US Navy Capable of Defending Itself against Houthi Attacks: Col. Dahouk
In response to the US airstrikes against the Houthis in Yemen, the rebel group announced on Sunday it targeted the USS Harry S Truman aircraft carrier and its accompanying warships in the northern Red Sea with 18 ballistic and cruise missiles, as well as drones, reported Euro News.
The Houthi military spokesperson said that the attack was a response to more than 47 US strikes against the areas they control in Yemen, including the capital Sanaa and the province of Saada.
On Saturday, the US President, Donald Trump, ordered a 'decisive and powerful military action' against the Houthis to stop their attacks against US ships, aircraft and drones. Trump said that the US will use 'overwhelming lethal force' to achieve its objectives. He warned the Houthis that if they do not stop their attacks 'hell will rain down upon you like nothing you have never seen before.' Houthi Attack on USS Truman
Commenting on the recent Houthi attack, the Former Senior Military Advisor to US Department of State, Colonel (Ret.) Abbas Dahouk, said that this is not the first time that the Houthis attack US assets.
'This is not the first time that the Houthis fire cruise missiles, antiship missiles or drones against US naval ships, and I think this is perhaps a first retaliation against the recent attacks against them,' he told Al-Jazeera.
Col. Dahouk added that the US has the capabilities to defend itself against these attacks. 'The US navy is capable to defend itself and has done so for the last year. So, I think it is part of the combat operation,' he said. Reasons Behind US Strikes
The US airstrikes against the Houthis come at a time when the group had actually stopped their attacks in the Red Sea since Trump came to power. With regards to this, Col. Dahouk thinks there are two dimensions to the timing of the US strikes.
'One of them is the threat is still there, the threat to the global commercial lanes through the Red Sea is still there, and the Houthis they control and they have the will to decide what to strike,' he noted.
'As the Secretary of State said, the US cannot allow Houthis to decide who is allowed to transit through the Strait and the Red Sea and which cannot. So, the Trump administration wants to end that once and for all,' Col. Dahouk explained. Iran's Last Card
The Former Military Advisor said that the other reason is related to Iran and the nuclear program negotiations. 'And the other thing is also perhaps to deny Iran the last card, like to use President Trump terms, to use the Houthis as a card for future negotiations on the nuclear engagement,' he said.
'So, I think this has two dimensions; one is to put a stop to the Houthis, whether to destroy their military capabilities or also to neutralize their political will to use them against the shipping lanes, and also to deny Iran any reach to Houthis to disrupt any future negotiations,' Col. Dahouk added. US Response to Houthi Retaliation
The Houthis said that any escalation will be met with escalation and threatened to resume attacks on US and Israeli-linked ships in the Red Sea, raising speculations about a full-scale US engagement in Yemen.
In the light of this, Col. Dahouk said: 'We already saw a much more lethal force brought to Yemen than we saw since October 7 last year under the previous administration. So, you see more commitment and a drive not only to go against the drone capabilities or missile capabilities. They are hitting their leadership at the highest level.'
However, Col. Dahouk ruled out the possibility of a full-scale US engagement. 'But I do not think the Trump administration is willing to commit land forces or boots on the ground. Perhaps they might assist the Yemeni government, the Yemeni forces on the ground to provide complementary efforts to the air campaign on the ground against the Houthis. That is a possibility,' he said.
Short link :
Post Views: 79
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Israeli military: Missile launched from Yemen toward Israel, seeking to intercept it
The Israeli military said on Tuesday that it was working to intercept a missile launched from Yemen toward Israel, hours after Israel deployed its navy to hit targets in the Yemeni Red Sea port of Hodeidah. Israel threatened Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthi militia – which has been attacking Israel in what it says is solidarity with Gaza – with a naval and air blockade if its attacks on Israel persist.
Asharq Al-Awsat
2 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Trump Deploys Marines, Raising Tensions in Los Angeles Protests
Hundreds of Marines were due to arrive in Los Angeles on Tuesday after US President Donald Trump ordered their deployment in response to protests against immigration arrests and despite objections by state officials. The 700 crack troops will join National Guard soldiers, amping up the militarization of the tense situation in the sprawling city, which is home to millions of foreign-born and Latino residents. The largely peaceful demonstrations -- marred by sporadic but violent clashes between police and protesters -- were entering their fifth day. The unrest was sparked by a sudden intensification of Trump's signature campaign to deport illegal migrants, with raids conducted on workplaces. In downtown LA's Little Tokyo neighborhood at night Monday, scores of protesters faced off with security officials in riot gear, some shooting fireworks at officers who fired back volleys of tear gas. Earlier, demonstrators marching with banners and handmade signs yelled "ICE out of LA" and "National Guard go away" -- a reference to immigration agents and Guard soldiers. California officials have stressed the majority of protesters have been peaceful and that they were capable of maintaining law and order themselves. Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X that US Marines "shouldn't be deployed on American soil facing their own countrymen to fulfill the deranged fantasy of a dictatorial President. This is un-American." Trump, meanwhile, has branded the LA protesters "professional agitators and insurrectionists." "If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now," he wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday. One small business owner in the city, whose property was graffitied during the protests, was supportive of Trump's strong-arm tactics. "I think it's needed to stop the vandalism," she told AFP, declining to give her name. Others were horrified. "They're meant to be protecting us, but instead, they're like, being sent to attack us," Kelly Diemer, 47, told AFP. "This is not a democracy anymore." Police have detained dozens of protesters in LA in the recent days, while authorities in San Francisco and other US cities have also made arrests. - 'Incredibly rare' - Trump's use of the military is an "incredibly rare" move for a US president, Rachel VanLandingham, a professor at Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles and a former lieutenant colonel in the US Air Force, told AFP. The National Guard -- a fully equipped reserve armed forces -- is usually controlled by state governors and used typically on US soil in response to natural disasters. The Guard has not been deployed by a president over the objections of a state governor since 1965, at the height of the civil rights movement. Deployment of regular troops, such as the Marines, on US soil is even more unusual. US law largely prevents the use of the military as a policing force -- absent an insurrection. Speculation is growing that Trump could invoke the Insurrection Act giving him a free hand to use regular troops for law enforcement around the country. The Pentagon said late Monday that Trump had authorized an extra 2,000 state guardsmen to LA. The state of California has sued to block the use of the Guard troops and Newsom said he would also sue against the Marines deployment.
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
‘These people don't want to be part of our culture': Destiny & Lilly Gaddis on LA protests
Welcome to the land of liberty, historically a nation of immigrants, where free speech is protected by the Constitution. America's political and ideological divisions are now laid bare on the streets of Los Angeles. Is this a manufactured crisis or a genuine state of emergency? Immigration raids sparked the protests. But are demonstrators solely to blame for the violent chaos? Or have President Trump's broader anti-immigration policies fanned the flames? President Trump made the highly controversial decision to call in the National Guard, arguing that LA's protests against immigration officials had turned violent. Their arrival sparked more anger... which led to more violence... which, in turn, gave the White House more ammunition to argue that migrants are causing chaos across America. So, is the use of the National Guard in this instance justifiable? LA Mayor Karen Bass doesn't think so. It begs the question: is the White House orchestrating this crisis to justify its tough anti-immigration stance? On this episode of CounterPoints, we'll ask our panel: Are the protests justified or is this an attempt to obstruct officials from carrying out their duties? Is the use of the National Guard an abuse of presidential power? And are Trump's travel bans reasonable—or racist?
