State lawmakers call for audit of metro districts as Colorado House weighs oversight bill
A bill in front of the Colorado House of Representatives could create an avenue for Coloradans to file ethics complaints about elected leaders of special districts, including metro districts and school boards.
CBS Colorado has been
investigating
the debt of one Castle Rock neighborhood's metro district. It revealed how $70 million in metro district bond debt from the 1980s -- intended to pay off infrastructure for The Meadows neighborhood -- has now ballooned sixfold, despite homeowners paying property taxes to their metro district for decades.
After that report, dozens of homeowners
decided to run
for the metro district board.
As Meadows residents seek to take over metro district board control in Castle Rock, lawmakers at the State Capitol are taking a closer look at metro districts.
For state Sen. Lisa Frizell (R-Col), the issue hits close to home.
"I live in The Meadows," said Frizell, who represents District 2.
Frizell was not surprised to learn her community was nearly $450 million in debt.
"I've really seen a lot of kind of shady dealings by metro districts over the years," said Frizell, who is a former Douglas County Assessor. "My neighbors in The Meadows are really, really concerned because they didn't have any idea of the extent of the debt."
But the debt structure in The Meadows is not unique among Colorado's 2,500 metro districts.
"That's how virtually every subdivision that's been built in the last 30 years was developed," Frizell said. "It's completely legal in Title 32 of the Colorado Revised Statutes. My concern is the lack of transparency that's available to citizens."
"It has become a growing and expanding issue in Colorado and is making it much harder on residents to be able to invest and stay in their homes," said Congresswoman Tammy Story (D-Col), state representative for District 25.
Story has been advocating for metro district oversight for years.
"Basically, there is no authoritative body over metro districts, not county government, not state government," Story said. "It does allow for a lot of abuses for the residents that live there in terms of the amount of taxes that they pay."
Right now, she's trying to pass a bill, HB 25-1079, that would expand the jurisdiction of the Independent Ethics Commission to include special districts. That commission currently monitors state elected officials
"You're talking about the elected school boards and their direct hires, which would be superintendents, and then the same with special districts, their elected boards and their direct hires," Story explained.
Members of the public can make complaints to the Ethics Commission, which can then investigate and issue penalties for ethics violations, including fines or legal action.
This is Story's third attempt to pass the legislation, which is currently in the House Appropriations Committee. The next step is for the bill to have its second reading on the House floor.
"I'm hoping that it's going to move through because there is no fiscal note on it for the coming fiscal year, and there's no reason to hold it there," Story said. "I'm fully anticipating it moving out, so we can move it through the process, and we ask that the jurisdiction be expanded using existing appropriations. Because we know this is a tight budget year, but the issues at hand are of significance and need to be heard."
In previous years, Story said the bill never made it out of the Senate Appropriations Committee, or it was pulled from the Senate calendar after some lawmakers threatened a filibuster.
The bill is opposed by lobbyists representing Denver Public Schools, the Colorado Association of School Boards and the Special District Association of Colorado.
Frizell is not yet familiar with the bill but supports her Meadows neighbors in their efforts to represent themselves on their metro district boards.
"Any metropolitan district, no matter where you are, it's important that you gain control of the metropolitan district board," Frizell said. "That's really what the folks in The Meadows are trying to do right now. They're actively working, and I encourage them and cheer them on."
Next week, state Sen. Michael Weissman (D-Col) will request a performance audit of the Department of Local Affairs' oversight of metro districts in Colorado. Frizell and Congressman Max Brooks (R-Col), a fellow Castle Rock state representative, support the audit, as does Story.
"Representative Brooks and I are actively working through the legislative audit process, and we both sit on the Legislative Audit Committee, and we are supporting an audit request that will dig deep into what's going on with metro districts in the state of Colorado," Frizell said.
Brooks and Frizell will hold a town hall 1 to 3 p.m. Saturday in Castle Rock at the Philip and Jerry Miller Library along with Congressman Anthony Hartsook (R-Col). They plan to hold discussion that will include property taxes, public safety, illegal immigration and state funding issues.
Weissman has co-sponsored many of Story's efforts to increase special district oversight, including HB 1079. He said in a statement, "There are nearly 2,500 metro districts in our state with about another 100 being allowed to come into being every year. Metro districts are governments with taxing power -- a lot of taxing power. According to public reports, authorized but unissued debt by metro districts exceeds $1 trillion. Metro district residents should demand transparency from their boards and should demand that their city and county governments place careful limits on metro district debt when metro district 'service plans' are approved in the first place."
The Metro District Education Coalition shared the following statement, "While MDEC is neutral on this particular bill, we have been proud to champion several pieces of legislation in the past few sessions that offer greater resident protections, including HB21-262, HB23-110, and HB24-1267. These three bills mandate more transparency in metro district elections, audit and budget requirements, mandatory mill levy caps and debt caps in the service plan filed with cities and counties, and more clarity around how metro districts enforce covenants, and more. In addition, MDEC worked with Rep. Jodeh to prohibit metro districts from foreclosing on properties related to covenant enforcement."
MDEC is an educational nonprofit backed by several law firms, including Spencer Fane, the law firm that represents The Meadows metro districts.
John Henderson with Coloradans for Metro District Reform calls HB23-110 a "Trojan horse" with superficial transparency provisions. Henderson said in a statement, "If the industry was honest about transparency, they would tell the residents how much debt the developer authorized themselves to impose on the residents, tell the residents that the developers 'voted' to eliminate the right of residents to vote on taxes and issuing bond debt for 20 years, tell the residents how much debt will be imposed by the developers on the residents over the next 10 years, tell the residents how much more they will pay in taxes to pay developer profits, tell the residents what happened to the money that residents paid for the developed lot when they bought their homes -- money paid to developers for the cost of the land, infrastructure and developer profits before metro district financing kicked in."
Spencer Fane and The Meadows developer, the Castle Rock Development Company, did not respond to requests for comment on this story.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
16 hours ago
- New York Post
Federal judge approves Colorado's age limit for firearms purchases
A federal judge upheld Colorado's restriction on firearms sales requiring buyers to be 21 or older after Rocky Mountain Gun Owners and two people looking to purchase firearms sued Democratic Gov. Jared Polis. Chief U.S. District Judge Philip A. Brimmer agreed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit's decision that age-based requirements for purchase do not fall under the Second Amendment's right to keep and bear arms. The 10th Circuit and Brimmer agree that the issue falls under a 'safe harbor' exclusion, placing it outside the scope of the Constitution. The only exceptions to Colorado's firearm purchase age restriction are for those in the U.S. Military and for peace officers. In both cases, the person must be making the purchase while on duty and is 'serving in conformance with the policies' of their respective agency. 'Governor Polis is committed to making Colorado one of the ten safest states, and common-sense laws encourage responsible gun ownership and keep people safe. For decades in Colorado, you had to be 21 to purchase a handgun, per federal law. The requirement to be 21 was expanded to rifles and shotguns with the signing of SB23-169, and Governor Polis is glad to see the court affirm that Colorado's common sense law does not infringe on Second Amendment rights. Governor Polis is confident this law has and will help keep Coloradans and our communities safe,' Polis' Communications Director Conor Cahill said in a statement to Fox News Digital. 3 A federal judge upheld Colorado's restriction on firearms sales requiring buyers to be 21 or older. REUTERS Brimmer acknowledged that Adrian Pineda and Matthew Newkirk — the two individuals under 21 who sued Polis together with Rocky Mountain Gun Owners — are part of 'the people' as written in the Second Amendment. However, he referred to the 10th Circuit's decision, saying it had resolved the case back in 2023, according to Courthouse News Service (CNS). The decision in Colorado comes in contrast to one issued by the Supreme Court in 2022 in which justices determined that New York issued unconstitutional requirements for carrying a concealed weapon in public. Then-President Joe Biden said he was 'deeply disappointed' by the ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. He said that SCOTUS had 'chosen to strike down New York's long-established authority to protect its citizens.' 3 The only exceptions to Colorado's firearm purchase age restriction are for those in the U.S. Military and for peace officers. DmyTo – 'This ruling contradicts both common sense and the Constitution, and should deeply trouble us all,' Biden said in a statement at the time. He went on to reaffirm his commitment to reducing gun violence and making communities safer. 3 The 10th Circuit and Brimmer agree that the issue falls under a 'safe harbor' exclusion, placing it outside the scope of the Constitution. Los Angeles Times via Getty Images Brimmer is also going against a decision made by the New Orleans-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which struck down a federal restriction banning the sale of firearms to anyone below the age of 21. That court held that those aged 18 to 20 are protected under the Second Amendment, according to The Trace, an organization of journalists who report on gun violence in the U.S. 'The federal government has presented scant evidence that eighteen-to-twenty-year-olds' firearm rights during the founding-era were restricted in a similar manner to the contemporary federal handgun purchase ban,' Judge Edith H. Jones wrote in the opinion. Several states, including New York, Massachusetts, California, Florida, Illinois, Delaware and Vermont have raised the age for purchasing firearms, according to the Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund. While some states have limited the age restrictions to handgun purchases, others have applied the restriction to any kind of firearm.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Federal judge approves Colorado law banning people under 21 from buying a gun
A federal judge upheld Colorado's restriction on firearms sales requiring buyers to be 21 or older after Rocky Mountain Gun Owners and two people looking to purchase firearms sued Democratic Gov. Jared Polis. Chief U.S. District Judge Philip A. Brimmer agreed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit's decision that age-based requirements for purchase do not fall under the Second Amendment's right to keep and bear arms. The 10th Circuit and Brimmer agree that the issue falls under a "safe harbor" exclusion, placing it outside the scope of the Constitution. The only exceptions to Colorado's firearm purchase age restriction are for those in the U.S. Military and for peace officers. In both cases, the person must be making the purchase while on duty and is "serving in conformance with the policies" of their respective agency. Supreme Court Declines To Examine Appeals Over Maryland, Rhode Island Gun Control Laws "Governor Polis is committed to making Colorado one of the ten safest states, and common-sense laws encourage responsible gun ownership and keep people safe. For decades in Colorado, you had to be 21 to purchase a handgun, per federal law. The requirement to be 21 was expanded to rifles and shotguns with the signing of SB23-169, and Governor Polis is glad to see the court affirm that Colorado's common sense law does not infringe on Second Amendment rights. Governor Polis is confident this law has and will help keep Coloradans and our communities safe," Polis' Communications Director Conor Cahill said in a statement to Fox News Digital. Brimmer acknowledged that Adrian Pineda and Matthew Newkirk — the two individuals under 21 who sued Polis together with Rocky Mountain Gun Owners — are part of "the people" as written in the Second Amendment. However, he referred to the 10th Circuit's decision, saying it had resolved the case back in 2023, according to Courthouse News Service (CNS). Read On The Fox News App Debate Over Whether To Ban Handgun Sales To Teens Could Soon Head To The Supreme Court The decision in Colorado comes in contrast to one issued by the Supreme Court in 2022 in which justices determined that New York issued unconstitutional requirements for carrying a concealed weapon in public. Then-President Joe Biden said he was "deeply disappointed" by the ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. He said that SCOTUS had "chosen to strike down New York's long-established authority to protect its citizens." "This ruling contradicts both common sense and the Constitution, and should deeply trouble us all," Biden said in a statement at the time. He went on to reaffirm his commitment to reducing gun violence and making communities safer. Brimmer is also going against a decision made by the New Orleans-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which struck down a federal restriction banning the sale of firearms to anyone below the age of 21. That court held that those aged 18 to 20 are protected under the Second Amendment, according to The Trace, an organization of journalists who report on gun violence in the U.S. "The federal government has presented scant evidence that eighteen-to-twenty-year-olds' firearm rights during the founding-era were restricted in a similar manner to the contemporary federal handgun purchase ban," Judge Edith H. Jones wrote in the opinion. Several states, including New York, Massachusetts, California, Florida, Illinois, Delaware and Vermont have raised the age for purchasing firearms, according to the Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund. While some states have limited the age restrictions to handgun purchases, others have applied the restriction to any kind of article source: Federal judge approves Colorado law banning people under 21 from buying a gun
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Governor, faith leaders condemn Boulder attack: ‘Violence and hate have no home in Colorado'
BOULDER, Colo. (KDVR) — Faith leaders in Boulder joined Governor Jared Polis on Pearl Street Wednesday, united in condemning Sunday's attack. Faith and political leaders of all backgrounds showed a united front in Boulder on Wednesday, making it clear, they do not want hate to win. Boulder Terror Attack: Continuing coverage 'Today, we return here. To the site where this occurred, to show and buy deeds and words that terrorism does not win. We are united as Coloradans of all faiths of all backgrounds, to make it clear that anti-semitism, that violence and hate have no home in Colorado, not today and not ever,' Polis said Wednesday morning. Faith leaders from the Jewish, Christian, Muslim and other communities came together in Boulder on Wednesday, calling out the attack on marchers on Pearl Street as an act of hate. 'The Muslim community here in Boulder and here in Colorado certainly denounces what happened here on Sunday,' said Imam Nader Elmarhoumi of the Islamic Center of Boulder. While all the leaders condemned the attack, some were not surprised. 'The whole Jewish community is reeling, shocked. That this hideous hate crime could happen right here in beautiful, downtown Boulder, Colorado. And yet we have seen this coming, we have seen this coming,' said Rabbi Marc Soloway of Congregation Bonai Shalom. 'This is not the time for pedantic analysis about the difference between anti-Zionism and antisemitism nor to talk about the horrors of a war thousands of miles away. This was a brutal, hateful, antisemitic terrorist attack against peaceful Jews in Boulder, Colorado, in 2025.' Tourist details newly obtained video of Boulder attack showing people on fire Leaders said they have seen a rise in hate speech and hateful actions towards the jewish community. They are asking Coloradans to help put an end to it. 'As the scourge of anti-Jewish and antisemitic rhetoric and sadly violence continues to rear its ugly head, we want to say enough. Hate, antisemitism, terrorism and violence have no place in Colorado and no place in the United States of America,' said Governor Jared Polis. Jewish community members are urging their friends and colleagues of different backgrounds to help call out hate when they see it in hopes of stopping more violence. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
