Proposed ban on drug middlemen owning retail pharmacies passes Arkansas House committee
Little Rock pharmacist Brittany Sanders (left), Arkansas Pharmacists Association CEO John Vinson (second from right) and Rep. Jeremiah Moore (right), R-Clarendon, present House Bill 1150 to the House Committee on Insurance and Commerce on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. (Tess Vrbin/Arkansas Advocate)
A House panel Wednesday approved a bill aimed at preventing pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) from holding a permit to operate a drug store in Arkansas.
Opponents outnumbered supporters in the public comment period of the House Insurance and Commerce Committee meeting, but a majority of the panel's 21 members voted to send House Bill 1150 to the full House.
PBMs negotiate prescription benefits among drug manufacturers, distributors, pharmacies and health insurance providers, and they rank prescription drugs with the highest-tiered products costing consumers the lowest out-of-pocket costs. The Federal Trade Commission released an interim report in July 2024 saying these conglomerates are eliminating competition and increasing drug prices at the expense of patients.
'Pharmacy benefit managers are gaming the system to line their own pockets with taxpayers' and patients' money,' said HB 1150 sponsor Rep. Jeremiah Moore, R-Clarendon.
He decried the 'patently false' statements circulating about the potential impact of HB 1150 from those who oppose it, such as the idea that 2.7 million Arkansans would lose access to health care. HB 1150 has faced a marketing campaign against it in the two and a half months since it was filed, and Moore said the opposition has primarily come from PBMs.
Arkansas lawmakers seek to ban prescription drug middlemen from owning pharmacies in the state
Some of Wednesday's opponents of HB 1150 represented corporate health care organizations, including Russell Harper, a government relations executive with the Navitus Health Solutions PBM.
Harper said the bill 'will result in lots of unintended consequences that will bring patient disruption, patient confusion and patient access issues to important drug treatments, not just in the commercial market, but in Medicare, Medicaid and Tricare.'
He claimed a wide swath of Arkansas pharmacies, including 23 within CVS and 26 within Kroger, would be at risk of closing if HB 1150 passes.
John Vinson, CEO of the Arkansas Pharmacists Association, denied the allegation that HB 1150 would force pharmacies to close by taking PBMs out of the competitive pharmacy market.
'It gives pharmacies a choice of whether they want to be a PBM or a pharmacy,' Vinson said. '[They would] pick one or the other.'
Several PBMs are affiliated with interstate mail-order pharmacy operations, and House Bill 1150 includes mail-order pharmacy permits among those that PBMs would be prohibited from holding. Vinson said Wednesday that some PBMs force consumers to receive their medications via mail, which costs more than receiving them over the counter.
Mike Castleberry claimed HB 1150 would reduce mail-order pharmacies' presence in Arkansas to the point that patients would not be able to access necessary medication. Castleberry is chief revenue officer at Consociate Health, which represents 'self-funded employers' in Arkansas, and he said many pharmacies can only afford to provide specialty drugs if they use mail-order operations.
'The first phone call that y'all are going to get from your constituents [if HB 1150 passes] is someone who's on a specialty drug,' he said.
Randy Zook, president of the Arkansas Chamber of Commerce, said lawmakers should not make laws that attack vertical integration in business, but Vinson and Moore both said PBMs' vertical integration is unique because they set their competitors' prices.
Federal regulator: Pharmacy middlemen appear to be raising prices, hurting patients
OptumRX, Express Scripts and CVS Caremark — the three largest PBMs — are each owned by much larger corporations that each also own a top-10 health insurer. Together they control about 80% of the U.S. prescription market, according to last year's Federal Trade Commission report.
CVS Caremark is a subsidiary of CVS Health, and District Leader of Pharmacy Operations Ashley Ellis expressed opposition to HB 1150 on Wednesday. Ellis said pharmacists that work for PBM-owned and corporate pharmacies are still members of their local communities, and they have access to the medications and equipment that serve people with complex health needs while independent pharmacies do not necessarily have these things.
Rep. Richard McGrew, R-Hot Springs, said he received several emails from constituents who ostensibly opposed HB 1150 but said they 'knew nothing about this' when he contacted them. He alleged that the emails came from lobbyists against HB 1150 who received his constituents' personal information from CVS, where they told him they receive prescription drugs.
McGrew questioned Ellis about this 'breach of integrity,' and Ellis said she was not aware of this.
Navitus Chief Pharmacy Officer Sharon Faust said Arkansas has been 'a frontrunner' on regulating prescription drug access and prices, but HB 1150 would be 'a step too far, a step further where you're actually limiting patient choice [and] reducing competition.'
Vinson and Moore said PBMs routinely reimburse their affiliate pharmacies at a higher rate than their competitors, locally-owned independent pharmacies.
This practice is outlawed in Arkansas by Act 1 and Act 3 of 2018, which became law after a special legislative session. Arkansas lawmakers have been attempting to regulate PBMs for the past decade, starting with Act 900 of 2015, which required PBMs to pay pharmacies at least as much as the national average of what drugstores pay wholesalers for drugs.
Pharmacy benefit managers will have to pay Arkansas drugstores dispensing fees under new rule
Despite this, pharmacies sent the Arkansas Insurance Department (AID) roughly 3,000 complaints in 2024, claiming PBMs either illegally paid them below this national average or paid them at or just above this amount, AID's general counsel told lawmakers last year. Independent pharmacists made similar claims in September, saying they were struggling to stay open in rural areas with limited healthcare resources.
The Arkansas Legislative Council approved a rule in December to require PBMs to include dispensing fees in their reimbursements for prescription drugs.
Removing PBM-affiliated pharmacies from the market would require the employee benefits division of the Arkansas government 'to reevaluate and restructure their pharmacy networks and implement new compliance measures,' according to an actuarial statement measuring the fiscal impact of HB 1150.
'There could be minor cost or saving[s] to the plan from excluding certain retail pharmacies from their network, such as CVS Caremark,' according to the statement. 'Such a change would require a significant number of EBD members to transfer their prescriptions to an in-network pharmacy and may reduce pharmacy network access.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Journals
an hour ago
- Business Journals
Sutter Health among Premier's 15 Top Health Systems for 2025
Story Highlights Sutter Health ranked third among large health systems nationwide. Premier's 15 Top Health Systems list evaluated 338 systems. Top-ranked systems outperformed peers in mortality rates and efficiency. Sutter Health was ranked among the best in the nation in Premier's 15 Top Health Systems in the United States. The annual list ranks health systems based on clinical outcomes, extended outcomes, operational efficiency and patient experience. A total of 338 health systems were evaluated for the 2025 Premier's 15 Top Health Systems list. GET TO KNOW YOUR CITY Find Local Events Near You Connect with a community of local professionals. Explore All Events To help spotlight the top hospitals and health systems across the nation, The Business Journals is partnering with Premier, a technology-driven, health care improvement company, to publish its annual rankings, including its 100 Top Hospitals ranking. Sutter ranked No. 3 among five large health systems, following two based in Texas. It earned five stars, indicating performance in the top quintile, for clinical outcomes, which consider risk-adjusted mortality, complications, hospital-acquired infections, 30-day mortality and readmissions. It also received four stars for operational efficiency and patient experience. Sutter is one of the largest employers, nonprofits and companies in the Sacramento region. It reported nearly $18 billion in revenue for fiscal 2024 and employs about 17,500 people in Sacramento, Placer, El Dorado and Yolo counties. This year's top performers on Premier's 15 Top Health Systems rankings were Houston Methodist in Houston, Texas; Saint Francis Health System in Tulsa, Oklahoma; and CHI Memorial in Chattanooga, Tennessee, each of which topped its respective size category. Only health systems with at least two short-term, general, acute care hospitals with separate Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Certification Numbers were included in the analysis. Rankings were based on Medicare Provider Analysis and Review data, and data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Care Compare website. Health systems do not apply to be considered. The health systems on this year's rankings outperformed peer systems by 22% on inpatient mortality rates. They also had fewer infections and shorter stays compared to peers. If the performance of this year's 15 Top Health Systems were extrapolated to all Medicare inpatients, more than 171,000 lives could be saved in-hospital and the typical patient could be released a half-day sooner. Here are this year's 15 Top Health Systems: Large Health Systems 1. Houston Methodist City: Houston, TX System type: Parent 2. Baylor Scott & White Health City: Dallas, TX System type: Parent 3. Sutter Health City: Sacramento, CA System type: System 4. Intermountain Health City: Salt Lake City, UT System type: Parent 5. UCHealth City: Aurora, CO System type: Parent Medium Health Systems 1. Saint Francis Health System City: Tulsa, OK System type: Parent 2. HCA Continental Division City: Denver, CO System type: Subsystem 3. HCA Mountain Division City: Cottonwood Heights, UT System type: Subsystem 4. HCA Central and West Texas Division City: Austin, TX System type: Subsystem 5. CHI Health City: Omaha, NE System type: Subsystem Small Health Systems 1. CHI Memorial City: Chattanooga, TN System type: Subsystem 2. CHRISTUS Spohn Health System City: Corpus Christi, TX System type: Subsystem 3. CHI Saint Joseph Health City: Lexington, KY System type: Subsystem 4. Health First City: Rockledge, FL System type: Parent 5. Baptist Health Care (Florida) City: Pensacola, FL System type: Parent

Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Dave Ramsey sends major message to Americans on IRAs, Roth IRAs
Americans preparing for retirement encounter various challenges, primarily centered on maintaining financial security and sustaining the lifestyle they envision after leaving the workforce. Key concerns involve estimating potential Social Security payments and evaluating how much they will be able to depend on their accumulated retirement funds. Dave Ramsey, bestselling personal finance author and radio host, offers important words for Americans on traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs and some key advice on ways to achieve a financially comfortable retirement. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Making sure retirement funds can adequately cover future expenses is a top priority for many Americans. With rising life expectancies and the uncertainty of financial markets, retirees must strategize how to extend their savings throughout their retirement years. To build financial security, individuals wisely invest in 401(k)s, IRAs, and similar accounts while factoring in tax considerations. Another significant concern is health care costs, which tend to increase as medical needs grow with age. Although Medicare helps alleviate some expenses, it does not cover everything, requiring retirees to account for out-of-pocket costs such as medications, long-term care, and some additional medical services. Related: Dave Ramsey warns Americans on Social Security The impact of rising inflation is a significant concern, as it reduces the purchasing power of fixed retirement incomes. Many retirees worry that inflation could hinder their ability to maintain their preferred lifestyle, especially those who depend heavily on Social Security benefits. While Social Security remains a crucial source of retirement income, relying on it entirely brings uncertainty. Questions surrounding its long-term viability, cost-of-living adjustments, and possible benefit reductions due to solvency concerns add to the financial stress many retirees face. Recognizing these challenges, Ramsey issues a caution regarding traditional IRAs and Roth IRAs, offering Americans guidance on setting financial priorities and navigating the complexities of retirement planning. Ramsey explains that both Roth IRAs and traditional IRAs are valuable tools for retirement savings, but the key distinction lies in how they are taxed. A Roth IRA is funded with after-tax dollars, allowing investments to grow tax-free. When retirement arrives, withdrawals from the Roth IRA remain tax-free, providing financial flexibility. In contrast, a traditional IRA is funded with pretax money, offering an immediate tax advantage. However, when funds are withdrawn during retirement, both the contributions and their accumulated growth are subject to taxation. "While a Roth IRA doesn't offer any current-year tax benefits like a traditional IRA, it gives you something even better: tax-free growth and tax-free withdrawals once you retire," Ramsey wrote. "Now, that's a sweet deal!" More on retirement: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social SecurityScott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threatShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has message on Social Security, 401(k)s Another significant difference between these accounts is the income limits. A traditional IRA has no income restrictions, meaning individuals can contribute regardless of how much they earn annually. A Roth IRA, on the other hand, has specific eligibility requirements. In 2025, those filing as single or head of household can contribute the full amount if their gross income is below $150,000. For married couples filing jointly, the threshold is $246,000. Related: Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on 401(k)s Once a person turns 59-and-a-half and has held their Roth IRA for at least five years, they are free to withdraw both contributions and earnings without facing taxes or penalties - an excellent advantage for retirees. However, if one's Roth IRA has been open for less than five years, any earnings they take out will be subject to taxes. In 2025, the Roth IRA contribution limit remains $7,000 for those under 50, translating to a monthly contribution of $583.33 when divided over 12 months. Individuals aged 50 and older can contribute up to $8,000, which allows for monthly contributions of $666.67. These limits require savers to plan smartly, ensuring steady growth in their retirement accounts while optimizing tax advantages, Ramsey explains. By making consistent contributions, individuals can build financial security for their future while taking advantage of tax-free growth. Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary makes bold prediction on U.S. economy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
CCTV Script 06/06/25
The war of words between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, which seemed to escalate almost hourly, has already cost real money in the capital markets. Overnight, Musk's personal net worth reportedly fell by approximately $34 billion. By aligning the timing of their social media exchanges with Tesla's stock movements, a clear pattern emerges: as the feud grew more intense, with language becoming increasingly blunt and emotional, Tesla's share price continued to slide. Many analysts believe that Tesla's stock is likely to remain volatile. To assess its future trajectory, we can start with the trigger of this conflict: a recently passed House spending bill. One provision would eliminate tax credits for electric vehicles—directly impacting Tesla. JPMorgan analysts estimate that the new legislation could cut Tesla's annual profits by around $1.2 billion. However, some market observers note that both Musk and others in the industry had long anticipated that the Trump administration would eventually scrap EV subsidies. This expectation has been priced in—it was only a matter of timing. But of even greater consequence is the second layer of impact: the broader regulatory posture of the White House toward Musk, particularly in the autonomous driving space. Timing is critical. Next week, Tesla is expected to debut its long-awaited Robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. Progress in self-driving technology has been a key reason many investors remain bullish on Tesla. But the breakdown in Musk's relationship with Trump could undermine those expectations. "there's a view that the battle here going on between musk and Trump, that this is going to continue to sort of, you know, increase, and with that, ultimately does is that autonomous and the regulatory vision does Trump now, now not start to play nice in the sandbox with musk.""Elon Musk, as brilliant as he can be, can also be mercurial and impetuous. CUT TO from a trading perspective, I think the stock could easily trade down into the 250s 260s until you get some support." Beyond the personal feud, the spotlight is also shifting to the broader relationship between Silicon Valley—the U.S. tech hub—and Washington, D.C.—the political center. As Musk and Trump move from allies to adversaries, their split is drawing attention to the evolving dynamic between big tech and federal power. Analysts told CNBC that during Trump's first term, major tech firms often found themselves in the administration's crosshairs. Companies like Meta, Google, and to some extent Apple were all named in antitrust inquiries. Now, the rift between Musk and Trump may open new doors for tech leaders who have had tense relations with Musk. For instance, Jeff Bezos—who also leads a space company—has in recent months made efforts to court Trump more closely, reportedly taking cues from Musk's political playbook. This shift may also present an opportunity for Sam Altman, CEO of AI startup OpenAI. "If you're a startup that's trying to make big names or big headlines with investments for the US, that's probably a good place to be." Still, some analysts caution that this overnight drama may not deserve too much attention. A defining feature of the Trump-era policymaking process has always been its volatility—things can shift dramatically within just a few hours. What ultimately matters is returning to the fundamentals and taking a long-term view of where the industry—and the economy—are heading.