logo
McEwen Mining adds equity exposure to Sudbury gold explorer

McEwen Mining adds equity exposure to Sudbury gold explorer

McEwen Mining (TSX:MUX) exercised 9,200,000 warrants for shares of Inventus Mining (TSXV:IVS), an Ontario-based gold and critical metals explorer, locking in an investment worth C$828,000
Inventus is a junior miner active on two projects in Sudbury, Ontario, one of which houses the first significant paleoplacer gold discovery in North America
Inventus Mining stock has added 50 per cent year-over-year but remains down by 35.71 per cent since 2020
McEwen Mining (TSX:MUX) exercised 9,200,000 warrants for shares of Inventus Mining (TSXV:IVS), an Ontario-based gold and critical metals explorer, locking in an investment worth C$828,000.
According to Inventus Mining's investor presentation for March 2025, McEwen Mining owns about a 6 per cent stake in the company, while its namesake, Rob McEwen, owns a 20 per cent position.
The proceeds, part of an early warrant exercise incentive program, will go towards Inventus' 2025 bulk sampling program at its Pardo gold project 65 km northeast of Sudbury, Ontario, where grade-control drilling is now underway.
Previous bulk samples at Pardo yielded 3.4 grams per ton (g/t) gold in 5,000 tons and 4.2 g/t gold in 1,000 tons, supporting the potential for a low-cost mining operation.
The warrant exercise follows Inventus and McEwen's recently signed memorandum of understanding to consider processing bulk sample material at McEwen's Stock Mill facility. The potential deal would cover up to 45,000 tons of material from Pardo over the next 12 months. Leadership insights
'We are extremely pleased by McEwen Mining's continued support through their participation in the early warrant exercise program. This funding will directly support the execution of our 2025 bulk sampling plans. With grade-control drilling now underway, we are taking steps to better define the thickness and gold grade of our bulk sample sites in preparation for extraction and processing,' Wesley Whymark, Inventus Mining's president and head of exploration, said in a statement. About Inventus Mining
Inventus is a junior miner active on two projects in Sudbury, Ontario. The company's flagship Pardo project houses the first significant paleoplacer gold discovery in North America.
Inventus Mining stock (TSXV:IVS) last traded at C$0.09. The stock has added 50 per cent year-over-year but remains down by 35.71 per cent since 2020.
Join the discussion: Find out what everybody's saying about this Canadian gold and critical metals stock on the Inventus Mining Corp. Bullboard and check out Stockhouse's stock forums and message boards.
The material provided in this article is for information only and should not be treated as investment advice. For full disclaimer information, please click here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada's Conservatives still aren't serious about housing
Canada's Conservatives still aren't serious about housing

National Observer

timean hour ago

  • National Observer

Canada's Conservatives still aren't serious about housing

He was so close to getting it. Jacob Mantle, the newly-elected thirty-something Conservative MP for York-Durham, rose in the House of Commons on Tuesday to make a point about housing costs. 'Oxford Economics reports that Toronto's housing market ranks among the worst in the world for affordability. At the same time, mortgage delinquency rates in Toronto are higher than at any time during the pandemic. The financial burden is suffocating the next generation of homebuyers.' But Mantle wasn't actually interested in proposing solutions to that problem. Instead, he wanted to whine about the fact that the Carney government isn't going to table a budget until the fall, which the government has defended on the basis that it will be better able to account for the fallout from Donald Trump's tariffs by then. And despite his supposed concern over housing, Mantle was dismissive of the government's plan to embrace and scale up modular housing in Canada. 'My generation refuses to live in a shipping container,' Mantle said. For what it's worth, I suspect many members of his generation (and mine) would be happy to live in the sort of modified shipping containers that are being designed and built right now, including the ones in his own city. But modular housing is so much more than just the use and conversion of shipping containers. It's an entirely new approach to homebuilding, one that uses factories and their inherent economies of scale to drive down costs. They can be one or two-storey, single or multi-family, and configured in any number of layouts and sizes. In an environment where driving down construction costs is a nearly existential issue for Mantle's generation, you'd think he would be more open to new ideas and economic innovation — especially when it promises to use more Canadian materials and labour. Then again, if you've been paying close attention to the Conservative Party of Canada's approach to this issue, his behaviour was entirely predictable. Under Pierre Poilievre's leadership, the party and its MPs have repeatedly highlighted the very real problem of rising housing costs in Canada and the disproportionate impacts they have on younger people. But when it comes to actual solutions to that problem — ones, at least, that don't involve cutting taxes or regulations and assuming the market will magically solve the problem it has helped create — those same Conservatives either disappear into the metaphorical bushes or come out on the other side of the issue. In Calgary, for example, opposition to a city-wide measure to increase affordability and density while reducing sprawl came mostly from Conservative-leaning councilors like Dan McLean, Peter Demong and Sean Chu, with some conspicuous cheerleading work coming from federal Conservative MP Greg McLean. In British Columbia, provincial Conservative party leader John Rustad decided to go to bat for the very 'gatekeepers' standing in the way of new housing that Poilievre had repeatedly promised he would eliminate. Even in Ontario, where Conservative politicians have been more visibly and vocally on-side with pro-supply measures, the results of the Ford government's efforts have been underwhelming, to say the least. We are not in a moment where we can afford to reflexively turn our noses up at potential solutions. And yet, Conservative politicians like Mantle seem determined to find fault in every proposed approach that doesn't flatter their own pre-existing ideological and political biases towards cutting taxes and reducing government involvement. Modular housing will not be, in and of itself, the solution to a problem that has been building for more than two decades. But that's only because nothing on its own will, or could, be the solution. The Carney government has embraced modular housing as a way to lower costs and improve affordability in Canada's housing market. Canada's Conservatives, on the other hand, seem determined to miss the mass timber for the trees. Instead, we need every possible lever being pulled right now, from regulatory reform and improved operating efficiencies to direct government involvement, procurement, and even development. Mantle is right that the status quo has failed his generation. But he's wrong to indignantly oppose a good-faith effort at challenging and changing it, and all the more so as he pretends to speak on behalf of an entire generation. We can only hope that his party and its online proxies don't decide to turn modular housing into this year's iteration of the 15-minute city and throw a self-evidently good and decent idea into the stew of online conspiracies it always seems to have at low boil. Yes, that might feed the eternally hungry appetites of their increasingly online political base. But it won't do anything to address the problem Conservatives like Mantle claim to care about. At some point, Canadians may conclude that they're not actually all that interested in solving it.

Canada risks squandering multi-billion-dollar critical minerals market without 'swift action': report
Canada risks squandering multi-billion-dollar critical minerals market without 'swift action': report

National Observer

timean hour ago

  • National Observer

Canada risks squandering multi-billion-dollar critical minerals market without 'swift action': report

Canada risks squandering a $12-billion-a-year domestic market for minerals and metals key to the country's energy transition by 2040 if the federal government cannot attract the massive investments needed to propel development of copper, nickel, lithium, graphite, cobalt and rare earth element mines, a new report has concluded. The study out today by the Canadian Climate Institute (CCI), a think tank, found Canada's place in the global critical minerals market would be jeopardized unless at least $30 billion in capital flowed into the country's mining sector over the next 15 years to meet growing minerals demand driven by technologies ranging from EV batteries to wind turbines and power infrastructure. 'Securing Canada's place in the global critical minerals race requires swift action to unlock public and private investment that can power Canada's energy transition with these building blocks of clean technologies,' said the CCI's director of clean growth, Marisa Beck, who was lead author of the report. "We are at a phase globally in critical minerals market development where the market is reorganizing itself [against the backdrop of the energy transition] and in the midst of major geopolitical and trade upheavals, so it is the perfect time to establish policies to support Canada's mining sector and supply chain,' she added, speaking with Canada's National Observer. To meet skyrocketing worldwide demand for these six key critical minerals – which the International Energy Agency, an industry watchdog, forecasts to reach $770 billion by 2040 – investment in Canadian mines would have to rise to $65 billion by the end of the next decade. Facilitating this investment, according to the report, which comes ahead of next week's G7 leaders summit in Alberta where critical minerals is one of three topics topping the agenda, will require: agreements between government and the private sector sharing the financial burden of capital investments in critical mineral mines; more funding for Indigenous communities to partner on these projects; strengthened environmental regulations that reduce risks and liabilities for neighbouring communities; and streamlined mining project reviews and decision-making processes. "Securing Canada's place in the global critical minerals race requires swift action to unlock investment that can power our energy transition with these building blocks of clean technologies,' says the Canadian Climate Institute's Marisa Beck. 'We are seeing very fast progress in a lot of the technologies that will need these critical minerals, so it is important to focus on the high-level areas of mine development, but we also recognize that the processing side and the high-value manufacturing side must all be considered going forward,' said Beck. 'But this was outside the scope of this report.' Marilyn Spink, director of operations at the Canadian Critical Minerals and Metals Alliance, an industry advocacy group, warned that the report could entrench 'old-world thinking' by government and industry on new mining sector development that focuses on resource development but 'doesn't sufficiently consider demand-pull,' where future market strategy is more demand-determined rather than supply-led. 'What is Canada going after?' 'What is Canada going after? Materials enable the economy; critical minerals do not. We need to intelligently decide who the customers for these critical minerals will be — EV battery-makers, sure, but think about the wider clean-tech space, energy infrastructure, robotics and so on,' she said, speaking with Canada's National Observer. 'Then decide which critical minerals you mine and where you mine them, because then you can build the midstream facilities to process them and then add real high-value manufacturing that will lead to economic development and job creation.' She cautioned that without following this strategy, Canada could fall prey to the 'resource curse,' when a country 'fails to leverage a natural resource well because it doesn't add manufacturing value and this results in slowly eroding the wider economy.' In a bid to ramp up mining of critical minerals in a global market dominated in recent decades by China, Ottawa in 2022 announced $3.8 billion in federal funding to finance geoscience and exploration, mineral processing, manufacturing and recycling applications, as well as research and development. And last year, Canada's critical minerals list was updated with three new materials, bringing the total to 34. But only a handful of critical minerals mining projects have gained traction in the past year, with developments in BC, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec recently receiving a financial boost from the $1.5 billion Canadian Critical Minerals Infrastructure Fund.

This retiree went to culinary school and worked in a retirement residence during the pandemic
This retiree went to culinary school and worked in a retirement residence during the pandemic

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

This retiree went to culinary school and worked in a retirement residence during the pandemic

In Tales from the Golden Age, retirees talk about their spending, savings and whether life after work is what they expected. For more articles in this series, click here. Heather Walker, 70, Waterloo, Ont. I retired in 2016 at the age of 61 after a career in technology and administration. My last job was working in health and safety training at a remote mine site in northern Ontario. I was working on a rotation: I flew into the site, worked for two weeks and then went home for two weeks. At first, I loved it, but after six years, I started finding it very stressful and difficult to leave home. The mine was winding down, so when the company announced another set of layoffs was coming, I volunteered to be let go with a bit of severance pay. I was ready to move on. My timing was perfect since my first grandson arrived the day after I officially retired. He came a month early. I wasn't set on retiring fully. I assumed I could find something closer to home with my software skills, but the technology I worked with at my last company turned out to be outdated. That set me back. After about a year of retirement, I started to get bored, so I took a culinary course at the local college. With my newly upgraded skills, I hoped to land a part-time job at a bakery or restaurant. It was quite an experience being the only senior in a class of 18- to 24-year-olds. It was a lot harder than I thought. You've heard of Hell's Kitchen? I was going in for pleasure, but they teach the kids the pressures of the pastry and baking world. I ended up quitting before the course finished. I got a part-time job front-of-house at a little bakery, but COVID-19 hit, and they didn't need me anymore. During the pandemic, I moved on to a server position at a retirement residence, wearing the full personal protective equipment and getting daily health checks. I thought it would be good for me to be around people and that the work would be fulfilling. I expected to work there for two or three months, but stayed for two years. Working for a group of residents ranging from 60 to 101 years old during the pandemic was an experience I will always remember. Next, I went to work at a country bakery, but couldn't keep up with the work. That's when I realized something was going on with my health. After getting it checked out, the doctors found several blockages, and I needed heart bypass surgery immediately. It was a bit of a shock to me because I'm a relatively healthy person. The heart issues forced me to change my retirement plans and adjust my bucket list. I planned to travel overseas a lot more, get involved in pickleball, and keep active with my two grandkids in their sports, but I can't do that now. I stay active, doing what I can. I have a community garden in Guelph and joined a mature singles group for nature walks, dining, theatre and many other events of interest. I also participate in some studies at the University of Waterloo in areas such as the aging brain, bone loss and nutrition. At first, I did worry about money in retirement, which I think is common. There are so many unknowns. It takes time to adjust to no longer receiving a paycheque and what your income looks like when you start collecting your Canada Pension Plan and Old Age Security benefits. I started to relax once I saw the true retirement picture after taxes. For most people, retirement is very doable if you save, invest and live within your means. The most challenging part of retirement was finding a lifestyle that would provide a healthy balance. It took me about five years to settle in, but now I love it. The one thing I would have done differently is not to wait for retirement to see more of the world. My advice for others? Don't put off today what you may not be able to do tomorrow. And plan for changes. There are lots of them. - As told to Brenda Bouw This interview has been edited and condensed. Are you a Canadian retiree interested in discussing what life is like now that you've stopped working? The Globe is looking for people to participate in its Tales from the Golden Age feature, which examines the personal and financial realities of retirement. If you're interested in being interviewed for this feature and agree to use your full name and have a photo taken, please e-mail us at: goldenageglobe@ Please include a few details about how you saved and invested for retirement and what your life is like now.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store