
What's making New Brunswickers sick? Premier Susan Holt intends to find out
Social Sharing
Premier Susan Holt says it's critical the province push ahead with its investigation into what's making some New Brunswickers sick, despite a new scientific study that found no evidence of a mystery brain disease.
"There's too many unanswered questions for us to stop the work that Public Health is doing to be able to provide patients — and potentially future patients — with the information they need about what's causing these illnesses," Holt told reporters Thursday in Fredericton during her weekly update on U.S. tariffs.
She was responding to questions about a report, published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association, known as JAMA.
Thirteen Canadian doctors and researchers reassessed 25 of the 222 patients diagnosed by Moncton neurologist Dr. Alier Marrero as having a "neurological syndrome of unknown cause."
They concluded all of the cases — 14 living and 11 who have died — were attributable to well-known conditions, such as Alzheimer's traumatic brain injury and cancer.
WATCH | 'There might not be one answer, there might be multiple things at play here,' Holt says:
Holt says N.B. to keep studying mysterious cluster of sick people, despite report
2 hours ago
Duration 0:55
A report in the Journal of the American Medical Association says there's no mystery brain disease in New Brunswick, but Premier Susan Holt says the province's own investigation will continue.
Their analysis of the patients also provides "strong evidence against a common cause of the patients' conditions, such as exposure to an environmental toxin," because of the wide range of problems, they wrote.
The work the province is doing "remains critical," Holt said.
"We need to work with the patients and the population of New Brunswick to answer the question about what is making New Brunswickers sick," she said.
"The study didn't answer that question."
Government report due this summer
In March, the New Brunswick government launched the "data analysis phase" of its investigation into undiagnosed neurological symptoms that Marrero says are now affecting some 500 people in seven provinces. The investigation will consider whether environmental substances, such as the herbicide glyphosate or heavy metals, are a factor.
"It is anticipated the results of the analysis will soon be shared with the Public Health Agency of Canada," Dr. Yves Léger, New Brunswick's chief medical officer of health, said in an email.
A public report with recommendations is expected this summer.
"I think that the work that Public Health is doing and the support we're getting from the Public Health Agency of Canada is critical for us to continue to try to answer those questions for New Brunswickers, knowing that there might not be one answer," Holt said.
"There may be multiple things that are at play here in different areas of the province and in different situations."
The premier did not say whether the province will help Marrero's hundreds of other patients to get a second opinion, as the study urges.
In an emailed statement, New Brunswick Medical Society president Dr. Lise Babin said, "We trust that the process that has recently been put in place by Public Health New Brunswick will consider all relevant research and data related to this ongoing issue."
Holt pledged last summer to launch a transparent scientific investigation if elected in the October provincial election.
New Brunswickers suffering from unexplained symptoms and the doctors trying to help them had "been ignored" by the Blaine Higgs government "for far too long," she said in a statement at the time.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
CTV National News: Why six infants had measles at birth in Ontario
Watch Ontario's top doctor revealed six infants were born with the measles after acquiring it from their unvaccinated mothers. Heather Butts on the risks.


CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
Survivors of MK-Ultra brainwashing experiments want judge to approve class-action lawsuit
It was called the MK Ultra project, meant to experiment on mind control using patients as guinea pigs. Lana Dean Ponting remembers her parents having her hospitalized at the Allan Memorial Institute, because she was a troublesome teen who often ran away. 'I was drugged up so bad I can't remember half of what they did to me,' explains the woman, who is about to turn 84. The abuse wasn't just medical. 'I bore a son when i was at the Allan Memorial and I got pregnant without ever knowing who the father was.' Ponting says she suffered from the debilitating effects of the treatments all her life. The experiments were sponsored by the CIA, funded by the Canadian government, and handled by a McGill University independent researcher named Donald Ewen Cameron between the 1940s and 1960s. It's reported the medical team used electroshocks, and experimental drugs on patients, including LSD. Ponting and several other survivors and their families were in court Monday as their lawyer is trying to get authorization for a class-action lawsuit filed in 2019. It's the first step before the case can move ahead. 'I think there is no question no one has ever taken responsibility. No one has ever apologized. There was some modest compensation in 1992 without any admission of liability,' said lawyer Jeff Orenstein, who's taking on the case on behalf of the consumer law group. He said that in the early 1990s, some survivors were offered settlements, without anyone taking responsibility for what happened. The courts already prevented the group from suing the U.S government. The CIA successfully argued the courts here have no jurisdiction. The other parties, such as the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) and the Canadian government, argue they can't be sued because the plaintiffs waited too long. 'There are many psychological reasons of blockages that just don't allow people to take action,' Orenstein said, liking it to women who wait decades to denounce sexual aggressors because of fear and stigma. Julie Tanny remembers how her father, Charles Tanny, was admitted over a neurological pain issue in his face. The doctors thought he had psychiatric issues, and began treating him. His daughter says he came out with permanent mental health damages from which he never recovered. 'He didn't know me or my two siblings. He remembered my mother, but he didn't remember he had children or that he had a business or anything. And he was very detached. That never changed. He never came back to the person he was before,' Tanny said. It could take a few months for the court to decide if the class-action can be authorized. If the case moves forward, the plaintiffs may finally have a shot at getting some closure that has eluded them for seven decades.


CBC
4 hours ago
- CBC
RFK Jr. ousts CDC's entire vaccine advisory committee
Social Sharing U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday removed every member of a scientific committee that advises the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on how to use vaccines and pledged to replace them with his own picks. Major physicians and public health groups criticized the move to oust all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Kennedy has not said who he would appoint to the panel, but said it would convene in just two weeks in Atlanta. Although it's typically not viewed as a partisan board, the entire current roster of committee members were appointees of U.S. President Joe Biden's administration. "Without removing the current members, the current Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majority of new members until 2028," Kennedy wrote in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece. "A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science." When reached by phone, the panel's now-former chair — Dr. Helen Keipp Talbot of Vanderbilt University — declined to comment. But another panel member, Noel Brewer at the University of North Carolina, said he and other committee members received an email late Monday afternoon that said their services on the committee had been terminated but gave no reason. "I'd assumed I'd continue serving on the committee for my full term," said Brewer, who joined the panel last summer. Brewer is a behavioural scientist whose research examines why people get vaccinated and ways to improve vaccination coverage. Whether people get vaccinated is largely influenced by what their doctors recommend, and doctors have been following ACIP guidance. "Up until today, ACIP recommendations were the gold standard for what insurers should pay for, what providers should recommend, and what the public should look to," he said. Committee not consulted But Kennedy already took the unusual step of changing COVID-19 recommendations without first consulting the committee — a move criticized by doctors' groups and public health advocates. "It's unclear what the future holds," Brewer said. "Certainly provider organizations have already started to turn away from ACIP." Kennedy said the committee members had too many conflicts of interest. Currently, committee members are required to declare any potential such conflicts, as well as business interests, that arise during their tenure. They also must disclose any possible conflicts at the start of each public meeting. But Dr. Tom Frieden, president and CEO of Resolve to Save Lives and former director of the CDC, said Kennedy's actions were based on false conflict-of-interest claims and set "a dangerous and unprecedented action that makes our families less safe" by potentially reducing vaccine access for millions of people. "Make no mistake: Politicizing the ACIP as Secretary Kennedy is doing will undermine public trust under the guise of improving it," he said in a statement. "We'll look back at this as a grave mistake that sacrificed decades of scientific rigour, undermined public trust, and opened the door for fringe theories rather than facts." 'Not how democracies work' Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, called Kennedy's mass ouster "a coup." "It's not how democracies work. It's not good for the health of the nation," he said. Benjamin said the move raises real concerns about whether future committee members will be viewed as impartial. He added that Kennedy is going against what he told lawmakers and the public, and the public health association plans to watch Kennedy "like a hawk." "He is breaking a promise," Benjamin said. "He said he wasn't going to do this." Dr. Bruce A. Scott, president of the American Medical Association, called the committee a trusted source of science- and data-driven advice and said Kennedy's move, coupled with declining vaccination rates across the country, will help drive an increase in vaccine-preventable diseases. The committee had been in a state of flux since Kennedy took over. Its first meeting this year had been delayed when the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services abruptly postponed its February meeting. During Kennedy's confirmation, Cassidy had expressed concerns about preserving the committee, saying he had sought assurances that Kennedy would keep the panel's current vaccine recommendations.