UN expert says Guatemalan prosecutor's office using criminal law to pursue opponents
Updated [hour]:[minute] [AMPM] [timezone], [monthFull] [day], [year]
GUATEMALA CITY (AP) — A United Nations expert warned Friday at the conclusion of her two-week visit that Guatemala's prosecutor's office is increasingly using criminal law against former prosecutors , judges , defense attorneys , journalists and others.
Margaret Satterthwaite, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, traveled the country meeting with judges, lawyers, lawmakers and others, including Guatemala's chief prosecutor.
'The instrumental use of criminal law by the Prosecutor General's Office appears to amount to a systematic pattern of intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights, targeted at specific groups,' Satterthwaite wrote in her preliminary report. 'This persecution appears to be intensifying, as those who have sought to end impunity and corruption, defend human rights, or speak out against abuses of power increasingly face digital harassment, threats, and criminal charges.'
The office is led by Consuelo Porras, who has been sanctioned by the United States and other countries and accused of being an obstacle to corruption investigations.
Satterthwaite met with Porras and her staff. They told Satterthwaite that they acted within the law, denied using criminal law to pursue opponents and said they were the real victims of attacks by the executive branch and its allies, the U.N. expert said.
'Criminal charges have been directed at more than 60 justice operators and defense or human rights lawyers,' Satterthwaite said, noting that more than 50 'justice operators' have been forced into exile by the prosecutor's office.
Porras' office said later that it did not agree with Satterthwaite's preliminary report, because it did not reflect 'the complex work that we do, nor the exhaustive information that was provided.'
'We energetically reject the idea of a 'criminalization of sectors,'' the office said. 'Our actions are based on serious, objective investigations that strictly adhere to the Guatemalan legal framework.'
President Bernardo Arévalo has tried unsuccessfully to convince Porras to step down . His office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Satterthwaite's observations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: Another UN failure — US had to veto a lopsided resolution that would not bring peace to Gaza
We wish that Elise Stefanik was sitting at the large C-shaped table in the UN Security Council chamber over on the East Side on Wednesday, where she would have ripped apart the fecklessness of the diplomats (from both friend and foe) who lined up to do the bidding of Hamas in support of a lopsided resolution that had to be vetoed by the United States. But due to D.C. politics and the narrowness of the Republican control of the House, Stefanik remains a congresswoman from upstate and is not the U.S. ambassador and the veto task fell to Chargé d'Affaires Dorothy Shea, a career Senior Foreign Service officer. Shea cast her veto, making for a 14-1 tally and correctly killing the resolution, which called for a ceasefire in Gaza without blaming Hamas, who started the fighting by launching the Oct. 7 onslaught against Israel and can stop the fighting by freeing the hostages, giving up, disarming and leaving Gaza. The way to peace is simple: get Hamas out and get aid in. They are stealing the supplies being shipped to the needy Palestinians in the territory. Hamas started this horrible situation by launching the Oct. 7 surprise attack on Israel, the deadliest day for Jews since Hitler's genocidal 1,000-year Reich was destroyed by the heroic soldiers and airmen of the Red Army and the Western Allies. Hamas has been defeated by Israel. Hamas has lost the war, but they are not willing to surrender and they are prolonging the agony for the innocent Palestinians by using them as human shields. The U.S., Egypt and Qatar have been conducting peace talks for months. Israel keeps saying yes, while Hamas keeps saying no, as recently as this past weekend. The U.S. policy has been consistent since Oct. 7: Hamas is the cause of the bloodshed and the suffering and any UN resolution must assign them the blame. The Biden administration vetoed prior Security Council resolutions that failed to condemn Hamas and now the Trump administration is continuing to do so. The Security Council cannot be allowed to deliver Hamas a propaganda victory, while in the real world, the terrorists refuse to accept a way out that the negotiators are offering. There was some hope for a breakthrough when Israel killed Hamas honcho Mohammed Sinwar last week, the younger brother of Yahya Sinwar, the fiend who masterminded Oct. 7 and who was killed last October. But this UN vote, which the Hamas champions will heap blame on Washington for, will only make a getting deal take that much longer and that means more suffering for the people of Gaza who have suffered under years of cruel Hamas dictatorship and now a war started by Hamas. But that's to be expected from the UN, which still hasn't labeled Hamas as a terror organization. As for what's happening in Gaza while the UN dickers, Hamas terrorists hide in their tunnels and ordinary Palestinians pay for their intransigence. There are still 58 Israeli hostages being held by Hamas, now for 608 days. The way forward is clear for Hamas: lay down your weapons, release the hostages and leave Gaza behind to be rebuilt. The Hamas legacy of death and suffering has to end. The UN is only postponing that day. _____
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
UN warns of surge in acute malnutrition among Gaza's young children
More than 2,700 children below the age of five in Gaza have been diagnosed with acute malnutrition, marking a steep increase in the number of children suffering from the serious medical condition since screening in February, the United Nations reports. Of almost 47,000 under-fives screened for malnutrition in the second half of May, 5.8 percent (or 2,733 children) were found to be suffering from acute malnutrition, 'almost triple the proportion of children diagnosed with malnutrition' three months earlier, the UN said on Thursday. The number of children with severe acute malnutrition requiring admission to hospital also increased by around double in May compared with earlier months, according to the report by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). According to data from the Nutrition Cluster cited by OCHA, more than 16,500 children below the age of five have been detected and treated for severe acute malnutrition in Gaza since January, including 141 children with complications requiring hospitalisation. Despite the increase in children suffering serious malnutrition and requiring hospitalisation, 'there are currently only four stabilisation centres for the treatment of [severe acute malnutrition] with medical complications in the Gaza Strip,' the OCHA report states. 'Stabilisation centres in North Gaza and Rafah have been forced to suspend operations, leaving children in these areas without access to lifesaving treatment,' it UN's latest warning on the health of young children in Gaza comes as the Palestinian territory's entire population deals with starvation, and the World Health Organization (WHO) warned that the enclave's 'health system is collapsing'. Issuing an appeal for the 'urgent protection' of two of Gaza's last remaining hospitals, the WHO said the 'Nasser Medical Complex, the most important referral hospital left in Gaza, and Al-Amal Hospital are at risk of becoming non-functional'. 'The relentless and systematic decimation of hospitals in Gaza has been going on for too long. It must end immediately,' the WHO said in a statement. 'WHO calls for urgent protection of Nasser Medical Complex and Al-Amal Hospital to ensure they remain accessible, functional and safe from attacks and hostilities,' it said. 'Patients seeking refuge and care to save their lives must not risk losing them trying to reach hospitals.' UN experts, medical officials in Gaza, as well as medical charities, have long accused Israeli forces of deliberately targeting health workers and medical facilities in Gaza in what has been described as a deliberate attempt to make conditions of life unliveable for the Palestinian population in the Strip.
Business Insider
6 hours ago
- Business Insider
Ghana joins France and the UK to back Morocco against Algeria
The fight for Western Sahara's sovereignty continues to intensify as more countries take sides. A few days back, the United Kingdom backed Morocco's claim to the small region of Western Sahara. Very recently, Ghana relayed the same sentiment. Western Sahara's sovereignty conflict continues to garner international attention and division. The United Kingdom and Ghana recently endorsed Morocco's Autonomy Plan for resolving the territorial dispute. Morocco and Algeria remain central figures in the conflict, with Morocco claiming the land and Algeria supporting the Polisario Front. Similar to the United Kingdom, Ghana stated on Thursday that the Moroccan autonomy plan is the sole basis for settling the Western Sahara dispute within the framework of the UN. Ghana considers the autonomy plan "as the only realistic and sustainable basis to a mutually agreed solution to the issue," said a joint statement issued after talks between Ghana's foreign minister, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, and his Moroccan counterpart, Nasser Bourita, in Rabat. These exact words mirror the declaration of the UK's Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, who noted that backing Morocco was the 'most credible and viable and pragmatic basis' to resolve the half-century dispute over Western Sahara between its neighbours, and other players. Moreover, Ghana and Morocco decided to advance defense cooperation and negotiate a visa waiver agreement, as reported by Reuters. Algeria's conflict with Morocco over Western Sahara The struggle over Western Sahara is one of Africa's most protracted and complicated territorial disputes. At the heart of this conflict are two crucial North African states: Morocco and Algeria, both of which play important but varied roles in the region's future. While Morocco claims sovereignty over Western Sahara, Algeria supports the region's right to self-determination by supporting the Polisario Front, which seeks independence for the Sahrawi people. This has resulted in decades of diplomatic deadlock and occasional flare-ups in regional tensions. Algeria does not claim Western Sahara as its own, but is a major supporter of the Polisario Front, which seeks full independence for the territory. On the other hand, Morocco sees Western Sahara as an important part of its territory. After Spain, the former colonial authority, left the territory in 1975, Morocco tried to seize it. In recent years, Morocco has won international backing for its Autonomy Plan, which calls for limited self-government in Western Sahara under Moroccan sovereignty. Countries such as France have been vocal about supporting Morocco, which has deteriorated its relationship with Algeria. France and Algeria France, in July 2024, sided with Morocco against Algeria on the matter of its sovereignty over the small Western Sahara country. This, as expected, did not bode well with the Algerian side, as they immediately moved to take action against France. To highlight the severity of the allegations, the Algerian foreign ministry summoned Stephane Romatet, the French ambassador to Algeria. In the same month, Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune spoke firmly against the long-term impacts of France's colonial rule.
