logo
Community helps create mural in Des Moines skywalk

Community helps create mural in Des Moines skywalk

Yahoo29-03-2025

DES MOINES, Iowa — Workers, residents, and visitors to Des Moines' downtown are helping add a little color to the skywalk.
The Greater Des Moines Partnership is hosting a unique event called the Spring Skywalk Paint-by-Numbers Mural, where community members can help paint a mural in the downtown skywalk. Molly Atkins, the organization's events coordinator, said this is their first time arranging an event like this.
They partnered with local artist, Claire Sedovic, who is a children's book illustrator and art teacher. She also has a studio in Mainframe Studios in Des Moines. She illustrated the design of the mural, as depicted below.
It showcases the Des Moines skyline and within it, there are several iconic symbols of the city. Sedovic graduated from Drake University, she she said some of her favorite designs are the ones that represent the Drake neighborhood.
This is Sedovic's first mural.
She outlined the drawing onto the wall of the skywalk and hundreds of community members helped filled in the color over the course of two days. Participants signed up for 15-minute painting sessions, but they had the opportunity to sign up for multiple shifts. All materials were provided on sight.
The mural is located at 700 Locust Street, on the third level of the skywalk near Happy Home Coffee.
Sedovic will now outline the images in the mural with black paint in the weeks to come. Participants can have their names included on the official art information plaque, which will be unveiled when the completed artwork opens to the public. The official unveiling will be announced at a later date.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A dapper young man has become the talk of Manchester-by-the-Sea
A dapper young man has become the talk of Manchester-by-the-Sea

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

A dapper young man has become the talk of Manchester-by-the-Sea

'There is something about Matthew Swindell that suggests he has just walked off the set of a period film, so perfect is each detail of his person,' gushed the local newspaper, 'The Manchester Cricket,' From the moment he arrived, Manchester-by-the-Sea suddenly had something it didn't realize it was lacking: a fashion icon. Advertisement 'It's been quite the experience for me,' Swindell said recently inside the tiny 'I humbly believe that people appreciate a well-dressed man, particularly a young person,' he said as he adjusted a stray hair on his head (held together, fittingly, with a pomade called Dapper Dan). Advertisement He speaks with a polished lilt, reinforcing what those who know him say: it's not just his clothes that seem pulled from a time machine; it is Swindell himself. 'He's not vintage. It's like he's from the 1920s, like he's stuck in an era,' said Anna Gonzalez, who sees Swindell a few times a week at the post office where he will wait in line to watch her hand stamp his cursive correspondence with the date and place, Manchester-by-the-Sea. His speech pattern adheres to a formal politeness, polished to a shine, and peppered with a natural lean toward old-timey sayings, like when he was asked about his evening strolls to Singing Beach, and said, 'Yes, when day's work is done.' What he's doing might go unnoticed in a more urban setting, where hipsters and vintage clothing stores abound. But in upper-crusty Manchester-by-the-Sea, where the preppy uniform is more Not to say that what Swindell is doing is either preppy or hipster. It's older than that, from an era of pleasing formalness, where a crowd at Fenway was better dressed than we are at weddings today. 'The first time I saw him I was like 'Oh, my God, I love you,'' said Beth Giblee, who owns Advertisement When Giblee asked Swindell why he dressed as he did, he gave his usual simple answer: He loves the feeling of it. 'It doesn't matter if he's got the umbrella or the straw hat or the fedora, there's never a hair out of place,' said Frank Fusco, assistant manager of Matthew Swindell stood inside the Manchester-by-the-Sea Museum. Jonathan Wiggs/Globe Staff Swindell said he started wearing traditional menswear when he was a student at Salem State, and committed to it when he landed an internship at the Manchester-by-the-Sea Museum after graduation. Nearly four years later, as he has risen to run the day-to-day operations, his look has become synonymous with the museum. And as he leads visitors on a tour of an exhibit highlight the town's 'resort era' in the late 18th and early 19th century, you can almost picture Swindell in one of the black-and-white photographs of bathers on Singing Beach, or strolling the grand lawn of the Masconomo House Hotel. As he looks at the photos, you can feel his pride in feeling connected to the era. He loves the detachable collars — 'I wish more people would join me in being an enthusiast for them' — and, particularly, the hats. Swindell is a dedicated follower of the tradition of switching from a winter felt hat to a summer straw hat on May 15. 'I've always loved history, but I have a particular fascination with happened before you in the places you know well,' he said. 'Some people say the past is another country. You might say I'm always visiting.' Advertisement Swindell switches from wearing a felt hat to a straw hat on May 15. Jonathan Wiggs/Globe Staff Billy Baker can be reached at

Behind the Scenes on the Science of The Last of Us
Behind the Scenes on the Science of The Last of Us

Scientific American

time27-05-2025

  • Scientific American

Behind the Scenes on the Science of The Last of Us

Behavioral ecologist David Hughes, who consulted on the video game that inspired the hit TV show The Last of Us, speaks about how our experience with the COVID pandemic changed the way we relate to zombie fiction By & Nature magazine The year was 2013, and the release of a hotly anticipated zombie-apocalypse video game was on the horizon. The game, called The Last of Us, invited players to explore what then seemed a fanciful scenario: a world devastated by a pandemic in which a pathogen kills millions of people. Unlike in many apocalypse fictions, the pathogen responsible wasn't a bacterium or a virus, but a fungus called Cordyceps that infects humans and takes over their brains. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. The writers at game studio Naughty Dog, based in Santa Monica, California, were inspired by real fungi — particularly Ophiocordyceps unilateralis, known as the zombie-ant fungus. The fungus infects insects and releases chemicals into the animals' brains to change their behaviour. Ahead of the game's release, Naughty Dog turned to scientists, including behavioural ecologist David Hughes, a specialist in zombie-ant fungi (he named one after his wife), to field questions from the media about the fungal and pandemic science that inspired the story. Hughes, who is at the Pennsylvania State University in University Park, has since moved to studying climate change and food security. The Last of Us spawned a sequel game in 2020 and a critically acclaimed television show, the second season of which concludes on 25 May on HBO. Hughes spoke to Nature about his experience consulting on the game and why COVID-19 changed our appetite for zombies. What was your involvement with the game? Naughty Dog studios asked me and a few other people who were notable in this space, including psychologists, to talk about whether we could have a global pandemic. Of course, in the intervening period, we all learnt that the answer was yes. They asked us to go around Europe and do a series of lectures to stave off critique and provide support to the idea that infections that jump from one species into another — zoonotic infections — are not only possible, but actually they're the predominant mechanism by which humans are infected with new parasites that cause disease. I had the good fortune to go to the studios and see the artistry that was involved, and meet the team and the voice actors of the video game. What did you make of the science in the game? I was really impressed by how much the game's writers got into the science of it and started to understand things like fungi and slime moulds, and just trying to think about the ways in which these organisms do their business. They really took it by themselves and incorporated those elements into the game. I think they were even mail-ordering slime moulds so they could just leave it out on a petri dish and examine it. And you see that throughout the game. And now in the TV programme, in the intros, they have these slime balls. The writers were geeky, and understanding fungi is not complex, so they ran with it. Did you play the games? I tried and I failed miserably! I'm just a typical hopeless scientist. Is the idea of a Cordyceps pandemic realistic? It is not unrealistic that fungi can infect humans if they come from animals. It is unrealistic to think that they could cause the behavioural changes in humans. The writers took liberties. They had different stages about how the infection changes over time. That's all fanciful, of course. Looking at the second season of the TV show, it was interesting that they have this communicative nature of the spores or the fungal hyphae. That's interesting because we know fungi are connected like that over many kilometres — for example, the mycorrhizal fungi, which are underneath root systems in trees, do that effectively. Have you been impressed by the science in the TV show? I often find that's the wrong question, because I dont think the job of the entertainment industry is to impress scientists. Scientists are highly problematic individuals. It's called the Carl Sagan effect. The more you popularize science, the less good your science is. It's an inverse relationship. I think it doesn't really matter. Science belongs to society, and people should tell stories about that. And, you know, snooty scientists saying, 'Oh, you didn't get this exactly right,' — like, who cares? What was your reaction when the COVID-19 pandemic happened? I told you so! In The Last of Us lectures, I talk about the same thing. I said, the problem is not whether we'll have zombie-ant fungi manipulating humans. It's not going to happen. The problem is if we lose 5% of our population, and the global economy shuts down, which we saw. Do you think the COVID-19 pandemic changed our appetite for zombie-apocalypse media? It's very interesting. You build a game about a dystopian future based on a pandemic, you live through a pandemic, and then what's the relevance of the game or the movie? I think our appetite for being scared by pandemics has receded because we all have PTSD. Or, we don't have PTSD and realized that some of us just don't care about other people. So it's interesting to look at the history of zombie lore. Back in the 1950s and 60s, it was all about nuclear weapons, because we were all collectively fearful of that. And then it moved into diseases, because we had an over-populated society. Then we had a pandemic, and we shrugged and moved on. So the fascinating thing is, The Last of Us is nice, but it's not what it used to be. first published on May 23, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store