logo
Upskilling and Training is the key to unlocking UK business growth

Upskilling and Training is the key to unlocking UK business growth

Entrepreneur21-05-2025

The UK is facing a significant change across the economy. Whether this be the adoption of new technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, or more rudimentary changes such as the major shift we have seen towards remote work since the pandemic.
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.
Throughout modern history, the UK has experienced seismic workplace shifts and with that comes a change in the skills requirements and needs of businesses and individuals across the country. As far back as the industrial revolution and as recently as the invention of the internet, the skills of the workforce have had to adapt in order to fulfil economic and business needs.
On an individual level, upskilling, reskilling and skills training has been vital in ensuring that the workforce has the adequate level of technical knowledge to ensure roles can be filled and in the present day, with new technologies emerging and being integrated at pace, this is more important than ever.
Addressing the skills gap and economic inactivity crisis
The importance of skills and upskilling is vital in today's economic landscape. This is not just as a consequence of emerging technologies but also the skill levels and qualifications we are currently lacking across the economy.
Many businesses across sectors with significant importance to the UK economy, such as technology and finance, are currently struggling to fill vacancies owing to a lack of skills in the workforce. Indeed, a recent report from the British Chambers of Commerce highlighted that 62% of organisations are facing skills shortages with 64% of organisations not confident about applying new technologies such as artificial intelligence or green technologies.
This has a major impact on organisational efficiency and innovation owing to not just the inability to recruit new members of staff but also placing an additional burden on the existing workforce. The same report highlighted that 68% of organisations say that skills shortages have increased the workload on existing staff and in turn removed the ability to work creatively and productively, which in the long run will stifle innovation.
The need for workers with new skillsets and demand for upskilling of existing staff is clear. This has been reflected in the Labour Government publishing its AI Opportunities Action Plan which will aim to train "tens of thousands" of AI professionals by 2030. While this is a positive development, it is crucial that businesses across the economy take immediate action in order to address the gaps they currently experience, rather than waiting for policy to shift the landscape for them.
SBOs (skills-based organisations)
Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) play a significant role in the UK economy. The entrepreneurs that lead them and the employees that work for them are the dominant business population, representing over 99% of businesses in the UK and are a significant driver of economic activity. These are the organisations that are currently in desperate need of additional and new skillsets in order to thrive and innovate in whatever sector they operate in.
We are seeing a key gradual transition towards businesses adapting to become Skills-Based Organisations (SBOs), in a bid to be agile and fulfil the requirements of their operations. An SBO goes beyond the traditional viewpoint of a business that advertises using traditional job descriptions and fits employees into siloed workstreams where they are expected to fulfil a single role. Instead, the requirement for new skills is seeing many businesses adapt and embrace employees with diverse skillsets, moving beyond rigid job descriptions and allowing them to respond faster to market and technological changes. The businesses that embrace a skills-based future will thrive in an ever-changing economy as they enhance internal mobility and allow them to become nimble and adaptable.
Although in theory, SMEs may find it easier to become skills-based as they have fewer employees with a relatively flexible set of roles and responsibilities, along with a greater control over how skills requirements can be matched with each role. However, larger business will be more likely to drive a skills-based workforce due to the need to improve internal employee mobility, as there are not enough people in the job market to fill in the skills gaps at the larger scale needed. Larger businesses also tend to have the budgets and bandwidth to shift the way they plan their workforce compared to smaller businesses. SMEs can then gradually follow suit as it becomes more and more mainstream.
How skills can turbocharge innovation
Fundamentally, for SMEs to thrive in a modern landscape and in the context of economic and industrial changes, it is vital that skills are put at the heart of all business activities. The requirements for businesses are clear, that they are in need of the skills that fit into the modern day, and they require them quickly.
Upskilling and training will play a crucial role in fulfilling these requirements. As roles become redundant, change and are enhanced by the emergence of new technologies and working practices, businesses need to embrace being skills-based organisations and adopt routes such as apprenticeships.
Apprenticeships are a key solution to address skills needs, as they provide the opportunity for businesses to acquire new talent and transform the capabilities of their current workforce. Skills are a key tenet in ensuring that businesses of all sizes are able to innovate and for UK organisations to be world-leading in terms of productivity and delivery. In order to achieve this, embracing the concept of being a skills-based organisation will be essential and utilising apprenticeships that have the ability to train new staff and upskill existing staff is crucial.
The UK's policy landscape demonstrates that this is something the Government is keen on developing. By establishing Skills England, the Labour Government have highlighted that skills and training will be a key facet in the UK's economic armoury in years ahead. Similarly, the proposed devolution of skills to the regions also shows the awareness that businesses across the UK have individual geographic needs. The national skills framework therefore also needs to be addressed with a regional lens.
In order to be a successful and innovative economic powerhouse, businesses need to adapt to the change and engage with its existing and prospective workforce to train and upskill them to fit business needs. The requirements of businesses across different industries and regions are not and will never be homogenous, and a tailored approach to addressing individual skills needs will ensure that as an economy we can be world-leading.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Role Of Leaders When AI Can Know Everything
The Role Of Leaders When AI Can Know Everything

Forbes

time17 minutes ago

  • Forbes

The Role Of Leaders When AI Can Know Everything

As much as AI can do and will do, there is something it cannot do that remains a crucial role for ... More leaders—and it's not what we think. When personal computers went mainstream in the 1980's, a euphoria around what they could do was met by contrarians pointing out their limitations. Sure, they could do analytical tasks better than humans, but not intuitive, strategic tasks, such as playing chess. And then computers were built to become chess champions. Yes, they could reason faster than humans but not coordinate movement tasks. And then computers were built into deft manufacturing robots and human prosthetics. Sure, they could do what humans programmed them to do, but they couldn't outlearn their programming. And then AI shredded that assumption. As ChatGPT burst onto the scene, a similar euphoria erupted around what it could do, again followed by contrarians pointing out limitations. Sure, it could learn and regurgitate case law faster than a human, but it also made up cases. Then AI was improved to show sources. Yes, AI can write content better than many people and faster than all, but it's wreaking havoc with publishing and educational practices. Then AI was developed to detect AI-developed content. And so on. We have decades of experience telling us that the edges we suppose to machine intelligence are but the starting point for the next X-prize. And so it is now as we witness the explosive use of AI in good hands and bad—arguably even its own hands—with command of knowledge and networked effects we cannot even imagine. It is with full recognition of this history of underestimating what machines can do that I suggest there is yet something AI cannot do, no matter how much it knows nor how powerful it becomes. And that is to be a living antenna and transformer for sensing and manifesting futures in which life flourishes. This is the crucial and uniquely human role for leaders when AI can know everything. It is an energetic or spiritual role: to sense the zeitgeist, the field, the emerging future, the collective unconscious, God-Source, the Way, or universal Mind—however we name it—and from this place of resonant connection, through collaboration and using all tools available, including AI, conduct that future into the present. I'm certainly not alone in suggesting there's a quality of human intelligence that supersedes AI, nor that AI could be mighty dangerous in the wrong hands or in charge of itself. The earliest pioneers in machine intelligence, such as Marvin Minskey saw risk, not in whether such intelligence could be achieved, but in having no way to ensure it would act in our best interests. The Australian Risk Policy Institute, part of a global risk advisory network, argues for the importance of AI augmenting human intelligence, not replacing it. Numerous tech companies have been party to AI pledges promising responsible and ethical AI development and use. And dominant players, such as Google, have also walked away from those pledges or subjugated them to a winner-take-all race to dominate the AI industry. Mo Gawdat, a former AI leader at Google, in a mind-bending interview on Diary of a CEO, sees the biggest threat facing humanity today is humanity in the age of the machines, with all of our ignorance, greed and competition. 'This is an arms race,' Gawdat says, with 'no interest in what the average human gets out of it…every line of code being written in AI today is to beat the other guy.' AI is an exponential amplifier of the mindset with which it's being created, trained and deployed. As covered in Closing The Great Divides, when that mindset is based in dualism, that is, separation within oneself, self from others or self from the environment, it propagates that separation and resultant suffering in what it creates. For example, it will create businesses that exploit the environment, social systems that create big winners and many losers, or economic policies whereby the rich get vastly richer. Add to this the amplification of AI and the effects are so extreme that it gives even the tech titans pause to ponder the ethics of it all. While dualism is the norm in our culture (in which AI has been created) and embedded in our subject-object language (on which AI has been trained), it is not the greatest truth for the human being. Human leaders are capable of a kind of merge or flow state that goes by many descriptions: unity consciousness, interbeing, samadhi, mystical union, being one-with, or simply being the whole picture. This one-withness is the essence of Zen Leadership. When leaders operate from this state of connection, they propagate a sense of care for the whole, for example, in businesses that take care of the environment, social systems that help people thrive, or economic policies that respect limits. Such leaders create flourishing futures. So, while there are many areas in which AI will far exceed human capacity, it is poorly equipped to sense connection at the depth available to a human being. Moreover, this isn't just another limit that will be superseded by the next generation of AI. Machine intelligence itself grew out of living in our heads—disconnected from the wisdom of the body—and equating intelligence with our thoughts, as in Descartes' dictum: 'I think therefore I am.' We failed to realize that the very thoughts 'I' thinks and the language it uses to express them is how 'I' keeps its ego-centric game going. Modeling computers and AI on how we think and talk propagated this mindset of separation, first replicating the mind's left-brain logic, then advancing to more holistic pattern recognition associated with the right brain. By contrast, the human being has a very different origin. We come from one living cell, through which the entire evolutionary journey played out in our development from gilled sea-creatures to lunged air-breathers. We embody antenna for a whole spectrum of consciousness whereby the universe has revealed itself to itself from the beginning of life, from five basic senses to thought consciousness, to ego consciousness, to collective consciousness. In the collective field, we are able to sense the energy of relationships, of opportunities in crises, of ideas not yet taken form, which is the playground from which skillful leaders bring an emerging future into the present. While AI can reproduce the veneer of human experience—even vastly accelerate and improve upon some aspects of it—it has not lived those experiences. Just as reading the Adventures of Tom Sawyer is not the same as being Tom Sawyer, AI's training in the language of human experience is not the same as living those experiences. Even though AI can talk a good game about being one-with by regurgitating things it has read, it has no physical basis for experiencing one-withness. It lacks the antenna. AI may have sensors or network connections to feed its semiconductors, silicon wafers, transistors, software and so forth. But it does not vibrate or resonate with the field the way a human body does. It does not have the complexity or fractal quality of life and hence cannot support the same expansive consciousness. Opinions vary in the field as to whether AI has consciousness (or 'interiority') at all. But even if we grant that everything has consciousness commensurate with its complexity, AI is far less complex than a human being. That said, AI is already superior to humans at knowing what there is to know. It has thoroughly commoditized knowledge; being the 'smartest person in the room' is no longer a necessary or useful role for human leaders. Far more useful and necessary are practices for connection, which are part of contemplative, embodied wisdom traditions, as in Zen Leadership, for literally resonating one-with others, one-with the environment, one-with the emerging future. Through our connected selves, we bridge AI knowledge and universal wisdom. For sure, such bridging will not be the main AI narrative anytime soon. AI development and use is likely to be dominated by the billionaire footrace we see now, with even shadier characters at the margins and AI itself in the not-too-distant future. But wise, connected AI development and use can serve as a vein of gold through the detritus of disruption and destruction of coming years, manifesting the priceless role of humanity in the evolution of consciousness. AI can only serve a flourishing future for life if it is helped along by living beings connected with same purpose. It is the essential, human leadership opportunity in an era when AI can know and do most everything else. As Mo Gawdat concludes, there are several inevitables with AI. (1) AI will happen, (2) AI will be smarter than us, and (3) AI will replace many of our jobs. But what he also concludes is that it's smarter to create from a place of abundance rather than scarcity, which is another way of saying create from a place of infinitely resourced connection rather than the scarcity of a separate self. That is the most important role a leader can play, and we are living at a most pivotal time in which to play it.

NetApp, Inc. (NASDAQ:NTAP) Just Reported Yearly Earnings: Have Analysts Changed Their Mind On The Stock?
NetApp, Inc. (NASDAQ:NTAP) Just Reported Yearly Earnings: Have Analysts Changed Their Mind On The Stock?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

NetApp, Inc. (NASDAQ:NTAP) Just Reported Yearly Earnings: Have Analysts Changed Their Mind On The Stock?

Last week saw the newest annual earnings release from NetApp, Inc. (NASDAQ:NTAP), an important milestone in the company's journey to build a stronger business. NetApp reported US$6.6b in revenue, roughly in line with analyst forecasts, although statutory earnings per share (EPS) of US$5.67 beat expectations, being 3.0% higher than what the analysts expected. Following the result, the analysts have updated their earnings model, and it would be good to know whether they think there's been a strong change in the company's prospects, or if it's business as usual. So we collected the latest post-earnings statutory consensus estimates to see what could be in store for next year. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. Following the latest results, NetApp's 18 analysts are now forecasting revenues of US$6.78b in 2026. This would be a modest 3.1% improvement in revenue compared to the last 12 months. Statutory earnings per share are predicted to increase 4.2% to US$6.07. In the lead-up to this report, the analysts had been modelling revenues of US$6.85b and earnings per share (EPS) of US$5.88 in 2026. So the consensus seems to have become somewhat more optimistic on NetApp's earnings potential following these results. See our latest analysis for NetApp There's been no major changes to the consensus price target of US$115, suggesting that the improved earnings per share outlook is not enough to have a long-term positive impact on the stock's valuation. It could also be instructive to look at the range of analyst estimates, to evaluate how different the outlier opinions are from the mean. The most optimistic NetApp analyst has a price target of US$135 per share, while the most pessimistic values it at US$100.00. Analysts definitely have varying views on the business, but the spread of estimates is not wide enough in our view to suggest that extreme outcomes could await NetApp shareholders. Of course, another way to look at these forecasts is to place them into context against the industry itself. The period to the end of 2026 brings more of the same, according to the analysts, with revenue forecast to display 3.1% growth on an annualised basis. That is in line with its 3.3% annual growth over the past five years. By contrast, our data suggests that other companies (with analyst coverage) in a similar industry are forecast to see their revenues grow 5.6% per year. So although NetApp is expected to maintain its revenue growth rate, it's forecast to grow slower than the wider industry. The biggest takeaway for us is the consensus earnings per share upgrade, which suggests a clear improvement in sentiment around NetApp's earnings potential next year. Fortunately, the analysts also reconfirmed their revenue estimates, suggesting that it's tracking in line with expectations. Although our data does suggest that NetApp's revenue is expected to perform worse than the wider industry. The consensus price target held steady at US$115, with the latest estimates not enough to have an impact on their price targets. With that said, the long-term trajectory of the company's earnings is a lot more important than next year. We have forecasts for NetApp going out to 2028, and you can see them free on our platform here. You can also see our analysis of NetApp's Board and CEO remuneration and experience, and whether company insiders have been buying stock. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Restaurants remove ‘king of fish' from menus as prices soar
Restaurants remove ‘king of fish' from menus as prices soar

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Restaurants remove ‘king of fish' from menus as prices soar

Chefs are being forced to take the so-called king of fish off their menus, as the soaring price of seafood makes it virtually impossible to turn a profit. Treasured for its succulent flesh and superior flavour, turbot has long been considered among the finest fishes on restaurant menus. Yet it is becoming a rare option for diners following steep increases in the cost of fish and seafood. Tommy Banks, chef patron of Michelin-starred restaurants The Black Swan and Roots, both in Yorkshire, said: 'It's the king of the sea, a beautiful fish. Pre-pandemic, I paid £18 per kilo. Now it can be as much as £65. 'You can't afford to put it on the menu. And if you do… the amount you'd have to charge for it. There's just no value whatsoever. There really isn't cheap or cheaper fish any more. But turbot in particular is just outrageous, and you can't afford to use it.' Mr Banks recently hosted a tasting night at his restaurant Roots where one of the dishes included turbot. However, he said: 'I was giving a 60g sliver, literally a sliver [to diners]. We were like 'Well, we need to make turbot the smallest [dish] because it's so expensive'. It was costing £9 for 60g of fillet.' Adrian Nunn, director of The Upper Scale, which sells fish to consumers and restaurants in London, said many restaurants had stopped ordering turbot altogether, and were using more affordable alternatives – like Dover sole. He said: 'I don't think I've got one restaurant using turbot. They used to and they've stopped, they can't afford to.' Seafood prices have soared across in recent years, with produce such as langoustines also becoming unsustainable to serve in restaurants. Mr Banks said: 'Some of these really luxury ingredients – like turbot, langoustine, lobster, caviar and truffle – you'll only really find in Mayfair now.' However, Mr Nunn added: 'It's not just the prime fish, It's all fish, whether it's frozen or whether it's sardines, mackerel, whether it's turbot, Dover soles, it's all gone up.' Traditional fish suppers have been hit too. According to the Office for National Statistics, the price of a kilogram of white fish fillets has risen by more than 28pc in the three years to January 2025 to hit £20.59. Inflation in fish and seafood has been blamed on steep rises in the cost of labour, shipping and energy – keeping fish chilled or frozen is particularly energy intensive – and the reduction of fishing quotas by international governments. Laky Zervudachi at fish wholesaler Direct Seafoods, added: 'This year we have seen increasing inflationary pressure on virtually all species of seafood, whether it be simple staples like cod and haddock, to the more exclusive species like scallops and lobsters. 'As always, there are many factors that combine to create these increases, not least are a number of precautionary measures that have been taken by international bodies to help preserve fishing stocks around the world.' Adding to pressure is increased demand for fish from Spanish and French buyers, which has driven up the price for British firms, Mr Nunn said. He said: 'We buy in North of England, because there's not so many Spanish and French buyers up there. They'll just outbid us. We'd love to buy turbot at £10 per kilo, but they'll pay £20, £25, £30 so that's it.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store