L'nuey and Parks Canada seek board members to co-manage protected lands, historic sites
The First Nations group L'nuey and Parks Canada are looking for board members to help co-manage P.E.I.'s protected lands and historic sites, taking the next step on an agreement they have spent years crafting.
"The agreements were signed and negotiated over many years. I believe the negotiations started even way back in the early 2000s," said Geraldine Arsenault, the field unit superintendant for Parks Canada on Prince Edward Island.
"These agreements for both the new national park reserve and for the Toquktmekl agreement, these agreements were both signed at different moments in 2024."
The new boards will consist of five members, including two selected by L'nuey and two chosen by Parks Canada. The fifth, who will chair, will be appointed by the board members.
"Now we're at the phase of implementation of these agreements, and the first part of that implementation is to form the boards themselves, so that they can advise on the governance of these places," said Arsenault.
The boards will oversee places like Pituamkek National Park Reserve off P.E.I.'s North Shore and national historic sites such as Province House in Charlottetown, Cavendish-North Rustico and the working inn at Dalvay-by-the-Sea.
Jenene Wooldridge is the executive director of L'nuey, an organization focused on Indigenous rights for the Mi'kmaq community on P.E.I.
"We advance and protect Mi'kmaq rights, and we focus on the areas of governance development, all negotiations and consultations for the Mi'kmaq," she said.
"L'nuey is proud to be able to support the Mi'kmaq leadership over the past number of years. They have been steadfast in making sure that these agreements come to fruition and that we are able to now get into the implementation phase."
Bringing Indigenous perspectives
Arsenault said reconciliation has been very important for Parks Canada.
"We've been working for a very long time with the Mi'kmaq of Prince Edward Island to really bring in the Mi'kmaw perspective to how we manage our national historic sites and our national park," she said.
"And now with the new national park reserve Pituamkek, it really brings a piece of Mi'kmaw traditional lands into the family, if you will, of protected sites."
Wooldridge said the boards will have different priorities.
"Pituamkek is a brand-new national park reserve, so it's really building it from the ground up. It's going to be looking at what the potential visitor experience could look like, where are their protected sites, that wouldn't be so good for visitors or lots of people being around," she said.
"Also access will be a discussion, I'm sure, for those co-management boards, so it's really more of the operational discussions that will be happening, building from the ground up for Pituamkek."
Wooldridge said that the other board will look at existing national historic sites and the national park.
She said they hope to have these board positions filled by the fall.
"The recruitment is open now, and we encourage Mi'kmaw community members who have interest or expertise in culture, governance, environment, you know, community engagement, to put their names forward because all of those perspectives matter."
She said non-Indigenouse Islanders are also welcome to put their name forward if they have experience in those areas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oklahoma lawmakers didn't think we deserved to know their plans as session ended, and they did a lot
Representatives Josh West, R-Grove, left, Steve Bashore, R-Miami, and John Pfeiffer, R-Orlando, watch the vote returns on a veto override vote during the House session on May 29. (Photo by Janelle Stecklein/Oklahoma Voice) Oklahoma's lawmakers are supposed to be accountable to the people who elected them, but our legislators conveniently forgot that last month in their frenetic scramble to reach the finish line. Lawmakers spent the final night of the annual legislative session chugging cups of coffee and scarfing down pizza as they cast dozens upon dozens of consequential votes while most of their constituents slept. When Oklahomans awoke the morning of May 30, they suddenly found themselves with nearly four dozen new laws ramrodded through the Legislature in the dead of night. Meanwhile, the head of a state agency woke up unemployed after legislators suddenly decided to fire her just before the stroke of midnight. It's not necessarily problematic that lawmakers cast votes at night: That happens many years because they procrastinate or are otherwise disorganized. What was extremely concerning this time was that they entered — and exited — the penultimate day without a full public agenda posted. If their sparse public agenda was to be believed, the state House of Representatives and Senate had no plans to take up any veto overrides or even the state's mental health commissioner. The reality was starkly different. It turns out our elected officials, who we pay to operate in the public, strode into session, secretly planning to override Gov. Kevin Sittt's vetoes on a wide range of topics ranging from mammogram screenings to food truck fire safety to investigations of missing and murdered Indigenous women. But they apparently didn't think the public was entitled to know those plans. It wasn't until they actually started voting that the public got an inkling that something was afoot. How is that good governing? Do our lawmakers think they know so much better than their constituents that they don't believe the people they represent should be able to weigh in on significant issues? Or is it just that they think the only voices that matter are the lobbyists gathered around the chamber television screens watching the shenanigans play out in real time? Is it any wonder that Stitt posted a video on social media frustrated with all the last-minute maneuvering and telling voters to watch closely? Because make no mistake, these were consequential votes. A successful override of the governor's veto meant these measures became law. And there were some great veto overrides like increasing women's access to mammogram screenings and focusing resources to help tackle the state's Missing Murdered and Indigenous People crisis. But there were some headscratchers. One such veto override saw lawmakers waste nearly five hours deadlocked on a strange bill that changed the leadership requirements to become the Oklahoma National Guard's top leader. Stitt said later it creates a new pension system, will cost taxpayers' a lot of money and that lawmakers didn't know what they were voting on. I'm still not 100% certain what exactly the bill does, but critics of the measure grumbled under their breath that the changes would benefit a seated lawmaker, and that the House leaders wouldn't allow any more critical veto overrides — like mammogram screenings — to move forward until that one happened. The Legislature decided Allie Friesen, the mental health commissioner, needed to go with all the chaos surrounding her agency's budgetary disarray, cut and canceled contracts and the need for tens of millions of dollars just to make payroll. Lawmakers were so disillusioned with her leadership in the final days that they essentially stripped her of her power to directly implement a landmark mental health settlement that involves providing competency restoration services for indigent defendants. Stitt, who opposed the firing, said Friesen disturbed 'the status quo and questioned long held practices at the agency.' He also criticized Sen. Paul Rosino, R-Oklahoma City, and Rep. Josh West, R-Grove, who ran the measure, questioning what they stand to gain, what they were trying to keep covered up, if they have conflicts of interest, and if Rosino was 'trying to help his wife avoid responsibility for her role in the finance department there.' Rosino admitted during questioning on the Senate floor that his wife works as a part-time employee at the agency. She was apparently working there even while her husband was helping lead investigatory hearings into the agency's operations and sought Friesen's firing. Stitt later apologized for bringing Rosino's wife into the conversation. We've entrusted our lawmakers with an enormous amount of power. They're pretty much the only governmental entity in the entire state that is not subject to the Open Meeting and Open Records Act. They have internal rules that govern their behavior, but it's not uncommon to watch them waive those at a moment's notice when they deem it convenient. That means legislators basically do whatever they want, when they want and how they want. The public can't look at their correspondence to determine what's happening behind the scenes that could influence their decision-making. Even the Governor's Office has to comply with both laws. Given lawmakers' secretive behavior, I think it begs the question, do they continue to deserve this level of trust? Lawmakers, how would you answer this question? SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
L'nuey and Parks Canada seek board members to co-manage protected lands, historic sites
The First Nations group L'nuey and Parks Canada are looking for board members to help co-manage P.E.I.'s protected lands and historic sites, taking the next step on an agreement they have spent years crafting. "The agreements were signed and negotiated over many years. I believe the negotiations started even way back in the early 2000s," said Geraldine Arsenault, the field unit superintendant for Parks Canada on Prince Edward Island. "These agreements for both the new national park reserve and for the Toquktmekl agreement, these agreements were both signed at different moments in 2024." The new boards will consist of five members, including two selected by L'nuey and two chosen by Parks Canada. The fifth, who will chair, will be appointed by the board members. "Now we're at the phase of implementation of these agreements, and the first part of that implementation is to form the boards themselves, so that they can advise on the governance of these places," said Arsenault. The boards will oversee places like Pituamkek National Park Reserve off P.E.I.'s North Shore and national historic sites such as Province House in Charlottetown, Cavendish-North Rustico and the working inn at Dalvay-by-the-Sea. Jenene Wooldridge is the executive director of L'nuey, an organization focused on Indigenous rights for the Mi'kmaq community on P.E.I. "We advance and protect Mi'kmaq rights, and we focus on the areas of governance development, all negotiations and consultations for the Mi'kmaq," she said. "L'nuey is proud to be able to support the Mi'kmaq leadership over the past number of years. They have been steadfast in making sure that these agreements come to fruition and that we are able to now get into the implementation phase." Bringing Indigenous perspectives Arsenault said reconciliation has been very important for Parks Canada. "We've been working for a very long time with the Mi'kmaq of Prince Edward Island to really bring in the Mi'kmaw perspective to how we manage our national historic sites and our national park," she said. "And now with the new national park reserve Pituamkek, it really brings a piece of Mi'kmaw traditional lands into the family, if you will, of protected sites." Wooldridge said the boards will have different priorities. "Pituamkek is a brand-new national park reserve, so it's really building it from the ground up. It's going to be looking at what the potential visitor experience could look like, where are their protected sites, that wouldn't be so good for visitors or lots of people being around," she said. "Also access will be a discussion, I'm sure, for those co-management boards, so it's really more of the operational discussions that will be happening, building from the ground up for Pituamkek." Wooldridge said that the other board will look at existing national historic sites and the national park. She said they hope to have these board positions filled by the fall. "The recruitment is open now, and we encourage Mi'kmaw community members who have interest or expertise in culture, governance, environment, you know, community engagement, to put their names forward because all of those perspectives matter." She said non-Indigenouse Islanders are also welcome to put their name forward if they have experience in those areas.
Hamilton Spectator
3 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Legislative assembly unveils plan for Reconciliation
As First Nations reclaim their sovereignty within the dominion of Canada, existing institutions need to adapt to the new political reality and the GNWT is aiming to be a leader in this new phase of Truth and Reconciliation. Groundwork plans for how the Legislative assembly can move forward in the spirit of Truth and Reconciliation as Indigenous self governance becomes a greater part of the decision-making process were released on May 29. It also doubles as the assembly's strategic plan for the next five years. 'The Legislative assembly has adapted over time, incorporating Indigenous leadership, voices, and traditions,' reads the report. 'But now, we must go beyond inclusion and prepare for a future of shared governance with Indigenous governments. 'Self-governance agreements are expanding, and the assembly must evolve to reflect this new reality. To prepare for this shift, we must embed Indigenous worldviews in governance, operations, and workplace culture. This means strengthening governance structures, adapting workplace policies, and begin the process of aligning legislative work with self-determination and co-governance now and in the future.' In the report the action plan is described as a living document, intended to develop and evolve based on feedback. It starts the GNWT's plans to adapt to the changing political reality with five areas, each with five immediate goals. Most of these are plans to gather information and to ensure Indigenous culture and values are reflected in the day to day operations of the assembly. The goals listed include things like developing Indigenous-led training programs for staff, establishing a protocols for engaging Indigenous communities on legislative processes, reviewing legislation to ensure Indigenous language are used in record keeping and legislative documents, removing barriers for Indigenous businesses to work with the assembly and reviewing the members code of conduct to ensure it is in line with Indigenous values, particularly in regards to 'respecting the voices of women and Elders in decision making.' Changes will be implemented by the legislative assembly clerk, currently Glen Rutland, and overseen by the speaker of the assembly. The program will be reviewed after two years and a public consultation on how well it performed will be taken on year four. The program is due for renewal after five years. 'As a workplace, the assembly reflects the diversity and strength of the territory,' says the report. 'It is a space where Indigenous perspectives are not just present but integral, where cultural identity is not separate from professional identity. Employees and Members bring their histories, languages, and traditions into daily work, shaping governance that is not only representative but also responsive to the needs of the people it serves. 'It is a workplace where knowledge is shared across generations, where youth see themselves reflected in leadership, and where reconciliation is not a checklist but a way of working together.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
