Kilsyth man walked 200 miles to raise money for Alzheimer's
Kilysth resident Stuart Donaghey signed up to walk along the Camino de Santiago, an ancient pilgrimage route that leads to the tomb of St James the Apostle.
The 64-year-old retired project manager, originally from Greenock, took on the challenge to raise funds for Alzheimer Scotland in memory of his loved ones.
Read more: Glasgow social care organisation named Scottish Charity of the Year
Stuart lives in Kilsyth with his wife Isobel (Image: Supplied) Stuart said: "My uncle Jim was diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and passed away in 2023, aged 81.
"I have fond memories of going fishing with him when I was younger, and of how much fun he was at family events.
"He was always the life and soul of the party.
"My mum, Alice, who was uncle Jim's sister, passed away in 2020, aged 83.
"I had started to notice some possible signs of dementia in her, so it's an illness that has affected a number of people in the family, as well as some very close friends.
"I started volunteering for Alzheimer Scotland after I retired a few years ago, and I thought this challenge would be a great opportunity to raise awareness and funds for a great cause."
Stuart's uncle Jim was diagnosed with Alzheimer's and passed away in 2023 (Image: Supplied) Stuart set off from Porto wearing his purple Alzheimer Scotland t-shirt and flag, following a coastal trail north to the finishing point at the Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela in Spain.
Throughout his two-week journey, Sturart spoke to people from all over the world whose lives have been affected by dementia.
He said: "I'm not a religious person, but the idea of the journey appealed to me.
"The walk was challenging in some places, but I loved every minute.
"What I enjoyed most was that people from all over the world would see my purple t-shirt and flag and come over to speak to me and sometimes walk with me – often telling me personal stories about how they had been affected by dementia.
"It was great to feel like I'd made a small difference through talking to so many people and raising awareness of dementia and Alzheimer Scotland.
"I didn't want the journey to end and when I reached the finishing point, I could've gone back and walked it all again.
"I'm so grateful to everyone who supported me along the way and who donated so generously."
Through his adventure, Stuart has already raised more than £3,000, and donations are still being accepted online at tinyurl.com/y2jez7zs.
Read more: Waspi women hail 'major breakthrough' in fight against UK Government
Stuart took on the 200m trek through Portugal and Spain to raise funds for Alzheimer's Scotland (Image: Supplied)
He has already raised more than £3,000 (Image: Supplied) Kirsty Stewart, executive lead of fundraising and engagement at Alzheimer Scotland, said: "We are very grateful to Stuart for taking on such a big challenge to raise funds for Alzheimer Scotland.
"What an amazing effort.
'Every penny raised helps Alzheimer Scotland continue to support our vital network of dementia advisors, resource centres, and our 24-hour Freephone Dementia Helpline (0808 808 3000).'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
23 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Labour MPs rebel against welfare cuts with bid to kill Bill
A reasoned amendment due to be published on Tuesday will seek to halt the Bill. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle would need to select the amendment when MPs debate the legislation at its second reading. But it could pose a major challenge to the Government's plans. Dozens of MPs, including 11 select committee chairs, are understood to have backed it. The chairwoman of the Work and Pensions Committee said the aim was to persuade the Government to 'think again', while another backer urged the Government to 'go back to the drawing board'. It comes after Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall sought to talk up the changes and persuade backbench MPs at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP). Under the proposals, ministers will limit eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC). The amendment acknowledges the need to reform the social security system but calls to reject the Bill because of a lack of consultation with disabled people and their carers. It also makes the case that arrangements are not in place to help those affected by the changes, noting that most additional employment support funding will not be in place until the end of the decade. And it points to the fact that an analysis of the impact of the reforms on employment from the Office for Budget Responsibility will not be published until the autumn. Debbie Abrahams MP, chairwoman of the Work and Pensions Committee, said: 'We desperately want the Government to succeed in the shared goal of getting people who can work into work and supporting those who can't. 'We want the Government to listen and to think again on this Bill. 'We are being asked to vote for this Bill before disabled people have been consulted, before impact assessments have been conducted, and before we have given enough time to some of the Government's key policies – investing in the NHS, to the right to try, and to work coaching – (to) have been able to bed in.' Another MP backing the amendment said: 'The breadth of the support for this amendment, from across the PLP, shows just how concerned MPs are about the cuts to disability benefits. 'The Government needs to withdraw the Bill and go back to the drawing board.' The Government has faced a growing backlash to its planned reforms, with Labour MP Vicky Foxcroft resigning as a Government whip because of her concerns over the package. MPs continued to voice their concerns in the Commons on Monday. Next week's Universal Credit and PIP Bill will impose poverty on disabled people. It is unacceptable the government are not publishing key information on the scale of that impact. — Andy McDonald MP for Middlesbrough & Thornaby East (@AndyMcDonaldMP) June 23, 2025 Andy McDonald, who represents Middlesbrough and Thornaby East, said he and his colleagues were being asked to vote on imposing 'appalling poverty'. Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5 billion a year. The Work and Pensions Secretary told the PLP that the plans are 'rooted in fairness'. Ms Kendall said: 'The path to a fairer society – one where everyone thrives, where people who can work get the support they need, and where we protect those who cannot – that is the path we seek to build with our reforms. 'Our plans are rooted in fairness – for those who need support and for taxpayers.' She argued they are about ensuring the survival of the welfare state so there is always a safety net for those in need of it. Ms Kendall added: 'But above all they are about our belief that everyone can fulfil their potential and live their hopes and dreams when, collectively, we provide them with real opportunities and support. 'This is the better future we seek to build for our constituents and our country.'
Leader Live
38 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Labour MPs rebel against welfare cuts with bid to kill Bill
A reasoned amendment due to be published on Tuesday will seek to halt the Bill. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle would need to select the amendment when MPs debate the legislation at its second reading. But it could pose a major challenge to the Government's plans. Dozens of MPs, including 11 select committee chairs, are understood to have backed it. The chairwoman of the Work and Pensions Committee said the aim was to persuade the Government to 'think again', while another backer urged the Government to 'go back to the drawing board'. It comes after Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall sought to talk up the changes and persuade backbench MPs at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP). Under the proposals, ministers will limit eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC). The amendment acknowledges the need to reform the social security system but calls to reject the Bill because of a lack of consultation with disabled people and their carers. It also makes the case that arrangements are not in place to help those affected by the changes, noting that most additional employment support funding will not be in place until the end of the decade. And it points to the fact that an analysis of the impact of the reforms on employment from the Office for Budget Responsibility will not be published until the autumn. Debbie Abrahams MP, chairwoman of the Work and Pensions Committee, said: 'We desperately want the Government to succeed in the shared goal of getting people who can work into work and supporting those who can't. 'We want the Government to listen and to think again on this Bill. 'We are being asked to vote for this Bill before disabled people have been consulted, before impact assessments have been conducted, and before we have given enough time to some of the Government's key policies – investing in the NHS, to the right to try, and to work coaching – (to) have been able to bed in.' Another MP backing the amendment said: 'The breadth of the support for this amendment, from across the PLP, shows just how concerned MPs are about the cuts to disability benefits. 'The Government needs to withdraw the Bill and go back to the drawing board.' The Government has faced a growing backlash to its planned reforms, with Labour MP Vicky Foxcroft resigning as a Government whip because of her concerns over the package. MPs continued to voice their concerns in the Commons on Monday. Next week's Universal Credit and PIP Bill will impose poverty on disabled people. It is unacceptable the government are not publishing key information on the scale of that impact. — Andy McDonald MP for Middlesbrough & Thornaby East (@AndyMcDonaldMP) June 23, 2025 Andy McDonald, who represents Middlesbrough and Thornaby East, said he and his colleagues were being asked to vote on imposing 'appalling poverty'. Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5 billion a year. The Work and Pensions Secretary told the PLP that the plans are 'rooted in fairness'. Ms Kendall said: 'The path to a fairer society – one where everyone thrives, where people who can work get the support they need, and where we protect those who cannot – that is the path we seek to build with our reforms. 'Our plans are rooted in fairness – for those who need support and for taxpayers.' She argued they are about ensuring the survival of the welfare state so there is always a safety net for those in need of it. Ms Kendall added: 'But above all they are about our belief that everyone can fulfil their potential and live their hopes and dreams when, collectively, we provide them with real opportunities and support. 'This is the better future we seek to build for our constituents and our country.'
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Labour MPs rebel against welfare cuts with bid to kill Bill
A reasoned amendment due to be published on Tuesday will seek to halt the Bill. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle would need to select the amendment when MPs debate the legislation at its second reading. But it could pose a major challenge to the Government's plans. Dozens of MPs, including 11 select committee chairs, are understood to have backed it. The chairwoman of the Work and Pensions Committee said the aim was to persuade the Government to 'think again', while another backer urged the Government to 'go back to the drawing board'. It comes after Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall sought to talk up the changes and persuade backbench MPs at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP). Under the proposals, ministers will limit eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC). The amendment acknowledges the need to reform the social security system but calls to reject the Bill because of a lack of consultation with disabled people and their carers. It also makes the case that arrangements are not in place to help those affected by the changes, noting that most additional employment support funding will not be in place until the end of the decade. And it points to the fact that an analysis of the impact of the reforms on employment from the Office for Budget Responsibility will not be published until the autumn. Debbie Abrahams MP, chairwoman of the Work and Pensions Committee, said: 'We desperately want the Government to succeed in the shared goal of getting people who can work into work and supporting those who can't. 'We want the Government to listen and to think again on this Bill. 'We are being asked to vote for this Bill before disabled people have been consulted, before impact assessments have been conducted, and before we have given enough time to some of the Government's key policies – investing in the NHS, to the right to try, and to work coaching – (to) have been able to bed in.' Another MP backing the amendment said: 'The breadth of the support for this amendment, from across the PLP, shows just how concerned MPs are about the cuts to disability benefits. 'The Government needs to withdraw the Bill and go back to the drawing board.' The Government has faced a growing backlash to its planned reforms, with Labour MP Vicky Foxcroft resigning as a Government whip because of her concerns over the package. MPs continued to voice their concerns in the Commons on Monday. Next week's Universal Credit and PIP Bill will impose poverty on disabled people. It is unacceptable the government are not publishing key information on the scale of that impact. — Andy McDonald MP for Middlesbrough & Thornaby East (@AndyMcDonaldMP) June 23, 2025 Andy McDonald, who represents Middlesbrough and Thornaby East, said he and his colleagues were being asked to vote on imposing 'appalling poverty'. Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5 billion a year. The Work and Pensions Secretary told the PLP that the plans are 'rooted in fairness'. Ms Kendall said: 'The path to a fairer society – one where everyone thrives, where people who can work get the support they need, and where we protect those who cannot – that is the path we seek to build with our reforms. 'Our plans are rooted in fairness – for those who need support and for taxpayers.' She argued they are about ensuring the survival of the welfare state so there is always a safety net for those in need of it. Ms Kendall added: 'But above all they are about our belief that everyone can fulfil their potential and live their hopes and dreams when, collectively, we provide them with real opportunities and support. 'This is the better future we seek to build for our constituents and our country.'
