
'Astronomical' fees and 'incompetent' management: The risks of living on a freehold estate
Imagine owning your own home only to find yourself subject to regular costs, strict rules and extra fees when you try to sell. Welcome to the world of freehold estates - a type of housing development that property experts have told Money is becoming increasingly common.
With thousands already built across the country, families moving into them are often left with confusing terms and big bills, with the government already taking action to intervene.
What are these kinds of properties?
Unlike with most other freehold properties, shared areas and facilities on a freehold estate are not owned or looked after by the local council. Instead, a private management company or homeowners themselves, via an estate management firm, take on the responsibility.
Andrew Bulmer, CEO of The Property Institute, said this is done by councils to avoid the expense of maintaining new housing developments.
Residents are required to pay the management company for the upkeep of the communal spaces, as well as their council tax to their local authority.
Costs increasing every year
A report by the Competition and Markets Authority published earlier this year found that the amount charged by estate management companies per household per year varies greatly, from around £60 to just under £1,000 in 2022.
It found that charges had been increasing significantly year-on-year. In some cases, they doubled or trebled if a new management company was appointed.
"Projecting these costs over a 25-year period, without accounting for future price rises or increasing prevalence, affected households would pay the equivalent of more than £4.4bn," it found.
Bulmer said residents on smaller estates could be left with "astronomical" fees because management companies have to split the costs between fewer people.
Not only do they need to cover the costs of maintaining the property, but also the running fees associated with it. For example, an out-of-hours call line, accountants, insurance, and risk assessments, he said.
'I don't feel safe - we are stuck with incompetence'
"As long as they are getting their money they don't give a damn about anything else," Thame resident Jane Morton Driscoll said about her management company RMG.
The 40-year-old bought her home six years ago but has been left feeling "unsafe" and "infuriated" by a litany of problems on her housing development.
While she knew about the required fees when she bought her home, she expected to get a better level of service for her money.
Morton Driscoll explained that broken equipment in the children's play area has never been replaced, 25% of the street lamps don't work, tarmac has melted, trees and plants have been left to die, and site managers have failed to upkeep the communal gardens.
"The estate is not being managed well at all. They have left parts to just get wrecked," she said.
"As a woman, I don't feel safe walking home at night. It doesn't feel safe at all, and it's really quite scary."
Despite this, her annual management fee has increased.
"It is really irritating. It is a feeling of hopelessness that this is what we are stuck with. We are stuck with incompetence," she said.
'Absolutely atrocious' customer service
Morton Driscoll showed Money a copy of the income and expenditure account sent to her by the management firm, which shows £20,773.24 was spent on grounds maintenance, £3,373.20 was assigned to playground costs, and £3,106.80 went on tree surgery.
Nearly £19,000 was spent on various "professional fees".
But she struggled to see how any of that money had been spent on improving the estate.
"My perception is that it doesn't cost £3,000 to remove and not replace a children's roundabout, and not fix a swing," she said.
"I have no problem with paying for gardening if it is being done, but it isn't."
She was also disappointed to see the amount spent on "professional fees" when she had received "absolutely atrocious" customer service.
"Things just keep disappearing off their records. Why should we have to keep chasing them up?" she asked.
'We encourage residents to get in touch'
RMG, the management firm of Morton Driscoll's estate, told Money: "We take all resident feedback seriously and remain committed to making meaningful improvements across the development."
The company said the children's roundabout was removed after failing a safety inspection, and it is working to reinstate all equipment "as soon as possible".
It is also working with residents to identify faulty streetlights so repairs can be carried out efficiently, and it's "actively progressing discussions with both the developer and contractors to resolve the tarmac issue".
"We recognise that some issues have taken longer than expected to address and are taking steps to improve our communication and responsiveness. Further conversations with residents are being arranged to better understand their experiences and ensure everyone feels listened to and supported," it added.
"To date, we have no record of any complaints being lost or disregarded. All concerns are tracked internally, and we encourage residents to get in touch if they feel an issue remains unresolved."
'It was pretty dangerous if my little boy stepped out'
Nigel Betterton was shocked to find that on top of his £600 a year management fee, he also had to pay extra costs when he looked to sell.
He moved from Germany to his estate in Burgess Hill in West Sussex with his partner and three-year-old son in 2018 but ended up feeling like he was the victim of an "elaborate con".
The 64-year-old's home was on a bridal pathway, which appeared on sat navs as a road, causing cars to drive very close by.
"It was pretty dangerous if my little boy stepped out. I insisted we did something about it and wanted boulders put at the end of the bridal way, but other residents thought it was a waste of money," he said.
He tried to talk to the council, who cared for the houses behind his garden fence, but he was told they didn't know anything about the estate and couldn't help.
"It was horrendous. You just didn't know what was happening," he said.
Residents were also required to stick to strict rules, so Betterton was stopped from building a gate at the front of his own home.
In other cases, an elderly neighbour was forced to tear down her car port and people were banned from parking caravans in the driveways, he said.
£700 fees just to sell
After six years of arguments with his management company HML, Betterton decided to sell and move to Cardiff, and that's when he discovered there were more fees to pay.
During the process, management firm Harper Stone took over the estate from HML in October 2024.
"We had to pay £350 for a sale package, which was just information about the house," he said.
"Then the management company changed, and I had to pay another £350 for the same information."
A sale package, also known as a management pack, contains important information about the property for potential buyers. This usually includes documents like accounting information, fire risk assessments, and details of any future maintenance works.
For the seller, it also sets out any requirements or fees payable to the management company for the transaction to be able to go ahead.
This could include any delayed bill payments, a fee for receiving a notice of transfer, or a charge for providing a certificate to comply with a restriction against selling without the management company's consent.
"It was ridiculous," Betterton said. "I'd never, ever, ever consider living in one [a freehold estate] ever again," he said.
How Betterton's management firms responded
Harper Stone said it was not involved in any of the issues raised before it took over management of the estates.
"Any concerns or requests regarding installations or alterations falling under the restrictive covenants would have been addressed appropriately during our period of management," it told Money.
It was responsible for issuing the sales pack Betteron needed.
"Harper Stone acted in accordance with industry best practice, maintaining transparency and clear communication. Preparing a sales pack is an administrative task that involves care and due diligence to ensure accurate disclosure to prospective buyers," it said.
It added: "While we cannot act beyond the scope of our authority, we are committed to ensuring that all residents' enquiries are dealt with respectfully and that requests for consent are relayed appropriately to the freeholder/ freehold company."
HML told Money it could not comment on information provided to Betterton at the time of his property purchase in 2018.
"All covenants, are stated in the legal documentation for each property, either in the Lease or Transfer document (TP1), to which Nigel Betterton would have signed upon legal completion and the purchase of the property, including restrictions on vehicles/caravans and fencing being erected as specifically mentioned by Nigel Betterton," it said.
"The bridle way referenced was not part of the estate managed by HML. It is owned and maintained by the local authority and council and serves as a designated route for right of access and emergency right of way if required."
What needs to be done?
Freehold estates aren't new, and the government has already intervened with the Leasehold and Freehold Act 2024.
This aims to bring greater transparency over charges and more power to residents to challenge unfair costs.
Bulmer said: "A better intervention would be to avoid creating these private areas in the first place and make local authorities adopt them.
"It is easy to understand why councils don't want them, but that is a poor solution that creates long term costs for homeowners. Some complex estates do need those private areas but they should be avoided where possible."
He explained that one of the big issues is that management firms are not putting sufficient funds into reserves to pay for future big bills.
"It saves money for homeowners in the short term, but future owners will be unhappy," he said.
What should you look out for?
Bulmer said residents should make sure they are clear on costs and check what they are buying before going ahead with their purchase.
"Ask your conveyancer to give you advice on what you are buying, and explain the implications, above and beyond simply providing information for you to figure it out by yourself," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Senedd hears incoming NRW chair embroiled in rail funding row
Nilesh Sachdev, the Welsh Government's preferred candidate to take the helm at Natural Resources Wales (NRW), appeared before the Senedd's climate committee on June 11. On his CV, Mr Sachdev boasts of securing £6bn of UK Government investment as chair of East West Rail (ERW) which is leading on a new railway between Oxford and Cambridge. The railway was controversially reclassified as a Wales-and-England project by the UK Treasury, denying Wales any consequential funding through the Barnett formula. Llŷr Gruffydd, who chairs the committee, asked: 'I was just wondering whether you have any qualms about… how does it look that potentially the chair of one of the biggest public bodies in Wales is actually spending Welsh money on England-only projects?' During the pre-appointment hearing, Mr Sachdev replied: 'A very fair and reasonable ask, I guess, I think I'll turn it around the other way: what a great opportunity. 'I managed to persuade, through my board and chief executive, to get the government in England to give all that money to East West Rail, I wonder what we could do here. 'So, I think there's an opportunity of saying: how can we, in Wales, put a case forward that makes sure the money that Welsh taxpayers are paying stays here?' Mr Gruffydd pressed concerns about his involvement with ERW, saying: 'I know you don't decide where the money comes from – but you're the guy signing the cheques.' Asked about his motivation for wanting to be chair of NRW, Mr Sachdev pointed to his passion on climate change and a recent move to Bristol. 'In fact, it's quicker to get here than it would be from Abergavenny in the traffic,' he said. He told the committee: 'I want to play a part in a community I dearly respect and have an affection for in an area I deeply care about.' Pressed about his local links, the father of three confirmed he has never lived in Wales but said his wife's grandparents were born in Gower and his son attended Cardiff University."

Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Senedd hears incoming NRW chair embroiled in rail funding row
Nilesh Sachdev, the Welsh Government's preferred candidate to take the helm at Natural Resources Wales (NRW), appeared before the Senedd's climate committee on June 11. On his CV, Mr Sachdev boasts of securing £6bn of UK Government investment as chair of East West Rail (ERW) which is leading on a new railway between Oxford and Cambridge. The railway was controversially reclassified as a Wales-and-England project by the UK Treasury, denying Wales any consequential funding through the Barnett formula. Llŷr Gruffydd, who chairs the committee, asked: 'I was just wondering whether you have any qualms about… how does it look that potentially the chair of one of the biggest public bodies in Wales is actually spending Welsh money on England-only projects?' During the pre-appointment hearing, Mr Sachdev replied: 'A very fair and reasonable ask, I guess, I think I'll turn it around the other way: what a great opportunity. 'I managed to persuade, through my board and chief executive, to get the government in England to give all that money to East West Rail, I wonder what we could do here. 'So, I think there's an opportunity of saying: how can we, in Wales, put a case forward that makes sure the money that Welsh taxpayers are paying stays here?' Mr Gruffydd pressed concerns about his involvement with ERW, saying: 'I know you don't decide where the money comes from – but you're the guy signing the cheques.' Asked about his motivation for wanting to be chair of NRW, Mr Sachdev pointed to his passion on climate change and a recent move to Bristol. 'In fact, it's quicker to get here than it would be from Abergavenny in the traffic,' he said. He told the committee: 'I want to play a part in a community I dearly respect and have an affection for in an area I deeply care about.' Pressed about his local links, the father of three confirmed he has never lived in Wales but said his wife's grandparents were born in Gower and his son attended Cardiff University."


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
ANDREW PIERCE: Is Angela Rayner's hard-Left boyfriend plotting to put her in No 10 as revenge for his sacking by Starmer's ruthless right-hand man?
On the eve of the Government's difficult Spending Review, Angela Rayner was in surprisingly high spirits. Drinks were flowing as the Deputy Prime Minister held court, acting as the DJ playing loud 'house music' while her guests danced the night away. Rayner's office has refused to confirm whether a party took place in her resplendent grace-and-favour apartment in Admiralty House, once the home of Sir Winston Churchill, the night before the Housing Secretary received one of the biggest financial packages of the Spending Review. Rayner had to battle to the bitter end against Chancellor Rachel Reeves, but the outcome fell in her favour and is a sign of her growing influence. In recent weeks, there have been reports of Rayner limbering up to replace Keir Starmer as Labour leader, and she has solid backing from members of the soft-Left, as well as the unions. Her victory in the Reeves negotiations is a clear sign that Downing Street is trying to keep her on side. Little wonder, then, that she indulged in raucous celebrations hours before the Chancellor addressed the Commons, reviving memories of when she was photographed belting out songs behind the DJ's desk in an Ibiza nightclub last summer. When Rayner, 45, took her place on the benches for the Spending Review, many thought she looked somewhat jaded. The same was said of Blackpool South MP Chris Webb, who was at the party and is one of her closest friends. A source told me: 'They were celebrating the fact that Ange had won her deal on the Spending Review. She is feeling on top of the world. The settlement showed that Ange is a serious player. Tarry, 42, has never got over being sacked as a shadow minister in July 2022 for giving a TV interview while on a picket line during a rail strike 'It may look insensitive but it was a private party for a small group of friends and supporters. These party guests will run an Angela Rayner leadership campaign if and when the time comes.' Rayner's ebullience was in stark contrast to the downbeat demeanour of the dwindling band of Reeves supporters. Her stock has fallen to rock bottom among Labour MPs and members. And Rayner's soiree will only heighten suspicions in the Downing Street bunker ahead of a potential crunch Commons vote on reforms to disability benefits. As many as 200 Labour MPs are said to be deeply unhappy about Reeves's plans to make £5 billion of cuts. In public, Rayner says she has no interest in becoming Labour leader. In private, however, I can disclose that many of the party-goers on Tuesday night are working hard to bolster her support among MPs and party members. Some MPs have dubbed the less-than-covert Rayner campaign Operation Revenge because it is being masterminded by her boyfriend Sam Tarry, 42, who has never got over being sacked as a shadow minister in July 2022 for giving a TV interview while on a picket line during a rail strike. Later that year, he was deselected as the MP for Ilford South. Tarry, who was part of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership team, blames his downfall on Starmer's all-powerful chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, who wants to purge the party of Left-wingers. Revenge is a dish best served cold, they say, and Tarry is pushing for Rayner to be the first elected woman leader of the Labour Party. In the run-up to the election, Rayner ruled out a tilt at the top job because she knew Labour was destined to win big and assumed that Starmer would be a fixture in No 10 for years. Since he became PM, however, support for Labour has collapsed faster than that of any newly elected governing party in the past 40 years. Starmer's personal rating is a woeful minus 46 per cent. And Rayner is popular where it counts – with party members. In a poll by independent party news website LabourList, she came second to Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, who is not a leadership contender after his disastrous election defeat in 2015. What's more, many Labour MPs believe they must elect a woman for the first time in the party's 125-year history. Even Rayner's many detractors, who scorn her intellectual ability, concede there is no serious alternative contender. Rachel Reeves and Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson have crashed and burned in the eyes of voters. Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham, another favourite of party members, does not have a Commons seat. And Health Secretary Wes Streeting's majority was cut to 550 by an independent Muslim candidate standing on a pro-Gaza platform. Many suspect he will lose next time. The man who helped Rayner avoid a similar fate is her close friend Wajid Khan, a former mayor of Burnley. He was instrumental in ensuring no independent Muslim candidate stood against her in her Ashton-under-Lyne constituency in Greater Manchester, which she won with a 6,700 majority over Reform. To the surprise of many, Khan – who was elevated to the Lords by Starmer in 2020 – became Rayner's deputy minister in the housing department. 'Khan was repaid with a ministerial job and he is now repaying her in turn by working discreetly on her behalf,' says a supporter. 'He will be a hugely important link to the Muslim vote which Labour is losing under Starmer.' All of which helps explains why Rayner has come round to the idea that, if Starmer goes, she should run. It explains, too, last month's leak of a memo from Rayner to the Chancellor outlining her alternative money-raising measures, arguing for higher taxes on wealthier people and cutting benefits for migrants. Whoever leaked it – and Rayner's team say it wasn't them – had one purpose: to cast her in a positive light with the MPs and party members who will choose the next leader. Some MPs say the leak fired the starting gun on a long race to succeed Starmer, which is why it caused such anger in Downing Street. Days later, Rayner had to fight her corner behind the scenes after reports that Starmer would strip her of the housing element of her brief. Flame-haired Rayner is unashamedly combative and, according to a source, 'there was a lot of shouting'. A darling of the trade unionists, she has the personality to build bridges across the party. Rayner was the special guest at Tony Blair's Christmas drinks last year. She is also close to Gordon Brown and her boisterous birthday karaoke parties are well attended by the Right and Left in the party. A Rayner associate says: 'If you're a working-class woman like Ange, who is always being written off by the men in the Downing Street bunker, what better way to prove them wrong than by seizing the top job?' Rayner famously left school aged 16, pregnant and without any qualifications. Her political hero was former Labour deputy prime minister John Prescott. 'Some say she's Prescott in a skirt,' says a supporter. 'Like Prescott, she speaks the language of ordinary voters. She understands them the way the metropolitan elite around Starmer don't. If there's a leadership election tomorrow, she wins hands down.' Downing Street is aware of the manoeuvring. It may be why, in the past few weeks, Rayner has lost her personal photographer, Simon Walker. 'No 10 thought she was getting too big for her boots, so they grounded her photographer and have now taken the post away altogether,' a source told me. A source close to Starmer says: 'You can't blame them for reining her in. Keir leads a stable government, a disciplined party, and knows what he wants. Ange would be woefully out of her depth as PM. She's not up to it and MPs know it.' But Rayner is indifferent to the barbs. She thinks she's on a roll and, judging by the mood of her party guests, they think the same.