US military to create two new border zones, officials say
WASHINGTON, June 25 (Reuters) - The Pentagon will create two new military zones along the border with Mexico, U.S. officials said on Wednesday, a move that allows troops to temporarily detain migrants or trespassers.
President Donald Trump's administration has hailed its actions along the border, including the deployment of active duty troops, as the reason for a sharp decline in crossings by undocumented migrants. Trump made voters' concerns about immigration a cornerstone of his 2024 re-election bid.
The Pentagon has already created two military zones, but only four people have been temporarily detained on them, a U.S. official said.
A new "National Defense Area" will be created covering about 250 miles (402 km) of the Rio Grande river in Texas and administered as a part of Joint Base San Antonio, according to the Air Force.
The U.S. officials said the other military zone would be administered as a part of Marine Corps Air Station in Yuma, Arizona.
The zones are intended to allow the Trump administration to use troops to detain migrants without invoking the 1807 Insurrection Act that empowers a president to deploy the U.S. military to suppress events such as civil disorder.
As legal deterrents to border crossers, the zones have had mixed results. Federal magistrate judges in New Mexico and Texas dismissed trespassing charges against dozens of migrants caught in the areas on grounds they did not know they were in a restricted military zone.
However, some 120 migrants pleaded guilty to trespassing in the first Texas zone in May and federal prosecutors obtained their first two trespassing convictions for the New Mexico zone on June 18, according to U.S. Attorneys' Offices in the two states.
Around 11,900 troops are currently on the border.
Illegal border crossings fell to a record low in March after the Biden administration shut down asylum claims in 2024 and Mexico tightened immigration controls.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pregnant Republican forced to evacuate Florida office after imminent death threats following her painful revelation
Florida Republican Kat Cammack shared Wednesday that her district office had to be evacuated due to death threats she received following a Wall Street Journal story published earlier this week detailed her experiences with an ectopic pregnancy last year. Cammack, 37, is currently pregnant and expecting her first child in mid-August. In a post on X, formerly Twitter, the congresswoman spoke of 'imminent death threats against me, my unborn child, my family and my staff' based on her revealing her story about a 'nonviable pregnancy with no heartbeat.' 'Since then, we've received thousands of hate-filled messages and dozens of credible threats from pro-abortion activists, which law enforcement is actively investigating,' she added, noting the uptick of violent threats against elected officials. In a statement sent to the Daily Mail by Cammack's office she also noted: 'This is the unacceptable reality we're facing: sharing a personal health story in an effort to improve healthcare for women and their children can lead to threats, harassment, and evacuation orders'. 'This should be a wake-up call. Women deserve better. And so does the national healthcare dialogue, Cammack added. The threats come just over a week after a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband were assassinated at their home by a gunman. Cammack also clarified that she did not vote for Florida's heartbeat law since she serves as a U.S. congresswoman, not a state legislature. Florida's heartbeat law, passed in 2023, bans abortion once a fetal heartbeat can be detected — typically around six weeks of pregnancy. 'Let me be clear: I will not be intimidated. I won't back down in the fight for women and families. Ensuring women have the resources and care they deserve is critical. We need real conversations about maternal healthcare in America—conversations based on truth, not fear,' Cammack said. Today, we had to evacuate our offices due to imminent death threats against me, my unborn child, my family, and my staff. These threats erupted after the Wall Street Journal reported on my life-threatening ectopic pregnancy—a nonviable pregnancy with no heartbeat. Since then,… — Rep. Cammack Press Office (@RepKatCammack) June 26, 2025 The Wall Street Journal reported that Cammack was about five weeks pregnant when she required a methotrexate injection to treat an ectopic pregnancy — a condition in which the embryo cannot survive. Cammack is a co-chair of the House Pro-Life Caucus, and opposes abortion, but backs exemptions in the case of rape, incest and when the life of the mother is in danger. Cammack's team said some of the threats came in as comments on a series of photos she and her husband Matt Harrison took to celebrate her pregnancy.
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump plots doing the unthinkable with Fed boss Jerome Powell
President Trump is considering naming the next chair of the Federal Reserve despite Jerome Powell still having 11 months left in the post. The move could dramatically undermine Powell who, along with the Open Market Committee, is responsible for setting benchmark interest rates that affect everything from mortgage rates to car loans. Trump has repeatedly expressed his disdain for Powell and his cautious approach to lowering interest rates. The President even threatened to fire him outright, before walking back the idea. Now, the Wall Street Journal reports the White House may announce Powell's replacement as early as this summer, far ahead of the typical timeline. The traditional transition period for announcing new Fed chairs is three to four months. Such an early nomination could create confusion in markets and turn the incoming candidate into a 'shadow chair,' publicly challenging Powell's decisions ahead of the official transition. 'The Administration is now laying the groundwork — including with The One, Big, Beautiful Bill — to turbocharge economic, job, and investment growth, and it's high time for monetary policy to complement this agenda and support America's economic resurgence,' a White House spokesperson said on Wednesday. Wall Street is particularly nervous about an early nomination as the independence of the Federal Reserve is seen as vital for market stability. Markets respond not just to official Fed decisions, but also to hints about future moves — meaning mixed signals could cause turmoil. 'You're going to have two people trying to steer the ship: One that's actually steering it, and one that's the backseat driver,' Ryan Sweet, chief US economist at Oxford Economics told Reuters. Wall Street has been unnerved by the President's willingness to push the boundaries of the Fed's independence from the White House. A new Fed chair seen as under Trump's influence would also concern Wall Street. 'Whomever is appointed, the key thing to monitor is whether they are perceived as being a political appointee,' Eric Winograd, chief U.S. economist at AllianceBernstein told Reuters. 'And by that, I mean someone whose views change with the whims of the president.' Callie Cox, chief market strategist at Ritholtz Wealth Management agreed that the next Fed chair will be crucial. 'Any Wall Street manager would tell you that Fed independence is the golden rule of markets,' Cox told the publication. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (left) and David Malpass (right) are top contenders Former governor of the Federal Reserve Kevin Warsh (left) and White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett (right) are said to be in the running Federal Reserve Gov. Christopher Waller has also been tipped as a Trump nomination 'To move away from that can introduce a whole host of issues.' A wildcard choice for the next chair could also discombobulate the markets. The top candidates are currently White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett; former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh; former World Bank President David Malpass; Fed governor Christopher Waller and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, the Journal reported. The Fed's 'dual mandate' is to keep inflation low while maintaining a healthy labor market. Economists have warned that Trump's tariffs will raise prices, something that will require interest rates to stay elevated. However, a slowdown in the job market will pressure the central bank's monetary policymaking committee to make a cut.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Donald Trump sends U.S. military to war against the media over Iran strike doubts
The United States military has carried out some of the most complex and difficult missions in the history of warfare, from the storming of the beaches of Normandy to the killing of Osama Bin Laden. But its latest operation — convincing the American media that its mission to destroy Iran's nuclear capability was a success — is proving to be a challenging one. Despite President Donald Trump claiming that the attack had left the facilities "completely and totally obliterated,' questions have lingered about the efficacy of Operation Midnight Hammer. Those questions were given fuel by a leaked initial assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency that suggested the strikes did not destroy the core components of the country's nuclear program and likely only set it back by months. To discredit what the White House called a 'flat-out wrong' assessment by 'a low-level loser in the intelligence community,' Trump dispatched the might of the U.S. military's top brass — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General Dan Caine, to set the media straight. In the early morning press conference, Hegseth played the role of a furious school teacher scolding the Pentagon press corps for not praising the mission or those who carried it out sufficiently, and for focusing too much on the potential downsides — namely the possibility that the strikes did not sufficiently damage Iran's ability to make a nuclear weapon while simultaneously making it more likely that it builds one in secret. 'It's like in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad you have to cheer against the efficacy of these strikes,' Hegeth said. 'You have to hope maybe they weren't effective, maybe the way the Trump administration is representing them isn't true.' Hegseth seemed to insist that wanting to know if Iran could build a nuke was simply unpatriotic. "There are so many aspects of what our brave men and women did, that because of the hatred of this press corps, are undermined because you people are trying to leak and spin that it wasn't successful,' he went on. Hegseth appeared angry that the journalists sent to cover the Pentagon spent too much time 'hunting for scandals' and not enough time praising the bravery of the bomber pilots who carried out this mission — a great irony considering he works for a president who won the White House in part by lambasting the media and political establishment for lying to the American public about the intelligence that led to the Iraq War. 'How many stories have been written about how hard it is to, I don't know, fly a plane for 36 hours. Has MSNBC done that story? Has Fox?' he asked incredulously, before calling on the press to 'wave an American flag' and 'be proud of what we accomplished.' The presentation from Hegseth and Caine at times felt like an extended deleted scene from Top Gun 3, a bewildering barrage of patriotic imagery — flags, bombs, brave pilots and the tears of their families as they returned home from their mission. You could almost hear the faint call of a bald eagle. Caine's description of the return of the bomber pilots, in particular, was emotive and touching, but did little to answer questions about Iran's nuclear capabilities. "The jets rejoined into a formation of four airplanes followed by a formation of three, and came up overhead Whiteman [air force base in Missouri] proudly in the traffic pattern, pitching out to land right over the base and landing to the incredible cheers of their families who sacrifice and serve right alongside their family members,' he said. 'There were a lot of flags and a lot of tears. One commander told me this is a moment in the lives of our families that they will never forget," Caine continued. The general then gave a lengthy tribute to the soldiers who manned the Patriot missile defense system, which shot down a barrage of Iranian missiles fired at U.S. bases in the Middle East in response to the strikes. 'You get orders from your higher headquarters to make sure that your missile batteries are pointed to the north. There are just a few other teammates,' he explained. 'It's hot. You're getting nervous, and you expect an attack outside of those Patriot vehicles. Your hot crew, which is one NCO and four additional soldiers, turns a key and relinquishes control of those missiles to that young lieutenant inside the vehicle, and you wait, you know that you're going to have approximately two minutes, 120 seconds, to either succeed or fail.' Hegseth and Caine's presentation was clearly ordered by a president who has been outraged at the doubting coverage over his decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. In the days s ince the leaked DIA intelligence report, Trump has fumed on social media at the press for daring to question the mission, calling reporters 'sick' and demanding their firing for 'trying to always make our Country look bad.' Hegseth noted that the leaked intelligence was merely preliminary, and that subsequent assessments had determined the mission was a resounding success. He cited John Radcliffe, the director of the CIA, and Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, who respectively described the nuclear program as 'severely damaged' and 'destroyed'. 'Time and time again — I can go down the list, those that understand, those that see, those that do proper assessments, recognize that what the United States military did was historic,' he continued. Caine, for his part, gave an in-depth explanation about the capabilities of the 30,000 pound bombs that were dropped on the Fordow nuclear facility, which has become a focus of the questions. He told the story of a Defense Threat Reduction Agency officer and a colleague who 'lived and breathed this single target Fordow, a critical element of Iran's covert nuclear weapons program' for more than 15 years. 'He studied the geology. He watched the Iranians dig it out. He watched the construction, the weather, the discarded material, the geology, the construction materials, where the materials came from,' he explained. 'He looked at the vent shaft, the exhaust shaft, the electrical systems, the environmental control systems, every nook, every crater, every piece of equipment going in and every piece of equipment going out. They literally dreamed about this target at night.' If the press conference was designed to alleviate the anger of the president, it appeared to have worked. 'One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' News Conferences I have ever seen! The Fake News should fire everyone involved in this Witch Hunt, and apologize to our great warriors, and everyone else!' Trump wrote on Truth Social after it had ended. But although it may have satisfied Trump, it failed to answer key questions the public have about Iran's nuclear program and its ability to build a bomb. In fact, those legitimate questions were batted away as an annoyance by Hegseth. Fox News chief national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin tried to ask Hegseth — himself a former Fox News host — whether it was possible that Iran had preemptively moved its highly enriched uranium ahead of the airstrikes. 'Of course, we're watching every single aspect,' he responded. 'But, Jennifer, you've been about the worst. The one who misrepresents the most intentionally what the president says. I'm familiar.' When another reporter followed up on the question, he said he was "not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be … moved or otherwise," suggesting it would have been destroyed in the strikes. But that was not the assessment delivered by Vice President JD Vance in the days after the strike, when he acknowledged an estimated 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium — which could eventually be enriched to weapons-grade levels — was still in Iran's hands. Nor is that the assessment of European intelligence agencies, who, according to a report in the Financial Times, have delivered preliminary reports to their governments that suggest Iran moved its stockpile away from its nuclear facilities before the strikes, leaving it largely intact. Much like Wile E. Coyote, Trump appears to believe the bombs dropped on the Fordow facility were so large that they couldn't possibly have failed. But a relentless focus on the Fordow nuclear site that was struck by bunker busters has blinded the administration to other lingering questions — other sites, other equipment that would aid Iran in building a bomb, that is potentially still out there. Furthermore, the strikes will only have increased the political will to build a weapon, if it wasn't there before. After watching the presser from California, Dr. Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the Middlebury Institute, became even more convinced that the mission was a failure. 'I think it's very telling that they don't have answers to what are very simple questions," he told The Independent. "They can't tell you what happened to the highly enriched uranium, and they have tried a million excuses. They can't, or won't, engage with any of the questions about the facilities or what happened to the equipment,' he said. Trump has now made it abundantly clear to his intelligence agencies and the U.S. military that he believes the strikes were a resounding success and that anyone who questions that narrative is insubordinate. That may help Trump battle negative headlines in the short term, but it likely won't help figure out just what capability Iran retained after the strikes.
