
She got into 5 colleges with mom's help. Now, who decides?
Tense and uncomfortable conversations can arise when parents dominate the discussion of where their kid goes to college.
From Gayatri Patil's point of view, it wasn't an option for her daughter to attend college outside Arizona.
The teenager, Mikiha Gadagkar, 17, had a different idea.
Gadagkar spent her teenage years in Phoenix earning a 4.0 grade point average and loaded up on extracurricular activities, including speech, debate and photography. She wanted to make herself attractive for highly ranked economics and political science college programs – both near and far from home.
Is college worth it? Here are the majors college grads say they regret the most
The hard work paid off when she got into five schools, including Arizona State and the University of Virginia.
And so began the tense conversation that rattles so many American households after the initial celebration of college acceptance letters: Who decides which college the student will attend?
Get ready for frustration and emotional blackmail.
More: Kids are ditching traditional college for career tech programs. Parents are concerned.
Gadagkar told her mom she wanted to attend a college near Washington D.C. She wanted a"change of pace" and a new environment with opportunities to attend law school.
But Arizona State University was still her mother's top choice.
"I want her to stay close," she said. "I tried emotionally blackmailing her, saying 'I'll give you home cooked food, drive you and do your laundry' during the time of her acceptances."
The family's discussions illuminate the tense and uncomfortable conversations that can arise when parents want a say in where their kids go to college.
'Sometimes it's a bad ending'
The Arizona family's story is one Matthew Riley's heard before. Often, wealthy parents pay Riley, a director and senior admissions consultant at Ivy Academic Prep, to help guide their kids when applying for college.
They come from two types of families: One set of parents allows their kids to take the lead on where they attend college. Those families are better at acknowledging that it is the student's life and ultimately their decision, he said.
The other type is more strict. They are "controlling helicopter types" who tell their children they must apply to a certain college or pursue a certain degree, he said.
"They usually say 'You will study computer science and will apply to five or 10 schools," he said. "Those are always rough to see. Sometimes students say 'Ok, my parents understand me' and sometimes it's a bad ending.' It can get ugly."
Sometimes those disagreements are harmful to a young person's well being, he said.
He recalled a case from last year.
The student wanted to to get a degree in business or political science at George Washington University or American University, but his parents insisted he attend a university with a prominent tech program, he said.
"He was passionate about government and interned with the state representative in his home state." he said. "But his parents said 'No, we're computer scientists and programmers who work for a big corporation, and you will do the same.'"
That student succumbed to his parent's wishes.
But during his first year, he "felt out of control" and experienced anxiety and depression, Riley said.
Is college worth it? Americans say they value higher education, but it's too expensive for many
Parents who work in technology, engineering or medical fields are more likely to want to pressure their kids into a certain school "in hopes for them to follow in their footsteps," he said.
"The parents are affluent, both are professionals, both are educated and they control the finances," he said.
Who should decide?
Traci Lowenthal, a licensed clinical psychologist, helps guide families through conversations about college.
"There's a fine line between having these thoughtful and open conversations and creating pressure," she said.
Creating realistic expectations and timing is important to avoid putting feelings of pressure on a child, she said.
They should discuss whether a family can afford college and if the young person will have to fund school themselves with loans. And they should decide together whether a student can live with independence across the country or if they are better suited staying near home.
Often, parents and students open up about their real feelings about college after it's too late and the student has been shoehorned into a school that's not right for them, Lowenthal said. Or parents reveal uncomfortable financial realities after a student has set their sights on a school they can't afford.
That can cause a rift. But they can be avoided.
Families should discuss college options during a high schooler's freshman and sophomore years when "tensions aren't already high," Lowenthal said. Earlier conversations offer young people a head's-up about their options, family finances and parental expectations − before they start applying to schools.
It can help to alleviate potential feelings of disappointment or betrayal.
"Sometimes I see a student get into an amazing school and there's literally no way they can go," she said. "So in the midst of getting rejections and acceptances, the parent tells them they can't go and the student asks: How come you kept this from me?"
She encourages students to do their own research to share with their parents.
"It's tough. Because if your parent is like 'You have to go to my alma mater or this prestigious school,' the student has to find a way to be really honest about that and say, 'I know this is a great school, but I think this would be a better fit," she said.
Lowenthal advises parents to consider the needs and desires of their child ahead of their own.
"It's really hard to not want them to do what they want you to do," she said. "But this is a unique individual and not an extension of us as people."
One of the arguments Gadagkar used in trying to win her mom over to the University of Virginia was telling her how high school counselors had shown which programs might best align with her career ambitions.
After learning she had guidance from other adults, Patil decided to hear her daughter out.
More: Have student loans? This part of the Trump tax bill won't apply to you
"My mom really let me take the lead in those conversations," Gadagkar said. "It was more of me saying, kind of, how I felt and her giving her thoughts on those. I'm really grateful for that because it made it a lot less stressful."
But Patil was still not fully convinced Virginia was the right option.
"I studied in India, so the process here was very new to me," she said.
Mom: 'I think we are happy with this decision'
Gadagkar ultimately decided to attend her mother's first pick, Arizona State University, two hours from home.
The teen received a scholarship that made ASU more affordable than the University of Virginia. And she'll be able to pursue economics and political science while honoring her mother's wishes. But she still thinks about what moving to Virginia would have been like.
"It's definitely a change of pace since this entire year I had developed a mindset that I was going out of state," she said. "This is not what I necessarily expected. But after attending orientation, I'm feeling good."
Patil, her mother, is elated Mikiha will be nearby. But she said she had warmed to the idea of sending Mikiha to the East Coast − if the option had been affordable.
"I think we are happy with this decision," Patil said.
Contact Kayla Jimenez at kjimenez@usatoday.com. Follow her on X at @kaylajjimenez.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Your July 4th Burgers Cost More Than Ever as Beef Prices Hit Record
Grilling this July 4th? That burger is going to cost you more. Americans hosting cookouts this week will have to pay more than ever to buy ground beef for hamburger patties due to multiple issues that continue to disrupt a historically low cattle supply, according to a survey published by the American Farm Bureau Federation.

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
America's oldest bombers have officially been flying for the Air Force for 70 years
This past weekend marked another decade in service for America's oldest bomber. The B-52 Stratofortress,affectionately nicknamed the "Big Ugly Fat Fellow," has been flying for the US Air Force for 70 years. The air service has been upgrading the strategic bomber for years, allowing it to continue to play a key role in the Air Force's long-range strike capability. Far from a relic, the plane can serve as a conventional missile truck and a nuclear deterrent. Over the weekend, Air Force Global Strike Command Public Affairs celebrated the 70th anniversary of the delivery of the first operational B-52, which was originally delivered on June 29, 1955, to the 93rd Bomb Wing at Castle Air Force Base in California. "For seven decades, the B-52 has stood as a symbol of American airpower," the command said in a press release. "With its unmistakable silhouette and dual-capable nature, the Stratofortress continues to serve as a visible and credible strategic deterrent for the United States and its allies." There are 72 B-52 bombers active with the Air Force, with some in conventional roles and others still able to serve in a nuclear capacity. Others that are no longer in active service remain in long-term storage at the Air Force's "boneyard" in Arizona. Since the 1950s, the B-52 made by Boeing Military Airplane Co. has undergone numerous upgrades that have preserved the lumbering aircraft as a formidable bomber for the Air Force. The B-52 remains a reliable platform for long-range strategic bomber missions even though it lacks the speed of the B-1 Lancers and the stealth of the B-2 Spirits, which were used to drop bombs on three of Iran's nuclear facilities earlier this month. The bomber boasts a lighter maintenance lift, lower operational costs, and a heavy payload. The B-52 can carry an estimated 70,000 tons of mixed ordnance, from stand-off cruise missiles to weapons like naval mines. Emerging hypersonic weapons have also been tested on the bombers. Though built during the Cold War to function as a high-altitude strategic bomber, it can serve a range of missions. The B-52's airframe and durable design have kept the planes in good condition over the decades. And upgrades to their weapons capacities, communications and radars, hardware, and software have kept the planes modern, as well as capable of receiving future updates. "Since its creation, the B-52 has anchored strategic deterrence for the nation," said Maj. Gen. Jason Armagost, Eighth Air Force and Joint Global Strike Operations Center commander, per the release. He added that the Air Force is looking "to the next model to serve as the physical embodiment of the idea of peace through strength and carry us into the 2050s." Plans for the next version of the B-52, the J-model, include engine and radar upgrades, as well as a new long-range stand-off missile that will replace the plane's aging air-launched cruise missiles. But these planned updates have faced challenges. A US Government Accountability Office report said last year that the engine replacement program, which seeks to substitute the B-52's older engines with new military-configured commercial ones, was delayed "in part due to funding shortfalls to complete the detailed design." The operational capability date for these engines was delayed to three years after initially planned. The Air Force originally announced plans to update these engines back in 2021 for improved fuel usage and easier maintenance. The cost, too, jumped from $8 billion to about $9 billion. Costs to replace the radars of the B-52s to provide greater range and resistance to electronic warfare countermeasures also saw an increase, per the GAO. The upgrades are critical for the Air Force to follow its plan of keeping B-52s active into the 2050s, a plan that would see the plane fly for a century. Last year, the B-52 bomber successfully conducted a first-of-its-kind test of the All-Up-Round AGM-183A Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon, a hypersonic missile, in the Western Pacific. The missile is a multi-stage, boost-glided weapon with a hypersonic glide body that can maneuver at high speeds. Such weapons are difficult to intercept, and the US military and its rivals have heavily prioritized the development of hypersonic weapons in recent years. While the missile received mixed results throughout testing, leaving its future in the Air Force's arsenal unclear, it marked an interesting moment for the B-52, which continues to be important for long-range strategic missions.


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
US Immigration Service Announces Change From July 1: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) plans to change its text alert number beginning July 1. Why It Matters The agency is set to discontinue sending text alerts from the number 468-311, also known as GOV-311. Going forward, applicants are expected to receive text messages from a new number: 872466, which stands for USA-IMM, short for "U.S.A. Immigration." This change is important for anyone who receives text updates from USCIS, such as case status alerts and appointment reminders. USCIS recommends saving its new number to your contacts to help avoid confusion or mistaking official messages for spam. An information packet and an American flag on a chair ahead of a naturalization ceremony at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Miami Field Office on August 17, 2018. An information packet and an American flag on a chair ahead of a naturalization ceremony at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Miami Field Office on August 17, 2018. Wilfredo Lee/AP Photo What To Know USCIS mainly uses text alerts to reach applicants who have chosen to receive electronic notifications. This option, available through Form G-1145, lets applicants receive case updates by text and email. These messages usually include the receipt number and details on how to track their case status online. USCIS said the change was intended to make messages easier to identify and to strengthen public confidence. Form G-1145, officially called E-Notification of Application/Petition Acceptance, is an optional form provided by USCIS that allows applicants to receive text and email updates when their application or petition has been accepted. While it does not grant any immigration benefit on its own, many applicants attach it to forms—such as the I-485, which is used to apply for a green card—to receive quicker confirmation that their paperwork has been received. The form helps applicants track their case by providing a receipt number and instructions for checking status updates online. In another change earlier this month, USCIS said it would require every new permanent residency application to have a renewed medical examination form. Applicants were previously allowed to use the same forms indefinitely. In March, sudden changes to a range of application forms created confusion among applicants, prompting a lawsuit from immigration attorneys and leading USCIS to reverse course and provide at least a two-week transition period for the new forms to take effect. Applicants should also remain cautious of scams. USCIS would never ask for payment or passwords via text message. If you receive suspicious messages claiming to be from USCIS, do not respond. Instead, report the message through the official USCIS website to help protect yourself and others from fraud. What People Are Saying United States Citizenship and Immigration Services announced: "Effective July 1, 2025, USCIS will no longer send text (SMS) messages from the phone number 468-311 (GOV-311). Our new number will be 872466 (USAIMM)." What Happens Next USCIS recommends that users add the new number to their contacts and disregard any texts from the old number beginning July 1.