
Türk Updates Human Rights Council: "We Need The Strongest Possible Defence Of International Law And Human Rights"
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk
59th session of the Human Rights Council
Global Update
Geneva, Monday 16 June 2025
Mr. President, Excellencies, distinguished delegates,
As we meet, conflicts are spiraling.
The military escalation between Israel and Iran is deeply worrying.
I join all those appealing for de-escalation and urgent diplomatic negotiations to end these attacks and find a way forward. And I call for full respect of international law by both sides, in particular the protection of civilians in densely populated areas.
Meanwhile, climate chaos is raging on.
And in every region of the world, economic uncertainty is taking root, while technology is developing uncontrolled, and at dizzying speed.
Behind each crisis, people are suffering. We must never lose sight of this fact.
The United Nations was founded to end war, reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, and promote justice and international law.
For 80 years, those promises helped to deliver a greater measure of peace and sustainable development. Life expectancy increased by 25 years. The number of people with a basic education doubled.
States agreed on wide-ranging laws of war. They adopted treaties on women's rights, on the environment, on disarmament, on preventing genocide.
Despite edging close to nuclear annihilation several times, reason prevailed.
Our global agreements have proven themselves over decades, providing a vision for a better future.
Today, we see dramatic steps to weaken them, creating a more dangerous world for us all.
Can we sit by as global security and prosperity are undermined?
Will we watch as the rule of law is eroded?
Can we continue as usual, while powerful countries cast aside the agreements that underpin our lives?
Can we risk massive conflict based on leaders' personal assessments and agendas?
We must ask ourselves, is this the world the framers of the Charter imagined?
And we must answer with the strongest possible defence of international law and human rights.
The current trajectory – of escalating conflict and blatant disregard for international human rights and humanitarian law – is indefensible.
Civilians are deliberately attacked.
Parties to conflict starve and rape as weapons of war.
Life-saving humanitarian aid is obstructed, and humanitarian aid workers are targeted.
And accountability is often absent.
Mr. President,
Israel's means and methods of warfare are inflicting horrifying, unconscionable suffering on Palestinians in Gaza. More than 55,000 Palestinians have been killed, including many thousands of children, according to the Ministry of Health in Gaza, and the attacks continue unabated. Israel has weaponized food and blocked lifesaving aid. I urge immediate, impartial investigations into deadly attacks on desperate civilians trying to reach food distribution centres. Disturbing, dehumanizing rhetoric from senior Israeli government officials is reminiscent of the gravest of crimes.
And Israel's refusal to allow international journalists to report from Gaza has helped its armed forces and Hamas to avoid transparency and accountability.
The facts speak for themselves. Everyone in government needs to wake up to what is happening in Gaza. All those with influence must exert maximum pressure on Israel and Hamas, to put an end to this unbearable suffering.
In the West Bank, no day passes without attacks by Israeli Security Forces and settlers killing, detaining and forcibly displacing Palestinians. Settlements are illegal; annexation is illegal.
Attacks on Israelis by armed Palestinians also continue, in both Israel and the occupied West Bank.
All of this is deeply worrying. Only an immediate ceasefire leading to a two-state solution, with Gaza as an integral part of a Palestinian State, can offer sustainable peace. All Israeli hostages must be freed immediately and unconditionally. All Palestinians detained arbitrarily must be released.
I am concerned by air and drone strikes by Israel in Lebanon, including in southern Beirut, which have killed civilians and destroyed homes and medical facilities. I urge full respect for the ceasefire to enable reconstruction, and the return home of displaced people on both sides of the border. At this critical juncture, it is key for the international community to support the Lebanese Government's efforts for much-needed institutional reforms and socio-economic recovery.
In Ukraine, as ceasefire talks stall, the conflict is escalating. Civilian casualties have increased significantly this year, as Russian armed forces used long-range weapons against cities and drones in frontline areas. While there have been exchanges of prisoners of war and, in some cases, civilian detainees, many are still in captivity. I urge the Russian Federation and Ukraine to commit to a full exchange of prisoners of war, and for the immediate release of Ukrainian civilians detained in Russia. We urgently need a comprehensive ceasefire leading to a peace agreement in line with the UN Charter and international law.
Sudan is plunging deeper into chaos and lawlessness, without the attention this situation demands. Hostilities have intensified in North Darfur and Kordofan, marked by grave violations of international humanitarian and human rights law. My Office documented a tripling in the number of arbitrary killings of civilians between February and April. This was largely due to summary executions by the Sudanese Armed Forces of alleged collaborators in Khartoum.
I remain deeply concerned about the situation in El Fasher, which has been under siege by the Rapid Support Forces for over a year. I am horrified by widespread sexual violence, including against children, and attacks on humanitarians. I urge the international community to press for a political solution, to stop the flow of arms, and to curb the business interests that are fueling this conflict. All parties must be held accountable.
In Myanmar, the military exploited the turmoil caused by the earthquake in March to double down on attacks against civilians, while restricting humanitarian access even further. Military operations have continued with reports of attacks on schools, religious sites, and other protected locations. This violence must end. I urge the parties to comply fully with international law, including the measures already ordered by the International Court of Justice to protect the Rohingya.
I remain deeply concerned about the human rights situation in the east of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and will provide a briefing later today.
The escalating hostilities in South Sudan are extremely worrying, threatening the country's already fragile peace process. In the first quarter of 2025, my Office documented that 739 people were killed, more than 650 injured, almost 150 abducted, and 40 subjected to sexual violence. I urge the parties to cease hostilities, resume dialogue and uphold the 2018 Revitalized Peace Agreement.
I was horrified by the attacks near Pahalgam in Indian-Administered Kashmir. The perpetrators must be brought to justice. I urge both India and Pakistan to ensure the ceasefire holds, to prevent hateful rhetoric and disinformation, and to reestablish essential water sharing arrangements.
I renew my call for the immediate and unconditional release by the de facto Houthi authorities in Yemen of personnel from the United Nations, civil society organizations, and diplomatic missions, including eight of my own staff. These detentions are an affront to the entire international community.
Mr. President,
A number of other crises also call for urgent attention.
Haiti is plunging further into turmoil, causing immense suffering. At least 2,680 people were killed and 957 injured between January and May. Gangs are tightening their grip on the capital and expanding their influence in the north and central regions, killing, raping and burning houses, schools, churches and businesses. The formation of unaccountable vigilante and so-called self-defence groups is disturbing.
I hope the judicial task forces agreed in April to address sexual violence, corruption and other crimes will be implemented without delay, and urge strong backing for the UN Mission and the Multinational Security Support Mission.
Libya is hanging by a thread. Clashes last month in Tripoli caused numerous civilian casualties and threaten the fragile reconciliation process. Security forces and armed groups are killing, abducting, and detaining their political opponents with impunity. I am appalled by continued abuses and violations against migrants and refugees, and call on the authorities to investigate the discovery of dozens of bodies at detention sites.
In Syria, the announcement of the lifting of sanctions, coupled with the creation of national commissions for Transitional Justice and Missing Persons, offer important opportunities. I am, however, concerned by continued reports of violence against certain communities and urge the enhancement of protection and accountability measures. We await the outcome of the investigation into the violence that led to hundreds of deaths in coastal areas earlier this year. I urge the authorities to ensure perpetrators are held to account in accordance with international standards. A meaningful OHCHR presence in the country would be instrumental in supporting a comprehensive and victim-centered transitional justice process.
In Ethiopia, political tensions are once again increasing in Tigray. I urge all stakeholders to engage in meaningful dialogue and ensure that the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement is implemented. I also call on the authorities to safeguard much-needed civic space ahead of the elections next year, to end arbitrary detention and intimidation of journalists and media workers and ensure respect for due process.
Mr. President,
Military authorities in the Sahel have consolidated their grip on power, frustrating the democratic aspirations of their people, while the human rights situation worsens. In Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger, thousands of civilians have been killed in attacks by extremist armed groups. We have also received reports of civilians killed by Government forces and their auxiliaries in all three countries. All responses to security threats must respect international law.
I am concerned by growing instability in Nigeria, which threatens to spill across borders. Armed groups have intensified killings, abductions, sexual violence, and forced recruitment, while intercommunal violence between farming communities and herders is increasing.
I am encouraged that the Interim Government and political parties in Bangladesh are making progress through dialogue. I urge meaningful advances on reforms, to create the environment for free and inclusive elections. However, I am concerned about recent changes to legislation to allow the banning of political parties and organizations and all related activities. This unduly restricts the freedoms of association, expression, and assembly.
My Office hopes to reach agreement on our expanded presence soon.
Mr. President,
Around the world, at least 625 human rights defenders and media workers were killed or disappeared in 2024, according to data gathered by my Office. That is one every 14 hours.
In many places around the world, civil society and the media are being vilified, harassed, and silenced. But it is precisely civil society and the media who hold power to account, and must be protected.
In a troubling trend, authorities in several countries with upcoming elections, including Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Honduras, Peru and Uganda, among others, are banning public gatherings, detaining opposition leaders, undermining civil society and attacking human rights defenders. I am closely following the recent developments in Bolivia. Electoral integrity must be preserved ahead of elections in August. Dialogue and respect for the rule of law must prevail.
In Somalia, the arrest and detention of journalists and media workers is undermining freedom of expression and creating a climate of fear. Some 26 journalists and media workers have been arrested in Mogadishu so far this year.
My Office is documenting increased arbitrary detentions and intimidation of political opponents and media workers in Venezuela, following the 2024 elections. I have serious concerns about torture and ill-treatment in detention and violations of due process. I will provide an update on 27 June.
In Türkiye, I am concerned about mass detentions, including of opposition figures, on charges of corruption and terrorism. All those detained for the legitimate exercise of their rights must be released immediately.
In Georgia and El Salvador, new laws make it more difficult for NGOs and independent media to access foreign funding. This could harm their ability to operate freely and effectively. Similar legislation is under discussion in Hungary. I urge the government to reconsider.
In the Russian Federation, I remain deeply concerned by the ongoing suffocation of dissenting voices, civil society, lawyers, and the independent media. Criminal charges and harsh sentences for people who criticize state policy or legislation are contrary to international human rights standards.
During my visit to Serbia last month, I was struck by the courage and resilience of young people, who have mobilised for accountability, transparency and the rule of law. Their voices need to be heard and respected.
I continue to engage directly with China on a wide range of issues. I am concerned about lack of progress on much-needed legal reform to ensure compliance with international human rights law. I also regret that there has not yet been a resolution to the individual cases we have raised. My Office continues to receive worrying reports of violations in Xinjiang, including undue prison sentences, incommunicado detention, and restrictions on fundamental rights. In Hong Kong, the continued application of national security laws raises serious concerns about the shrinking of civic space. In Tibet, there are ongoing infringements on cultural and other rights. I call for the release of all individuals detained for exercising their rights, and to align legislation and policies with international human rights law.
Mr. President,
Social tensions are often rooted in systemic, long-standing discrimination based on race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, migrant status, caste, and other characteristics.
Policies to tackle such discrimination have had important successes in all regions of the world.
Some call these DEI policies. I call them standing up for equality.
When we look at the pushback against such policies, we see it for what it is: a fundamental misrepresentation that reveals a strategic decision to scapegoat vulnerable groups.
Discrimination is neither rare nor random; it is widespread. Across 119 countries, one in five people reported experiencing discrimination in the past year, according to data gathered by my Office.
Colonialism's brutal legacy persists. Racism remains a scourge.
People of African descent continue to suffer disproportionately from excessive use of force, including deaths at the hands of law enforcement, in Brazil, the United States, and beyond.
Data gathered by my Office shows that worldwide, women face discrimination at more than double the level experienced by men.
In parts of the Russian Federation and the United States, there are severe restrictions on women's reproductive rights and rights to healthcare. These rights are essential to women's participation and leadership in every aspect of life.
More broadly, I call on all states to implement gender quotas for women's political representation, and I regret that some countries are abolishing them.
In Iran, I note the temporary suspension of the so-called Hijab law and urge its full repeal, along with all related laws and practices that restrict the rights of women and girls.
And in Afghanistan, the de facto authorities continue to enforce a systematic policy of erasing women and girls from public life. Even their voices are silenced outside the home, and women are banned from higher education and most employment.
Disability rights also face pushback after years of progress. Some countries are reducing accessibility and cutting funding for access programmes. Influential figures have openly mocked people with disabilities.
LGBTIQ+ people continue to face legal restrictions, hate speech and even violence.
In West Africa, draconian laws threaten to criminalize consensual same-sex relations and restrict the work of human rights defenders supporting LGBTIQ+ people.
In Argentina and the United States, government officials have made statements vilifying transgender and non-binary people, while restricting their rights.
Georgia, Hungary, Slovakia and Türkiye are among countries that have adopted, or are considering, laws that could prohibit LGBTIQ+ advocacy, and ban Pride marches and educational material in schools. In Uganda, the Anti-Homosexuality Act fuels systemic violence and discrimination. At least 70 cases involving 88 victims were documented in the first four months of this year.
Migrants and refugees are also targeted by hate speech, unjust legal restrictions, scapegoating and other forms of discrimination in many parts of the world.
In Tunisia, anti-migrant rhetoric from public officials has fueled physical attacks and online hate campaigns.
Close to 640,000 Afghans returned to their country from Pakistan and Iran in recent months. More than 250,000 of them were forced to do so. Regardless of legal and documentation status, Afghans forced to return may encounter serious protection risks, especially women and girls, who face severe persecution.
Migrant workers from Myanmar face deportation from Thailand, sometimes followed by conscription into the Myanmar armed forces.
I am disturbed by reports that the immigration authorities in the Dominican Republic deported pregnant women migrants from Haiti and those who had just given birth.
Here in Europe, I am concerned that several leaders recently called for changes to the interpretation of human rights law on complex issues of migration governance.
I urge EU countries to put human rights at the centre of new regulations on returns and migration governance more generally, including by expanding safe and regular pathways.
In the United States, the arrest and deportation of large numbers of non-nationals, including to third countries, raise serious concerns over respect for their rights.
As people protest against these developments, I urge the authorities to respect the right to peaceful assembly, and to uphold human rights in law enforcement, including by refraining from any resort to military force when civilian authorities are capable of maintaining public order.
Mr. President, distinguished delegates,
As disturbing as all this pushback is, we must not fall for the hype.
This is not a global phenomenon.
The vast majority of countries around the world continue to support the expansion of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Half the world's population now benefits from effective national human rights institutions that work with my Office. That figure has tripled in the past two decades.
And policies to promote equality are working.
In Brazil and Nigeria, for example, quotas for minorities and marginalized groups have contributed to greater representation in education and employment.
Countries including Bolivia, Chile, Fiji, and Peru have implemented initiatives to promote the participation of Indigenous Peoples, including reserving seats in national parliaments.
The government of Guatemala has started to hold monthly meetings with Indigenous Peoples and people of African Descent, leading to several local agreements on territorial claims.
Thailand recently became the first country in Southeast Asia to legalize marriage equality.
Timor Leste recently passed a law stipulating that police must carry out their duties without discrimination based on gender or sexual orientation.
Pakistan has outlawed child marriage in Islamabad – a historic legal breakthrough.
The first resolution on discrimination based on work and descent adopted by the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights is an important step to address deep-seated stigma.
In Somalia, the new National Disability Rights Bill provides a framework for action and inclusion.
And around the world, I am pleased to see governments working to implement their pledges under our Human Rights 75 initiative, with new laws on access to information, reforms to criminal justice systems, and stronger engagement with human rights mechanisms.
Mr. President,
Many of the poorest people in the world are falling even further behind, with their rights to food, health and an adequate standard of living under assault. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is slipping out of reach.
More than half of low-income countries are currently in, or at high risk of, debt distress. Many are also on the frontlines of the climate crisis. And the development finance they desperately need is dwindling, as major economies shift their priorities, expand defence budgets, and cut development finance.
The recent imposition of soaring tariffs may seem like a high-stakes poker game, with the global economy as the bank.
But the shockwaves of a trade war will hit Least Developed Countries with the force of a tsunami. Caribbean countries and small island developing states are among those that will suffer most. The impact on countries with large export sectors, including Bangladesh, Cambodia, Sri Lanka and Viet Nam, could be devastating.
Higher tariffs could put healthcare, education and a nutritious diet out of reach for many.
Higher tariffs could also roll back gains on gender equality, as they have a disproportionate impact on women working in low-paid manufacturing jobs. Many Least Developed Countries have no social safety net, leaving people utterly unprotected.
I am deeply disturbed by approaches that treat the poorest people on earth as collateral damage.
Long-term global stability requires a fundamental shift to human rights and sustainable, inclusive development – not trade wars or arms races.
My Office is working around the world to realise the right to development.
We are supporting over 80 projects in 38 countries, from Belize to Jordan and Kenya, with budget analysis, advice on debt servicing, and policies that promote a human rights economy.
Mr. President,
Digital technologies and AI systems offer great promise. But they also have a shadow side. If we don't act urgently, we could lose the battle, with unknowable consequences for the enjoyment of human rights.
The use of AI in military systems has likely already contributed to large numbers of civilian casualties.
AI-enabled mass surveillance poses grave risks to the rights to privacy and freedom of expression.
The concentration of AI development in rich economies widens digital divides; and AI systems often perpetuate racial and gender-based discrimination.
Regulating this technology will require transparency, open minds and inclusiveness.
Human rights set the path, by reinforcing the rule of law, establishing clear legal frameworks, and ensuring broad participation.
I reject the argument that human rights somehow stifle innovation.
On the contrary.
Innovation that ignores human rights has led to terrible consequences, from an algorithm that unjustly deprived families of social support, to border screening that relies on profiling.
Human rights are essential for innovation that delivers for people and planet – not just profits.
I welcome steps towards mandatory human rights due diligence in the development, deployment and use of AI technologies. Brazil, the Republic of Korea and the EU are considering such legislation.
In some cases, data protection authorities are stepping up. Australia, France, Italy and the Netherlands took legal action against a facial recognition company for breaching people's privacy.
Momentum is also building towards protecting workers. For example, the Hollywood actors' union reached agreement with major studios on the use of AI in filmmaking.
But we need much more.
Many countries lack the legal frameworks and resources to meet the challenges posed by AI, and could miss out on the opportunities it offers.
The coming months will see critical decisions about regulation, including the establishment of two United Nations mechanisms.
For the technology we want, these decisions and mechanisms must reflect the firm human rights commitments that are, not least, included in the Global Digital Compact.
Mr. President, distinguished delegates,
Populists and authoritarians are working hard with their so-called culture wars to distract people from today's very real problems.
But there is an alternative.
It lies in more human rights – not less.
Human rights provide stability and security in our troubled times. They are a bridge between governments and people; between generations past, present and future.
And they are guardrails on power, especially when it is unleashed in its most brutal forms.
The painstaking work of investigating and reporting abuses and violations, supporting human rights institutions, and addressing human rights emergencies are the best tools we have to prevent and mitigate conflict; and to build peace.
I am therefore deeply disturbed by attacks on the international institutions that underpin our rights, including the International Criminal Court. Sanctioning judges and prosecutors at national, regional or international levels, for doing their jobs, is an assault on the rule of law and corrodes justice.
This is only the latest in a series of attacks on multilateral institutions and mechanisms, including the United Nations; the International Court of Justice; Special Procedures mandate holders, and more. They must stop.
I am also deeply troubled by funding cuts to my Office, to the Human Rights Mechanisms, and to our partners in civil society.
Nearly three-quarters of our partner organizations told my Office they expect to lose more than 40 percent of their funding.
That means fewer early warnings; less advocacy for people who are wrongly imprisoned; fewer investigations into abuses and violations; less accountability.
Funding cuts to my Office, and the broader human rights ecosystem, offer comfort to dictators and authoritarians.
But the vast majority, and our global security, will suffer.
At this testing time, we need governments and societies to stand up for human rights, in word and deed.
Thank you.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Live updates: Trump says he won't kill Iran's supreme leader - ‘for now'
President Donald Trump said the United States would not kill Iran's supreme leader 'for now' and appeared to demand Tehran's surrender, as US ally Israel traded fire with its arch foe for a fifth day. The comments marked a dramatic escalation in Trump's rhetoric against Iran and its leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, fuelling questions as to whether Washington would join Israel's attacks after insisting it had no hand in the campaign. Israeli warplanes targeted drone and missile sites with at least two waves of strikes in western Iran on Tuesday (local time), the military said. It also said it had killed senior Iranian commander Ali Shadmani in an overnight strike on a 'command centre in the heart of Tehran', just four days after his predecessor, Gholam Ali Rashid, was killed in Israel's initial surprise attack. STORY CONTINUES AFTER LIVE BLOG STORY CONTINUES The attacks drew retaliatory fire from the Islamic republic, with explosions heard over Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, and air raid sirens sounding around Dimona, a southern town home to a nuclear power plant. There were no immediate reports of hits. Days after a senior US official said Trump had told Israel to back down from plans to assassinate Khamenei, the US President appeared to put the option back on the table with a post on his Truth Social platform. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now,' Trump said. 'But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin,' he added, later posting a message saying: 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' Trump had said earlier in the day that he wanted 'a real end' to the conflict. A White House official said Trump was convening a meeting of his National Security Council to discuss the conflict. Despite mounting calls to de-escalate, neither side has backed off from the aerial blitz that began on Friday, when Israel launched an unprecedented bombing campaign targeting Iranian nuclear and military facilities. 'Punitive operations' Iranian media reported several explosions on Tuesday in the central city of Isfahan, home to nuclear facilities. Blasts were also heard across Tehran. The Iranian armed forces warned residents in the Israeli cities of Tel Aviv and Haifa to evacuate 'for the sake of their lives', warning of 'punitive operations' to come. Iran's Revolutionary Guards said they had launched an attack targeting Israeli air bases. Residential areas in both countries have suffered deadly strikes since the fighting broke out, and foreign governments have scrambled to evacuate their citizens. A cyber attack crippled Sepah Bank, one of Iran's main state-owned banks, the Fars news agency reported. Fearing the violence, many residents have fled Tehran. Long queues stretched outside bakeries and petrol stations as the remaining residents rushed to stock up on fuel and basic supplies. Security checkpoints have been set up across the capital, adding to the atmosphere of tension as authorities monitor movement in and out of key districts. Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth said the United States was deploying 'additional capabilities' to the Middle East, with a US aircraft carrier reportedly heading to the region. Even before Trump's remarks about Khamenei, China had accused him of 'pouring oil' on the conflict. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan accused Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu of being 'the biggest threat to the security of the region'. At a G7 summit in Canada, leaders, including Trump, had called for 'de-escalation', while stressing Israel had the right to defend itself and that 'Iran can never have a nuclear weapon'. 'Direct impacts' After decades of enmity and a prolonged shadow war, Israel said its surprise air campaign aimed to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons – an ambition Tehran denies. The UN's nuclear watchdog said there appeared to have been 'direct impacts on the underground enrichment halls' at Iran's Natanz facility. Israel has maintained ambiguity regarding its own atomic activities, but the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) says it has 90 nuclear warheads. The conflict derailed a running series of nuclear talks between Tehran and Washington in recent weeks, with Iran saying after the start of Israel's campaign that it would not negotiate with the United States while under attack. Since Friday, at least 24 people have been killed in Israel and hundreds wounded, according to Prime Minister Netanyahu's office. Iran said on Sunday that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. It has not issued an updated toll since then. Netanyahu said Israel's campaign was 'changing the face of the Middle East, and that can lead to radical changes inside Iran itself'.


Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Be careful what you wish for, Netanyahu
Israel's war with Iran is definitely the war that Prime Minister Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu has wanted all along, but he may have bitten off more than he can chew. In the past three months Israel has bombed Syria, Lebanon, Yemen and now Iran. It has an open-ended war involving tens of thousands of Israeli troops in the Gaza Strip, and a lower-intensity counter-insurgency war in the occupied West Bank that also soaks up lots of Israeli troops. And now it is also at war with Iran, a country of 90 million people. This is less of a burden on the 7.5 million Jewish Israelis than it would seem, since geography decrees that the wars with Iran and Yemen do not require ground troops. (Neither country has a land border with Israel.) However, the air wars will hurt Israel's population and damage its infrastructure, and its reservist soldiers are already exhausted by 20 months of war. So is the civilian population of Israel, which is emotionally drained by the long-running drama of the hostages. It is also deeply divided by Netanyahu's decision to use this moment of maximum Israeli power to try to wipe out every potential challenge to the country's status as the Middle East's dwarf superpower. Netanyahu has declared that Iran is on the brink of getting nuclear weapons half a dozen times in the past 20 years, always in the hope that he could get the US military to do the heavy lifting in a war to "disarm" it. And each time, after the US president of the day declined to do so, the Iranian "threat" magically receded — only to be revived for the next president. Bibi made some headway with Trump in his first term, convincing the latter that he should pull out of the treaty putting strict controls on Tehran's nuclear activities that Barack Obama had signed with Iran in 2015. But it turned out that Trump wasn't up for an actual war with Iran; he was just on a mission to destroy all the achievements of his predecessor. Nobody could have been more pro-Israeli than Joe Biden, but he wouldn't go to war with Iran for Netanyahu either. Initially, the Israeli prime minister thought that he was making more headway with Trump 2.0, but Trump's promises are as empty as his threats; by May he was negotiating with Iran for a thinly disguised return to the treaty he had cancelled in 2018. At this point Netanyahu took the decision he had probably always promised himself never to make: he gave the order to attack Iran without a guarantee of full American support. He forgot that Trump, almost uniquely among post-1945 US presidents, has never committed the United States to a war overseas. True to form, Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that "The US had nothing to do with the attack on Iran tonight." That may not be strictly true, in the sense that he certainly must have known Netanyahu's plans, but it's accurate in the sense that he did not approve of them. Indeed, Bibi was deliberately pre-empting a possible revival of the 2018 treaty. Saving face always comes first with Trump, so he was soon trumpeting: "If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the US Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before." But he says that every time, to any country he disagrees with, and they are all still here. TACO. The reality is that Netanyahu has broken his lifelong rule and attacked Iran without Washington's full support because he cannot bear to miss this opportunity to attack his enemies when they are all far weaker than ever before. He cannot actually lose this war he has begun with Iran, but he may find it almost impossible to end in a satisfactory manner. There are three problems for which he has no apparent solution. One is that he lacks the specialised bombs that would enable him to destroy the Iranian centrifuges, labs and enriched uranium that are buried deep inside mountainsides. Trump would have to give them to him. The second is that Trump is extremely petty and vindictive when defied or "disrespected". If he decides that he no longer wants to deal with Netanyahu, he holds such power over the country's fate that a different prime minister would be found to replace him. Finally, Iran has a "nuclear option" that has nothing whatever to do with nuclear weapons. It can cut the world's oil supply by 20% and cause a global recession simply by closing the Strait of Hormuz. A recession is what Donald Trump fears above all else. • Gwynne Dyer is an independent London journalist.


Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
Israeli Attack On The Islamic Republic Of Iran's Territory Is An Attack On International Values
The ongoing aggression and attack on the Islamic Republic of Iran constitute grave violation of the Iranian people's rights to peace, freedom and territorial integrity. NACI condemns in the strongest terms possible this illegal, unjustifiable, unprovoked and immoral aggression and attack against the Islamic Republic of Iran. NACI is of the opinion that this act of overt military aggression threatens stability in the broader region and across the world. We join the civilised global community in calling for the immediate cessation of violence. We call on the chaotic and client media to end fanning the embers of violence and war crime attacks against civilians in the Mid-east region. NACI members across Africa and the diasporas are deeply alarmed and concerned by the profound human suffering that the Israeli action is causing wide spread humanitarian consequences and result in the senseless deaths of innocent Iranian people, officials and destruction of civilian infrastructural facilities. We therefore, reiterate the urgent need for promoting peace and the rule of international law, and the importance of long-term bridge building. We commend the bravery of concerned individuals and groups all over the world, who are expressing their opposition to war, and make it very clear that the ongoing war between Iran and Israel is unjustifiable and a damaging endeavour for all sides. This is not just an attack on the Islamic Republic and its ability to engage in and benefit from possession of its own nuclear powers. This is an attack on the principles of rules-based international order and human rights, and a clear violation of international law and the UN Charter. This aggression goes a long way to expose the political hypocrisy and double standards when dealing with different conflicts. When it comes to Israel, all acts that undermine international security and stability are excused in the name of self-defense. During this attack, which took place on the early hours of 13th June, 2025 Israel violently violated the airspace of Iraq and Syria, in a show of disregard for the sovereignty of its neighbours. Ostensibly, Israel claimed its action is to destroy Iran's nuclear capability, while Israel itself possesses an arsenal of nuclear weapons. In reality, Israel is pursuing regime change agenda in Iran, as they did in many countries. In the process, Israel repeatedly evades accountability. Unfortunately, the US and other Western countries continue to support Israel regardless of the nature of its unending aggression towards its neighbours. NACI stands with the people of Iran and supports them in this time of their horrific and unjustifiable suffering. The Islamic Republic of Iran reserves its inherent right of self-defence and the Iranian armed forces' efforts to defend Iran's territorial integrity and population in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. The West invented international law, and the same West is allowing Israel to violate it with impunity. We urge all countries to be consistent with international law and to put an end to Israel's crimes. This Israeli aggression and attack on Iran coincides with preparation of United Nations Conference, which is scheduled to take place next week on a possible two-state solution between Israel and Palestinians. It has been reported that the Trump administration in Washington has sent a diplomatic demarche to 185 countries that would attend the said UN conference next week, threatening that any anti-Israel actions will be viewed as opposition to US foreign policy interests. This was followed also by the reckless statement made by the ambassador of the US to Israel Mike Huckabee, who said: 'Muslim countries should give up some of their land to create a future Palestinian State, and that the US no longer pursuing the goal of an independent Palestinian State'. The timing of this aggression and attack on Iran coincided also with the ongoing starvation and genocidal war against Palestinians in Gaza. As usual, Israel gets away with all kinds of severe violations. When the world tries to stop it, the US veto is ready at the UN. The result is a global legal system undermined by selective enforcement and geopolitical bias. The Israeli action is exacerbating souring prices in the global oil market, and this will affects poor countries, especially African countries. We advocate peace and an end to violence as means to settle political and religious ideological differences, and underline the need to adhere to and pursue universal values such as sustainable peace, respect for the rule of law, human rights, freedom and dignity. This is needed to make the world a peaceful place for humankind. NACI remains dedicated to supporting peace and two-state solution to end the genocide in Palestine. God save humanity!