
Poll suggests support for better end-of-life care over assisted dying Bill
The polling, commissioned by a group opposed to assisted dying being legalised, 'blows apart the arguments that the public are desperate' for a change in the law, a campaigner claimed.
Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater said last week that MPs should not have to choose between supporting assisted dying or palliative care as it is not an 'either/or' conversation for dying people.
She said palliative care and assisted dying 'can and do work side by side to give terminally-ill patients the care and choice they deserve in their final days', and urged MPs to support 'all options available to terminally ill people'.
An amendment to the Bill, requiring the Health Secretary to publish an assessment of the availability, quality and distribution of palliative and end-of-life care one year after the Bill passing into law, could be voted on on Friday.
Friday is also set to be the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill's third reading stage, which is likely to see the overall Bill voted on for the first time since November's historic yes vote, when a majority of 55 supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales.
The latest polling, commissioned by Care Not Killing and carried out by British Polling Council member Whitestone, saw 2,089 UK adults surveyed online between May 30 and June 1.
Respondents, who are said to have been weighted to be a representative sample, were told of concerns raised by the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Psychiatrists and the Association for Palliative Medicine about the Bill in its current form as well as opposition from disability campaigners.
Campaigners gathered in Parliament Square earlier this month (James Manning/PA)
In this context, they were asked about replacing the Bill with a plan to improve and invest in palliative care – to which 69% agreed, and about a Royal Commission being set up to consider and make recommendations for a holistic end-of-life and palliative care service – with which 61% agreed.
Almost two thirds (65%) said the Government's priority should be sorting out palliative and social care before changing the law – down very slightly from 66% last year.
Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of Care Not Killing, said: 'This major new poll blows apart the arguments that the public are desperate for a so-called assisted dying law.
'The public want the Government and MPs to focus on fixing the NHS and palliative care which they know are broken. After all one in four Brits who would benefit from palliative care aren't currently receiving it, while in many places services are piecemeal, part-time or facing cuts.'
Former prime minister Gordon Brown (Lucy North/PA)
It comes as former prime minister Gordon Brown repeated his opposition to assisted dying.
Writing in the Guardian, he said: 'It has become clear that whatever views people hold on the principle, passing the terminally ill adults (end of life) bill into law would privilege the legal right to assisted dying without guaranteeing anything approaching an equivalent right to high-quality palliative care for those close to death.'
He said MP's personal preferences 'cannot be separated off from the duties they have as members of a community to ensure that the way we treat the dying reflects the values of a decent, compassionate country'.
He added: 'That should mean upholding the role of the medical professions as care-givers, and exclusively care-givers; avoiding the possibility of private profiteering by legal-medical consortiums which might well commercialise assisted dying as a lucrative business; safeguarding vulnerable people about whose fate the royal medical colleges have all expressed concern; preventing unacceptable coercive pressures that can be brought to bear on disabled people, and those who are incapacitated or mentally stressed; and thus showing that as a society we value life above death.'
Dozens of Labour MPs called for Friday's overall vote to be delayed, asking for more time to scrutinise a Bill they brand as 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'.
Writing to Commons leader Lucy Powell, they said: 'We implore you as the Leader of the House to allocate more Parliamentary time to the scrutiny of this Bill, the valid concerns that members have about its implementation, and the consequences it could have on vulnerable populations.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'This Bill has been brought as a Private Members' Bill. The amount of time for debate is therefore a matter for the House.'
Labour MP Kim Leadbeater is the sponsor of the Bill (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
The Bill's sponsor, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, has repeatedly stated that her proposed legislation has been strengthened since it was first introduced last year, insisting it is subject to robust safeguards.
Medical staff are among some of the MPs who back the Bill.
As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.
MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer voted in favour of the Bill last year, but said the Government remains neutral on the issue.
Both Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood voted against.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1000%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75%26crop%3D3%3A2%2Csmart%26trim%3D&w=3840&q=100)

Scotsman
8 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why the Government needs to 'save quality journalism education'
The funding cuts come 'at a time when we need trusted news and information more than ever' Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A campaign to 'Save Quality Journalism Education' has been launched following a Government move to cut funding to key training courses. Strategic Priorities Grant (SPG) funding is being withdrawn from journalism, media studies and publishing courses for 2025-26. Education secretary Bridget Phillipson has instead instructed the Office for Students to redirect this cash to other 'high cost' subjects like engineering, IT, pre-registration nursing, agriculture, forestry and food science. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Industry leaders have branded the move 'irrational and misguided' at a time when trusted news and the provision of more well-trained journalists is needed more than ever. This website - and all our sister titles across National World - is supporting the Save Quality Journalism Education campaign, which is being spearheaded by the National Council for the Training of Journalists (NCTJ). We have long-established links with the NCTJ and many of the reporters who have provided your high-quality, accurate, ethical and trusted journalism over the years will have been through one of its accredited courses. The Government plans to withdraw Strategic Priorities Grant funding from journalism, media studies and publishing courses this year | (Image: National World/) We work closely with the NCTJ in ensuring today's trainee journalists join our newsrooms with the skills we need and with the knowledge they will continue to support them as they learn and develop with us. A recent survey by the NCTJ showed that 81% of working journalists hold a journalism qualification, with 84% saying it helped them secure their first job. We believe journalism education is essential infrastructure for democracy and deserves proper funding. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad NCTJ chief executive Joanne Forbes said: 'The targeted withdrawal of funding suggests the government's value and support for journalism is diminishing at a time when trusted, well-trained journalists are more essential than ever. These cuts risk reducing the accessibility, quality and diversity of journalism education, and threaten the future health of journalism in the UK.' The SPG is not the only source of funding for journalism courses, but it will reduce the resources universities can draw upon to support journalism programmes, at a time when many are already under financial strain. The campaign is backed by the New Media Association (NMA), which represents national, regional and local publishers, and the Society of Editors. NMA chief executive Owen Meredith said the funding cut was 'contrary to the government's stated policy of creating and supporting an environment in which local and national journalism can thrive'. He added: 'At a time when we need trusted news and information more than ever, this misguided and irrational move risks undermining the pipeline of talent into the industry and restricting access to journalism as a career choice. The Education Secretary has got this one wrong and needs to think again.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The campaign is also backed by the Association for Journalism Education, the Broadcast Journalism Training Council, the Media, Communication and Cultural Studies Association and the Professional Publishers Association.

The National
23 minutes ago
- The National
Scottish Tories join Labour MP in call for Scottish grooming inquiry
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced an official probe into group-based child exploitation on Monday after the UK Government rejected calls for this earlier this year. Now the Scottish Tories have written to Cooper warning that 'victims of grooming gangs in Scotland must not and cannot be overlooked'. It comes after Scottish Labour MP Joani Reid also called for John Swinney to launch a grooming inquiry. Shadow Scottish Secretary Andrew Bowie said: "Now that the Labour Government has finally bowed to the huge public demand for a national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal it is essential that it is truly national in scope. READ MORE: Scottish Government names date for ditching two-child cap 'That means extending the remit to include Scotland, where there have been well-documented cases of gangs responsible for the rape and sexual abuse of young women. 'The Home Secretary must work with the Scottish Government to agree the scope of the inquiry because it's imperative that the voices of Scottish victims of these vile gangs are heard and appropriate lessons learned for the future. 'We already know that vulnerable young women were appallingly let down by Labour-run councils, where it appears that partisan political considerations led to the cover-up of the issue." Reid said there was "less understanding about the scale of this problem in Scotland" and this was "unacceptable". 'If the Scottish Government does not intend to hold its own dedicated inquiry, we need clear reasons why – not the vague responses we've had so far. This issue is too serious and urgent to leave unanswered," she said. The UK Government rejected calls for a public inquiry earlier this year and instead said it was focusing on putting in place the recommendations already made in a seven-year national inquiry by Professor Alexis Jay. But the Prime Minister announced on Saturday a full probe would be held after a review by Baroness Louise Casey. READ MORE: Cuts to PIP will plunge families further into poverty, research says The review found suspects were often 'disproportionately likely' to be Asian men. Speaking to journalists on Monday, First Minister Swinney said: 'The Prime Minister has obviously taken his own decision on grooming gangs. 'We established some years ago the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry, which has got extensive scope and ability to explore many or all of these issues. "I would give every consideration to an issue of this type if I felt it was necessary to be undertaken and obviously we will do that in the fullness of time.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Child sexual abuse and exploitation has a devastating impact, which is why we are taking action to ensure that children are protected from harm. 'The independent Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry is undertaking an extensive review of child protection policy and practice in Scotland and will report with recommendations for further development in due course. We have also established a national multi-agency Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation Strategic Group, of which Professor Alexis Jay is a member, to consider all UK and Scottish work and make recommendations to Ministers accordingly. 'In Scotland, all healthcare and education professionals already have a duty to report child abuse. The case for introducing mandatory reporting more widely remains under active consideration, and we are continuing to engage closely with key partners, including Police Scotland, Social Work Scotland and Child Protection Committees Scotland, on this important issue.'


ITV News
41 minutes ago
- ITV News
Grooming gang report author Louise Casey appears before MPs after major review of failures
The author of a major review into grooming gangs which found authorities have 'shied away' from the ethnicity of sex offenders has appeared before MPs. Baroness Louise Casey appeared before the Commons Home Affairs Committee on Tuesday morning, after the Government set out plans to launch a new nationwide inquiry into grooming gangs following her rapid review of the scandal. During her appearance, she urged people to "keep calm" about drawing conclusions from data on the ethnicity of suspects and offers, warning that any statistical evidence in "incomplete and unreliable". She said: 'When we asked the good people of Greater Manchester Police to help us look at the data we also collected... if you look at the data on child sexual exploitation, suspects and offenders, it's disproportionately Asian heritage. "If you look at the data for child abuse, it is not disproportionate, and it is white men. 'So again, just note to everybody, really outside here rather than in here. Let's just keep calm here about how you interrogate data and what you draw from it.' Baroness Casey said that misusing unreliable data to come to any conclusion was "a different level of public irresponsibility". As Baroness Casey faced MPs, elsewhere in London Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch held a press conference alongside a number of victims of grooming gangs. When asked if she owes an apology to survivors of grooming gangs for the Conservatives' lack of action when in office, she said she had already said sorry. She said: 'We have done that. I have spoken this is not the first time that I'm meeting the survivors. I have spoken to them about this. 'I have apologised, but what I find extraordinary is that more people are interested in prosecuting a government that did some things... rather than looking at what needs to happen right now, what I'm really worried about is that we're spending a lot of time bringing the politics back into this when we want to take the politics out of it. 'I have spoken to survivors, and what they're talking about right now is a full national inquiry. 'No one here has asked me for more apologies. They have heard the apologies. Apologies are easy. 'What we need to see is action. We can sit here and say sorry all day long, but what I actually want to see is an inquiry that gets to the bottom of this.' On Monday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper claimed officials have dodged the issue of ethnicity among the groups of sex offenders for fear of being called racist, even though available data showed suspects were disproportionately likely to be Asian men. She said 'much more robust national data is needed' on the ethnicity of offenders, adding that the authorities 'cannot and must not shy away from these findings'. Doing so would allow 'the criminality and depravity of a minority of men to be used to marginalise whole communities." Ms Cooper also said the Government would take action 'immediately' on all of Lady Casey's recommendations, which include launching a national inquiry and making it mandatory to record the ethnicity and nationality of all suspects in child sexual abuse cases. At the committee meeting, Baroness Casey said: 'I listened to what the Home Secretary said in Parliament yesterday, I would like to see quite a significant uplift in the prosecutions, the action, the criminal investigations on child sexual exploitation, both historic and current.' In the Commons, Ms Cooper 'unequivocally' apologised for the failings which had led to grooming and child sexual abuse. The Home Secretary also pledged to exclude convicted sex offenders from the asylum system, while the report warned 'a significant proportion' of live investigations into grooming gangs 'appear to involve suspects who are non-UK nationals and/or who are claiming asylum in the UK'.