Could Canada really become the US's 51st state?
Canada's relationship with the United States is back in the spotlight after US President Donald Trump suggested that Canada could be annexed as the 51st American state. The comment has sparked political backlash and heightened tensions on both sides of the border.
So is this threat of annexation credible?
This week in UpFront, Redi Tlhabi speaks with Canada's ambassador to the United Nations, Bob Rae.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump warns of 68% tax hike if budget bill fails. Not true, say experts
US President Donald Trump has been sounding an alarm: if Congress doesn't pass his tax and spending bill, Americans will be forced to pay much higher taxes. Referring to his wide-ranging tax and spending legislation called the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' Trump said in a June 5 Truth Social post, 'If this bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% tax increase.' Trump cited the same figure in May 25 comments to reporters and during a May 30 news conference. However, independent analyses of the controversial bill – which would extend the 2017 tax cuts that are slated to expire later this year – found that Trump's estimate is about 10 times bigger than the expected increase would be if the cuts expire. The budget bill has caused a split between Trump and his close aide, Elon Musk, who called it a 'disgusting abomination'. The White House did not respond to an inquiry for this article. Republicans have largely advocated for extending the full 2017 law. Democrats – including the party's 2024 presidential nominee, then-Vice President Kamala Harris – have generally supported extending the lower tax rates only for families earning up to $400,000 a year. If the 2017 tax bill sunsets, taxes would rise for most taxpayers. But the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan think tank, has estimated, on average, Americans' taxes would rise by about 7.5 percent if the 2017 tax cuts fully expired, not 68 percent. The Tax Policy Center didn't find any single income group, whether lower-income or higher-income, that would see a 68 percent tax hit if the law expired. Taxpayers earning up to $34,600 could expect a nearly 12 percent increase, and taxpayers earning $67,000 and up could expect a 7 percent to 8 percent increase. The centre-right Tax Foundation hasn't calculated an estimate, but the group made broadly similar projections as the Tax Policy Center, said Garrett Watson, the Tax Foundation's director of policy analysis. Watson said the 68 percent figure is much higher than estimates he has seen from credible experts. It's possible that Trump's 68 percent figure is a garbled reference to a separate statistic, tax experts said. The Tax Policy Center estimated that just over 64 percent of taxpayers would see taxes increase if the law expires. That percentage varies based on the household income. Many low-income households would see no change, often because they don't earn enough to pay federal income taxes. But for households making $67,000 or higher, there's a roughly 80 percent likelihood of a tax increase. Similarly, the Tax Foundation said 62 percent of taxpayers would pay higher taxes if the 2017 law lapsed. None of this, however, means that the increase for the typical taxpayer would be more than 60 percent compared with what they paid in taxes the previous year. The Republican tax bill generally reduces taxes for lower and middle-income groups while benefitting wealthier taxpayers the most, the Tax Policy Center found. Those earning $34,600 or less would see their after-tax incomes rise by 0.6 percent if the Republican bill passes, while those earning $67,000 or more would see a 2.8 percent increase. The boost would be even stronger for the top 5 percent of earners, the top 1 percent of earners and the top one-10th of 1 percent of earners. A Tax Foundation February analysis found higher gains among all income groups, especially when factoring in expected economic growth from the lower taxes. But the same pattern held – the biggest percentage gains from passing the Republican bill went to the top 5 percent and 1 percent of earners. Trump said if his 'Big Beautiful' tax and spending bill doesn't pass, 'there will be a 68 percent tax increase.' If the 2017 tax law is not extended, independent analyses show that taxes will increase, but by far less than what Trump said. The Tax Policy Center projects that the increase would be about 7.5 percent overall. The Tax Foundation broadly agreed with that assessment. We rate the statement False.
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Elon Musk says he ‘regrets' social media attacks on Trump
Tech billionaire Elon Musk has expressed regret over his broadsides against United States President Donald Trump following the spectacular public falling out between two of the world's most powerful men. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' Musk said in a post on X on Wednesday. Musk's expression of regret comes after he made a series of extraordinary attacks on Trump, including an unsubstantiated claim that his administration has refused to release files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in order to protect the president. More to follow…
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Curfew in LA as protests against Trump's immigration crackdown continue
A nighttime curfew was in force in Los Angeles as local officials sought to get a handle on protests that United States President Donald Trump claimed were an invasion by a 'foreign enemy'. 'I have declared a local emergency and issued a curfew for central Los Angeles to stop the vandalism, to stop the looting,' Mayor Karen Bass told reporters on Tuesday. One square mile (2.5 square kilometres) of the city's more than 500-square-mile area will be out of bounds until 6am (13:00 GMT) for everyone apart from residents, journalists and emergency services, she added. Small-scale and largely peaceful protests began on Friday in Los Angeles as anger swelled over intensified arrests by immigration authorities. At their largest, a few thousand people have taken to the streets, but smaller groups have used the cover of darkness to set fires, daub graffiti and smash windows. Overnight on Monday, 23 businesses were looted, police said, adding that more than 500 people had been arrested in recent days. Protests have also sprung up in other cities around the United States, including New York, Atlanta, Chicago and San Francisco. Trump has ordered 4,000 National Guard soldiers to Los Angeles, along with 700 active-duty Marines, in what he has claimed is a necessary escalation to take back control, despite the insistence of local law enforcement that they could handle matters. The Pentagon said the deployment would cost US taxpayers $134m. 'What you are witnessing in California is a full-blown assault on peace, on public order, and national sovereignty,' Trump told troops at Fort Bragg, a military base in North Carolina. 'This anarchy will not stand. We will not allow an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy.' California Governor Gavin Newsom said Trump's shock militarisation of the city was the behaviour of 'a tyrant, not a president'. In a livestreamed address, Newsom called Trump a 'president who wants to be bound by no law or constitution, perpetuating a unified assault on American tradition'. 'California may be first, but it clearly will not end here.' In a filing to the US District Court in Northern California, Newsom asked for an injunction preventing the use of troops for policing. Trump's use of the military is an 'incredibly rare' move for a US president, said Rachel VanLandingham, a professor at Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles and a former US Air Force lieutenant colonel. US law largely prevents the use of the military as a policing force – absent the declaration of an insurrection, which Trump again mused about on Tuesday. Trump 'is trying to use emergency declarations to justify bringing in first the National Guard and then mobilising Marines,' said law professor Frank Bowman of the University of Missouri.
