Killer's criminal record ‘wiped clean' after self-identifying as woman
A killer's criminal record was 'wiped clean' after they self-identified as a woman, it has emerged.
The SNP's 'reckless' gender policy has been blamed for an administrative mistake that led to a murderer's criminal record being 'cleaned'.
The Crown Office and Police Scotland are now under pressure to investigate the 'serious lapse' amid concern the case may not be isolated.
The bungle was discovered after a solicitor requested a previous convictions disclosure on prosecution witnesses in a case involving alleged conflict inside HMP Greenock.
The witnesses included the trans woman Alex Stewart, who went by the name Alan Baker before being convicted of murder in 2013.
Prior convictions for all witnesses were provided, except for Stewart, who appeared to have a clean sheet.
Sharon Dowey MSP, Scottish Conservative shadow minister for victims and community safety, warned: 'This appalling shambles, which will rightly enrage the public, demands full accountability and transparency from the Crown Office and Police Scotland.
'This won't be an isolated case'
'We already have dangerous male offenders cynically gaming the system to serve their sentences in women's prisons, and that number is only likely to rise if they spot an opportunity of having their records wiped via this ruse.
'Scotland's justice system, like all our public bodies, has been in thrall to the SNP's reckless gender policy, which the Supreme Court has ruled unlawful.
'We urgently need a directive from John Swinney to public bodies telling them to uphold the Supreme Court ruling.'
Pauline McNeill, Scottish Labour justice spokeswoman, added: 'There should be no way to erase a criminal record and we need to ensure there are policies in place to ensure that is the case.'
Dr Kate Coleman, of the campaign group Keep Prisons Single Sex, said their research had shown that individuals who switched gender 'are awarded uniquely enhanced individual privacy rights which enable exactly this sort of thing'.
She added: 'This won't be an isolated case – this is standard practice north and south of the border.
'It has widespread ramifications, including for safeguarding and the operation of Disclosure Scotland checks. For years we have been calling for urgent changes – not just for the recording of data, but the handling and disclosure of data.'
The Daily Record said the scandal came to light during the case of the hairdresser Jayney Sutherley, who killed a man with a pair of scissors.
Sutherley, 51, was acquitted at Greenock Sheriff Court last month of carrying out a four-year campaign of transphobic and homophobic abuse against Stewart, 33, and lover Nyomi Fee, 37, a child killer.
Both are serving time for murder in HMP Greenock, where Stewart was sent from a male prison after deciding to self-identify as a woman.
When disclosure requests were made by Sutherley's defence solicitor, Paul Lynch, for both killers, they returned an accurate record for Fee but a blank sheet for Stewart.
A correction was only made after the Crown was told that Stewart was appearing in the witness box as a prisoner and serving a life sentence for murder.
A new search under the killer's former name revealed their criminal history, including a conviction for the murder of John Weir, 36.
'Wicked and brutal' attack
In Jan 2013, Alan Baker, 25, invited Mr Weir into his home in Bonhill, West Dunbartonshire, before stabbing him at least 16 times.
He claimed to have acted in self-defence but was convicted of murder and attempting to cover up his crime.
In Aug 2013, at the High Court in Glasgow, Baker was told he must serve at least 19 years in jail before being eligible for parole.
Judge Lord Boyd told Baker he was guilty of a 'wicked and brutal' attack.
A spokesman for the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) said: 'Although the initial witness check showed no previous convictions, on further inquiry by the Procurator Fiscal this was corrected prior to trial.
'Information about previous convictions is provided to COPFS by the police following a check of the relevant databases.
'COPFS have asked Police Scotland to review and confirm the processes for recording and sharing information on previous convictions.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Asylum seekers behind new grooming gang cases
Asylum seekers and foreign nationals are involved in a 'significant proportion' of live police investigations into child sex grooming gangs, an official report has warned. On Monday, the Government released a report by Baroness Casey which was ordered after renewed outrage over the scandal at the start of this year. In her 200-page audit, the peer accused officials of being in 'denial' about the scale of the problem and said that lessons had not been learnt from crimes committed in Rotherham a decade ago. It found that police and council leaders covered up the scale of Asian grooming gangs since concerns were first raised in 2009 because they feared being branded racist. Ahead of the release of the report, Sir Keir Starmer was forced to announce a national inquiry into the scandal in an embarrassing policy reversal. He has also ordered the National Crime Agency to carry out a nationwide investigation. Despite reviews, reports and inquiries raising questions about Asian or Pakistani suspects grooming young white girls, Lady Casey's review found police, local authorities and other agencies 'consistently failed' to fully acknowledge the fact or collect data so that the theory could be tested. She also warned that when she had reviewed about a dozen live police cases, 'a significant proportion of these cases appear to involve suspects who are non-UK nationals and/or who are claiming asylum in the UK'. Neither the Office for National Statistics nor the Ministry of Justice records data on the number of crimes committed by asylum seekers or foreign nationals. On Monday night, the Conservatives warned that the involvement of asylum seekers in grooming gangs must be taken seriously. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'I am deeply troubled to read that a significant proportion of these cases involve non-UK nationals and asylum seekers. 'This underlines the importance of securing our borders, which the Government has completely failed to do. I also call on the Government to prevent perpetrators from using human rights laws – not just asylum laws – to avoid deportation.' A record 84,200 applications for asylum were made in the UK in 2024. At the end of May, more than 14,600 migrants had crossed the Channel in small boats – up more than 30 per cent on the same point last year and the highest numbers for the first five months of a year since small boats started crossing in 2018. Unveiling the Casey report to the House of Commons, Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, said any asylum seekers found guilty of grooming children or committing sexual offences would have their applications rejected. The Home Secretary said she would accept Lady Casey's recommendations in full, including the mandatory collection of ethnicity and nationality data for all suspects in child sex abuse and criminal exploitation cases, as well as improvements to the ethnicity data collected for victims. She also said sorry for two decades of failure. Announcing the full national inquiry, she said: 'Those vile perpetrators who have grown used to the authorities looking the other way must have no place to hide.' The about-turn on a national inquiry is an embarrassment to Sir Keir, who in January accused those demanding one of jumping on a 'far-Right bandwagon'. The inquiry will last about three years, although this is much shorter than other probes such as that into Covid lockdowns. It comes 10 years after Lady Casey wrote a damning report into the culture of denial at Rotherham, South Yorkshire, where at least 1,400 children were sexually abused by grooming gangs between 1997 and 2013. In her latest audit, she accused public bodies of having used flawed data to dismiss claims about Asian grooming gangs as 'sensationalised, biased or untrue'. 'Instead of examination, we have seen obfuscation,' she wrote. 'In a vacuum, incomplete and unreliable data is used to suit the ends of those presenting it. 'The system claims there is an overwhelming problem with white perpetrators when that can't be proved.' Lady Casey also referred to 'examples of organisations avoiding the topic altogether for fear of appearing racist or raising community tension'. 'Flawed data is used repeatedly to dismiss claims about 'Asian grooming gangs' as sensationalised, biased or untrue,' she said. 'This does a disservice to victims and indeed all law-abiding people in Asian communities.' Lady Casey found that information on the ethnicity of abusers was not recorded in two thirds of cases. But her report contained local data from three forces which showed 'clear evidence of over-representation among suspects of Asian and Pakistani heritage men'. Ms Cooper told the Commons that 800 cold cases would be investigated, a number she expected to rise to 1,000. 'Perpetrators of these vile crimes should be behind bars and paying the price of what they have done,' she said. The Home Secretary said the report found a 'deep-rooted failure to treat children as children', adding: 'A continued failure to protect teenage girls from rape, from exploitation and serious violence, and from the scars that last a lifetime. '[Lady Casey] finds … too much reliance on flawed data, too much denial, too little justice, too many criminals getting off, too many victims being let down.' Ms Cooper said the report found children as young as 10 and those with learning difficulties were singled out for grooming. 'Perpetrators [were] walking free because no one joined up the dots or because the law protected them instead of the victims that they had exploited,' she added. 'Blindness, ignorance, prejudice, defensiveness and even good but misdirected intentions all played a part in this collective failure.' The Home Secretary pledged to ensure that 'those who engaged in cover-ups' should be prosecuted. She also delivered an apology to the victims. 'To the victims and survivors of child exploitation and grooming gangs, on behalf of this and past governments and the many public authorities who have left you down, I want to reiterate an unequivocal apology for the unimaginable pain that you have suffered and the failure of our country's institutions for decades to prevent that harm and keep you safe,' she said. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said: 'The Prime Minister's handling of this scandal is an extraordinary failure of leadership. After months of pressure, the Prime Minister has finally accepted our calls for a full statutory national inquiry into the grooming gangs.'
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
QUENTIN LETTS: Blimey, Kemi went for it. And a black woman saying anti-racism wasn't the most important thing fried her opponents' brains
With Sir Keir Starmer on one of his foreign jaunts – it feels a bad time to be abroad – Kemi Badenoch seized the moment. The Government was abandoning another policy position, this time on the child-rapes scandal. Sir Keir was in a distant time-zone when the cave-in was announced to the Commons. The Tories ' response would normally have been made by Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp. Handsome lad but a touch blurty. Mrs Badenoch sensed an opportunity. Mr Philp was demoted to note-taker and his party leader replaced him at the despatch box. Blimey, she went for it. She tore into liberal queasiness about investigating gangs of 'Asian and Pakistani heritage men'. This was the phrase Whitehall had chiselled out of granite for the occasion. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, making the announcement, resorted to a hammy mixture of sad-voice, prickly self-defence and antiseptic precision. 'We want to put them behind bars,' she said of the offenders. Every consonant was accentuated. Mrs Badenoch didn't buy the tough-guy act. 'She speaks as if this was their plan all along but we all know it's another U-turn,' she murmured in her smoky voice. Yvette sounded squeaky by comparison. Labour MPs started stirring. A blowhard from Bracknell, name of Swallow, was reprimanded by Speaker Hoyle for 'bawling' at her. Mrs Badenoch was only energised. Another Labour figure itching and gurning and jawing and rolling her eyes throughout was Jess Phillips, safeguarding minister. Deputy PM Angela Rayner and Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson sat rigid. Lucy Powell, the Leader of the House who had once mocked Tory requests for an inquiry, sucked her gnashers. But Ms Phillips could not contain herself. She pulled faces to indicate that she thought opposition MPs were dim. She shrugged, laughed repeatedly and muttered asides to a neighbour. Mrs Badenoch sailed through it. She has a Nigerian Right-winger's contempt for Lefty hand-wringing. It fries her opponents' minds. You can sense their inner microchips overloading with the conundrum: a black woman saying anti-racism should not have been the predominant concern? Computer not recognise. The chamber filled with the smell of hot Scalextric wire as Lefties' synapses fused. She was angry that the absent Sir Keir just a few weeks ago dismissed calls for an inquiry as 'a bandwagon of the far-Right'. Yet now the nasal knight had done a reverse ferret, a volte-face, a gymnastic flip-and-twist whereby he was now facing in completely the other direction, arms held wide, grinning at his feat. 'An extraordinary failure of leadership!' she cried. Volume levels were rising. Mrs Badenoch relished it. Her eyes, behind their big glasses, bulged like two Rosey Apple boiled sweets. She hollered that Labour MPs voted three times to block an inquiry – 'three times!' – but were now professing delight that one would be happening. Her right arm sawed and stirred and jabbed and flew horizontally. We were almost in Margaret Hilda territory, although in place of Mrs T's blonde barnet the most noticeable thing here was the gap between Mrs Badenoch's front teeth and her pulsating denunciation of the Starmerites. 'What changed the Prime Minister's mind from thinking this is far-Right dog whistle politics to thinking it was something he must do?' And she wanted action against those in 'the police, local authorities, social service, or even the Crown Prosecution Service' who had put concerns about community ahead of stopping girls as young as ten from being raped. Even the CPS? Who can she have in mind? The following pupils appeared to be absent: Farage, N. (Clacton), Champion, S. (Rotherham) and, more surprisingly, Lowe, R. (Great Yarmouth). Jonathan Brash (Lab, Hartlepool) accused Mrs Badenoch of 'weaponising child rape to go after clicks'. A particularly damp Lib Dem, Josh Babarinde (Eastbourne), accused Mrs Badenoch of being 'party political'. In the Commons? That's the whole point of the place, poppet. Party politics is only despicable when it distorts justice. As we now can see.
The Sun
29 minutes ago
- The Sun
Grooming gangs inquiry must root out racists who turned blind eye to rape of young white girls – they MUST face justice
IF there ever was a justification for holding a public inquiry it is surely the mass rape of under-age girls by gangs of men. Also, the failure for many years of police, social workers and other agencies to take the issue seriously. 5 5 5 The scale of the offending is extraordinary. A report by Professor Alexis Jay concluded that 1400 girls were abused in Rotherham alone between 1997 and 2013, yet the girls themselves were ignored -- or even blamed for their own abuse. That we are finally getting an inquiry is of little credit to this government, which for months until Keir Starmer's U-turn at the weekend had tried to belittle the scandal and, even worse, make out that those who called for an inquiry were pandering to extremists or as he put it: 'jumping on the bandwagon of the far right'. The Prime Minister himself made this claim back in January, accusing Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch of 'amplifying' the words of the Far Right and making unfounded claims that critics such as Elon Musk were 'spreading lies and misinformation '. 'Stain on our society' Lucy Powell, Leader of the House of Commons, went on to describe it as a 'dog whistle' even to mention the abuse scandal. Around the same time Starmer insisted: 'This doesn't need more consultation. "It doesn't need more research. It just needs action.' He later added the victims 'don't want to see another national inquiry'. Well he was wrong. Many of these women treated so appallingly DID want an inquiry. And they are getting one now because Louise Casey, whom the government engaged in January to carry out a rapid review in the hope of batting away the issue, has come down in favour of one. Home secretary Yvette Cooper told us that the scandal was 'a stain on our society'. I was locked up & raped in dingy flat for days by grooming gangs - only to find out one sicko was a POLICE officer who's never seen justice So it is. But why couldn't she and the rest of the Government bring themselves to admit that back in January when they were trying to tell us that it was all sorted out, in the past, and that there was nothing more to say on the matter? Officials, she added, often avoided the topic for fear of being labelled racist. So they do, but the same applies to most of the Cabinet. The perpetrators were, inconveniently to many of them, heavily concentrated in one section of the UK population: they were men of Pakistani heritage. There is of course a glaring reason why the abuse scandal was ignored by so many individuals and organisations who were in a position to stop it. The perpetrators were, inconveniently to many of them, heavily concentrated in one section of the UK population: they were men of Pakistani heritage. Cooper still can't quite bring herself to admit the truth, telling the Commons that 'Asians' had been found to be 'over-represented' among the suspects in abuse by gangs. For some reason she couldn't bring herself to be more specific than that. It is true that there are some on the Far Right who would love to make an issue of the grooming gangs scandal for their own ends. But they are somewhat outnumbered by those on the liberal-left who for years balked at the idea that an ethnic minority could be disproportionately involved in a serious form of crime. It is the latter who are far more influential in the legal justice system. Sadly, these people, who tend to dominate police constabularies, council social services departments and the judiciary, lack the insight to see that they are equally guilty of racism and prejudice as are the Far Right. For years, they were making decisions on whether or not to investigate sex offences or prosecute rapists on the basis of the colour and religion of the offenders. Bizarrely, people who bleat endlessly about the gender gap in company boardrooms, and other supposed injustices against well-paid professional women, turned out to be blatant misogynists when faced with the mass abuse of white working class girls. They treated them as worthless, whose welfare was to be cast aside in the cause of promoting racial and religious equality. Most Britons, needless to say, want justice to be meted out to offenders equally, regardless of race, religion, gender or sexual orientation. They reject utterly the notion that some groups of the population should, to borrow George Orwell's phrase, be more equal than others. They want the criminal justice system to deal with what is happening now, not be used as a tool to try to right injustices in the distant past through treating some groups more leniently than others. In spite of the child abuse scandal the Prime Minister, and many others on the Left, simply cannot stop themselves. The same attitude which prevailed in Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford and many other towns was there to be seen again during last summer's riots. Starmer, who had had little to say about riots in Leeds, sparked when Roma children were taken into care, or a machete fight on Southend seafront, lost no time in condemning anyone he thought he could blame for encouraging the riots which followed the Southport murders. Police withheld important information about the suspect behind the attacks, apparently out of fear it might encourage the Far Right. Racial tensions But if you want to encourage the Far Right there is no better way of doing so than to brush serious acts of crime under the carpet. For years the only people who were talking about the mass rape of white girls by men of Pakistani heritage were the British National Party. Indeed, the first I heard about it was in a BBC documentary filmed covertly to expose the BNP. It is vital that the racist attitudes of those who tried to excuse serious criminal activity are rooted out for good. I have to say that, like most viewers I suspect, I thought that rape gang allegations which featured in the programme were just a tall story made up to ramp up racial tensions. But they weren't. Much as I despise the BNP, the efforts of others to cover up the mass rape scandal handed the party the initiative. That is why we need an inquiry into the rape scandal, and why it must focus absolutely on the most important question: Why was there such a conspiracy of silence, and why did so many 'enlightened' people think it acceptable to turn a blind eye to gang rape. It is vital that the racist attitudes of those who tried to excuse serious criminal activity are rooted out for good. 5 5
