Opinion - Baby bonds — not bonuses — are what we need to strengthen families and build wealth
To encourage Americans to start families, the White House recently proposed baby bonuses, a policy where the government would offer one-time financial payments of $5,000 to parents upon the birth of a child.
With the cost of living rising, it's clear Americans need economic support. Particularly for income constrained families, $5,000 could provide a near-term boost — maybe help pay for a year of diapers and baby formula. But what happens once the bonus runs out? Without wraparound supports, like quality education, affordable health care and pathways to meaningful employment, many parents will find themselves right where they started: stuck in a cycle of financial insecurity and unable to afford basic necessities.
Quick fixes, like a baby bonus, don't work. This moment requires people-focused investments that are durable and both short and long term, so working people — and their kids and grandkids — can thrive in the years to come. The formula to make that happen calls for combining cash for today with capital for tomorrow.
One way our federal government can invest in 'capital for tomorrow,' is in the form of baby bonds.
Baby bonds are a bipartisan, government policy in which every child would receive a publicly funded trust account upon birth that they could access at 18. The amount would vary based on household income, with children from working families or lower income backgrounds receiving more. This substantial start-up capital would allow young adults to pursue research-based wealth-building activities including home ownership, entrepreneurship, and debt-free college or training. In fact, legislative guardrails ensure the resources are applied only to these eligible purposes.
If we think of income as an essential flow of resources to support daily living, wealth is a stock or reserve of resources that buffers us from economic shocks and allows us to lead lives that are more fulfilling and self-directed. For most of us, income, hard work, and education aren't enough to get us to this next level of prosperity.
Programs like the Child Tax Credit or a guaranteed income, similar to President Trump's stimulus checks during the pandemic, are important 'cash for today' provisions, keeping families afloat. But, to achieve real economic security and freedom over lifetimes, Americans need opportunities to build wealth.
Research shows that while baby bonuses may lead to a temporary uptick in birth rates, the effect often fades over time. Studies have also found that the cost of a baby bonus scheme would be substantial relative to any marginal increase in births, raising questions about whether the investment could create a greater impact if put into childcare, housing or education, instead.
Conversely, by establishing a strong foundation of capital for low-income individuals, the baby bonds program recognizes that we all have different starting points — and works to create a world where those facing economic barriers can access similar opportunities to those who are born into resources.
With bipartisan support, Connecticut became the first state to pass and fund a baby bond effort in 2023. This initiative provides $3,200 to every child whose birth is covered by the state's Medicaid program. This seed capital is invested and carefully managed by the State Treasury. Beneficiaries can keep the funds in their accounts until age 30, with the value projected to grow to nearly $12,000 by the time the first recipients turn 18.
On the heels of Connecticut's implementation, another 20 states — red, blue and purple — have either introduced or are seriously considering similar legislation. Another 11 baby bond pilot projects are also in the works, including in Vermont, Georgia, Missouri, New Mexico and Maryland.
Research suggests that a nationwide baby bond proposal (like the American Opportunity Act as introduced by Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.)) would significantly close the country's extraordinary wealth gap and have positive effects on family wealth, student debt, home equity and retirement savings across gender, race and ethnicity.
A separate 2024 study by the Urban Institute found that a federal baby bonds program would decrease the share of people that take on student loans and reduce the total amount of debt held by student loan borrowers.
We know the ingredients needed to promote families, grow a vibrant middle class and build an economy that works for all of us: a combination of cash for today, capital for tomorrow and policies that make life's essential needs, like health care and housing, more affordable. More than a baby bonus, this recipe will provide the base level of resources necessary to allow people the freedom to make the choices they want, such as starting a family, without worrying about financial survival.
In these times, wanting and being able to afford the American Dream are two different things. It will be family-first, wealth promoting investments like baby bonds — not just baby bonuses — that will get us there.
David Radcliffe, State and Local Policy Director, The New School's Institute on Race, Power, and Political Economy
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil Advances as OPEC+ Supply Boost Vies With Geopolitical Risk
(Bloomberg) -- Oil advanced as OPEC+ hiked production less than some had feared and geopolitical concerns flared over Ukraine and Iran. Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry Where the Wild Children's Museums Are The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move Now With Colorful Blocks, Tirana's Pyramid Represents a Changing Albania NYC Congestion Toll Brings In $216 Million in First Four Months Brent crude for August rose toward $65 a barrel after losing 2.2% last week, while West Texas Intermediate was above $62. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies agreed on Saturday to add 411,000 barrels a day of supply in July, matching expectations, but defying reports late last week that the group was considering an even bigger volume. Meanwhile, Ukraine struck air bases deep in Russia and Iran criticized a report showing its growing stockpiles of enriched uranium, in escalations that reduce the chance of more supply from the sanctioned OPEC+ members entering the market. Trade frictions also remained in focus, after President Donald Trump said he would be increasing tariffs on steel and aluminum. Monday's move higher comes after a turbulent two months that saw prices tumble to a four-year low in the wake of Trump's tariff wars, before recuperating some of those losses. Crude remains almost 15% lower this year, pressured by the simmering trade conflicts and the abandoning by OPEC+ of its former strategy of defending higher prices by curbing output. OPEC+ officials said the quota boost reflected Saudi Arabia's desire to punish over-producing members such as Kazakhstan and Iraq. Some members — including Russia, Algeria and Oman — had wanted a pause. The group next meets on July 6 to discuss output levels for August. 'Brent should be well supported in the middle of our expected $60-$65 summer range until we get a better understanding of how quickly actual OPEC production is rising,' said Robert Rennie, head of commodity and carbon research at Westpac Banking Corp. in Sydney. 'We may be seeing signs that the pace of increase could slow in the coming months' as some members had wanted a lull in the quota hikes. YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
The election of a Trump ally in Poland could alter EU and Ukraine policies
WARSAW, Poland (AP) — Poland has elected Karol Nawrocki, a conservative historian and staunch nationalist, as its next president in a closely watched vote that signals a resurgence of right-wing populism in the heart of Europe. Nawrocki, who is set to take office on Aug. 6, is expected to shape the country's domestic and foreign policy in ways that could strain ties with Brussels while aligning the Central European nation of nearly 38 million people more closely with the administration of President Donald Trump in the United States. Here are some key takeaways: Nawrocki's victory underscores the enduring appeal of nationalist rhetoric among about half of the country along the eastern flank of NATO and the European Union, and its deep social divisions. The 42-year-old historian who had no previous political experience built his campaign on patriotic themes, traditional Catholic values, and a vow to defend Poland's sovereignty against the EU and larger European nations like Germany. His win also reflects the appeal of right-wing nationalism across Europe, where concerns about migration, national sovereignty, and cultural identity have led to surging support for parties on the right — even the far right in recent times. Far-right candidates did very well in Poland's first round of voting two weeks earlier, underlining the appeal of the nationalist and conservative views. Nawrocki picked up many of those votes. As his supporters celebrate his win, those who voted for the defeated liberal candidate, Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, worry that it will hasten the erosion of liberal democratic norms. Nawrocki's presidency presents a direct challenge to Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who returned to power in late 2023 pledging to mend relations with the EU and restore judicial independence which Brussels said was eroded by Law and Justice, the party that backed Nawrocki. But Tusk's coalition — a fragile alliance of centrists, leftists, and agrarian conservatives — has struggled to push through key promises including a civil union law for same-sex couples and a less restrictive abortion law. Nawrocki, who opposes such measures, will have the power to veto legislation, complicating Tusk's agenda and potentially triggering political gridlock. Nawrocki's election could signal a stronger relationship between Poland and the Trump administration. Poland and the U.S. are close allies, and there are 10,000 U.S. troops stationed in Poland, but Tusk and his partners in the past have been critical of Trump. Nawrocki, however, has a worldview closely aligned with Trump and his Make America Great Again ethos. Trump welcomed Nawrocki to the White House a month ago and his administration made clear in other ways that he was its preferred candidate. While Nawrocki has voiced support for Ukraine's defense against Russian aggression, he does not back Ukrainian membership in NATO and has questioned the long-term costs of aid — particularly support for refugees. His rhetoric has at times echoed that of Trump, for instance by accusing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of what he said was insufficient gratitude for Poland's assistance. With growing public fatigue over helping Ukrainian refugees, Nawrocki's approach could shift Poland's posture from strong ally to conditional partner if the war drags on much longer. The election result is a setback for the EU, which had welcomed Tusk's return in 2023 as a signal of renewed pro-European engagement. Nawrocki and the Law and Justice party have criticized what nationalists view as EU overreach into Poland's national affairs, especially regarding judicial reforms and migration policy. While the president does not control day-to-day diplomacy, Nawrocki's symbolic and veto powers could frustrate Brussels' efforts to bring Poland back into alignment with bloc standards, particularly on rule-of-law issues. Though an EU member, Poland has its own currency, the zloty, which weakened slightly on Monday morning, reflecting investor concerns over potential policy instability and renewed tensions with EU institutions. Billions of euros in EU funding has been linked to judicial reforms which Tusk's government will now be unlikely to enact without presidential cooperation.

24 minutes ago
List of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' removed from US government website following criticism
WASHINGTON -- A widely anticipated list of ' sanctuary jurisdictions' no longer appears on the Department of Homeland Security's website after receiving widespread criticism for including localities that have actively supported the Trump administration's hard-line immigration policies. The department last week published the list of the jurisdictions. It said each one would receive formal notification the government deemed them uncooperative with federal immigration enforcement and whether they're believed to be in violation of any federal criminal statutes. The list was published Thursday on the department's website but on Sunday there was a 'Page Not Found" error message in its place. The list was part of the Trump administration's efforts to target communities, states and jurisdictions that it says aren't doing enough to help its immigration enforcement agenda and the promises the president made to deport more than 11 million people living in the U.S. without legal authorization. The list is being constantly reviewed and can be changed at any time and will be updated regularly, a DHS senior official said. 'Designation of a sanctuary jurisdiction is based on the evaluation of numerous factors, including self-identification as a Sanctuary Jurisdiction, noncompliance with Federal law enforcement in enforcing immigration laws, restrictions on information sharing, and legal protections for illegal aliens,' the official said in a statement. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' that there had been anger from some officials about the list. However, she didn't address why it was removed. 'Some of the cities have pushed back,' Noem said. 'They think because they don't have one law or another on the books that they don't qualify, but they do qualify. They are giving sanctuary to criminals.' The list, which was riddled with misspellings, received pushback from officials in communities spanning from urban to rural and blue to red who said the list doesn't appear to make sense. In California, the city of Huntington Beach made the list even though it had filed a lawsuit challenging the state's immigration sanctuary law and passed a resolution this year declaring the community a 'non-sanctuary city.' Jim Davel, administrator for Shawano County, Wisconsin, said the inclusion of his community must have been a clerical error. Davel voted for Trump as did 67% of Shawano County. Davel thinks the administration may have confused the county's vote in 2021 to become a 'Second Amendment Sanctuary County' that prohibits gun control measures with it being a safe haven for immigrants. He said the county has approved no immigration sanctuary policies.