US begins uneasy World Cup countdown as Trump moves Marines to Los Angeles
The SoFi stadium in Los Angeles, the city's Fifa 2026 World Cup venue.
Photo:
AFP / Daniel Slim
US cities hosting next year's Fifa World Cup faced questions about how to reassure international fans concerned by President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown and travel ban as the year-to-go countdown began.
The United States, along with Canada and Mexico, is set to co-host the finals, which will feature 48 teams and a record 104 matches in a tournament that Fifa boss Gianni Infantino said would usher in a new generation of soccer fans.
Celebrities and soccer stars were due to walk the red carpet at the Fox Studio Lot in Los Angeles - one of the host cities - for the year-to-go event there, a day after President Trump
deployed Marines
and the National Guard to quell protests.
California Governor Gavin Newsom described the deployment as an "unmistakable step toward authoritarianism," while Trump officials defended it and branded the protests as lawless, blaming local and state Democrats for permitting upheaval.
Los Angeles is one of several host cities marking the year-to-go occasion.
New York-New Jersey held a waterside party on Wednesday, where local officials and fans celebrated against the backdrop of Ellis Island.
President Donald Trump has deployed Marines and the National Guard to quell protests in Los Angeles.
Photo:
SAUL LOEB / AFP
Asked about comments Vice President JD Vance made last month warning World Cup travellers not to overstay their welcome, New York-New Jersey host Committee CEO Alex Lasry said: "Our goal is to make sure everyone who comes to New York-New Jersey has an incredible time."
"Something that you have to kind of know, when you're putting on mega sporting events ... is the world is still going on. The world doesn't stop for these sporting events," said Lasry.
"And you kind of have to go with the flow and make sure that you're able to adapt."
Minky Worden, director of global initiatives at Human Rights Watch, said Fifa needed to work with the U.S. government to ensure the rights of competitors, support staff, fans and media were protected regardless of their identities or views.
"Fifa should publicly acknowledge the threat US immigration and other anti-human rights policies pose to the tournamentG��s integrity ... (and) should establish clear benchmarks and timelines for the US policy changes needed to ensure respect for immigrants' rights during the 2026 World Cup and beyond," she said.
US Democratic leaders raised concerns over a national crisis on Tuesday as Trump moved U.S. Marines into Los Angeles to tackle civilian protests over his immigration policies.
"There are certainly things that are happening at the national level, the international level, there are going to be geopolitical issues that we don't even know right now that are going to affect the tournament," Meg Kane, a host city executive for Philadelphia told reporters at a Paley Center event on Monday.
"So we recognise that we're planning within uncertainty."
Fifa did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
FIFA president Gianni Infantino.
Photo:
© Copyright Photosport Ltd 2023
Fifa President Gianni Infantino said last month after meeting Trump that he was confident the world would be welcomed in for the 2026 World Cup and this year's Club World Cup, which runs from June 14 to July 13.
But the task of reassuring international fans was complicated by a travel ban that went into effect on Monday, cracking down on what Trump called "foreign terrorists".
Of the 12 countries facing travel bans, Iran is the only one that has qualified for the 2026 tournament so far. Tehran said on Saturday that the ban showed "deep hostility" toward Iranians and Muslims.
European fans, supporter groups and former players contacted by Reuters said it was too early for anyone to be thinking about revising schedules or reevaluating plans for attending the World Cup.
Alina Hudak, the Miami host committee president and CEO, told Reuters she had been in touch with the local consular corps to address their concerns and to offer support.
"My responsibility is to make sure that we're ready, that we're safe, that we're coordinating logistically with all of our law enforcement agencies, that we've done everything we can to ensure that our mass transit system is ready and can handle the volume," said Hudak.
"And so for me, you know, what's happening outside of that is something that we're monitoring, but not something that, quite frankly, I have an impact (on)."
-
Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Israel launches 'preemptive strikes' against Iran,
By Helen Regan and Lauren Izso , CNN Photo: 123RF Israel carried out "preemptive" strikes against Iran on Friday, targeting its nuclear plant and military sites, after US President Donald Trump warned of a possible "massive conflict" in the region. Explosions were heard Friday morning in the Iranian capital, state TV reported, adding that Iran's air defence were at "100 percent operational capacity". Israel declared a state of emergency, with Defence Minister Israel Katz saying that retaliatory action from Tehran was possible following the operation. "Following the State of Israel's preemptive strike against Iran, a missile and drone attack against the State of Israel and its civilian population is expected in the immediate future," Katz said. Oil prices surged as much as 6 percent on the strikes, which came after Trump warned of a possible Iranian attack and said the US was drawing down staff in the region. "I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen," Trump told reporters at the White House Thursday when asked if an Israeli attack loomed. Trump said he believed a "pretty good" deal on Iran's nuclear programme was "fairly close", but said that an Israeli attack on its arch foe could wreck the chances of an agreement. The US leader did not disclose the details of a conversation on Monday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, but said: "I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it." Trump quickly added: "Might help it actually, but it also could blow it." A US official said there had been no US involvement in the Israeli strikes on Iran. The United States on Wednesday said it was reducing embassy staff in Iraq -- long a zone of proxy conflict with Iran. Israel, which counts on US military and diplomatic support, sees the cleric-run state in Tehran as an existential threat and hit Iranian air defences last year. Netanyahu has vowed less restraint since the unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Tehran-backed Hamas, which triggered the massive Israeli offensive in Gaza. The United States and other Western countries, along with Israel, have repeatedly accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon, which it has repeatedly denied. Israel again called for global action after the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) accused Iran on Wednesday of non-compliance with its obligations. The resolution could lay the groundwork for European countries to invoke a "snapback" mechanism, which expires in October, that would reinstate UN sanctions eased under a 2015 nuclear deal negotiated by then US president Barack Obama. Trump pulled out of the deal in his first term and slapped Iran with sweeping sanctions. Iran's nuclear chief, Mohammad Eslami, slammed the resolution as "extremist" and blamed Israeli influence. In response to the resolution, Iran said it would launch a new enrichment centre in a secure location. Iran would also replace "all of these first-generation machines with sixth-generation advanced machines" at the Fordo uranium enrichment plant, said Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran. Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, far above the 3.67-percent limit set in the 2015 deal and close, though still short, of the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead. - AFP

RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Trump's China 'truce' is nothing of the sort
Analysis by David Goldman , CNN Xi Jinping and Donald Trump. Photo: AFP Analysis: At long last, the United States has reached a trade agreement with China. Again. After a testy war of words that escalated into a tit-for-tat restriction on key exports, American and Chinese officials this week met in the United Kingdom with a singular goal: Find a way to agree to what they had agreed to a month earlier in Geneva. It appears the countries' top trade negotiators have accomplished that. On Wednesday (NZT) , both Chinese and Trump officials said they had agreed to a framework to implement the consensus they reached in May, and the trade truce would be sent to their respective leaders for their approval. Businesses, consumers and Wall Street investors will no doubt breathe a sigh of relief: Burdensome tariffs have raised significant anxiety, and easing trade barriers between the world's two largest economies should lower costs and help inject some much-needed certainty into an economy that has been demonstrating some signs of strain. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said in a Truth Social post that a "deal" with China has been completed. "Our deal with China is done," Trump said in his all-caps social media post. Trump said both countries agreed to ease export restrictions, per the prior arrangement agreed upon in Geneva in May. The president also confirmed on Wednesday in his post that the deal included "full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China." But in reality, the trade truce - if that's really what was accomplished this time around - is mostly just a return to the already-tense state of affairs from before 2 April. Tariff rates from both countries remain historically high, and significant export restrictions remain in place. The United States has not opened its doors to China's autos, nor is it going to sell its high-end AI chips anytime soon. And, in Trump's parlance, China isn't treating America much more "fairly" after this agreement than it did before. Without a doubt, a trade agreement was much needed. After Trump's 2 April "Liberation Day" announcements, tensions ran so high that trade between the United States and China came to an effective halt. A 145 percent tariff on most Chinese imports made the math impossible for US businesses to buy virtually anything from China, America's second-largest trading partner. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, America's chief negotiator in both trade talks with China, said previous tariff levels were "unsustainable." On 12 May, delegates from China and the United States announced they would significantly roll back their historically high tariffs on one another. Economists pared back their recession forecasts, and moribund consumer confidence rebounded. But Trump and his administration in recent weeks grew increasingly hostile toward China, accusing the country of breaking the promises it made in mid-May. China similarly said the United States failed to live up to its obligations under the Geneva agreement. The Trump administration had expected China to lift restrictions on rare-earth materials that are critical components for a wide range of electronics, but China has only very slowly allowed them to return to the open market, causing intense displeasure inside the Trump administration and prompting a series of export restrictions on US goods to China, three administration officials told CNN last month. China has a virtual monopoly on rare earths, without which cars, jet engines, contrast dye used in MRI machines and some cancer drugs cannot be manufactured. Trump told reporters Friday that Chinese President Xi Jinping had agreed to allow exports of rare earth minerals products to begin, but industry analysts said the crucial materials had not been flowing to the United States as they once had. If both countries satisfy the terms of the agreement this time around, the de-escalation should prevent the direst warnings about the trade war, including potential pandemic-level shortages. Despite the good vibes, the United States and China remain in an economic standoff. The Trump administration - and the Biden administration before it - have maintained that Chinese companies are more than happy to sell inexpensive products to the US market but that China places significant restrictions on US businesses operating in the country and encourages Chinese companies to steal American intellectual property. China has long disputed those claims. Trump, in his first term, raised tariffs on China based on national security concerns. Biden maintained many of those tariffs and doubled down on some. But the second Trump administration has taken trade barriers to an unprecedented level. It has placed a 10 percent universal tariff on virtually all goods coming into the United States. It put in place an additional 20 percent tariff on Chinese goods in an effort to get China to take action to reduce the flow of fentanyl over the US border. Both of those extraordinary tariffs remain in place on most Chinese goods, with the exception of some products like electronics. In addition, the White House closed the so-called de minimis exemption that allowed packages with a value of under $800 (NZ$1381) to come into the United States tariff-free. Hefty new tariffs remain in place on small packages, undermining the business models of Chinese ecommerce giants Shein and Temu. The compounding tariffs create significant trade barriers with America's second-largest trading partner, raising prices for American businesses and consumers with no easy fixes or clear market alternatives. Some gigantic companies, such as Apple, have complex supply chains that can withstand some of the price pressures. But even Apple, which has said it would ship most US iPhones from India as Chinese tariffs rise, said it would face a $900 million quarterly cost increase because of tariffs - at their current levels, not at the sky-high 145 percent rate. Other businesses, such as Boeing, have been completely shut out of China's market. Even without any tariffs or other formal barriers by China on purchases of US aircraft, Boeing has made virtually no sales in China, the world's largest for aircraft purchases, since 2019. But Trump sounded a hopeful note about the path forward. "President XI and I are going to work closely together to open up China to American Trade," Trump said in a post Wednesday morning. "This would be a great WIN for both countries!!!" A trade truce may be better than the alternative - if it lasts this time. But if the deal leads to reduced trade barriers, that could boost both economies. -CNN

RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Protests spread across US as Marines prepare for Los Angeles deployment
By Brad Brooks and Sandra Strojanovic , Reuters Police officers surround arrested protesters following a demonstration against federal immigration operations near Los Angeles City Hall in Los Angeles on 11 June, 2025 Photo: RONALDO SCHEMIDT / AFP California will face off with the Trump administration in court on Friday (NZT) over the deployment of US troops in Los Angeles after demonstrators again took to the streets in major cities to protest President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. Some 700 US Marines will be on the streets of Los Angeles by Thursday or Friday, the military said, to support up to 4000 National Guard troops in protecting federal property and federal agents, including on immigration raids. Trump's decision to dispatch troops to Los Angeles over the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom has sparked a national debate about the use of the military in law enforcement operations on US soil. A federal judge in San Francisco will hear arguments on Thursday as part of California's lawsuit against Trump. The state is requesting a temporary restraining order to block the troops' participation in law enforcement activities. In a court filing on Thursday, California argued that the federal government has already violated the law by having National Guard troops assist ICE agents in immigration raids. On Saturday, Americans likely will see split-screen images of US troops on the streets of two major cities: Los Angeles, where troops are guarding federal buildings, and Washington where soldiers, accompanied by tanks and other armored vehicles, will rumble down Constitution Avenue in a rare public display of military might to celebrate the Army's 250th birthday . Nearly 2000 protests against the parade, which is taking place on Trump's 79th birthday, are planned around the country in one of the biggest demonstrations against Trump since he returned to power in January. Mostly peaceful street protests so far this week have taken place in multiple cities besides Los Angeles including New York, Chicago, Washington and San Antonio, Texas. The Los Angeles protests began last Friday in response to a series of immigration raids in the city. Trump in turn called in the National Guard on Saturday, then ordered the deployment of Marines on Monday. "Los Angeles was safe and sound for the last two nights. Our great National Guard, with a little help from the Marines, put the L.A. Police in a position to effectively do their job," Trump posted on social media on Thursday. State and city officials say Trump is exaggerating what is happening in the city and that local police have the situation under control. The protests have been largely orderly but occasionally punctuated by violence, mostly contained to a few blocks. Police said demonstrators at one location threw commercial-grade fireworks and rocks at officers on Wednesday night. Another group of nearly 1000 demonstrators was peacefully marching through downtown when police suddenly opened fire with less lethal munitions in front of City Hall. Los Angeles Police Department Chief Jim McDonnell, in an interview with CNN late on Wednesday, said the city was calmer and asserted that police were protecting people's free speech rights to protest while holding those intent on violence accountable. Photo: AFP / SPENCER PLATT Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice. US President Donald Trump Photo: SAUL LOEB / AFP The administration has circulated images showing National Guard troops protecting immigration agents who were arresting suspected illegal migrants - a permissible function for the troops under federal law. But the state argues those Guard troops have crossed the line into illegal activity under the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the military from participating in civilian law enforcement. "For example, photos posted on social media by ICE depict heavily armed members of the National Guard standing alongside ICE agents during arrests," California said in its latest court filing. Unless a judge intervenes, the military's role likely will grow to include "detention, interrogation, and other activities that are practically indistinguishable from urban policing operations", the filing asserts. California is seeking a court order that would stop troops from "patrolling the streets of Los Angeles" and limit their role to protecting federal personnel and property. The lawsuit ultimately seeks a ruling that would return California's National Guard to the state's control and a declaration that Trump's action was illegal. The Trump administration said in a Wednesday court filing that the judge should not restrict the military's activities in Los Angeles. "Neither the National Guard nor the Marines are engaged in law enforcement. Rather, they are protecting law enforcement, consistent with longstanding practice and the inherent protective power to provide for the safety of federal property and personnel," the administration wrote. US Army Major General Scott Sherman, who commands the taskforce of Marines and Guardsmen, told reporters the Marines will not load their rifles with live ammunition, but they will carry live rounds. - Reuters