
Can drab clothes save the day?
SLOUGH, ENGLAND:
Have you been wistfully craving a spot of victim-blaming when it comes to women attracting unwanted male attention? Perhaps you have been perusing through stories of Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni's legal battles, or avidly reading up on Udit Narayan kissing female fans on stage and thought, "You know what's missing from this? Someone crying foul about inadequately cloaked women."
Well, this is your lucky day because 1970s actor Jacqueline Bisset has stepped up to fill that void. Before you say, "Jacqueline who?", all you need to know is that Bisset was a model and actor in her heyday with a healthy CV comprising appearances in Murder on the Orient Express (1974) and many more. More pertinently for our purposes, she is a woman that celebrity outlet Page Six deemed worthy of their time.
Modest clothing is no armour
"I understand as an idea, it's important that men behave, but I do really think it's important that women behave, too," explained Bisset. "I think how you dress, your subtext is very, very important," she continued. "It's very dangerous and not to be played with."
As we all know by now, much to the chagrin of film producer Harvey Weinstein, the #MeToo movement went viral in 2017 after a myriad of women who had had enough launched abuse and assault allegations against him. And if you feel that Weinstein is stale news by now, you can always turn to Neil Gaiman's fresh hell as he faces at least eight allegations of rape and sexual assault. Failing that, there is also disgraced rap mogul Diddy's ongoing legal battles as prosecutors find more and more women willing to testify that they, too, were assaulted by the hip-hop star.
Bisset graciously grants that men (such as Weinstein, Gaiman, and Diddy, although she does not name them) should "behave", but in the same breath, she implies that the women who have spoken against them should have been more mindful of their demeanour, body language, and wardrobe choices. In other words, she has proven to us that it is not judgemental mothers-in-law in Pakistani dramas who excel in victim-blaming. As a caveat, according to Page Six, she offers the helpful suggestion that women "need to learn the word 'no' or the F-word or something" to put an end to sexual harassment.
"You have to do it, and you can get through it without any problem," she advises, adding that she has never, throughout her career, experienced any harassment of any form.
Bisset is not alone in subscribing to the optimistic notion that drab clothing confers protected status. In 2017, actor Mayim Bialik wrote in the New York Times that she has managed to sidestep sexual harassment by choosing to dress modestly.
Not as easy as Bisset thinks
Unfortunately for women, not even the brownest, dullest, shapeless blob of an outfit can spare a woman from sexual exploitation if the atmosphere is right. That atmosphere, of course, can be anywhere – be it a crowded bus or an entertainment industry in a country where women do not generally dress the way Bisset assumes Western victims of sexual harassment can be found. Last year, during an online interview, filmmaker Bee Gul addressed head-on the lewd requests running rampant in the Pakistani showbiz industry, and her comments were ominous.
"It is so common that any girl who enters the industry considers it normal," declared Gul in a matter-of-fact tone, ripping to shreds the misguided notion that the industry could ever be "paak saaf". "It happens everywhere I know. Women are mentally prepared for it. They know that at some point, they will have to trade off their body or beauty."
Given the universal nature of sexual exploitation, then, it is a shame that Weinstein's victims or the women who have spoken up against Gaiman or Diddy didn't think of Bisset's brainwave and just vocalise their standpoint. Think of all the trouble they could have avoided if they had only expanded their vocabulary to 'no' and 'the F-word'! Also, as an aside, the next time we read about a man robbed in the streets at gunpoint, we should ponder whether or not he was really asking for it by flashing a wad of cash or brandishing his new phone and shouting "Come and get this!" In addition, we must also ask ourselves why this idiot man did not just say 'no' during this armed robbery to fend off his attackers because as Bisset has shown us, that is all it takes.
Of course, you could take Bisset's argument further and point out that we would never think to step outside without locking our houses and cars – and nor, for that matter, unlike our hypothetical male victim, would we think to flash a wallet or a phone in public (unless we despise that phone and want to pretend to someone at home that we lost it and have a cast-iron excuse for buying a new one). You could argue that, as Bisset so thoughtfully suggests, we should take as much care with our bodies as we do with our prized material possessions and shield them with yet more fabric to ward off hopeful harassers.
But as women in Karachi can testify, no amount of clothing can repel a harasser who is really determined to take that unwanted peek. Perhaps Bisset should throw on a burqa and take a stroll along Tariq Road or on the 11C bus to test her hypothesis on women's tailoring (or mannerisms) controlling the direction of the lecherous male gaze.
Actually, she need not bother making the trek all the way to Karachi and risk heat rash in a burqa. She could save herself the trouble and idly scroll through posts littering Pakistan-based women-centric social media groups. Those who are esteemed members of these groups already know that here lies a certified goldmine of reading material involving women who have been groped in public as they line up to pay for groceries or eyed up and down as if last year's sweat-soaked lawn outfit and giant dupatta is a seductive come hither sign. Drab clothes, sadly, do not confer any sort of protected status, despite what Bisset and Bialik may believe.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Baldoni's defamation case against Lively rejected
Lively accused Baldoni of harassment during filming of It Ends With Us. Photos: File A New York judge on Monday dismissed Justin Baldoni's $400 million countersuit against his It Ends With Us co-star Blake Lively, marking a major legal victory for the actor and her allies in a highly publicised dispute that has rocked Hollywood since late last year. As per Variety, the ruling from Judge Lewis Liman threw out Baldoni's claims of extortion and defamation, brought in response to Lively's December 2024 lawsuit against the actor and his production company, Wayfarer Studios, in which she alleged sexual harassment on set and subsequent retaliation. The lawsuit stems from tensions on the set of the film adaptation of Colleen Hoover's bestseller, where Lively starred as Lily Bloom and Baldoni served as both co-star and producer. The film's release was overshadowed by allegations Lively first made public in a New York Times article, before formally filing her complaint in court. Baldoni had responded with a sweeping defamation countersuit not only targetting Lively, but also her husband Ryan Reynolds, publicist Leslie Sloane, and the New York Times. He alleged that Lively orchestrated a campaign to damage his reputation and sabotage the film's release, including threats to withdraw promotional support unless demands were met. But in a sharply worded opinion, Judge Liman rejected the basis of Baldoni's legal arguments. "The Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Lively is responsible for any statements other than the statements in her lawsuit, which are privileged," Liman wrote. He further ruled that Lively's actions amounted to "legally permissible hard bargaining," not extortion. As for the $250 million suit against the New York Times, the judge said Baldoni failed to show that the publication acted with actual malice. "The Times reviewed the available evidence and reported, perhaps in a dramatised manner, what it believed to have happened," the opinion read. Following the ruling, Lively's legal team released a statement hailing the decision as "a total victory and a complete vindication." The statement also noted the dismissal extended to all parties named in Baldoni's lawsuit, including Reynolds, Sloane, and the Times. On Instagram, Lively responded to the ruling with a message of solidarity: "Like so many others, I've felt the pain of a retaliatory lawsuit," she wrote. "While the suit against me was defeated, so many don't have the resources to fight back." Baldoni has been granted the option to amend and refile parts of his complaint related to alleged interference with contractual agreements by June 23. The decision comes just a week after Lively voluntarily withdrew two of her claims against Baldoni — those relating to emotional distress — in what her lawyers said was a procedural narrowing of the case. With a trial still expected next year, the legal and reputational fallout from It Ends With Us continues to unfold, casting a long shadow over a film once positioned as a prestige project.


Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Drug suppliers using 'official vehicle' held
The Defence police claimed to have arrested two individuals involved in the sale, purchase, and use of narcotics, seizing high-quality drugs and illegal weapons during a raid. Among the items recovered were the British-brand 'Jungle Boy' weed, hashish, illegal arms, and a double-cabin Vigo vehicle bearing a 'fake government number plate (GBA 786) and police lights'. According to the police, the raid was conducted on intelligence-based information. The arrested suspects are British-Pakistani national Sulaiman Ali Memon and his accomplice, Shahriyar. During the interrogation, the suspects revealed that the vehicle was actually part of the official protocol fleet for an MPA from Mastung area of Balochistan and had been rented under the name of Sulaiman Ali Memon. The police are now investigating the vehicle's rental records and are working to identify any additional accomplices or facilitators linked to the suspects. Meanwhile, the Darakhshan police have arrested a woman, allegedly involved in supplying drugs in association with her sons, and seized her vehicle. The police on suspicion stopped a car and recovered weed. The police arrested the woman in the car, identified as Mujahida Khalid Mansoori, the mother of notorious drug dealers Rabi Mansoori and Daniyal Mansoori. The group was active in supplying drugs in DHA and adjoining areas.


Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds
A federal judge has dismissed actor and director Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, marking a significant development in the legal feud stemming from the 2024 film It Ends With Us. The ruling, issued Monday by Judge Lewis J. Liman, also included the dismissal of Baldoni's $250 million libel suit against The New York Times. Baldoni, who co-starred and directed the film adaptation of Colleen Hoover's novel, had alleged that Lively, Reynolds, and publicist Leslie Sloane defamed him in connection with Lively's civil rights complaint filed in December 2024. The complaint included allegations of sexual harassment, retaliation, and a smear campaign during and after the film's production. Baldoni, who has denied the allegations, filed his countersuit in January. According to court documents obtained by multiple outlets including Page Six and CNN, Judge Liman determined that Lively's complaint was protected by legal privilege under California law, which shields such statements made in civil rights proceedings. Additionally, the court ruled that Baldoni failed to show that Reynolds, Sloane, or The New York Times acted with 'actual malice' or seriously doubted the truth of the statements in question—criteria necessary to sustain a defamation claim. The court allowed Baldoni until June 23 to amend two claims: breach of the implied covenant of good faith and tortious interference with contract. These claims relate to alleged disruptions to existing agreements and potential reputational damage involving Reynolds and Lively. In a statement to Page Six, Lively's attorneys, Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb, called the decision a 'total victory and a complete vindication.' They further criticized Baldoni's lawsuit as a 'sham' and stated their intent to pursue attorneys' fees, punitive damages, and treble damages. While Baldoni's legal team did not immediately respond to requests for comment, the broader legal battle remains active, with a trial date set for March 2026.