Dutch government falls as far-right leader Wilders quits coalition
By
Richard Carter
, AFP
Freedom Party (PVV) leader Geert Wilders
Photo:
AFP / ANP
Far-right leader Geert Wilders has brought down the Dutch governmentby pulling out of a shaky coalition in a row over immigration, sparking a political crisis and likely heralding fresh elections.
The withdrawal on Tuesday (European time) came just weeks before a NATO summit in the Netherlands, and ushered in a period of uncertainty for the European Union's fifth-largest economy and major exporter.
After a stormy last-ditch meeting aimed at salvaging the four-party coalition, Wilders emerged to say he had no choice but to pull his ministers out of the cabinet.
"I signed up for the strictest asylum policy, not for the downfall of the Netherlands," said Wilders, 61, whose far-right Freedom Party (PVV) handily won elections in November 2023.
Prime Minister Dick Schoof described the decision as "unnecessary and irresponsible" and said he would offer the resignation of the PVV ministers to King Willem-Alexander.
"I will continue as a caretaker... until a new cabinet is in place. Because life in the Netherlands and abroad does go on," he told reporters.
Wilders had agreed with coalition partners to push through what he called the "strictest-ever immigration policy", but he has since said the pace of its introduction had been too slow.
Eighteen months after that surprise election victory sent shockwaves through Europe, polls suggest his PVV is still the strongest party.
However, the gap to his nearest rivals has narrowed, with the Green/Left party of former European Commission vice-president Frans Timmermans following close behind.
The liberal VVD party, a traditional powerhouse in Dutch politics, is also running near the top two, meaning any election would likely be closely fought.
VVD leader Dilan Yesilgoz, visibly angry, described Wilders' move as "super irresponsible", adding she was afraid it would open the door to left-wing parties.
"How can you do this to the Netherlands," she asked.
Any elections would likely be held after the summer break, Sarah de Lange, professor of political pluralism at the University of Amsterdam, told AFP.
"New elections are likely, but in the Netherlands, organising them takes almost three months. Snap elections in the Netherlands are not as quick as in other countries," she said.
In late May, Wilders called an impromptu press conference to announce his "patience has now run out" with Schoof's government.
He threatened to torpedo the coalition if a new 10-point plan to crimp immigration was not implemented within a few weeks.
His plan included border closures for asylum seekers, tougher border controls in general and deporting dual nationals convicted of a crime.
Political and legal experts criticised the plans as unworkable or illegal, with some suggesting Wilders was creating a crisis to collapse the government.
The far-right leader has often been called the "Dutch Trump" for his anti-immigrant views and instantly recognisable bouffant hairstyle.
His ambitions to lead his country were frustrated after his election win, as his coalition partners blocked his premiership bid, settling instead on Schoof as a compromise candidate.
The leaders of the four coalition partners agreed not to take up cabinet positions, instead running their parties as parliamentary chiefs.
Wilders has been an uncompromising figure in parliament, his quick-witted jousting with Timmermans being a highlight of debates.
He has frequently said that the only way to implement his anti-immigrant policies is
for him to become prime minister
.
However, in the fractured Dutch political system, no party can win an absolute majority in the 150-seat parliament and Wilders will need partners.
He can count on the support of the BBB farmers' party. The backing of the VVD, currently an uneasy coalition partner, is less certain.
The fourth party in the current coalition - the anti-corruption New Social Contract - has seen support collapse since charismatic leader Pieter Omtzigt stepped down.
Far-right parties have been on the rise across Europe. In May, the far-right Chega ("Enough") party took second place in Portuguese elections.
In Germany, the anti-immigration far-right AfD doubled its score in legislative elections in February, reaching 20.8 percent.
And in Britain, polls show the anti-immigration, hard-right Reform UK party of Nigel Farage is making significant gains following a breakthrough in local elections.
-AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
Legal expert weighs in on Michael Forbes allegations
crime politics 27 minutes ago The Prime Minister has ordered a review of vetting processes for parliamentary staff after his Deputy chief press secretary quit following allegations he recorded intimate audio of sessions with sex workers and was in possession of intrusive photos of women. Dozens of photos and footage were found on the staffers phone and some appear to have been recorded in public places and shot through windows at night. The police investigated a complaint in July last year and spoke to Michael Forbes, but said the case was filed because it didnt meet the threshold for criminal prosecution. So what are laws and do they go far enough to protect victims? Senior lecturer in law at AUT Paulette Benton-Greig spoke to Lisa Owen.

RNZ News
20 hours ago
- RNZ News
UK: Defence spending, winter fuel payment U-turn
UK correspondent Dan Bloom joins Kathryn to talk about how Britain's plan to lift defence spending to 2.5 percent of GDP over the next decade is still not enough for the US. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is still locked in talks with holdout departments over funding for the next fuel years and PM Keir Starmer is set to deliver a U-turn to pensioners over their winter fuel payments. Dan Bloom is Political Editor of Politico UK To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Trump says Putin told him in phone call he will respond to Ukraine's weekend drone attacks
By Kevin Liptak , CNN President Donald Trump said he spoke by phone with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, but that the conversation would not yield an immediate end to the war in Ukraine. Photo: Jacquelyn Martin/AP/Gavriil Grigorov/Pool/AFP/Getty Images via CNN Newsource Russian President Vladimir Putin told President Donald Trump in a phone call Wednesday that he was obligated to respond to Ukraine's weekend drone attack, Trump said, setting up a potential escalation in the conflict just as the US president hopes to broker an end to the war. The leaders' conversation was their second time speaking in a matter of weeks. Trump, who announced the call afterward in a post on Truth Social, made no mention of applying pressure on the Russian leader to agree to a ceasefire, or to calibrate his reprisal for Ukraine's audacious drone attack on Russian airfields over the weekend. Instead, Trump acknowledged the 75-minute conversation would not yield an immediate end to the war in Ukraine. "We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides," Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. "It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace." "President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields," he went on. Trump's matter-of-fact description of the call offered little evidence of advancement in his attempts to end the war. The president said last week he would be able to determine within two weeks whether Putin was serious about negotiating a ceasefire but has said little about how he would make that assessment. Meanwhile, there's been increasing pressure on Trump to levy additional sanctions against Russia, which he has so far resisted. Russian and Ukrainian officials met earlier this week in Istanbul for direct talks on ending the war, but both sides emerged without budging from their positions. Trump has taken credit for bringing the two sides together for face-to-face discussions. Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov said Putin briefed Trump on the latest round of talks on Wednesday. "As was emphasized, Ukraine tried to disrupt these negotiations by carrying out, on the direct orders of the Kyiv regime, targeted attacks on purely civilian targets, on the peaceful population," Ushakov said without specifying what attacks. "The leaders agreed to continue further contacts on the Ukrainian issue, including at the highest level and at other levels and through other channels," Ushakov said. Neither Trump nor the White House have publicly reacted to the weekend drone attacks beyond saying Ukrainian officials hadn't informed them of the planned assault ahead of time. Previously, Trump had lashed out at Putin after Russian aerial assaults on Ukrainian cities. New footage released Wednesday showed in stunning detail the surgical precession with which the Ukrainians struck their targets, damaging or destroying military aircraft that Moscow has been using to terrorize Ukrainian civilians with near daily aerial attacks. The video, released by the SBU, Ukraine's security agency, shows drones approaching dozens of planes of different types across several airfields as aircraft burn and explode around them. Ukrainian military officials said 41 Russian aircraft were hit, including strategic bombers and surveillance planes, with some destroyed and others damaged. The call came the same day US Secretary of State Marco Rubio was meeting in Washington with Andriy Yermak, the head of Ukraine's presidential office, to discuss the US posture amid the ongoing war. Rubio was expected to tell Yermak that the Ukrainian position - which the US sees as showing flexibility and a desire to get a ceasefire - was useful, a senior administration official said. But the secretary of state also planned to tell the Ukrainian official that dragging the US back into a Biden-era policy of unlimited military support for Ukraine won't happen, the official said. Yermak posted on social media after meeting with Rubio that they discussed the "urgent need to strengthen support for Ukraine's air defense." Ukraine's drone strikes deep inside Russia created a dramatic backdrop for the Washington meetings. The Trump administration has not moved to warn Ukraine against such attacks, US officials said, despite a belief that the strike increases the risk level. "People have to understand in the national security space: when you attack an opponent's part of their national survival system, which is their triad, the nuclear triad, that means your risk level goes up because you don't know what the other side is going to do. You're not sure," Keith Kellogg, special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, said during a Fox interview on Tuesday. In his readout of the Wednesday call, Trump also said he discussed Iran with Putin as he works to complete a nuclear agreement with Tehran. "We also discussed Iran, and the fact that time is running out on Iran's decision pertaining to nuclear weapons, which must be made quickly!" he wrote. "I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement." He said Putin would likely join discussions with Iran. "President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion. It is my opinion that Iran has been slowwalking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!" Trump wrote. Ushakov said the two leaders discussed the negotiations on the Iranian nuclear program, with Trump saying assistance from Russia "may be needed." - CNN