Harvard and University of Toronto make contingency plan for international students
TORONTO: Harvard University and the University of Toronto on Thursday (Jun 26) unveiled a contingency plan that would allow select Harvard graduate students to continue their studies in Canada if US visa restrictions prevent them from re-entering the United States.
It is the first international student backup strategy announced since the US Department of Homeland Security moved last month to strip Harvard of its ability to enrol international students. A federal judge has since blocked the move.
In response to potential visa challenges, students at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government who are unable to return to the US will have the option to continue their studies through a visiting student programme at the University of Toronto's Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy.
The programme would combine courses taught by Kennedy and Munk faculty, the deans of both institutions said in a statement sent to Reuters.
The contingency plans are being announced to ease student uncertainty, but will only be implemented if there is sufficient demand from those unable to enter the US due to visa or entry restrictions, the statement added.
'With these contingency plans in place, HKS will be able to continue to provide a world-class public policy education to all of our students, even if they cannot make it to our campus this year," Harvard Kennedy School Dean Jeremy Weinstein said.
The programme will be available to international students who have already completed one year at the US campus.
US President Donald Trump's administration has threatened or moved to cut billions of dollars in federal research funding for Harvard. The administration has accused the university of failing to adequately address antisemitism and campus violence, violating reporting requirements, and coordinating with foreign entities, including China's Communist Party, in ways that raise national security concerns.
Over the past five years, 52 per cent of Kennedy School students have come from outside the United States, the school's media office said.
The school currently enrols 739 students from 92 countries in programmes aimed at developing leadership in public policy and government, according to the Harvard International Office website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
42 minutes ago
- Independent Singapore
Harvard and University of Toronto brace for crisis, draft backup plan for international students
A group of multicultural students (for illustration purposes only) TORONTO: In an audacious and extraordinary move, Harvard University and the University of Toronto have teamed up to protect and defend the academic future of many international students who have been caught in the crossfire resulting from America's ever-changing immigration guidelines. Confronted with the uncertainties involved in US visa protocols, the two internationally esteemed institutions have come up with a contingency plan that would permit some Harvard graduate students to continue their education in Canada. This is the first official global backup plan to counter US government initiatives to curb international student registration. The agreement involves Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government and the University of Toronto's Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy. Under this plan, students who are unable to return to the United States would be offered an opportunity to continue their studies in Toronto, with projects co-instructed by teachers from both campuses. In a joint statement to Reuters, the deans of both institutions stressed the value of academic permanence during these uncertain times, stressing their collective vow to support students confronted with immigration issues. This move follows a contentious effort in May by the US Department of Homeland Security to strip Harvard's ability to sign up international students, an initiative that was eventually obstructed by a federal judge. Notwithstanding the legal triumph, apprehensions remain among the 739 students from 92 countries presently registered in the Kennedy School's programmes. While the cross-border scheme will only be initiated if a considerable number of students are affected by visa or travel limitations, its introduction offers a vital safety net and assurance to the diverse global student population navigating an increasingly complex immigration environment.
Business Times
11 hours ago
- Business Times
The high cost of Trump's brain drain
[WASHINGTON, DC] – US President Donald Trump's attacks on Harvard University and its international students have shocked the world, not just because of their crudeness but also because of their blatant short-sightedness. For decades, leading universities like Harvard have been a cornerstone of American 'soft power'. Many of the world's brightest students have aspired to attend US institutions, and top researchers have sought to join their faculties. Harvard itself represents the pinnacle of American – and global – higher education. Even Chinese President Xi Jinping chose to send his daughter there. Now, the tide is turning. Prominent scholars are leaving the US to escape the paranoid atmosphere fostered by Trump's policies, and top-tier international students who once aimed to attend universities like Harvard, Columbia, or Northwestern – all recently targeted by Trump – are choosing other countries, fearing their education might be disrupted. Severe consequences The consequences could be severe. Since 2000, US-based researchers have won around two-thirds of the Nobel Prizes in chemistry, physics, and medicine – and 40 per cent of those laureates were immigrants. Notably, nearly half of immigrant US-based Nobel Prize winners completed their graduate studies at US universities. These scholars not only advanced groundbreaking research and enhanced their institutions' prestige but also served as teachers and mentors to both American and international students, attracting a new generation of academic talent. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Moreover, these cross-cultural interactions help American students gain a deeper understanding of other societies while giving their international counterparts firsthand experience of life in the US. Many of those who study in America later return to their home countries and rise to prominent positions in government, academia, and the private sector. As at 2024, 70 heads of state or government had completed part or all of their higher education in the US. Until recently, these benefits were widely acknowledged across the US political spectrum. A well-functioning system – the Student and Exchange Visitor Programme (SEVP) – allowed certified institutions to admit foreign students. SEVP enabled graduates on student visas to remain in the country for up to three years to gain work experience. But in a stunning display of ignorance and malice, the Trump administration tried to strip Harvard of its ability to enrol international students and even instructed US consulates not to process visa applications for those planning to attend the university – a move that was recently blocked by a federal court. This uncertainty is deeply unsettling for current and prospective students. Those who had planned to begin their studies in September may now find it is too late to enrol elsewhere for the upcoming academic year. A decline in international-student enrolment will not only hinder research at US institutions by shrinking the pool of talented assistants; it will also weaken the global pipeline of future scientists, diminishing the depth and quality of research worldwide. Strong link What Trump and his acolytes fail to grasp is the strong link between the excellence of American universities and the country's record of innovation. An analysis from 2022 found that more than half of US startups valued at over US$1 billion had at least one foreign-born founder, and in half of those cases the founder first came to the country as a student. Some Trump supporters have argued that barring foreign students from enrolling at Harvard and other private universities would create more opportunities for American students. But while a few additional spots might open up, the impact will likely be minimal. In fact, since a significant share of international students pay full tuition, their absence would reduce the resources available for financial aid. Foreign students have been effectively subsidising American students receiving assistance – a vital source of financial support that would now be lost. Those lost revenues pale in comparison to the broader contributions of Harvard and the higher-education system. University education has long been a major US export, with far more international students coming to the country than Americans going abroad. In the 2023-24 academic year alone, foreign students contributed an estimated US$44 billion to the US economy. To be sure, Harvard and other universities are not immune from criticism. But discouraging or restricting foreign enrolment would be a profound loss for American and international students and faculty alike. By attacking leading universities, the Trump administration is undermining one of America's crown jewels and dealing an unprecedented blow to the engine of US competitiveness. PROJECT SYNDICATE The writer, a former World Bank chief economist and former first deputy managing director of the International Monetary Fund, is senior research professor of international economics at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies and senior fellow at the Centre for International Development at Stanford University.
Straits Times
12 hours ago
- Straits Times
US House committee subpoenas Harvard over tuition costs
A view of Harvard campus on John F. Kennedy Street at Harvard University is pictured in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - The US House Judiciary Committee sent a subpoena to Harvard University on June 26 seeking documents and communications for its probe into tuition costs and financial aid for Ivy League students. A letter to Harvard President Alan Garber, signed by committee chairman Jim Jordan and US Representative Scott Fitzgerald, both Republicans, described Harvard's response to previous requests for documents as inadequate and said the committee needs the documents 'to fulfill its oversight and legislative responsibilities'. A spokesperson for Harvard said in a statement: 'We are disappointed that the Committee has chosen to issue a subpoena and believe it is unwarranted, unfair and unnecessary.' It added: 'There is no basis for an allegation of collusion in Harvard's setting of tuition and financial aid.' The investigation into tuition is part of a larger fight between Harvard and the White House and Congress, including over cuts to federal funding and efforts to block foreign students from attending the university. President Donald Trump has said he is trying to force change at Harvard - and other top-level universities across the US - because in his view they have been captured by leftist 'woke' thought and become bastions of anti-Semitism. The subpoena comes as part of an investigation by the Republican-controlled US House Judiciary Committee into whether Harvard and other Ivy League schools broke antitrust laws by raising tuition costs. 'We are concerned that Ivy League member institutions appear to be collectively raising tuition prices while engaging in perfect price discrimination by offering selective financial aid packages to maximise profits,' the letter to Harvard's Garber said. US Representative Jamie Raskin, a Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, called the investigation 'plainly ridiculous' and 'based on pathetically weak allegations'. The Harvard spokesperson said the school has produced thousands of pages of documents on its tuition-setting process and financial aid. While the Judiciary Committee said it had received hundreds of requested documents, it added that some of them contained publicly available facts and lacked specific information that was desired. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
