logo
Wilding, based on Isabella Tree's book, shows how one failing farm tried something new, and changed everything

Wilding, based on Isabella Tree's book, shows how one failing farm tried something new, and changed everything

In a tiny corner of southern England, there's a small pocket of paradise.
There's not a hedge or lawn in sight: ethereal deer wander peacefully through clouds of blossoms; dark-haired, stocky horses amble through abundant green scrub.
What: A peaceful documentary about the huge successes of an enormous rewilding project on English farming land.
Directed by: David Allen
Starring: Isabella Tree, Charlie Burrell and a menagerie of incredible animals
Likely to make you feel: Like ripping up your lawn
The air is full of birdsong — even the lilting call of the turtle dove, that beloved bird from Christmas songs past, which has lost 98 per cent of its population in England and is on its way to extinction.
This is Knepp Estate, a resplendent tract of land passed down through generations of a farming family to Charlie Burrell and his partner, Isabella Tree. But when they took over the farm in the late 80s, it was a muddy wreck where nothing would grow.
"We're on this terrible land, heavy clay soil, 320 metres of the stuff. And, you know, in the winter, it's just like porridge," Tree explains to ABC Entertainment.
"You can't get heavy machinery onto it, so you can't sow spring crops, you can't do the maintenance, you can't be competitive. No matter what we tried, we couldn't make farming work."
Millions of pounds in debt and running out of options, the couple made the decision to stop farming, selling their equipment and stock. They were heartbroken.
But after a fortuitous meeting, a light appeared at the end of the tunnel: they could 'rewild' Knepp estate.
This spur-of-the-moment decision changed everything, as shown in a new documentary, Wilding.
Rewilding can look quite different to traditional conservation, according to Doctor Sally Hawkins, a lecturer at Central Queensland University and a leading rewilding scientist and educator.
Where conservation is about protecting a certain species or habitat, rewilding is about allowing nature to restore "without trying to control what it looks like".
Rewilding is a step away from "colonial attitudes towards natural resources", says Dr Hawkins.
Using government subsidies to fund the initial transition, the Knepp project pulled down the farm's fences and released populations of Old English longhorn cattle; Exmoor ponies and Tamworth pigs — mammals that would have roamed in this area centuries before.
The animals did what machines couldn't: turned over the soil, spread around seed, created hollows and habitats that bugs and plants thrive in. When a particularly stubborn thistle threatened to take over, a breed of butterflies that hadn't been seen for years appeared in droves and ate it all. The lack of pesticides and machine ploughing allowed mycelium networks to reconnect and plants became healthier.
In short, it was working.
"Ironically, we used to travel the world to see nature, to see wildlife," says Tree.
"We never once wondered why we didn't have it in our own backyard because of what we were doing to our landscape. Then we thought, 'My God, we might actually get nature back here.'"
After only about five years, the scale of wildlife returning brought other income streams to Knepp, largely in ecotourism. They now have a restaurant, a café and a shop, and employ more than 100 people.
"People often assume that rewilding is about excluding people from nature, but it's actually about bringing more people in," says Tree.
"Suddenly, you've got a vibrant community. Nature has brought all this back to life.
"What we didn't really anticipate was how healing it would be for us as well because we hadn't realised how stressful it had been trying to force the land to do something it didn't want to do."
The damp, verdantly green world of Knepp might be light-years away from Australian wilderness but Dr Hawkins says the principles of rewilding stay the same.
"There's a lot of degraded land [in Australia], whether that's been through mining or whether it's been through intensive agriculture," she explains.
But what works in rural England won't fly in the Australian outback; the strategy must be adapted to what the nature here needs.
We don't have native mega herbivores like they do in Europe and North America, but traditional burning practices can fill that role of disturbance, says Dr Hawkins.
"In many places in Europe, we don't remember how we sustainably managed our land in the past, but here we have first-hand knowledge. So it's really a big advantage."
In Australia there are already many "very valuable" protected areas, and rewilding could help connect those together across the country, creating healthy migratory corridors.
Wilding, the 2018 book by Tree on which it was based, and the whole Knepp project, in its essence is about the joy of nature.
The film is full of dreamlike wilderness montages and Tree's gentle but excited storytelling.
It isn't wagging the finger, it's celebrating the power of change.
"You know, we have what, 40, 50, harvests left? So we have to change, and we have to do that now," says Tree.
She says rewilding and regenerative farming work "hand-in-glove": wild spaces threading through and alongside farmland can help make the land healthier.
"It's providing the life-support system that is going to enable ourselves to feed ourselves."
Dr Hawkins says while legislation is key to protecting what we still have, the rewilding process has to start from the ground up.
Tree is a happy poster child for the huge impacts that small, local steps can have.
"It's that old mantra, you know, 'Think globally, act locally': we can restore even the tiny ecosystem in our garden [and then] it's cooler, it holds onto moisture … and then you might notice more birds coming to your garden."
There's one more point she says people should know about rewilding.
"It's also tremendous fun."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meghan releases rare photo of Lilibet for her birthday
Meghan releases rare photo of Lilibet for her birthday

News.com.au

time2 days ago

  • News.com.au

Meghan releases rare photo of Lilibet for her birthday

COMMENT I'd put money on it now: On June 4, 2039 Princess Lilibet will turn 18-years-old and it will trigger a media-free-for-all of comparing, contrasting and juxtaposing she and Princess Charlotte. They are Diana, Princess of Wales' granddaughters and they seem cursed, no warty witch required, to be perpetually pitched against one another even though their lives bear no resemblance. One girl's is of the highest calibre, full-focus exposure and a Getty archive of 22,606 shots of her. (Really.) The other's face has not been seen in public since she was a baby. Charlotte is the only fifth grader in the world used to making small talk with the Archbishop of Canterbury during a live global TV broadcast and is already a dab hand at the regal Buckingham Palace wave; Lili's face has been on view since Queen Elizabeth was still firmly planted on the throne. Until now. Wednesday marked not only Lili's fourth birthday but her mother Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex pulling a surprising social media swerve by sharing a front facing photo of the tiny princess looking at the camera, showing more of her face than has been seen in years. Since 2022, Meghan and Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex have followed a tried and tested celeb-y protocol and only released photos of their kids taken from the back, in profile or with something obscuring their faces. It seemed like a nice midline: Their little ones' privacy was maintained while public interest was moderately sated. However, since joining Instagram this year and with this new Lili image, a beautiful black and white shot showing her being embraced by a perfectly windswept, stunning duchess on a boat, Meghan appears to be inching closer and closer to backflipping on this one. Is the Sussex status quo no longer a-go-go? Protection and privacy have been the firmly entrenched watchwords of Harry and Meghan's approach with them clearly choosing to not put them on display. Only last month, to mark Prince Archie's sixth birthday, Meghan marked the day by posting a single photo of the pyjama-clad primary schooler that was devoid of anything like detail. Or on May 19, to celebrate the Sussexes' seventh wedding anniversary, she shared an image of a collage of touching family photos including some showing the kids' faces but which were so weeny and small it was nearly impossible to discern any real detail or see what they actually look like. Clever. And yet now we have this Lili shot, her facing the camera, with the top half of her face clearly visible. What is all a bit inexplicable is why, in under a month, the swing from that to this higher degree of exposure? Is this simply a one-off or are she and Archie being slowly revealed to the world like the latest model iPhone? This Lili birthday snap clearly raises more questions than it answers, least importantly, how much time are Harry and Meghan spending at sea? (To mark International Women's Day Meghan went the obvious route and shared a shot of Harry tenderly kissing his daughter on some sort of speedboat.) More significantly, it highlights a split in the duke and duchess' attitudes towards social media. In late April the couple were in New York where they launched an Archwell-backed memorial remembering the children and teens lost to social media harms, a cause they have been involved with for years. Harry made his feelings abundantly clear: 'Keep your kids away from social media..... Life is better off of social media'. The Duke of Sussex also comes to the question of shielding his children with other complicating factors. He has made abundantly clear the trauma that constant media exposure during his childhood did to this tender, young psyche. Also, in August 2024, a friend of the Sussexes told Peopl e that ​​'Harry has been reluctant to show his children publicly, not out of a desire to hide them but to protect their privacy and safety from potential threats'. Given all of this, what might Aitch, whose genuine joy and delight in fatherhood is a balm for his often publicly vinegary persona these days, make of a half of his daughter's face being broadcast to two billion people on Instagram? There are other details about Lili's birthday posts that have not been explained either. Archie got one birthday shot; for Lili Meghan has put out three posts including four stills plus a bizarre video of her and Harry twerking in the hospital ahead of her delivery, and all of it shared across nine hours, based on timestamps. The main portrait (and another showing Lili with Meghan seemingly just after her birth) appears to have gone live at midnight California-time. However a second post, one photo showing Harry with a newborn Lili and another of them barefoot, was shared at 7.40am followed by the awkward video at about 9.00am, according to online conversion tools. The best answer I can come up with is that, swept away on a tide of maternal love and a sugar high thanks to a before school-run slice of cake, the Duchess of Sussex couldn't help but keep posting adorable images. That or she was bored waiting for an Uber. So are all these glimpses and peaks building towards something? Or are they as far as Meghan will go? What the last few months have shown is that any and all photos of her children popping up on Insta are guaranteed to generate buzz and interest, handy if you're in the midst of a relaunch as a home-y, lifestyle doyenne. Here's a dose of pathos to close things out. Both Meghan and Charlotte's mother Kate, The Princess of Wales, have inherited bits and bobs of Diana's jewellery but in having daughters, they got something the late princess dreamt of. 'Diana always wanted a girl,' her longtime private secretary Patrick Jephson said in 2015. 'Both my daughters were born when I was working with Princess Diana, and she more than once said how lucky I was to have girls'.

Meghan isn't trying to go viral, she's just being authentic
Meghan isn't trying to go viral, she's just being authentic

News.com.au

time2 days ago

  • News.com.au

Meghan isn't trying to go viral, she's just being authentic

Can we all just leave Meghan alone? Yes, that '00s reference holds today because Meghan Markle (apologies, Sussex) can't catch a break no matter what she posts or who she hosts. While I was sceptical of the rainbow sprinkles as well, and I wasn't overwhelmed by her show, the backlash over her video has me firmly on Team Meghan. At the start of 2025, Meghan made her return to Instagram after a decade-long hiatus, following Royal Family protocol. And when she returned, she was unashamedly Meghan, keeping a curated 'realness' of her life. And that's precisely what she did to celebrate Lilibet's birthday. When even a birthday message is coping hate, we've gone too far She shared her dance in the delivery suite as she tried to encourage her labour to begin. She said she tried everything to get things moving, so she took to dancing as a last resort. I've had three babies myself and know a lot of women who have also given birth. When it comes to tips and tricks to kickstart labour, many pregnant women will admit they've tried them all, from the G-rated (curb walking or eating a pile of dates) through to the R18+ (having sex with your partner, god forbid), there's no judgment. Because that final week (or weeks) of pregnancy should be named 'I'm Over It' or 'Time To Vacate'. That's the point where patience runs thin, energy is low, sleep deprivation is already a thing, and every trick in the book is attempted in hopes of getting things moving. Whether it's walking, bouncing on a yoga ball, or, yes, dancing shamelessly around the room — anything to bring on that beautiful, albeit exhausting, moment when labour begins. It's a time when the mind needs to be distracted, the body needs to stay active, and for some (think of every parenting influencer you follow on social media) there's an urge to share these final moments of pregnancy with the world in a way that feels authentic. Meghan Markle is no different. Imagine you've been thinking about this milestone for nine months (or more). You look down at your belly and say, 'OK, baby, it's time!' The problem is, babies don't have a calendar or a watch; they run on their own schedule, thank you very much. Once you've hit 40 weeks, as the song says, 'Been pregnant for way too long!' Don't worry, Meghan, I danced too! Meghan's pre-labour dance was her second pregnancy. She'd been down this road before. She wasn't going to wait any longer, and she knew what she had to do. And let's face it — dancing at 40 weeks, whether you're a duchess or not, isn't sexy. It might even be cringey. But hey, she's human. I was doing the same jig almost three years ago when I was due with my third baby boy. I was cautious and reserved during my first two pregnancies, and by the third time, I just wanted to have fun with it. And in the words of Lizzo, it was 'about damn time.' I was proud to share this moment with my friends and family. For sure, some people were laughing at my expense, but I couldn't hear them or see them from the delivery room. I posted it to celebrate and bring joy into the room while also desperately wanting my labour to start and finally be on the other side of this whole journey. I also knew that once I posted, I wouldn't be hit with a tidal wave of hate – the upside of being a non-celebrity. OK, I'll admit, I hoped for a 'like' from Lizzo or a dream scenario repost, but I didn't censor myself because I was worried about what people would say. And yet, when Meghan Markle shares a moment like this, she's immediately criticised for being 'too much.' She gets called out for being too polished when she shares the perfectly manicured, PR-approved moments. And when she dares to show a more human side — a mother feeling silly, a wife being playful with her husband, a woman not trying to be anyone other than herself — she's labelled 'cringe.' It's exhausting, and frankly, boring. If you don't like her, just keep scrolling. Meghan's dance is what we, as her followers, demanded of her: real, unfiltered moments. If the 'Baby Mama Dance' was shared by any other celebrity or regular mum-to-be, it might've just been celebrated for being fun and relatable. But because it's Meghan Markle, who's been under a microscope since she was first linked to Harry nearly a decade ago, it becomes fodder for criticism. The truth is, no matter what she does, she's always going to be criticised. And that is just really sad. I want to believe in a world where fellow mothers who have been overdue or had their baby on their due date aren't hating on her while watching this video. Because as we all know, pregnancy and parenthood are hard enough without the added layer of keyboard warriors. So let's assume we do live in this utopia where mums don't hate on other mums for dancing to induce labour — this goes out to the partners too, who get a front-row seat in the delivery room. And to everyone else, strap on a watermelon and two rockmelons, then go about your regular everyday activities … it won't be long before you're twerking your way out of wearing the fruit salad on your belly and chest. Regardless of your personal opinion of Meghan Markle, in this raw, unfiltered moment, she is just a woman, a mum, about to become a mother for the second time. Trying to have a laugh with her husband by her side knowing she has a very challenging few hours ahead. So let's all find something better to critique.

Beckham family drama deepens as Romeo splits from girlfriend Kim Turnbull
Beckham family drama deepens as Romeo splits from girlfriend Kim Turnbull

News.com.au

time2 days ago

  • News.com.au

Beckham family drama deepens as Romeo splits from girlfriend Kim Turnbull

Romeo Beckham and girlfriend Kim Turnbull have split up after just seven months together. The pair's romance 'fizzled out' shortly after Romeo's dad David's star-studded 50th birthday party last month. A friend of the pair told the Mail: 'Romeo and Kim are both young and they had a lovely time together but at that age things don't always last forever and they decided to split up. 'They have been friendly since and have even been at the same venues. 'It's a huge shame, particularly as David and Victoria really adored her and thought she made Romeo happy but it wasn't to be. 'It happened a couple of weeks ago and relations have remained friendly between them.' The Sun has contacted representatives for Kim and Romeo. Kim, 26, is said to be at the heart of the Beckham family feud in which eldest child Brooklyn and wife Nicola Peltz, 30, have become estranged. Brooklyn previously dated Kim as a teenager and was reportedly unhappy she was on the guestlist for David's birthday celebrations. However, the insider insists that the feud has had no bearing on their decision to call it a day. Kim and Romeo went public in November, 20 months after his split from Mia Reagan, his ex of five years. While Kim was previously linked to Rocco Ritchie, the son of Madonna and Guy Ritchie, who is one of Becks' closest pals. The Beckhams are yet to speak publicly about their family row, but there have been digs thrown around on social media. Tellingly, Brooklyn publicly wished Nicola's brother a happy birthday just days ago, not long after snubbing his dad's milestone entirely. He has also added a floral tattoo to his chest, swamping the 'mama's boy' tribute to his mum Victoria that previously took pride of place. While Romeo's romance has ended, Brooklyn and Nicola's appears stronger than ever as they band together. In a love-struck confession, Brooklyn, 26, said he knew she was 'the one' after just three months of dating. He opened up to Glamour on his early plans to pop the question to the Lola actor, who he married in Miami three years ago. In a rare joint interview with his wife, Brooklyn said: 'I knew after three months that I wanted to marry her. 'But because of Covid, I wanted to wait until our families could be there.' The chef and photographer failed to mention his parents, David and Victoria, by name amid their feud which has seen claims Brooklyn has now hired Prince Harry's lawyers to solve the bitter dispute. Brooklyn continued to detail his proposal plans to Glamour's Germany edition and added: 'A few hours before, I had a golf cart accident and needed stitches in my hand. 'My thumb was completely bandaged – I couldn't even open the wine!' During the chat, he was quick to gush over his spouse and their almost-instant connection. He said: 'When I first saw Nicola at Coachella, I was immediately captivated – by her beauty, her warmth, her charisma. 'Even though it was only a fleeting moment, it stayed with me for a long time.' He then added: 'You have to marry your best friend, someone you feel at home with. For me, Nicola is exactly that.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store