Bono defends decision to accept medal of freedom from Joe Biden
Bono
has defended his decision to accept the
US
Presidential Medal of Freedom from
Joe Biden
earlier this year, insisting he took it on behalf of people who do not receive honours such as activists losing their lives in
Gaza
.
The
U2
singer received the highest civilian honour the US has to offer in January, becoming the first Irish recipient since former president
Mary Robinson
in 2009.
However, Bono was criticised by some for accepting the award from an administration that was giving military backing to
Israel
at a time when thousands of
Palestinians
were
being killed
.
He questioned why anyone would think he was 'not shocked and appalled by what is going on in Gaza' and happening to the children living there.
READ MORE
'It's such a strange thing, this competitive empathy that's going around: 'I feel this wound more than you, and my emergency is more important than your emergency'.'
[
Bono calls for end to war in Gaza as U2 perform Sunday Bloody Sunday at Ivor Novello awards
Opens in new window
]
In an interview with RTÉ's Brendan O'Connor show, Bono said he had been an activist for 25 years and was grateful that people have high expectations of him.
He said: 'When I was younger I had a lot of rage. Yes. And outrage in some respects was enough to write a certain kind of song. As I got older I demanded more of myself. I looked towards outcome,' he said.
Bono said as he matured he became 'the most boring of things – a single issue protagonist'.
'It might be bewildering but I was trying not to speak about stuff that I didn't really understand. And even my understanding of development issues has decreased as I have gotten closer and closer to the music,' he said.
'I used to really know what I was talking about when I was going into those meetings. So I was involved and am involved in all of that. And I can't get the realpolitik of the situation that Joe Biden found himself in.'
He said he accepted the medal on behalf of activists and people who are getting killed in Gaza.
[
Israeli use of Palestinian human shields in Gaza is widespread, detainees say
Opens in new window
]
'The activists, the people who are getting killed now in Gaza. And I sat beside José Andrés (Spanish chef who founded the Global Food Institute). And he had lost people he felt who were deliberately targeted (in Gaza). And yet he was going up to say thank you to the American people for their support of World Central Kitchen. He was very emotional about the loss of his people.'
The World Central Kitchen aid convoy attack took place on April 1st, 2024, when Israeli drones targeted a three car convoy belonging to the organisation in the Gaza Strip, killing seven aid workers. The workers had been overseeing the transfer of a shipment of food to a warehouse in the northern Gaza Strip.
Bono spoke of his enormous respect for Mr Biden, who he said he had worked with for 25 years on issues such as increasing aid flows, dropping debt for impoverished countries and improving access to antiretroviral drugs.
'This is a man I have deep respect for and a real relationship with.'
He said he was used to criticism having been 'egged and all the rest of it' for standing beside George W Bush as part of his work combating Aids at a time when the Republican US president had ordered the invasion of Iraq.
Bono stressed that the reality is that millions of people are still alive because of funds that the US government put in to the US Emergency Fund for Aids.
U2 reunited in London this week to receive the Fellowship of the Ivor's Academy award, the institution's highest honour.
At the ceremony Bono criticised Hamas, Binyamin Netanyahu and 'far-right fundamentalists' in Israel.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
39 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Corporate tax receipts drop 30% as Trump's tariffs bite
Corporate tax receipts fell by 30 per cent in May, amounting to a loss of over €1.1 billion when compared to the same month last year, amid signs US tariffs may be denting the profitability of multinationals in Ireland. The latest exchequer returns for May, published by the Department of Finance, indicated that the Government collected just under €2.5 billion in corporate taxes last month, compared to almost €3.6 billion in May last year. The department insisted, however, that 'once-off factors' had boosted receipts in May last year which distorted the year-on-year comparison. Nonetheless with most EU exports currently facing a 10 per cent levy in the US, possibly rising to 50 per cent if negotiations between Brussels and Washington fail, exporting companies here may be predicting lower earnings READ MORE [ Subscriber Only Opinion Ireland cannot base its economic strategy on the 'Taco' theory – Trump Always Chickens Out Opens in new window ] On a cumulative basis, receipts from the business tax were up by €1.1 billion at €7.4 billion but this reflects once-off revenues from the EU court ruling against Apple. When they are removed, corporate tax receipts to the end of May were down 9.4 per cent at €5.7 billion. Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe said: ' May is one of the more important months for tax revenues, and the steady growth in most tax headings points to an economy that is in a relatively good position." 'The most notable feature of the May exchequer returns was in respect of corporation tax, which saw a marked year-on-year drop,' he said. 'While this reflects once-off factors last year, it nonetheless highlights the degree of concentration in the corporate tax base, wherein a small number of multinational firms can significantly impact on the overall tax yield,' Mr Donohoe said. 'In a context of unprecedented uncertainty in the international economic landscape, this serves as a timely reminder of Ireland's exposure to changes in the global trading environment, and of the vital importance of adhering to a sensible and sustainable budgetary strategy,' he said. Overall the latest exchequer data show the Government collected €38.2 billion in tax revenue during the first five months of the year. This was up nearly €3 billion or 8.5 per cent on the same period last year aided by positive increases in income tax and VAT. Income tax receipts, the Government's largest tax channel, generated €14.5 billion, €630 million more than last year, reflecting the State's strong labour market. Separate figures, published on Thursday, put the headline rate of unemployment near a historic low of 4 per cent. VAT receipts for the year so far were also up by €600 million at €11.4 billion. The sales tax reflects consumer activity. On the spending side, total gross voted expenditure for the five-month period amounted to just under €42 billion, up by €3.1 billion (8.1 per cent) on last year and €37 million (0.1 per cent) behind profile. At a headline level, an exchequer surplus of €4 billion was recorded compared to a surplus of €0.8 billion last year, an improvement of €3.2 billion. Excluding the once-off receipts arising from the Apple tax case, the underlying surplus was €0.7 billion.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Suspended solicitor's appeal over professional misconduct finding to be heard in July
A date has been fixed next month for an appeal by suspended solicitor Declan O'Callaghan over findings of professional misconduct in connection with his handling of a land deal in Co Mayo. On Friday, the president of the High Court, Mr Justice David Barniville, set a provisional hearing date of July 23rd for the appeal. Barrister Michael Mullooly, for Mr O'Callaghan, said he expected it to run for two days and Mr O'Callaghan would be among his side's witnesses. Barrister Ruadhán Ó Ciaráin, for Nirvanna, the concrete products manufacturer that brought the complaint against Mr O'Callaghan over the 2007 land deal to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, said it is expected to call two witnesses at most. READ MORE Last month, Mr Justice Barniville rejected a challenge by Mr O'Callaghan over the procedures adopted by the tribunal in reaching its findings last year of professional misconduct over the 2007 deal. On Friday, he made an order requiring Mr O'Callaghan to pay Nirvanna's costs in opposing that application. The rejection of Mr O'Callaghan's judicial review-type challenge cleared the way for the hearing of his full appeal. If he loses that appeal, the High Court will then consider whether or not to grant an application by the Law Society to strike him off. The society has agreed with the tribunal recommendation that Mr O'Callaghan be struck off, but the final decision on whether or not to grant a strike-off order must be made by the High Court president. The three-member tribunal last summer found Mr O'Callaghan guilty of four counts of professional misconduct over his handling of the 2007 land deal involving Nirvanna, a company of Co Mayo businessman Tom Fleming. [ Declan O'Callaghan: No end in sight as saga of suspended solicitor continues Opens in new window ] Now aged 80, Mr Fleming claimed Nirvanna never received €250,000 for selling the land to a now-deceased businessman. Mr O'Callaghan denied the sum was owed, and disputed the transaction was for 'sale' of the lands. The tribunal upheld the Nirvanna complaint, finding professional misconduct on grounds Mr O'Callaghan breached his duty of care to the company, provided inadequate professional services, and purported to act for vendor and purchaser in a transaction where there was 'a clear conflict of interest'. In recommending strike-off, it had regard to two findings of professional misconduct previously made by it in 1990 and 2019 against Mr O'Callaghan. He has been suspended as a solicitor since 2018 arising from a separate Law Society investigation into matters at his now-defunct practice Kilrane O'Callaghan & Co, which was based in Ballaghaderreen, Co Roscommon. The suspension was imposed pending a tribunal hearing of the society's application for an inquiry into matters arising from its investigation. Concerns raised in an independent solicitor's report for that investigation included that Mr O'Callaghan withdrew substantial fees from the estate of a bereaved child.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Windfarm must shut down three turbines and pay €360,000 damages to couple, High Court orders
A Co Wexford wind farm must fully shut down three of its six turbines and pay a total €360,000 damages, including €60,000 aggravated damages, to a couple over its adverse impact on them, a High Court judge has ordered. ABO Energy Ireland Ltd and ABO Energy O&M Ireland Ltd, operators of the wind farm at Gibbett Hill, near Bunclody, along with its owner, Wexwind Ltd, also face a potential legal costs bill of €2.3 million incurred by Raymond Byrne and Lorna Moorhead in their proceedings. Mr Justice Oisín Quinn refused to grant a stay, pending appeal, which would permit the three turbines closest to the couple's home to partially operate over certain fixed hours. The defendants failed to engage 'in any meaningful way' with the 'genuine and substantive' complaints made by the couple over 12 years since the turbines began operating in 2013, he said. READ MORE The defendants' 'seriously unimpressive' approach represented a threat to the goal of developing wind farms and wind energy here, he said. Addressing wind turbine noise in a substantial way was seen as 'critical' to the future success of wind as a major source of renewable energy. The trial had heard engineers and other experts are used to engaging with nearby residents and others and there are 'usually many solutions available', short of shutting down wind turbines, he noted. The defendants' approach merited aggravated damages, he said, but he would not award exemplary damages for reasons including the impact of the shut down order and positive behaviour of the defendants during the trial, including their admitting liability for nuisance on day 11 of the hearing. In their proceedings, the couple claimed the defendants wrongfully caused or permitted noise, vibration and shadow flicker to be emitted from the wind farm which caused, and continues to cause them, stress, anxiety and sleep disturbance, 'destroyed' the use and enjoyment of their property and devalued it. Represented by John Rogers SC, instructed by solicitor Joe Noonan, they initiated their action in 2018. The defendants had contested the claims but, last March, on the 11th day of the hearing of their full action, the defence admitted liability in relation to the claims of nuisance and they switched off the turbines from 10pm to 7am daily. At the end of the six week trial on April 4th, the defendants apologised for the nuisance and said they would also switch off the turbines from 7am to 11am at weekends and public holidays, pay damages for nuisance to date and into the future and address shadow flicker. In his 100 page judgment, Mr Justice Quinn said the plaintiffs' expert evidence was that the nuisance was 'one of the worst cases of wind farm noise impact' while the defence expert said it was 'an outlier'. He awarded annual damages of €10,000 and €15,000 respectively to Mr Byrne and Ms Moorhead for the 12 years of the nuisance from May 2013, meaning €120,000 and €180,000 general damages respectively. It was not appropriate to permit the defendants to pay additional damages rather than have the three turbines shut down, he held. The 'fair, just and appropriate' outcome was a permanent order directing their full shut down as that was the only order which would prevent what the defendants admitted was a serious nuisance. If an evidential basis for a solution, or combination of solutions, had been put forward by the defendants, that could have avoided the full shutdown of the turbines, he said. His conclusions, he stressed, were limited to the circumstances of this case, including the defendants decision to 'largely ignore' and then fail to engage in any meaningful way with a 'substantial and serious problem' they had belatedly admitted.
