Approval for Mayo data centre plan is appealed
Contentious plans for a data centre in Co Mayo have been stalled after an appeal was lodged against the county council's decision to approve the Mayo Data Hub Ltd plan.
The data centre on a site located 1.8km to the south of Killala and 10.5km to the north of Ballina will require 50MW average electrical power to operate.
Planning consultants John Spain Associates, for the applicants, said the proposed development 'will attract complementary technology-based companies within the ICT sector and complementary industries to the west of Ireland which will provide for higher paying jobs and activate the local economy'.
The Spain report also notes that the electricity grid in the west of Ireland is currently unconstrained with sufficient capacity to accommodate the connection for the data centre.
READ MORE
It says the project 'was in fact situated in this part of Ireland after consultation with EirGrid because this location is outside grid-constrained areas and in a region with a surplus of renewable power'.
However, one of the objectors to the plan – Colin Doyle from Station Rd, Ennis, Co Clare – has now lodged a third party appeal to An Bord Pleanála.
In his original objection to the proposal, Mr Doyle said his main concern was indirect greenhouse gas emissions generated by the data centre and the resulting impact on climate.
Bestselling author Sally Rooney, who was born in Castlebar and lives in Mayo, was also among the original objectors to the scheme, calling the data centre plan a 'wasteful, unnecessary and environmentally toxic proposal'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
15 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Son of John Magnier says he handed over €50,000 in two envelopes as an ‘appreciation' to Barne Estate owners
A son of billionaire bloodstock magnate John Magnier has told the High Court he handed two 'brown' envelopes containing a total of €50,000 in cash to an estate agent involved in a failed €15 million property deal. JP Magnier said the envelopes were to be delivered to the beneficiaries of the Barne Estate as a showing of 'appreciation'. In other evidence on Thursday, a solicitor involved in the proposed conveyance of Barne Estate, Co Tipperary, which is the subject of the legal action by John Magnier who alleges the €15 million deal was reneged upon by the vendors, told the court an agreement was in place between the parties before an exclusivity document was signed. Joseph Fitzpatrick, of Smithwick Solicitiors, told counsel for the Barne Estate he secured an exclusivity agreement signed by both sides to run from August 31st to September 22nd, 2023, after hands were allegedly shaken on a deal. READ MORE Lawyers for Mr Magnier, founder of Coolmore Stud, have argued that a US-based construction magnate, Maurice Regan, the preferred buyer, engaged in a 'full-frontal assault' on Mr Magnier's claimed deal to buy the 751-acre estate. Mr Magnier's proceedings claim the Barne Estate owners reneged on the alleged deal, preferring to sell at the higher price of €22.25 million to Mr Regan, founder of the New York building firm JT Magen. Mr Magnier – along with his adult children – wants to enforce the alleged deal which they say was struck at an August 22nd, 2023, meeting at Mr Magnier's Coolmore home. They claim the exclusivity agreement would not permit its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier. The Barne Estate has been held for the benefit of Richard Thomson-Moore and others by a Jersey trust. The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been 'unequivocally' agreed. The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any agreement and subsequently they preferred to sell the estate to Mr Regan, who is not a party to the case. On Thursday, JP Magnier told Paul Gallagher SC, for the Magnier side, his father asked him to get €50,000 in cash on September 8th, 2023, and to put it into two envelopes to be given to the Thomson-Moores. He said the money was an 'appreciation' for letting the Magnier side on to the Barne land, for their loyalty in honouring the deal and because they were allegedly 'cash strapped'. JP Magnier said he put the money into two envelopes and gave it to the estate agent at Barne Estate for them to be passed on to the Thomson-Moores. On September 11th, 2023, he said the estate agent met JP Magnier and 'pushed' the envelopes in his direction, saying the Thomson-Moores were concerned their farm manager may have seen the original transaction. Niall F Buckley SC, for the Barne side, asked what colour the envelopes were and was told they were brown. Mr Buckley put to JP Magnier the envelopes were to keep the Thomson-Moores 'sweet', as John Magnier was concerned they were going to pull out of the deal. JP Magnier said his father never said that to him. 'I take it you didn't ask for a receipt?' asked Mr Buckley. 'No,' JP Magnier replied. 'Doesn't that say it all,' Mr Buckley said. 'Knowing what you did about my clients' family circumstances and the need for them to provide for their child and given the vast amount of land you have, did it ever occur to you to let this one go?' 'It wouldn't be my call,' said JP Magnier. Mr Fitzpatrick told Martin Hayden SC, for the Barne Estate, the exclusivity agreement was not to further any negotiation but to keep the 'status quo' of the alleged sale agreement in order to further the preparation and receipt of the contracts. 'Exclusivity was not for negotiations going forward but to facilitate the contract,' said Mr Fitzpatrick. He said Mr Magnier had deposited €15 million in the Smithwicks' client account before any purported contract was signed in order to 'show good faith'. However, he said that a week before the exclusivity agreement expired, the Thomson-Moores said they were taking tax advice. 'We invited them to a meeting and that was refused, then the extension of the exclusivity was refused. It was clear they had no intention of signing with us and were running down the clock,' said Mr Fitzpatrick. The case continues in two weeks' time before Mr Justice Max Barrett.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
TCD's Israeli boycott draws criticism from Ireland's Jewish community
Trinity College Dublin 's decision to boycott Israeli institutions and universities will 'detrimentally impact' the college's global standing, particularly in the US, the Jewish Representative Council of Ireland has warned. In an open letter to the chair of TCD's board Paul Farrell, Maurice Cohen, a senior figure in Ireland's Jewish community, accused the university of a 'blatant violation' of the Equal Status Acts. In the letter, which was co-written with former minister for justice Alan Shatter , Mr Cohen also accused Trinity of violations of the Universities Act and relevant EU regulations, including those governing the Erasmus student exchange programme Trinity's board voted on Wednesday to cut all ties with Israeli universities and companies based in Israel over the conflict in Gaza in what is the first move by an Irish university to agree on the full divestment of interests in Israeli companies. READ MORE The boycott includes ending all academic and research collaborations and Erasmus student exchange programmes with Israeli universities. Trinity has two Erasmus+ exchange agreements with Israeli universities - one with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, which ends next month, and the other with Bar Ilan University, which ends in July 2026. Mr Cohen and Mr Shatter said in their letter that boycotting Israeli academics, a majority of whom are Jewish and who include prominent critics of the Israeli government, amounts to 'anti-Semitism', according to the definition laid out by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. 'It also constitutes discrimination against non-Jewish Israeli academics, of whom there are many in Israel's universities and research bodies,' they wrote. They argued that by boycotting Israeli academics and Israeli research institutions, Trinity is 'holding them collectively responsible for actions of the Israeli state'. The letter also criticised Trinity's board for failing to address 'Iran's sponsorship of the Houthis attacking international shipping and daily targeting Israel with ballistic missiles, its sponsorship of Hamas, Hizbullah and other terrorists groups'. The boycott vote followed a series of meetings of a taskforce set up between staff and student representatives at the university. The meetings were arranged as part of an agreement to end a five-day encampment that was set up on campus in May of last year in protest over the university's ties to Israel. The letter from Mr Cohen and Mr Shatter requests that the board immediately publish the report of the task force and 'cancel its premature decisions'. It also requests that before any further decisions, 'representatives of Ireland's Jewish community should be given the opportunity to consider and respond to the report' alongside Government and relevant departments. The Irish Times contacted Mr Farrell seeking his comment on the letter from Mr Cohen and Mr Shatter. Jenny Maguire, outgoing president of TCD' students' union, called the decision a 'historic win' that 'must be a catalyst for action across this island'.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘Crampgate' tells us rugby's code of dignity counts for little when lucrative online views are at stake
There was indignation, outrage, pique and scorn emanating from Durban's Shark Tank last week . Huff went viral. Umbrage took off. Rage and resentment flooded the zone when the effrontery of Jaden Hendrikse was broadcast from Kings Park. The knowing smile and the wee wink from the Sharks' place kicker as he lay on the ground having his hamstring stretched and happily obstructing the disbelieving Jack Crowley's attempt at goal. Fans in Limerick were livid . Cork was on the cusp of rebellion again. We thought it might prompt some kind of a scathing rebuke from the United Rugby Championship in a Zoom call on Wednesday with chief executive Martin Anayi. But, no. READ MORE This week, platforms and eyeballs, YouTube figures and broadcast peaks – and the URC brand raking in 150 million viewers since it started in 2021 – were the main talking points. Anayi then freely skated over Hendrikse's antics and Crowley gamely effing the Sharks officials and players as an emotional tsunami washed over Irish rugby. Instead, he pivoted to the benefits to the URC of the whining Irish, the underhand South Africans and some of the merits of Crampgate. The URC attitude seemed more shaped by the payload of page impressions and scroll depth it delivered than by the shamelessness of the act itself . 'Ultimately, we want characters in the sport and when you have characters and when you encourage people to show their character, that can be positive and negative,' said Anayi. 'There are heroes and villains in all stories, great sporting stories. I think that's kind of what is emerging here, isn't it? Needless to say, it certainly spiked an interest in the league.' Well, that's it, isn't it? Spiking interest in the championship, gaining greater purchase in the market. Still, the URC are only picking up on what the World Rugby website told them when they clicked on the About Us icon. It wasn't Maradona's Hand of God goal against England in the 1986 World Cup 'World Rugby recognises that rugby union is competing for the public's attention in an ever more varied and complex media and entertainment-driven world, but also that the federation properly embrace matters touching on social responsibility,' it begins. What langers we were for living in the old world of respect and integrity and not stepping into the new rugby vista of broadcast viewership, YouTube, X and Instagram. The match and its acrimonious end was the most viewed highlights over two days that the URC has ever had. In terms of turning a negative into a positive, this was a stunning performance by the URC chief, with the unsaid part being that we can park the rugby values piece and talk about that another day. And of course, he had a point. United Rugby Championship CEO Martin Anayi was not overly concerned about the fallout from the Sharks-Munster match. Photograph: Dan Sheridan/Inpho Reducing the number of Welsh clubs in the league to two or three, the emergence of the Club World Cup and Italian rugby's place in the European game were 10-fold more important talking points for the URC to consider. It wasn't like it was Bloodgate, where Tom Williams used a blood capsule to feign injury and be replaced by a better kicker against Leinster. It wasn't Maradona's Hand of God goal against England in the 1986 World Cup, nor was it USA figure skater Tonya Harding's plot to attack and injure her arch-rival Nancy Kerrigan. It certainly wasn't Lance Armstrong's entire career or Dr Eufemiano Fuentes's 211 blood bags with 35 athletes' names attached. The Hendrikse cramp and wink malarkey wasn't a full-frontal assault on rugby's regulations and it didn't fundamentally threaten the innate integrity of the game. But the idea that rugby is a righteous and honest sport was damaged in a way that enhanced viewership figures can't paper over. It also excited a lot of people in the wrong kind of way because the act was fraudulent and deceitful. It is not difficult to understand why the URC preferred to concentrate on the perks attached to the controversial incident than deride the gamesmanship involved, as the latter benefits the former with more attention and engagement. It is also not hard to understand why the business of rugby leans heavily into figures. Understandably, it swooned at 2022, the year the URC league set a record high of 34.6 million for its broadcast audience. It went weak at the knees in 2023, when the figure rose to 37.2 million. It was better again in the 2023-24 campaign, with 47.7 million. In the light of players' wages and vanishing clubs like Wasps, London Irish and Worcester, it is the numbers that move the dial more than anything. But blurring the lines about what is legal and illegal and what belongs in the game and what doesn't is important. It is particularly important in a sport like rugby because it is played along the thin boundaries of thuggery and fair play. In that scenario, any kind of erosion of behaviour is problematic. The URC choosing to see Crampgate as 'intrigue' is the modern take. They view gamesmanship as 'the rivalry between Ireland and South Africa, which is really bubbling along'. While the URC might choose to embrace the inflated numbers that rage and distain deliver, there are those who believe rugby must be as much about the unwritten rules and codes that the Sharks shattered as the established laws of the game.
