NCLT to decide on RCom's ₹550 crore refund plea against Ericsson in June
The insolvency court said it will decide next month on bankrupt telco Reliance Communications Ltd's plea seeking a ₹ 550 crore refund from Swedish telecom equipment maker Ericsson.
During a brief hearing at the Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on Thursday, Ericsson's counsel termed the plea 'frivolous'. The tribunal has directed both parties to file their responses and listed the matter for hearing on 11 and 12 June.
RCom and its two subsidiaries—Reliance Telecom and Reliance Infratel—paid Ericsson ₹ 550 crore in 2019 following a Supreme Court order.
The bankrupt company now argues that the payment amounted to preferential treatment, since Ericsson is an operational creditor and received full payment ahead of secured financial creditors.
In a court petition this week, RCom's resolution professional, Anish Nanavaty of Deloitte, said the payment to Ericsson amounted to a 'preference' as it had 'the effect of putting the respondent in a beneficial position vis-a-vis the other creditors of the corporate debtor in the event of distribution being made under liquidation of the corporate debtor'.
The respondent here refers to Ericsson while the corporate debtor is RCom.
Ericsson is in no mood to give in.
'The demand for refund is an abuse of process of law inasmuch as the settlement and undertaking was in an order passed by the Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India,' Anil Kher, senior advocate representing Ericsson, earlier told Mint. Article 142 allows the apex court to pass any order to ensure justice.
RCom had approached NCLT in 2019 seeking a refund from Ericsson, which asked the tribunal to dismiss the petition 'with exemplary costs', calling it wholly misconceived. The Swedish company had called the petition 'motivated at the instance of the members of the Committee of Creditors who are also the Financial Creditors'. Nanavaty's petition this week was a rejoinder to this.
Once among India's leading telecom operators, RCom could not survive a brutal tariff war that began in 2016, and filed for bankruptcy in 2019.
Earlier in 2013, RCom and its subsidiaries had engaged Ericsson to maintain their telecom networks. By 2017, with unpaid dues mounting to over ₹ 1,500 crore, Ericsson initiated insolvency proceedings.
The case escalated, and after payment deadlines were missed, Ericsson filed a petition in the Supreme Court against RCom's former chair Anil Ambani and the company's units.
At the time, RCom was reeling under a debt load of over ₹ 46,000 crore, with major financial creditors including the State Bank of India and China Development Bank. Operational creditors included the telecom department, tower companies, and vendors.
In early 2019, RCom filed for bankruptcy, and Deloitte was appointed as the resolution professional. That same year, RCom cleared the dues to Ericsson—paying ₹ 458.77 crore in addition to an earlier deposit of ₹ 118 crore.
Later in 2019, Deloitte filed a petition before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) seeking a refund from Ericsson on grounds of preferential payment. The appellate tribunal directed the parties to approach the NCLT's Mumbai bench, which is now hearing the matter afresh.
In 2020, RCom's committee of creditors selected UVARCL as the preferred bidder for RCom and Reliance Telecom, while Reliance Jio was chosen for Reliance Infratel's assets. However, both transactions remain entangled in legal challenges.
First Published: 1 May 2025, 02:06 PM IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
'What did you do in 1996?': Man claims HR asked about resume gap from 30 years ago
A job applicant shared a bizarre experience during a recent interview during which he was asked to explain a gap in his resume dating back to 1996. In the post titled "Asked me about a gap 30 years ago", the man recounted a team interview for a management role at a German company. During the call, one of the HR representatives reportedly questioned him about a three-year gap immediately after high school. "I can see you ended high school in 1996, but I can't see what you did between 96 and 99?" the HR interviewer allegedly asked. The applicant, now 47, said he was taken aback by the question and responded bluntly: "If I mentioned every job I ever had on my CV, it would be 10 pages long," before going on to explain the missing years. "I can understand asking about a gap a year ago or so, but almost 30 years back? Seriously. What is the relevance?" he wrote, adding that despite being the only Swedish-speaking candidate, which the role required, he did not get the job. The post drew widespread support from fellow Reddit users, many of whom shared similar frustrations about being asked to explain employment gaps. "There isn't any relevance. The person who asked is an idiot," one user wrote. Another added, "I lost a job offer because of a one-year gap on my resume. The hiring manager couldn't comprehend that I used savings to travel." Others advised editing resumes to avoid such questions entirely. "I recently removed the months from mine and just kept the years. I got tired of justifying every short stint." "There isn't any relevance. They're just trying to seem like they know what they're doing. They practice interviewing procedures, and they go by that," said one user.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Bank sells Bihar man's 'fake' gold even after he pays off loan; SC backs borrower
The Supreme Court has reinstated an FIR and chargesheet against Bank of India officials in Bihar's Motijheel branch, after a gold loan customer accused them of not returning pledged ornaments despite full repayment, TOI has reported. The case involves Abhishek Singh, who had pledged 254 grams of 22-carat gold to secure a Rs 7.7 lakh loan on July 22, 2020, and repaid it on March 31, 2023. When Singh asked for his gold back, the bank claimed the ornaments had been revaluated during the loan default period and found to be fake. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo It said the items were auctioned off, and an FIR was filed against Singh for cheating on May 22, 2023. Singh then filed a counter FIR accusing the bank staff of misappropriating his gold. The Patna High Court quashed Singh's FIR, saying it was a retaliatory move. However, the Supreme Court, in a judgment last week, reversed the HC order and said the matter warrants a full trial, TOI reported. Live Events "It is true that the appellant (Abhishek Singh) repaid the amount, but with substantial delay. However, once the loan is settled, it is difficult to understand as to why the gold was revalued and auctioned," a bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Manoj Misra observed. Writing the judgment, Justice Karol added, "At all times, the appellant had no access to the gold which, after its initial valuation, was always kept in the safe custody of the bankers. Fraud, if any, whether perpetrated at the first instance of valuation or later, is a matter which could be unearthed only after a trial based on the evidence led by the parties." Criticising the High Court's approach, the bench said, "The discussion made by the high court in quashing the FIR in no way addresses the possibility of the respondents' possible involvement in the misappropriation of the gold pledged." The top court concluded that Singh's allegations merit investigation. "But, as of now, in no circumstances, it can be said that no prima facie case regarding commission of an offence, as alleged in the FIR, is made out from its perusal."
Business Standard
8 hours ago
- Business Standard
Rajeswari Sengupta Rajeswari Sengupta
Rajeswari Sengupta India's overzealous anti-dumping response may gradually fuel protectionism Its liberal use of anti-dumping duties risks turning into protectionism - and may do more harm than good Bhushan Power and Steel case: A test for India's insolvency regime In a major reversal, the Supreme Court ruled that the resolution plan for BPSL, approved by the committee of creditors (CoC) and cleared by both the insolvency and the appellate tribunals Updated On : 19 May 2025 | 11:09 PM IST India must watch out for GDP growth with third chance at doorstep Having missed two chances to boost manufacturing, India can't afford to miss the third one now at its doorstep Updated On : 14 Apr 2025 | 11:09 PM IST Updated On : 18 Mar 2025 | 3:20 PM IST Budget 2025: Balancing reforms and fiscal consolidation to revive growth The two key questions are: What is the diagnosis of the economic slowdown? And what can the Budget do to address it? Updated On : 20 Jan 2025 | 11:37 PM IST Rajeswari Sengupta & Anirudh Burman: Ushering in insolvency professionals Countries such as the United Kingdom and Canada have a well-developed cadre of self-regulated insolvency professionals Updated On : 20 Nov 2016 | 9:30 AM IST GDP conundrum: Is India booming? While CSO insists India is the world's fastest-growing large economy, private economists say the country is struggling to recover from its post-2010 downturn Updated On : 17 Nov 2016 | 4:19 PM IST Anirudh Burman & Rajeswari Sengupta: Clear the air before enforcing Bankruptcy Code Poor regulation of the insolvency professional industry will lead to poor bankruptcy outcomes Updated On : 09 Oct 2016 | 9:59 PM IST Pratik Datta & Rajeswari Sengupta: RBI should not regulate asset reconstruction companies Banking and stressed asset management are two separate businesses Updated On : 02 Jul 2016 | 10:02 PM IST
