&w=3840&q=100)
Environment dept issues stop-work notice to controversial project in Goa
The Goa State Environment Impact Assessment Authority issued a stop-work notice on Tuesday to a construction project of a private company near Panaji for allegedly not obtaining prior environment clearance amid protests.
A day before, the Revolutionary Goans Party (RGP) had demonstrated against the upcoming project at Bambolim village.
RGP MLA Viresh Borkar and the party president Manoj Parab had alleged that the project would adversely affect the environment.
As the protests continued on Tuesday, the Goa State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (GSEIAA), which works under the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, issued a stop-work notice to the project.
State Environment Director Sachin Desai, also a member secretary of the authority, ruled that the construction activity was undertaken by M/s Worldwide Resorts and Entertainment Private Limited without obtaining prior Environment Clearance (EC) as prescribed under the Environment Impact Assessment notification, 2006.
Desai stated that the application for EC has been pending before the GSEIAA.
"In exercise of the powers conferred under section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Authority directs you (the company) to stop the work with immediate effect," the notice reads.
The GSEIAA has also ruled that the company should ensure that no civil work is carried out at the site.
"Failure to comply with the directions shall attract action under section 15 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, which includes imprisonment or fine," the order reads.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Punjab govt struggles to translate central laws into Punjabi
1 2 3 Patiala: The Punjab govt's prolonged struggle to translate key central laws into Punjabi has come under fresh scrutiny, with activists and rural workers voicing frustration over years of delay. Despite repeated demands and official commitments, critical legislation such as the Building and Other Construction Workers (BOCW) Act and the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) remain untranslated, creating barriers to legal clarity and access for Punjabi-speaking citizens. The issue gained renewed attention after a group of rural labourers from Nabha encountered confusion over the interpretation of the English word "may" in the MGNREGA Act during a dispute with the local administration. Their request for a Punjabi version of the Act was denied, prompting them to file a Right to Information (RTI) application. With no response, the matter is now scheduled for hearing before the Punjab State Information Commission on June 25. This is not the first time the commission has intervened on such issues. Activist Vijay Walia, who was advocating for the Punjabi translation of the BOCW Act since 2022, revealed that multiple hearings were held over the years. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo "Every time, the govt claims the Act is being translated by the Language Department and universities, but nothing concrete has emerged," Walia said. At one point, the language department even issued a written statement citing staff shortages as the reason for the delay. In 2023, the Estimates Committee of the Punjab Vidhan Sabha pressed for an expedited translation, prompting the labour department to seek assistance from Punjabi University. However, the translation is yet to be completed. In a response submitted in March 2024, the BOCW Welfare Board — chaired by the chief minister — told the Commission that once the translation is ready, it will be reviewed by the Vidhan Sabha's Legal Cell and then presented to the Cabinet for approval before being officially notified in Punjabi. Despite these assurances, there was no official notification to date. Meanwhile, the Democratic MGNREGA Front has also entered the fray and is set to begin its own hearings on the lack of a Punjabi translation of the MGNREGA Act starting June. For many, this delay underscores a broader systemic neglect toward Punjabi as an administrative and legal language in Punjab itself. With legal interpretations hanging in the balance, stakeholders are now hoping that pressure from civil society and the Information Commission will push the govt toward swift action. MSID: 121440669 413 |
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Claims of forest rights face challenges as Dec deadline looms
Margao: Sixty-five-year-old Mahadev Velip clutches weathered papers outside his mud house at Morpirla, in Quepem taluka — documents that could secure his family's future under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act. Like thousands of others, he waits as chief minister Pramod Sawant's Dec 19 deadline to clear all pending claims faces mounting challenges. With 10,500 claims filed across the state, only 871 families have been cleared to be issued sanads (title deeds) so far. Another 949 claims have been rejected, leaving 8,680 families in limbo — including Velip's. Sanads will be issued to 150 families at a function to be held on Monday at Ponda. Also, a special camp will be held on June 14 across six talukas to fast-track pending cases. 'This land has been our home for generations,' said Velip, his eyes scanning the foliage around his dwelling. 'Without official recognition, we have always lived in fear.' Sources in the tribal welfare department reveal three critical obstacles threatening the Dec 19 timeline. The most pressing is a severe shortage of skilled personnel for spot verification and demarcation of claimed land — the crucial step in the validation of each claim. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Esta nueva alarma con cámara es casi regalada en Bragado (ver precio) Verisure Undo Survey teams currently manage only three to four verifications per day, a pace that appears insufficient given the massive backlog. The monsoon compounds these difficulties. Heavy rain triggers extensive vegetation growth and waterlogging, making forest sites virtually inaccessible and bringing verification work to 'almost a standstill', officials said. A forest department official said, 'We are racing against time and nature. The monsoon window severely limits our working months.' A third challenge involves ensuring adequate gram sabha attendance to validate claims — the requirement of 50% quorum at gram sabhas, with a third of them women, has turned out to be a major impediment in the speedy processing of the claims. Further, processing claims that are not supported by adequate documentation is fraught with delays. With the Dec 19 deadline only six months away, sources said the fulfilment of the promise depends on navigating these formidable challenges.
Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
Why Kerala wants Wildlife Act amended to allow it to kill some wild animals
Kerala has sought the Union government's nod to kill wild animals that pose a threat to human life and properties. The state wants the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 amended so it can be allowed to kill wild animals that foray into human habitats. Here is why. The wildlife attack problem in Kerala Wildlife attacks have emerged as a major issue in Kerala, with the government identifying 273 village local bodies, out of 941, as hotspots. The problem animals are mainly tiger, leopard, elephant, bison, wild boar, bonnet macaque and peafowl. Although bonnet macaque (a monkey species) and peafowl do not pose a threat to life, their repeated raids have forced farmers to abandon vast tracts of agricultural land. As many as 919 persons were killed and 8,967 others injured in wildlife attacks in Kerala from 2016-17 to 2024-25 (till January 31), according to government data. Major reasons are regional fluctuations in wildlife population, animals forced to move out as the quality of their habitats decline, grazing of domestic cattle in forest areas, changes in cropping patterns, etc. But importantly, the population explosion in the case of wild pigs and various species of monkeys is wreaking havoc in human habitations. The existing legal framework puts several constraints in taking timely action in emergency situations, officials said, especially in the case of animals protected under Schedule I of the Act. Before ordering the killing of dangerous wild animals, the state chief wildlife warden should be convinced that it cannot be captured, tranquilised or shifted to another place. Such captured animals should not be held under confinement. Also, apart from conditions laid down in the Act, the government has to follow the advisory of the Tiger Conservation Authority and Project Elephant Scheme while dealing with human-wildlife conflict. While the district collector, who is the executive magistrate, can issue orders for removal of a public nuisance, there are court orders preventing the invoking of these powers with regard to wild animals. The government's stand on killing wild animals State Forest Minister A K Saseendran said the state wants the Centre to amend the 1972 Act to allow Kerala to kill 'all man-eating wild animals.' 'We are not looking for powers for indiscriminate killing of wild animals. Culling of animals posing threat to life and cultivation should be allowed for a certain period. The permission can be also region-specific and seasonal. All preventive measures such as fencing have failed to stop animal attacks,' he said. The minister added that in the case of wild boars, the wild boar control system (in which licenced shooters are allowed to kill crop-raiding animals) has failed to effectively curb the menace. 'Before shooting a wild boar, one has to examine whether it is pregnant or not. Such impractical guidelines have failed to serve the purpose. The growing population of wildlife has to be controlled to prevent threats to human lives,'' he added. Changing the legal status of animals The state wants wild boars to be declared as vermin for a certain period under section 62 of the Act. The state also wants to address the bonnet macaque threat by removing it from the category of Schedule I. This species of monkey was included in Schedule I in 2022. Until then, the chief wildlife warden could order capturing and relocating of monkeys causing mayhem in human habitations. Now, the warden cannot take any suo motu action on this threat.
