Corruption trial: Zampino grilled again about alleged extortion attempt by ‘Mr. Three Per Cent'
Montreal Crime
By
Frank Zampino, the former president of Montreal's executive committee, testified for a second time about one of the more startling allegations to arise from his criminal trial at the Montreal courthouse, where he is charged with running a multimillion-dollar bid-rigging scheme out of city hall.
While being cross-examined by prosecutor Nicolas Ammerlaan for a second day on Wednesday, Zampino, 65 and now retired, was asked several questions about an alleged attempt by Bernard Trépanier, the man who came to be known as 'Mr. Three Per Cent' during the Charbonneau Commission, to extort $1 million from Smart Centres, a real-estate development company based in Ontario.
Trépanier is alleged to have asked for $1 million to give Smart Centres access to a project involving a quarry in St-Michel.
In 2017, Trépanier was charged in Project Fronde, the investigation that is the subject of the current trial, along with Zampino, Robert Marcil, 60, the former head of Montreal's public works department, and three former executives with engineering firms alleged to have taken part in the bid-rigging scheme. Trépanier died of natural causes in 2018.
Throughout the trial, which began on Feb. 3, Trépanier has been portrayed as the go-between for Zampino and the engineering firms that took part in the scheme. Zampino was the head of Montreal's executive committee between 2002 and July 2008, and Trépanier was the head of fundraising for Union Montréal, the political party that Zampino and former Montreal mayor Gérald Tremblay were in.
The Crown's theory in the case is that Zampino organized the bid-rigging scheme and that Trépanier went to executives from engineering firms demanding they kick back three per cent of the value of the contracts they were awarded to Union Montréal.
One of the more startling allegations to emerge in the trial is that while the illegal fundraising scheme was well underway, Trépanier had become so brazen that he simply tried to extort $1 million from Smart Centres. The allegation was part of a civil lawsuit and at least two witnesses heard in Zampino's trial said it happened.
Like all of the incriminating testimony heard at the trial, Zampino continued to deny knowledge of both the scheme or any wrongdoing on Trépanier's part. He has repeated often that he knew Trépanier since 1986 and that he helped organize his political campaigns.
Tremblay testified during the trial and said he informed Zampino that Trépanier would be dismissed from Union Montréal because of the allegation. Zampino has said he has no recollection of the discussion and repeated on Wednesday that he first learned of the situation when Trépanier 'stormed' into his office at city hall.
'I sort of remember the incident. It was many years ago. I was in a meeting and I wasn't able to speak to him. He was emotional, troubled and stressed by the situation,' Zampino said. 'I just told him that I was in a meeting and that I'd be home by 7 o'clock. It was a matter I thought I needed to speak (to him) in person.
'I was extremely troubled by the fact that he told me he had spoken to the chef du cabinet du maire and that he was being accused of having requested a $1-million extortion amount from a representative of Smart Centres.
'I told him clearly that I didn't want any stories. I wanted the truth. I wanted him to tell me exactly what happened because this was a serious allegation.'
Zampino said Trépanier denied the allegation 'and I took his word for it.'
'He told me that this never happened.'
Zampino also said that once he had Trépanier's denial, he decided to discuss the allegation with Tremblay for the first time.
'It was troubling to me because it was the most serious allegation that I had ever heard at the city of Montreal and it involved my political election organizer that was with me since 1986,' Zampino said. 'He gave me a clear and transparent answer to the fact that he had never done this.'
Zampino also denied Tremblay's version of events and said he spoke to the mayor only after he spoke to Trépanier, who was ultimately dismissed from Union Montréal.
Some witnesses who testified in the trial said Trépanier somehow continued to do fundraising for the political party after he was fired and that he did it from an office outside of Union Montréal headquarters.
Zampino's cross-examination will resume on Thursday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
3 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Ajax man caught dealing drugs in Sudbury to serve rest of sentence behind bars
Stephen Malabre-Patrick argued he should be released now because of poor conditions at Sudbury Jail Harold Carmichael Published Jun 07, 2025 • Last updated 5 hours ago • 3 minute read A southern Ontario drug dealer has failed to convince a Sudbury judge he should be released early because of poor conditions at Sudbury Jail. A southern Ontario drug dealer has failed to convince a Sudbury judge he should be released early because of poor conditions at Sudbury Jail. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Instead, Ontario Court Justice Martin Lambert ruled that Stephen Malabre-Patrick of Ajax will need to finish his sentence for drug trafficking in jail. Malabre-Patrick's lawyer argued his client should be given time-served credit because of poor conditions at Sudbury Jail, such as overcrowding and lockdowns, and be released now. Now 33, Malabre-Patrick pleaded guilty to cocaine possession for the purpose of trafficking and conspiracy to traffic controlled substances. He was one of six southern Ontario people police officers busted in 2023 for drug trafficking in Sudbury. The Crown and defence lawyer Thomas Evangelista agreed Malabre-Patrick should receive a sentence of two years less a day. The only thing to be determined was how much pre-trial custody he should get. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The Crown argued Malabre-Patrick should receive the typical 1.5-1 so-called Summers pre-trial custody credit. Summers credit refers to the practice of a sentencing judge reducing a sentence for the time an individual spent in pre-trial custody. It's based on the principle that time served before a trial or plea may be considered in determining the final sentence, reflecting that the individual has already endured some of the potential consequences of their actions. As a result, a judge can subtract 1.5 days from the sentence for every day spent in pre-sentence custody. Evangelista, however, said his client should also receive a Duncan credit due to poor conditions at Sudbury Jail. If granted, Malabre-Patrick would be released immediately. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. A Duncan credit allows a judge to award additional credit for time spent in pre-trial custody beyond the standard 1.5:1 ratio when 'particularly harsh' conditions of detention are present. Justice Lambert, however, didn't buy that argument. He ruled Malabre-Patrick was entitled only to the 1.5-1 Summers pre-trial custody credit. Lambert noted that sentences for drug trafficking often involve penitentiary terms, meaning two years or more in a federal jail. He said the Duncan credit is issued for 'exceptionally punitive conditions' and granting the extra credit to Malabre-Patrick to turn his sentence into a time-served one 'would not reflect the seriousness and gravity of the offences.' In the end, Malabre-Patrick's pre-trial custody credit came to 516 days. That leaves him with 213 days or about seven months to serve. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Justice Lambert also issued a 10-year weapons ban and a DNA order. Lambert noted that Malabre-Patrick, 33, had worked in construction and painting and has a job offer in construction waiting for him upon his release. The judge took into account that Malabre-Patrick completed numerous programs while in custody. 'I accept that Mr. Malabre-Patrick's pleas of guilt are an indication of remorse on his part,' said Lambert. Members of the Provincial Joint Forces Guns and Gangs Enforcement Team, in partnership with the Greater Sudbury Police Service and with assistance from the Durham Regional Police, executed warrants in Greater Sudbury, Toronto and Ajax on March 29, 2023, as part of an ongoing investigation that began in August 2022 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Malabre-Patrick was one of six people from southern Ontario arrested in a Greater Sudbury home on March 30, 2023, during the execution of a search warrant. Officers found 200 grams of cocaine with an estimated street value of $100,000 in a bedroom Malabre-Patrick was using. According to a police news release at the time, officers seized about 2.7 kilograms of cocaine, nearly 300 grams of fentanyl, a loaded nine-millimetre magazine, more than $97,000 in Canadian currency, and $1,000 in counterfeit currency. After 44 days in custody following his arrest, Malabre-Patrick got bail with strict conditions that included house arrest. He breached those conditions and was back in custody in Oshawa on Aug. 5, 2024, and has remained in custody since. As a result of the two guilty pleas, the Crown dropped other charges Malabre-Patrick was facing. hcarmichael@ X; @HaroldCarmichae Olympics Columnists Toronto & GTA Columnists Toronto & GTA


Vancouver Sun
16 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Prolific B.C. drunk driver could face deportation after dozens of driving bans over 30 years
A driver who has racked up 32 driving prohibitions or suspensions, as well as 16 24-hour driving bans, failed to convince a British Columbia judge he should get a lighter sentence than normal for drunk driving because more than six months in jail could get him deported to India. Vernon's Gurinder Pal Singh Bajwa, a permanent resident of Canada who escaped deportation in 2019 on an impaired driving conviction with a sentence of five months and 29 days, got a reduced sentence this time around because Mounties captured him on surveillance cameras using the toilet in a holding cell after he was arrested for impaired driving again on May 11, 2022, after rear-ending a white Hyundai Tucson with his Mercedes sport utility vehicle in the parking lot of a Wholesale Club. His blood alcohol level was more than twice the legal limit. But the judge refused to lighten Bajwa's sentence on convictions for impaired and prohibited driving to a level that wouldn't have immigration consequences for the 57-year-old. Any sentence over six months can result in deportation from Canada. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'To accede to Mr. Bajwa's request for a (conditional sentence) or a reduction of the jail time on either count for the impact of the collateral immigration consequences to Mr. Bajwa and as a remedy (for breaching his Charter right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure), would bring the administration of justice into disrepute and result in an inappropriate and artificial sentence; in other words, an unfit sentence,' Judge David Patterson of B.C.'s provincial court wrote in a recent decision. Bajwa immigrated to Canada from India's Punjab region over 34 years ago. 'He received his first British Columbia driving prohibition on March 19, 1993,' said the judge. 'He has also accumulated a substantial number of additional Criminal Code convictions and Motor Vehicle Act infractions.' The Crown recommended Bajwa get between nine and 12 months in jail, a $2,500 fine and a five-year driving prohibition for the impaired driving charge, plus another four months behind bars for getting behind the wheel while he 'was subject to five separate driving prohibitions' or suspensions. 'I am flabbergasted that Crown counsel has only sought a four-month consecutive jail sentence (for driving while prohibited),' Patterson said in his decision dated June 2. 'Given the circumstances of the offence, it is hard to imagine a more suitable case for the two-year less-a-day maximum sentence allowed.' Bajwa's lawyer argued for a conditional sentence or no more jail time than he got in 2019 — five months and 29 days behind bars. He noted that would allow Bajwa to remain in Canada. The court heard Bajwa 'has no one in India' and that he's in the process of getting a divorce 'as his alcohol usage ruined his relationship with his estranged wife and his children,' said the judge, who noted they live in Canada. Eight days after he was caught drunk driving in May of 2022, Bajwa 'was very intoxicated at his daughter's wedding and smacked a plate of food out of her hand,' said the decision. 'He was subsequently convicted of assault … and handed a 60-day jail sentence followed by an 18-month probation order, which included having no contact with his estranged wife or children.' That was 'the last straw for the family, essentially,' said the decision. Bajwa 'claims that his problems with alcohol started when he was a roofer,' it said. 'He had a group of co-workers and they would often go drinking alcohol together. His alcohol consumption spiralled out of control.' After he was caught driving drunk in 2022, Bajwa 'began the process of getting his life together,' said the decision. 'He gave up drinking alcohol and took a few counselling sessions. He now lives with a close friend … and he is an active participant in the Vernon Sikh community.' Bajwa's 'moral blameworthiness is at the highest end of the spectrum,' said the judge. Patterson said he had 'considered the potential impact of a jail sentence of six months or more on him, including the possibility that he may be removed from Canada, his home for more than 34 years.' Bajwa got a letter from the Canada Border Services Agency in February of 2024 'alleging he may be inadmissible to Canada' for serious criminality. 'Removal from Canada would lead to dire consequences for Mr. Bajwa,' said the judge. 'He would be forced to leave the country he has called home for more than 34 years. He would face the prospect of returning to India, which has changed since he last resided there. A country that now may be as foreign to him as Canada was when Mr. Bajwa immigrated to Canada.' After considering the Charter breach, Patterson sentenced Bajwa to 198 days (just over six months) in jail for the impaired driving conviction, fined him $2,000 and banned him from driving for three years. For driving while prohibited, the judge handed Bajwa another 120 days behind bars (about four months) to be served consecutively, for a total of about 10 months in jail. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
Montreal Gazette
a day ago
- Montreal Gazette
McGill Ghetto murder trial: ‘I was dealing with all sorts of evil'
By François Pelletier, the man on trial for the murder of 24-year-old Romane Bonnier, ran out of time Friday before he could tell the jury hearing his case about the day of the brutal slaying in the McGill Ghetto more than three years ago. Friday was Pelletier's third day on the witness stand in a first-degree murder trial at the Montreal courthouse, where the 39-year-old is acting as his own lawyer. His testimony has been confusing, full of unfinished thoughts and asides on pop culture references he appears to be fixated on. When he brought up Brave New World, the book by Aldous Huxley, yet again late Friday afternoon, Superior Court Justice François Dadour abruptly called it a day. The judge noted he had asked the jury to stay an extra 45 minutes with the hope Pelletier would reach the end of his testimony in principle before the weekend. Instead, Pelletier is expected to testify on Monday about Oct. 19, 2021, the day he stabbed Bonnier 26 times in front of several stunned witnesses. He will then be cross-examined by either prosecutor Louis Bouthillier or prosecutor Marianna Ferraro. The Crown's theory of the case is earlier in 2021, Pelletier met Bonnier after she placed an ad seeking a roommate to share the apartment she was already living in, and they had a brief relationship after he moved in. It did not end well and, on Oct. 19, 2021, he killed the woman who dreamed of being an actor on Broadway. The jury has heard evidence Bonnier put a quick end to the relationship and, on Sept. 1, 2021, Pelletier moved out of the apartment as had already been planned. On Friday, Pelletier said September was difficult for him as he rented a room to start, but he couldn't take the noise there and ended up moving in with a friend on Oct. 1. 'In late September, I'm still trying to figure (the breakup) out,' he said, adding he was having nightmares in which he killed Bonnier. 'I was dealing with all sorts of evil. 'Towards the end, I was trying to tell (Bonnier) that I was not well.' Pelletier said Bonnier ignored many text messages he sent to her and she asked him to 'stop harassing her' after he met her mother and asked her to tell Bonnier to read his messages. 'She finally did agree to give me a last 30 minutes in her presence. I was like, that sounds like a fair deal, right,' Pelletier told the jury. 'We actually did meet, on Oct. 11, (2021) on McGill (University's) campus. At that point, I was in a rather rough shape, but I showed up. I had been requesting this meeting and I was getting it. At that point, I was deeply immersed into this different interpretation of things. I had been cooking in it for weeks now.' Pelletier said he and Bonnier sat on a bench for the conversation and it was clear 'Romane had moved on.' 'She was not just like a girl to me, she was like my twin flame,' he said. 'I was thinking about her all the time.' Before he described the meeting at the university campus, he told the jury about a scene from the movie Dude, Where's My Car?, a goofball comedy starring actor Ashton Kutcher. Pelletier said he compared his inability to communicate with Bonnier, through text messages, to a scene in the movie where 'these two idiots' are unable to understand each other. 'So there we were. I didn't get any of my answers, no explanation,' Pelletier said. 'I was not expecting Romane to tell me what I wanted to hear or anything specific. I just wanted her to tell me ... I don't know exactly what I wanted her to tell me. 'I chose not to ask her at all (about their relationship). We talked about a bunch of stuff. Essentially, it was just back and forth and then I went away from there.' Pelletier said before they parted ways that day he gave Bonnier a hug. 'It was like hugging a corpse, really,' he said. 'I was in bad shape already and that (hug) was bad.' Pelletier added the last words Bonnier told him before she walked away was: 'Have fun.'