logo
Jannik Sinner says French Open final loss to Carlos Alcaraz 'hurts' after epic battle at Roland-Garros

Jannik Sinner says French Open final loss to Carlos Alcaraz 'hurts' after epic battle at Roland-Garros

After a flawless fortnight in Paris, Jannik Sinner was on the brink of capturing his first French Open title after a dominant run on the clay courts of Roland-Garros.
Facing defending champion Carlos Alcaraz, the top-ranked Italian was firmly in control.
Sinner's deep groundstrokes, excellent service, heavy top spin, and subtle variations had worn down the Spaniard, who found himself 5-3 down and trailing 0-40 in the fourth set, and facing three match points.
At that moment, it felt like the best of all possible worlds for the 23-year-old Sinner.
But then the momentum swung. Alcaraz fought back, saved the first match point when Sinner sent a forehand long. On the second, Sinner missed a return. The third ended with Alcaraz winning a short baseline exchange.
Sinner had just let his chance slip away.
From there, Alcaraz produced one of the greatest comebacks in Roland-Garros history to win the longest final ever played on the Parisian dirt — 5 hours and 29 minutes.
"It's an amazing trophy, so I won't sleep tonight very well, but it's OK," Sinner said during the trophy ceremony.
There is hardly anything between the two best players in tennis at the moment, who have now combined to win the past six Grand Slam titles and appear poised to build one of the sport's most compelling rivalries in the years ahead.
The duel delivered a match of rare intensity, filled with punishing baseline rallies, exquisite drop shots, and brilliant passing shots — thrilling a packed Court Philippe-Chatrier.
Reflecting on the match in his post-final press conference, Sinner tried to draw positives from a devastating loss.
"Obviously, this one hurts," he said.
"There's not so much to say right now. But again, I'm happy with how we're trying to improve every day and put myself in these kinds of positions. It was a very high-level match, that's for sure.
"I'm happy to be part of it. But yeah, the final result hurts."
It was a particularly tough ending for Sinner, who had not dropped a set on his way to the final, including a dominant semifinal win over three-time French Open champion Novak Djokovic.
Before facing Alcaraz, Sinner had never lost a Grand Slam final, winning his first three. A victory would have made him just the fifth man in the Open Era to win three consecutive major titles.
"I'm pretty sure you are going to be a champion, not once but many, many times," Alcaraz told him during the trophy ceremony.
"It is a privilege to share the court with you in every tournament, making history with you."
Sinner, who will remain world number one, said he will lean on his family and loved ones to recover from the loss.
"Now it's my time to take something from the close people I have," he said.
"As I've always said, before my career started, I never would've imagined finding myself in this position. It wasn't even a dream because it felt so far away — I wasn't even thinking about it.
"Now I find myself here, playing the longest final in the history of Roland-Garros. It hurts, yes, but on the other hand, you can't go on crying."
AP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GEORGIE PARKER: Men should play three sets at tennis majors like women after French Open female fixture snub
GEORGIE PARKER: Men should play three sets at tennis majors like women after French Open female fixture snub

West Australian

time3 hours ago

  • West Australian

GEORGIE PARKER: Men should play three sets at tennis majors like women after French Open female fixture snub

The French Open finals were both epic encounters, but there's something about the way the tournament is run that leaves a bitter taste. Coco Gauff won in three sets against world number one Aryna Sabalenka to claim her first French Open title, and Carlos Alcaraz triumphed in an absolute thriller — lifting the trophy after a five-and-a-half-hour marathon against Jannik Sinner overnight. I love a lot of things about tennis — it's one of my favourite sports to watch. One thing I really appreciate, which is rare in other sports, is the personalities of the players that shine through in their press conferences. They play and speak for themselves — not through a team's PR or brand — so they often say exactly what's on their mind. During the French Open, two things stood out to me from the press conferences. Australia's top male hope, Alex de Minaur, who has been battling injuries on and off, suffered a shock second-round exit. He complained, 'there's just too much tennis,' saying the season is too long and that 'the solution is you shorten it … because careers are going to get shorter and shorter — they're just going to burn out mentally.' In the women's draw, Aryna Sabalenka, Jessica Pegula, and Ons Jabeur all made comments about the visibility of women's tennis at the tournament, with no women's matches played in the prime-time evening slot — reportedly because they only play three sets, not five. That's not really a sound argument, as the Australian and US Opens alternate night matches between the sexes. Pegula said it made her feel like 'hitting her head against the wall.' Sabalenka played Olympic champion and world number eight Zheng Qinwen at 11 a.m.—a quarterfinal match that should have been a lock for prime-time action. In some ways, tennis is far ahead of many sports, with equal pay at Grand Slams. But in other ways, it throws women under the bus, and there's still deeply rooted sexism in the sport. In 2020, for example, the women's Italian Open champion received just €10 less than the men's champion — an amount so small it could only be interpreted as a deliberate statement that women shouldn't be equal. They won't allow women to play five sets (even though the WTA has repeatedly expressed interest) due to 'logistical challenges' with broadcasting and scheduling. Yet, because women aren't allowed to play five sets, they're denied prime-time slots—and the shorter matches fuel the 'you're not doing equal work for equal pay' criticism that women endure online every major tournament. It's infuriating. So, from these press conferences, I'm hearing two problems: the men are playing too much tennis (though de Minaur was more focused on the length of the season than match format), and the women want to be seen as equal. So here's a left-field solution: bring the men back to three sets at majors so everyone is on the same page? Grand Slams would be easier for men to handle workload-wise, as best-of-five is extremely taxing, and there would be no excuse for tournament directors not to give women prime-time slots. Now, if I'm being honest, I don't really want this. I love the five-set thrillers — staying up watching Lleyton Hewitt until 4:30 a.m. against Marcos Baghdatis in the 2008 Australian Open is one of my favourite sporting memories. But what I do want is a solution for the women. It's not fair to hold something over them that directly impacts their visibility and growth, while not only denying them the opportunity to change it but actively blocking any change that could help. Jabeur said it perfectly: 'Honouring one side of the sport shouldn't mean ignoring the other.' Something has to give — because it's 2025, and these women deserve better.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store