by MP Panda visited the Naif Arab University for Security Sciences and the Gulf Research Centre think tank to express serious concerns over cross-border terrorism originating from Pakistan. 9. In Rome, the all-party delegation led by BJP MP Prasad met with senior Italian officials to reiterate India's "zero-tolerance" policy towards terrorism and New Delhi's determination to fight all forms of terror. 10. The delegation led by MP Panda concluded a two-day visit to Kuwait focussed on enhancing bilateral relations and reaffirming India's unified stance against terrorism. The Indian representatives emphasised their 'Zero Tolerance' policy and the 'New Normal' approach to counter-terrorism, which makes no distinction between terrorists and those who support them. (With inputs from ANI and PTI)

Trump vowed to remake aid. Is Gaza the future?
Trump vowed to remake aid. Is Gaza the future?

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump vowed to remake aid. Is Gaza the future?

President Donald Trump has slashed US aid and vowed a major rethink on helping the world. A controversial effort to bring food to Gaza may offer clues on what's to come. Administered by contracted US security with Israeli troops at the perimeter, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is distributing food through several hubs in the war-ravaged Gaza Strip. An officially private effort with opaque funding, the GHF began operations on May 26 after Israel completely cut off supplies into Gaza for over two months, sparking warnings of mass famine. The organization said it had distributed 2.1 million meals as of Friday. The initiative excludes the United Nations, which has long coordinated aid distribution in the war-ravaged territory and has infrastructure and systems in place to deliver assistance on a large scale. The UN and other major aid groups have refused to cooperate with GHF, saying it violates basic humanitarian principles, and appears crafted to cater to Israeli military objectives. "What we have seen is chaotic, it's tragic and it's resulted in hundreds of thousands of people scrambling in an incredibly undignified and unsafe way to access a tiny trickle of aid," said Ciaran Donnelly, senior vice president of international programs at the International Rescue Committee . Jan Egeland, head of the Norwegian Refugee Council, said his aid group stopped work in Gaza in 2015 when Hamas militants invaded its office and that it refused to cooperate in Syria when former strongman Bashar al-Assad was pressuring opposition-held areas by withholding food. "Why on earth would we be willing to let the Israeli military decide how, where and to whom we give our aid as part of their military strategy to herd people around Gaza?" said Egeland. "It's a violation of everything we stand for. It is the biggest and reddest line there is that we cannot cross." The UN said that 47 people were injured Tuesday when hungry and desperate crowds rushed a GHF site most of them by Israeli gunfire while a Palestinian medical source said at least one person had died. The Israeli military denied its soldiers fired on civilians and the GHF denied any injuries or deaths. Israel has relentlessly attacked Gaza since Hamas's unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. Israel has vowed to sideline the UN agency for Palestinian refugees UNRWA, accusing it of bias and of harboring Hamas militants. UNRWA said that nine out of thousands of staff may have been involved in the October 7 attack and dismissed them, but accuses Israel of trying to throw a distraction. John Hannah, a former senior US policymaker who led a study last year that gave birth to the concepts behind the GHF, said the UN seemed to be "completely lacking in self-reflection" on the need for a new approach to aid after Hamas built a "terror kingdom." "I fear that people could be on the brink of letting the perfect be the enemy of the good instead of figuring out how do we take part in this effort, improve it, make it better, scale it up," said Hannah, who is not involved in implementing the GHF. Hannah, a senior fellow at the Jewish Institute for National Security of America, defended the use of private contractors, saying that many had extensive Middle East experience from the US-led "war on terror." "We would have been happy if there were volunteers from capable and trusted national forces... but the fact is, nobody's volunteering," he said. He said he would rather that aid workers coordinate with Israel than Hamas. "Inevitably, any humanitarian effort in a war zone has to make some compromises with a ruling authority that carries the guns," he said. Hannah's study had discouraged a major Israeli role in humanitarian work in Gaza, urging instead involvement by Arab states to bring greater legitimacy. Arab states have balked at supporting US efforts as Israel pounds Gaza and after Trump mused about forcibly displacing the whole Gaza population and constructing luxury hotels. Israel and Hamas are negotiating a new Gaza ceasefire that could see a resumption of UN-backed efforts. Aid groups say they have vast amounts of aid ready for Gaza that remain blocked. Donnelly said the IRC had 27 tons of supplies waiting to enter Gaza, faulting the GHF for distributing items like pasta and tinned fish that require cooking supplies not therapeutic food and treatment for malnourished children. He called for distributing relief in communities where people need it, instead of through militarized hubs. "If anyone really cares about distributing aid in a transparent, accountable, effective way, the way to do that is to use the expertise and infrastructure of aid organizations that have been doing this for decades," Donnelly said. sct/nl

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store