logo
Swinney defends claims Labour 'out of it' in by-election

Swinney defends claims Labour 'out of it' in by-election

In the run-up to the vote, the First Minister had dismissed Labour's chances. He told The Herald on Wednesday that Anas Sarwar's party was 'out of it'.
READ MORE
Speaking to journalists at SNP headquarters in Edinburgh, Mr Swinney said the close result showed there had been some improvement on his party's dire performance at last year's general election.
He also insisted he remained the right person to lead the SNP into next year's Holyrood election.
'The SNP has made progress in this by-election — perhaps not as much as I would like, but progress nonetheless. That is against the backdrop of a really damaging election last summer.
"We have got to continue to focus on addressing the priorities of the people of Scotland and giving them hope about the future — for a better Scotland. That is what my leadership is about.'
He said the party had 'faced a tough time'.
'We are in a period of recovery. We have not recovered. We are in a period of recovery, so we are making headway — but not all the headway we need to make.
"I have got to ensure the SNP remains absolutely focused at all levels, in government and the party, and in all aspects of our work — making sure we complete that journey before 2026.
'Last summer, I think people would have doubted the SNP could have been in contention to win a by-election in Hamilton after the severe loss we suffered. But we were in contention. We were not strong enough to win, but we were in contention — and we will build on that.'
Asked how he had so badly misjudged the race, the First Minister said he had called it as he saw it.
'What I saw was the Labour vote collapsing compared to last summer — down 20% on the result last night. I saw Reform surging, and that was patently obvious in the result. I told people they could vote SNP to stop Reform.
"We got into contention. Last summer, we lost that constituency — roughly that area — by about 9,000 votes. This time, we were in the running.
'I think people would have been surprised last summer if the SNP had got itself into the running. But, you know, I called it as I saw it — and the result demonstrates the trends I was seeing: Labour way down, Reform way up.'
Asked if he owed voters an apology for potentially misleading them — suggesting Labour had no chance when that was not the case — Mr Swinney said he had given an 'honest assessment'.
'The Labour vote was crashing down compared to last summer. On the doorsteps, people were angry with Labour over issues like the winter fuel payment for pensioners being abolished. They told us they were not going to vote Labour. At the same time, they said they planned to vote Reform.
'The combination of those two things shaped the message: the SNP could stop Reform. I certainly do not want the poisonous politics of Farage to be imported into the Scottish Parliament.'
Asked if the result represented a failure of the SNP's ground campaign, Mr Swinney said it did not.
'What we were seeing were trends — and those trends were borne out by the result. Labour's vote is way down. Last summer, it was at 50%. They are now down to 31%. The data speaks for itself.
'Reform was a strong presence in the constituency. That is what it was. The SNP vote held firm. That was based on our position in the election last summer. We have delivered some progress — not enough. I am not for a moment suggesting we have delivered enough progress, but our share of the vote was up on last summer.'
READ MORE
Mr Swinney said voters had raised concerns over NHS services, including access to GPs.
'These are issues that are very much at the heart of the priorities in the programme my government is taking forward.'
He said he would 'reflect carefully' on what voters told him during the campaign.
'Obviously, I will consider carefully what I heard. There is nothing quite like being on the doorsteps for several weeks to hear what people are thinking and feeling — you hear it very directly. So I will consider that response and determine how best the government and the SNP should respond.'
Asked about a potential reshuffle, Mr Swinney said he would 'consider all issues around the ministerial team'.
Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero. Màiri McAllan, he added, would return from maternity leave soon.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour at war over spending plans as Number 10 tries to stem threat from Farage
Labour at war over spending plans as Number 10 tries to stem threat from Farage

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour at war over spending plans as Number 10 tries to stem threat from Farage

Sir Keir Starmer is fighting to quell mounting Labour tensions over how to deal with the threat from Nigel Farage, as bitter Whitehall negotiations over the Government's Spending Review go down to the wire. Sources describe 'very unpleasant' exchanges between Rachel Reeves and senior Cabinet ministers, including Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Local Government Secretary Angela Rayner, as the Chancellor prepares to give the NHS a £30billion boost at the expense of the police and local councils. Preparations for Wednesday's announcement have been held against the backdrop of slamming doors and raised voices, as No 10 and the Treasury work out how to divide a limited pot of public money in a way most likely to arrest the surge in support for Mr Farage's Reform UK. Ms Reeves is expected to set out plans for an extra £113billion in spending on infrastructure projects such as Sizewell C nuclear power plant, and an extra 2.8 per cent real-terms increase in the NHS's £200billion-a-year budget, amounting to an extra £30billion by 2028. But with the economy barely growing, other departments have had to take a hit as a result. A source said: 'It turned nasty between Yvette and Rachel. It was just as bad as that between Rachel and Angela, who walked out during her negotiations. 'Yvette was just passing on the concerns of the police, who said that without more money they would be forced to make stark choices about which crimes they prioritise. 'The anger of the police shows they've been briefed by Cooper on how the negotiations are going, and they're not happy.' Reeves plotting £3bn tax raid on pension By CALUM MUIRHEAD Rachel Reeves is planning a £3billion tax raid on millions of pensions. The new Pension Schemes Bill lays out a blueprint for companies to take out 'surplus' cash from certain schemes. The theory behind the plan is that companies can use the money to invest in their business and that would fuel growth. But experts fear this could lead to a repeat of the Robert Maxwell scandal of the early 1990s, when the late tycoon stole £400 million from his staff pension fund to prop up his companies. The Chancellor, who is desperate to raise tax revenues, would benefit because any 'surpluses' released are taxed at 25 per cent, which could raise almost £3billion over a decade. The bill, tabled in Parliament last week, will affect old-style pension schemes where retirement incomes are linked to people's pay packets, which have around nine million members. A minister said: 'The negotiations over the final settlements are still not sorted for some departments. They're going to carry on fighting it out over the weekend.' Another source added: 'Rachel will stand up and promise things she can't deliver. There will be a lot of guff about how she will deliver security for the country. 'But how can you promise to deliver security when Trump's doing what he's doing on tariffs and Putin is so active?' At the heart of the schism is an ideological divide between the party's Blairites, represented in No 10 by Liz Lloyd, Sir Keir's head of policy delivery, and Morgan McSweeney, the Downing Street chief of staff. Mr McSweeney is desperate to tackle small boats migration while Ms Lloyd is encouraging spending more on the NHS. Rachel Reeves is planning a £3billion tax raid on millions of pensions. The new Pension Schemes Bill lays out a blueprint for companies to take out 'surplus' cash from certain schemes. The theory behind the plan is that companies can use the money to invest in their business and that would fuel growth. But experts fear this could lead to a repeat of the Robert Maxwell scandal of the early 1990s, when the late tycoon stole £400 million from his staff pension fund to prop up his companies. The Chancellor, who is desperate to raise tax revenues, would benefit because any 'surpluses' released are taxed at 25 per cent, which could raise almost £3billion over a decade. The bill, tabled in Parliament last week, will affect old-style pension schemes where retirement incomes are linked to people's pay packets, which have around nine million members.

Reform UK are 'chancers' and no friends of working people says GMB chief
Reform UK are 'chancers' and no friends of working people says GMB chief

Daily Mirror

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Reform UK are 'chancers' and no friends of working people says GMB chief

The General Secretary is expected to praise Labour's employment bill - but urge the party to 'think again' on other issue Reform UK are 'chancers and bankers' who are no friends of working people, GMB Chief Gary Smith will say in a speech to the union's annual congress today. The General Secretary is expected to praise Labour 's employment bill - but urge the party to 'think again' on other issue. ‌ The union's annual congress is taking place in Brighton this week. ‌ 'Let's get one thing clear,' Mr Smith will tell union members in a keynote speech today. 'Mr Farage and his ex-Tory soulmates are no friends of workers. They've spent a political lifetime attacking trade unions and the rights we have all fought so hard for. Decent pay, better conditions, protections we cherish.' He'll add: 'By the way, why is it always the posh, private schoolboys who want act like they're working-class heroes. Do they really think we can't see the bankers, the chancers, the anti-union blowhards? 'If Reform are so pro-worker, why did they just vote against protections against fire and rehire? Why did they vote against sick pay for all workers? Why did they vote against fair pay for carers? Why did they vote against trade union rights to access and organise in places like Amazon? 'Now they are going to run town halls. And, the first thing they want to do is sack council workers.' Mr Smith will say it was time to call Reform UK out for their 'sneering, snooty attitude' to public sector pensions. ‌ 'Go ask a local authority care worker, refuse collector, street cleaner, school support staff member if they think they're meagre pension is gold-plated,' he will say. 'Reform's abuse and name-calling of low-paid public sector workers is an utter disgrace. 'Of course, Mr Farage has also threatened the NHS. And, he is notoriously weak about Putin." ‌ On Labour, Mr Smith will add: 'The new Employment Rights Bill biggest, most positive step in trade union rights in 50 years. 'But, Labour aren't making it easy to rally to their banner. Congress, it is less than a year since Labour won its landslide. There was a feeling of real hope, real change. Where there could be a common endeavour in rebuilding our country. Where GMB was willing to play our part. 'But mistakes have been made. My message to the Government .....is simple – listen. Listen to GMB. Listen and think again.'

Our Auld Enemy rivalry will always be part of our DNA — but look to the US and Canada for the next great national drama
Our Auld Enemy rivalry will always be part of our DNA — but look to the US and Canada for the next great national drama

Scottish Sun

time5 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Our Auld Enemy rivalry will always be part of our DNA — but look to the US and Canada for the next great national drama

ZARA JANJUA Our Auld Enemy rivalry will always be part of our DNA — but look to the US and Canada for the next great national drama Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) WE Scots pride ourselves on being world-class grudge holders. For centuries, the English have been our go-to national frenemy — the original source of cultural, political and footie-based beef. But while we've been locked in this existential tug-of-war with England, another rivalry has been quietly gathering momentum across the Atlantic. 4 Scottish Sun columnist Zara Credit: The Sun 4 Our Auld Enemy rivalry with England will always be part of our DNA Credit: PA 4 Donald Trump with new Canadian PM Mark Carney Credit: AP 4 Matthew Tkachuk of Team USA fights with Brandon Hagel of Team Canada during the first period in the 4 Nations Face-Off game Credit: Getty And I hate to say it, but it might just outdo ours in both stakes and pettiness. I speak, of course, of Canada vs the United States — a feud with the energy of a polite street fight outside a farmers' market, but one that could soon eclipse our age-old Anglo-Scottish sparring. One close point from the US to Canada is the border between Detroit, Michigan (US) and Windsor, Ontario (Canada), which spans the Detroit River. This week I flew to Detroit and crossed the border by car into Windsor. On one side, muscle cars and MAGA hats; on the other, maple leaves and passive resistance. Landing in the US, I found myself wondering: Have I ever tweeted something spicy enough to be flagged by Homeland Security? I'm a liberal Pakistani-Scottish woman with a fondness for human rights and sarcasm — so, probably. I even censored myself mid-flight while chatting to the woman beside me, just in case my views got me deported before I'd even finished my pretzels. As it turned out, I sailed through immigration. But the process felt Orwellian — less Big Brother, more Big Border Patrol. It was the first time I felt that my politics, passport and profile picture might be under review by an algorithm with a grudge. Trump crushes hopes of 'peace talks' call with Musk as he insists Elon has 'lost his mind' after feud went nuclear Last week King Charles and Queen Camilla landed in Ottawa, 400 miles from Windsor — like some royal advance party sent to remind Canada they're not available for franchise. Charles was there to open Parliament and, unofficially, to stick a diplomatic elbow between Canada and Trump's vision of turning it into a Walmart with trees. Trump had recently floated the idea of Canada becoming the 51st US state — a suggestion so absurd it made The Handmaid's Tale look like a romcom. But Canadians, long stereotyped as gentle pacifists with a fetish for fleece, have started pushing back with the Elbows Up movement. Time to tan and pair up again TEN years. That's how long Love Island has been thrusting bronzed 20-somethings into a villa armed with veneers, trust issues, and bikinis smaller than their moral compasses. And somehow, despite the rise of AI lovers and Hinge horror stories, the show's stayed loyal to its original premise: couple-up or get dumped. In this economy? That's practically a marriage vow. Tomorrow, the 12th series washes ashore – and just like your ex, it'll turn up every weekday at 9pm, whether you want it to or not. But credit where it's due: in an age of ghosting, orbiting and situationships, the transactional honesty is almost refreshing. Find someone hot. Stay together. Win. If only the rest of us had a narrator explaining where we went wrong with that man from Fife who 'wasn't ready to label things'. 'Elbows Up, Canada!' is their national pep talk, a slogan born from ice hockey legend Gordie Howe, who once said: 'If a guy slashed me, I'd pull him close and elbow him in the head.' And now the nation has adopted that spirit. It features in a video campaign with new Prime Minister Mark Carney and actual national treasure Mike Myers, whose shirt: reads: 'NEVER 51.' That's the mood now — polite defiance in plaid. It's a masterclass in soft power. The Scottish-English tension may have Brexit baggage, but this? This is a full-blown cold war of the niceties. Miley is the adult now THERE are things no one prepares you for in life: pandemics, the rise of Crocs, and your dad dating Liz Hurley. But here we are – Miley Cyrus, patron saint of post-trauma empowerment, has broken her silence on her da Billy Ray's new love interest. Not a line-dancing divorcee or a country starlet, but the one and only safety-pinned icon of the Nineties. Yes, that Liz Hurley. Now, if you thought family drama peaked with Meghan and Harry, hold Miley's gluten-free beer. The former Disney rebel has navigated her parents' split, gone no-contact with Dad, and now emerged with the kind of perspective that costs thousands in therapy. 'I'm being an adult about it,' she told the New York Times, as if she's not clearly the only adult in the room. Should we have opinions on our parents' love lives? Absolutely not. Do we? Always. Especially when their new flame once dated Hugh Grant and probably owns lingerie more expensive than most mortgages. But Miley's honesty hits a nerve. That moment you realise your parents are fallible, with achy breaky hearts and questionable taste in post- divorce rebounds. It's disarming, dignified – and depressingly mature. Still, if anyone can make blended family dysfunction look glam, it's Liz bloody Hurley. And if Miley can 'wish happiness' to the chaos, maybe there's hope for the rest of us. Next year construction is due to finish on the Gordie Howe International Bridge between Detroit and Windsor, named after the elbow-throwing icon. But this isn't just infrastructure — it's metaphor. A physical link between two nations increasingly trying to figure out how to stay connected without being consumed. The old Auld Enemy rivalry will always be part of our DNA — but if you're looking for the next great national drama, look to the US and Canada. It's neighbour vs neighbour, lumber vs logic, satire vs statecraft and Mike Myres vs Trump.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store