Major reservoirs to unlock new UK homes and address water supply fears
The government has intervened in the planning of two major reservoir projects in East Anglia and Lincolnshire, amid growing concerns over the UK's water supply.
Environment Secretary Steve Reed has designated these projects as "nationally significant," thereby transferring authority from local planning to central government.
This decision seeks to expedite the construction of these reservoirs, the first in over three decades, to enhance water resources for more than 750,000 homes in England 's water-stressed regions and facilitate new housing developments.
The government plans to legislate that major reservoirs will automatically be designated as "nationally significant" to streamline their construction and secure future water supplies.
Officials caution that without new reservoirs, population growth, aging infrastructure, and climate change could cause drinking water demand to exceed supply by the mid-2030s. Water supply shortages are also impeding the construction of thousands of homes in areas like Cambridge.
The two reservoirs which have been designated as nationally significant are being proposed by Anglian Water, which wants to build the Lincolnshire reservoir south of Sleaford and is partnering with Cambridge Water for the Fens Reservoir between Chatteris and March in Cambridgeshire.
Under the plans, the Lincolnshire reservoir, which would provide up to 166 million litres a day for up to 500,000 homes, would be completed by 2040 and the Fens Reservoir, supplying 87 million litres a day to 250,000 homes in the driest region of the UK, would be completed by 2036.
Both projects will now progress to the consultation phase, gathering views from communities and stakeholders, the Government said.
Water companies across England have committed to bringing nine new reservoirs online by 2050, in Lincolnshire, Cambridgeshire, Oxfordshire Somerset, Suffolk, Kent, East Sussex and the West Midlands and Somerset, with the potential to supply 670 million litres of extra water per day.
Water Minister Emma Hardy said the Government was 'intervening in the national interest and slashing red tape to make the planning process faster to unblock nine new reservoirs'.
She said it would secure water supply for future generations and unlock the building of thousands of homes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Will the ban on water industry bonuses get flushed away?
'The era of profiting from pollution ends today,' declared environment secretary Steve Reed, taking aim at our deeply dysfunctional water industry. Big talk – and it was backed up with a ban on bonuses for 10 top bosses as a result of the scandalous level of sewage pollution consumers have had to put up with. Over the last 10 years, execs at the nine biggest water companies have had their wallets fattened by a combined £112m for running regional monopolies – badly. In just the last year, they've pocketed nearly £8m. No wonder people are cross. If you want an example of why monopolies are a thoroughly bad thing, you've got it here. If you want a case study of why bosses' bonuses make people blow a gasket, you've also got it here. The nearly 2,500 'sewage events' recorded over the 12 months can in part be traced to profoundly misaligned incentives. And also, it should be said, to Ofwat's continued failure to properly regulate the sector. If these companies received effective oversight, the current mess would not have been allowed to happen. But back to the government's order, which will hit executives at the stricken Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities, and Southern Water where it hurts: in the pocket. 'While it is for water companies to set their own remuneration, new standards published by Ofwat that come into force today mean bonuses will not be permitted to be handed out in specific cases when a water company fails to meet core environmental standards,' the government said. Future bans will be imposed if a water boss 'presides over serious pollution offences, fails to meet basic financial resilience standards (e.g. meet minimum credit rating requirements), fails to meet core consumer standards (e.g. failure to operate and maintain sewage networks, is convicted of a criminal offence'. This will be a popular move from a government that needs to find a few winners. However – and you can call me a cynic if you want – there is a potential problem here. Remember the EU's bankers bonus cap, limiting payments to 100 per cent of salary, or twice that with shareholder approval? The net result of that rule, since jettisoned by the UK, was that affected institutions sharply increased the base salaries of their leading rainmakers. Some of them actually found they were really quite keen on having (much) larger pots of guaranteed money coming to them. Executive pay is a multi-headed hydra. Cut off one of those heads – the bonus, in this case – and the others (basic pay, benefits, pensions) typically get bigger. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see some of the water companies attempting to push through big increases in basic pay for their execs, or more likely still, quietly increasing benefits and especially pension contributions. This will merit close attention. Water bosses being handed fat pay rises will, of course, go down like a cup of cold sewage and generate an overflowing storm drain of controversy. But, given the tin ear the water industry has turned to its critics in the past, would anyone be all that surprised if one or two of these companies tried this? I wouldn't. You can, nonetheless, file the bonus ban under 'easy win' for Mr Reed, who was out tub thumping on TV on the back of the announcement. He puffed out his chest, made himself look big and tough, and talked about promises being delivered. It might be me, but isn't it just a little bit early for him to be saying that? Yes, he's had a good start on this one. I'm not denying that. But turning the water industry into something that works for both consumers and investors is a much tougher nut to crack. Reed touted a £104bn pot of private investment – 'the largest ever since privatisation' – which, we are told, will be ring-fenced 'to cut sewage discharges by nearly half over the next five years', as opposed to being used for 'shareholder payouts'. Things that make you go hmm. The money is certainly welcome. It is much needed. But what you have to remember is that private investors are not charities. They don't pump money into companies without the prospect of a return. They will require payouts at some point otherwise the money will dry up quicker than the water pouring out of a leaky Thames Water pipe on a hot summer's day. The other thing to remember, with the water industry being in such a godawful mess, is that it's going to take some smart people to fix it. Preferably new people, untainted by previous scandal. These people tend to demand very high salaries. If their incentives are properly aligned with the delivery of the services these companies are supposed to provide, it ought to be possible to deliver something that hasn't happened to date: an industry that works for all its stakeholders. But Mr Reed, and a beefed up Ofwat, still have work to do on that front.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Planned AI datacentre in England could cause five times emissions of big airport
A vast new datacentre to feed Britain's rising demand for artificial intelligence could cause more greenhouse gas emissions than five international airports. Elsham datacentre in Lincolnshire is on course to cost £10bn and its 15 power-hungry computer warehouses are projected to release five times the carbon dioxide of Birmingham airport, including from take-offs and landings. A planning application for the facility nine miles east of Scunthorpe was submitted last month and a public consultation closes in three weeks. Documents estimate the datacentre would consume 3.7bn kWh of energy, with annual CO2 emissions of 857,254 tonnes when running at full tilt. This is based on the current mix of energy sources powering the National Grid. The datacentre will also create so much excess heat that glasshouses are being proposed with capacity to produce more than 10 tonnes of tomatoes a day. Global tech firms are struggling to meet their carbon-cutting goals. By 2030, carbon dioxide emissions from AI datacentres will be six times the 2023 level, according to research by the Öko-Institut in Germany. Greenpeace has called for commensurate renewable energy capacity to be added to national grids at the same time as new datacentres are built. Microsoft recently admitted that five years after it committed to becoming zero carbon by 2030, its total emissions had risen by 23% due to factors including AI expansion. This week Meta signed a 20-year deal with a nuclear power station in Illinois, while Amazon and Google are also investing in nuclear energy to fuel the race for AI dominance. Datacentres are needed to train AI models and run AI searches, which are now routinely offered to billions of people by Google and Meta and which require four to five times more computing power, according to estimates. Climate experts believe AI could help the fight against global warming by making power grids work more efficiently or accelerating the development of new zero-carbon technologies. Martha Dark, a co-executive director of Foxglove, a non-profit organisation based in London campaigning for 'a fairer tech future', said the Elsham planning application put two key UK government missions on collision course. 'The prime minister has talked up datacentres powering generative AI as the magic beans to miraculously sprout Britain's withered economy into life but also made a promise at the election to get toxic pollution out of our air and deliver net zero by 2050,' she said. 'It's decision time: does the government want an economic plan that's best for Britain, or one that's best for Amazon, Google and Meta?' Planning documents state: 'Elsham Tech Park Ltd will endeavour to purchase green power for the facility, where possible.' The backers believe CO2 emissions could be lower than the 850,000 tonnes a year figure if the National Grid becomes greener by the time the datacentre is due to be switched on in 2029. The developer has ruled out on-site renewables as impractical. If the system ran on biomass energy it would require the daily delivery of 100 large lorry loads of wood chips. Wind energy would require 10,000 20-metre wind turbines, while an area five times the size of the Glastonbury festival site would be needed if it were to be powered by photovoltaic panels. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion A government spokesperson said it was 'alert to the power demands which will drive AI development' and it would use 'responsible, sustainable sources', with advanced modular reactors, which create nuclear power, playing 'a particularly important role'. 'We're shaking up the planning rules to make it easier to build nuclear power stations across the country,' the spokesperson said. Peter Kyle, the secretary of state for science and technology, has called datacentres 'the engines of the AI age', and the government has said it is targeting a 'rapid build-out' to boost the UK's capacity for building and running AI models. Last month the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, overruled a local council that had rejected a plan for a £1bn datacentre at Abbots Langley in Hertfordshire, citing the 'clear and pressing need for new datacentre capacity'. Robert Waltham, the leader of North Lincolnshire council, which covers Elsham, said: 'You have to be aware of the management of resources but we also have to have significant investment in the UK, and AI is contributing to health and supporting the most vulnerable people. This is not just about Google search – AI is improving medical science and our productivity.' He cited the example of how the council was deploying AI chatbots to help older people stay on top of their medicines, enabling them to stay at home longer rather than moving into residential care. A spokesperson for Greystoke, which owns Elsham Tech Park Ltd, said the project would create 900 jobs. 'The region is an ideal location for AI datacentres due to the significant investment already made in developing the UK's most advanced clean energy cluster,' they said. 'It has access to a third of the UK's offshore wind energy as well as access to 66% of the UK's licensed carbon capture and storage.'
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Show us your BritCard: Minister confirms Government looking at introducing ID app in illegal immigration crackdown
The Government is 'absolutely' looking at the idea of introducing a BritCard ID app as it seeks to tackle illegal immigration. a Cabinet minister confirmed today. Environment Secretary Steve Reed said that ministers 'know we need to look at all the actions we can take' to reduce the number of people crossing the Channel in small boats. The phone app would display a person's right to live, work and rent in the UK on a smartphone. And as well as blocking illegal immigrants from working, supporters say it would also tackle benefit fraud through links to government records. It has already received support from several cabinet ministers, including cabinet office minister Pat McFadden and technology secretary Peter Kyle. And today Mr Reed told Times Radio on Friday morning, Mr Reed said: 'It's absolutely something that we are looking at, and that we should be looking at.' He added: 'We know we need to look at all the actions we can take to stop the levels of illegal migration that we were seeing particularly under the last government. 'We have to stop the number of people that we've seen who don't have a right to come here.' Environment Secretary Steve Reed said that ministers 'know we need to look at all the actions we can take' to reduce the number of people crossing the Channel in small boats. Asked whether he thought digital IDs should be mandatory, Mr Reed told the same station: 'There's a discussion going on and I'm happy to take part in that discussion as well. Advocates think the scheme will send the message that Britain is not 'a soft touch' on illegal migration and will decrease the 'pull' factor, which many European countries blame for the ongoing small boats crisis. Britain remains the only European nation without an ID card system, with Tony Blair 's famous attempt to introduce one collapsing in 2011, after the coalition government pulled the plug on it. It is also hoped the app can tie a number of different services together, including ordering passports, displaying driving licences and national insurance numbers, and offering NHS services. Labour Together, a think tank run by Sir Keir Starmer's chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, from 2017 to 2020, has collated plans for the card and sent them to Downing Street. They include a requirement to 'show' the ID when renting a property or starting a new job, with the system automatically checking their right to work or rent against government records. Existing documents to check identity can be easily forged, potentially deceiving landlords or prospective employers. A mock up of the app, seen in the plans, shows a screen with an individuals' face and name on it, as well as his right to work and rent statuses, driving licence, and options to share identity or age. The report, published on Friday, urges the Prime Minister to make digital identity a 'top prime ministerial priority' and commence a 'fundamental transformation in the way British citizens interact with the government'. It points to a poll which suggests 80 per cent of the public back the implementation of digital right-to-work credentials, with just under one in three believing it would act as a deterrent against people entering the country illegally. The report said that those who did not want to have a digital ID card on their phone would be allowed to carry a physical one instead. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has placed herself in opposition to some of her colleagues, including many from the 'Red Wall' wave of Labour MPs, with Home Office sources describing her position as 'nuanced'. Sir Keir Starmer has admitted the public has 'every right to be angry' about the issue after more than a thousand migrants made the journey in a single day for the first time this year. Home Office data showed 1,194 migrants arrived in 18 boats on Saturday. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper , pictured in May, has placed herself in opposition to some of her colleagues, including many from the 'Red Wall' wave of Labour MPs But Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch described Sir Keir's words as 'rubbish', claiming that even Defence Secretary John Healey had acknowledged ministers had 'lost control' of the borders. Saturday's figures were the first time daily crossings topped a thousand in 2025, and prompted Mr Healey to claim Britain had 'lost control' over the last five years, implicating the former Tory government. Writing on social media site X on Monday, the Prime Minister said: 'You have every right to be angry about small boat crossings. 'I'm angry too. We are ramping up our efforts to smash the people smuggling gangs at source.' He claimed hundreds of boats and engines had been 'seized', raids on illegal working were up, and 'almost 30,000 people' had been returned. But Mrs Badenoch hit back, responding: 'Rubbish! Even the Defence Secretary admits the govt has 'lost control' of our borders.' Small boat arrivals are 'up 95% from this point in 2023', she said, and claimed ministers had 'scrapped the only viable deterrent': the previous Conservative government's Rwanda plan. Sir Keir had earlier insisted the Rwanda plan 'didn't deter anybody', after his decision to scrap it was highlighted while he visited Glasgow for a major defence announcement. He added: 'I'm not up for gimmicks. I'm up for the hard work of working with partners, enhancing the powers that law enforcement have, in my determination to take down the gangs that are running this vile trade.' Saturday's crossings brought the provisional annual total so far of migrants who have made the journey to 14,811. This is 42 per cent higher than the same point last year (10,448) and 95% up from the same point in 2023 (7,610). It is still lower than the highest daily total of 1,305 arrivals since data began in 2018, which was recorded on September 3, 2022.
