UK plummets down rankings for LGBT+ rights in Europe
The UK has plummeted to a new low in European rankings for LGBT+ rights, despite having topped the list just a decade ago.
Britain dropped six places to 22nd in 2025's rankings - its lowest position ever - in The Rainbow Map and Index, which has been published annually since 2009.
The UK was ranked at the top of the list from 2011 to 2015, but has had all legal gender recognition-related points deducted following the recent Supreme Court ruling, which has defined a woman strictly by biological sex under the Equality Act.
The UK was given an overall score of 45.65 per cent in the rankings, meaning it has an above-average score for Europe, which is 41.85 per cent, but is lower than the European Union members' average of 51.13 per cent.
The rankings give countries in Europe a score between zero and 100 per cent. A score of zero would mean the country grossly violates human rights for LGBT+ people, while 100 per cent means it champions them.
Malta topped the 2025 list with a score of 89 per cent, followed by Belgium in second with 89 per cent, Iceland with 84 per cent, Denmark with 80 per cent and Spain with 78 per cent.
ILGA Europe, the advocacy group that publishes the rankings, said it had removed all legal gender recognition-related points from the UK's score in 2025, as the ruling had meant 'legal gender recognition is no longer fully effective'.
'Legal gender recognition should enable a person to legally function and be recognised in their affirmed gender in all areas of life; this is no longer the case in the UK,' it said.
'The ruling, along with interim guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), means that individuals with a gender recognition certificate are not fully recognised as their affirmed gender in important legal contexts.
'It is, in fact, impossible for a trans person to be fully legally recognised in their gender identity within the legal framework created by the judgment and interim update.'
Britain also lost points for not yet having a ban on conversion therapy, and limited options for healthcare for young trans people.
The UK also scored low on issues such as rights for intersex people and the draft government guidance advising teachers in England not to teach schoolchildren about gender identity, and proposing a ban on sex education for children under nine.
A low score of 16.67 per cent was also given for the UK's record over LGBT+ asylum seekers, with such refugees often facing homelessness and abuse.
LGBT+ rights group Stonewall said the rankings should be a 'wake-up call' for the government as it 'undermines our position on the global stage'.
'No country can afford to be on autopilot during these turbulent times,' a spokesperson said.
"The UK has reached an all-time low position of 22 out of 49. Warm words and empty promises from the government won't restore the UK's global reputation on LGBTQ+ rights. Action will.'
The Good Law Project's executive director, Jo Maugham, said the sharp fall in the UK's ranking came as little surprise.
'Only ten years ago, we were the best in the world in the annual LGBTI Rights Ranking,' he said.
'We're now 22nd and making all the wrong headlines, alongside Hungary and Georgia, for the biggest decline in protections. This is not just an embarrassment abroad – it's also a tragedy at home for tens of thousands of people struggling to live lives of quiet dignity.'
The UK did score highly in some categories, such as family and civil society space.
The country was given a score of 85.67 per cent for LGBT+ families, with the Marriage Act 2013 being cited as a reason.
Civil society space was given 100 per cent, as the UK was deemed to have laws, policies and practices in place which allow for full exercise of freedom of assembly, association and expression for LGBT+ people.
Equality and non-discrimination were given an average score of 49.13 per cent, while hate crime and hate speech were given a score of 40.55 per cent.
The UK was joined by Hungary and Georgia in seeing big drops in its annual rankings.
Hungary has seen the prohibition of Pride events and criminalisation of participants, and both Georgia and Hungary have removed references to 'gender identity and expression' from their legislation.
Despite slipping down the ranks, the UK is still far above those at the bottom of the list.
Russia came in last with a score of just 2 per cent, followed marginally by Azerbaijan at 2.25 per cent and Turkey at 4.75 per cent.
In 2023, Russia's Supreme Court effectively outlawed any LGBT+ activism in a ruling that designated 'the international LGBT movement' as extremist.
A UK government spokesperson said: ' The UK has long championed the rights of LGBT+ people at home and abroad. We proudly uphold a clear and robust expansive legislative framework.
'We are working to advance the rights afforded to LGBT+ people, including bringing forward legislation to finally ban conversion practices and strengthening protections against hate crime.'
A spokesperson for the EHRC told The Independent: 'At the EHRC we uphold and enforce the Equality Act. Our response to the Supreme Court's judgment has been, and will continue to be, firmly grounded in the law. Those who rely on us are reassured that every explanation of equality law from the EHRC will be accurate and authoritative. That is our job, as Britain's independent and expert equality regulator.
'We know there is uncertainty among duty-bearers and affected groups. The EHRC has been visible in providing clarity on the consequences of the judgment and will continue to be so.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Daniel Levy's right-hand woman Donna Cullen to leave Tottenham
Daniel Levy's right-hand woman Donna Cullen has stepped down from the Tottenham Hotspur board and is to leave the club in the first of a number of anticipated summer changes. Cullen has been on the Tottenham board since 2006 and has been considered Levy's closest confidant in recent years. A trustee of the Tottenham Hotspur Foundation, Cullen has received criticism from fans over recent years as part of the protests against Levy. The news is yet to be confirmed by Tottenham, but staff have been informed of the decision in an email that has been seen by Telegraph Sport.
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Keir Starmer refuses to set date for UK to spend 3% of GDP on defence
Keir Starmer has refused to give a date for the UK to spend at least 3% of GDP on defence, saying he would not indulge in 'performative fantasy politics', as he prepared to launch the government's strategic defence review. Speaking at a defence facility in Scotland, the prime minister said his commitment to hit 2.5% of GDP on defence spending from 2027 showed he was serious about the issue, but that he could not go further without fiscal certainty. 'I am not, as the prime minister of Labour government, going to make a commitment as to the precise date until I can be sure precisely where the money is coming from, how we can make good on that commitment, because I don't believe in performative fantasy politics, and certainly not on defence and security,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. Pressed again on the date, Starmer said: 'We had a commitment for 2.5% by the end of this parliament. We pulled that right forward to 2027. We showed that when we say there's a new era of the defence and security of our country, is our first priority – as it is – that we meant it. We take the same approach to 3%. 'But I'm not going to indulge in the fantasy politics of simply plucking dates from the air until I'm absolutely clear that I can sit here in an interview with you and tell you exactly how that's going to work.' The defence review will say Britain must be ready to fight a war in Europe or the Atlantic, though it is not expected to promise immediate increases in the size of the armed forces to deal with the threat. The 130-page document will call for a move to 'war-fighting readiness' to deter Russian aggression in Europe and increases in stockpiles of arms and support equipment, some of which currently may only last days in a crisis. Asked about this, Starmer said: 'We have to recognise the world has changed, and if the world has changed, we need to be ready. What I would say, by way of reassurance, is if you want to deter conflict, then the best way to do that is to prepare for conflict.' Questioned on whether this could involve, for example, British troops being sent to defend attacks on countries adjoining Russia, Starmer replied: 'I very much hope not. And in order to make sure that that isn't the case, we need to prepare. But we cannot ignore the threat that Russia poses. 'We've seen what's happened in Ukraine just over three and a half, three years ago, those tanks rolled across a border, something I think all of us thought we wouldn't really see in our lifetimes – the invasion of a European country. Russia has so shown in recent weeks that it's not serious about peace. We have to be ready.' The review is not expected to contain any additional spending commitments. The defence secretary, John Healey, acknowledged on Sunday that any plans to increase the size of the British army, at its smallest for 300 years, would have to wait until after the next election. Speaking to the BBC, Healey said there had been '15 years of a recruitment and retention crisis in our armed forces' as he acknowledged that the size of the army had fallen to 70,860, below the government's target of 73,000.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Buying Florian Wirtz reveals Liverpool's new ambition – and poses a question for Arne Slot
When Florian Wirtz was 18, he was interviewed by Bayer Leverkusen 's club magazine. The headline was a quote from the teenager: 'I have big dreams'. If he leaves, as looks likely, it will be after making Leverkusen's biggest come true and yet while showing he didn't share the dream of many a star at Germany's other clubs. From Lothar Matthaus to Leon Goretzka and Leroy Sane, they gravitated to Bayern, given their guarantee of trophies. The Bavarian dominance in the 21st century has been aided by an ability to raid the rest of Germany for their prized assets. Michael Ballack, taken from Leverkusen, was a pioneer. Jonathan Tah, going from Leverkusen this summer, follows in his footsteps, just as Dortmund were plundered when they represented Bayern's major rivals. Not Wirtz, though. A player who can weave his way past defenders is plotting a different path: to Liverpool. It is a dream with a big price, Liverpool's second bid amounting to €109m (£92m), Leverkusen still wanting more. It shows a certain ambition and audacity at Anfield: to target and tempt Wirtz. Logic suggested Wirtz would be paired with Jamal Musiala at Bayern, Germany's two generational talents together for club and country. Yet, Tah's decision notwithstanding, this Leverkusen have displayed a capacity to frustrate Bayern. Their maiden Bundesliga title ended the Bavarians' run at 11 in a row. Xabi Alonso rejected Bayern's advances to stay another year, Real Madrid instead his preferred destination. Now Wirtz is set to become Liverpool's new Jurgen Klopp: a man Bayern had wanted but never got. The similarities with Klopp may end there. Wirtz has a different kind of charisma; with the ball at his feet, caressing it, sometimes with the simplicity of a master, sometimes with a crowd-pleasing flair. He has a capacity to catch opponents out with deft footwork; in a different way, Liverpool demonstrated their own with an approach that almost came by stealth. He would be a statement signing: win the title and then buy perhaps the most coveted player on the market this summer. Wirtz is an illustration that Fenway Sports Group and Liverpool can go very big: not often, normally when they have earned the right to and, encouragingly, usually successfully. Virgil van Dijk and Alisson Becker were the £140m pair acquired for world-record fees. Relative to the prices previous centre-backs and goalkeepers cost, there was a case for arguing they paid over the odds; yet they bought players who were both among the best in the game in their position then and who still are now. The false economy would have been to spend less on lesser players. Wirtz, they may hope, becomes a similar case. Darwin Nunez has proved otherwise, but then his signing owed more to Klopp. Wirtz will join when Arne Slot's dealings are underpinned by the axis of the returning Michael Edwards and the relatively new sporting director Richard Hughes. He may be still be cheaper than Moises Caicedo might have been: Liverpool's £111m bid in 2023 remains an oddity, and they instead constructed a title-winning midfield for lower fees, but it again shows they will stretch the budget. Wirtz can be seen as a reward for relative austerity, for making a profit last summer. He would be, though, a coup that raises questions. The most immediate may be where he will play. There might have looked a more natural vacancy at Manchester City, with Kevin De Bruyne going, with a central creator required. At Liverpool, Dominik Szoboszlai is forever running but going nowhere. The Hungarian had a huge importance as a presser, a hassler, a harrier and a man who did some of Mohamed Salah 's defending. There were days when he was incisive: he was wonderful in a week that brought back-to-back wins over City and Newcastle, for instance. Yet Slot often says a midfielder for Liverpool has to score goals and Szoboszlai's return can be slight, given his class. Wirtz offers more creativity, more end product after 34 goals in his last two seasons at Leverkusen; six of them came in this year's Champions League alone, albeit largely against weaker teams in the group. So simply an upgrade as a No 10? It may not be that simple. Slot experimented with Szoboszlai as a No 8 at the end of the season. The Hungarian could still have a considerable role to play. And it does feel pertinent that, whereas there had been an expectation Liverpool would devote much of their budget to a striker this summer, they are instead committing it to an attacking midfielder. Luis Diaz was a qualified success when reinvented as a No 9 but Diogo Jota arguably regressed over the season. There were reasons to think the attacking upgrade would come in the centre of the attack, perhaps with Diaz competing with Cody Gakpo on the left. Alonso made few mistakes in his two-and-a-half years in Leverkusen but playing Wirtz as a false nine in the 2024 Europa League final against Atalanta may have been one of them. Nevertheless, one of Liverpool's finest performances of the season occurred in a striker-less 4-2-2-2, with Szoboszlai and Curtis Jones as twin No 10s against City. Slot soon abandoned the tactic, compelling as it seemed. At Feyenoord he built around a prolific centre-forward, in Santiago Gimenez. But there are reasons to revive it and a temptation to wonder if Wirtz, though very different, could take on the mantle of Roberto Firmino as the central conductor, with quick, wide raiders ahead of him (his Leverkusen teammate Jeremie Frimpong among them). Tellingly, the sense is that Liverpool presented Wirtz with a clearer idea of his role than Bayern did. That felt persuasive. Whatever Slot's tactical idea, and further summer signings could help answer that, Wirtz looks the future of Liverpool. He can form part of the succession to Salah: not directly, as another right winger would be required for that. But he is a decade the Egyptian's junior. For most of the last decade, it has helped Liverpool's other attackers that Salah shouldered so much responsibility that the burden on them was reduced. They could score in his slipstream. Even as Salah has his new deal, his era may be entering its final couple of years. Perhaps Wirtz's big dream was to become Liverpool's main man.
