logo
Early voting starts for S. Korea election triggered by martial law

Early voting starts for S. Korea election triggered by martial law

News.com.au4 days ago

Early voting in South Korea's presidential elections began on Thursday, with both main candidates casting ballots in a poll triggered by ex-leader Yoon Suk Yeol's ill-fated suspension of civilian rule last year.
South Koreans are desperate to draw a line under months of political turmoil sparked by Yoon's declaration of martial law, for which he was impeached.
Since then the Asian democracy has been led by a revolving door of lame duck acting presidents as its export-driven economy grapples with trade turmoil abroad and sluggish demand at home.
All major polls have placed liberal Lee Jae-myung as the clear frontrunner in the presidential race, with a recent Gallup survey showing 49 percent of respondents viewed him as the best candidate.
Trailing behind him is conservative ex-labour minister Kim Moon-soo of the ruling People Power Party -- Yoon's former party -- at 35 percent.
While election day is set for June 3, those who want to vote early can do so on Thursday and Friday.
South Koreans have in recent years turned out in growing numbers for early voting, with 37 percent casting their ballots ahead of polling day in the 2022 presidential election.
By midday the early voting turnout rate was 8.7 percent, the highest yet for that time in South Korean election history, according to Seoul's National Election Commission.
The overseas voter turnout also reached a historic high, with four-fifths of 1.97 million eligible voters casting their ballots.
"Given that this election was held in the wake of an impeachment and a martial law crisis, it naturally reflects the public's strong desire to express their thoughts about democracy in South Korea," Kang Joo-hyun, a political science professor at Sookmyung Women's University, told AFP.
- 'Vote more powerful than a bullet' -
Voting in Seoul on Thursday morning, Lee told reporters: "There's a saying that a vote is more powerful than a bullet."
"Even an insurrection can only truly be overcome through the people's participation at the ballot box," added Lee of the Democratic Party.
According to a Gallup poll, more than half of his supporters said they planned to vote early, compared to just 16 percent of Kim's supporters.
Kim has said he will cast his vote in Incheon, west of Seoul, with his campaign framing it as "the beginning of a dramatic turnaround", a nod to General Douglas MacArthur's landing there during the Korean War.
Kim's decision to vote early has surprised many on the right, where conspiracy theories about electoral fraud –- particularly during early voting –- are rife.
The 73-year-old however reassured his supporters that there is "nothing to worry about."
"If you hesitate to vote early and end up missing the main election, it would be a major loss," said Kim on Wednesday.
"Our party will mobilise all its resources to ensure strict monitoring and oversight of early voting," he said.
"So please don't worry and take part in it," he said.
After early voting, Kim insisted he still has time to win the race.
"We're closing the gap quickly, and at this pace, I'm confident we'll take the lead soon," he told reporters.
Conservative candidate Kim shot to public attention in the aftermath of Yoon's martial law debacle, when he declined to bow in apology to the public for failing to prevent the suspension of civilian rule.
In contrast, lawyer-turned-politician Lee played a central role in stopping the push to suspect civilian rule, live-streaming his frantic drive to parliament and his scramble over the perimeter fence as he and other lawmakers raced to vote down the decree.
He has since vowed to "bring insurrection elements to justice" if elected president.
But whoever succeeds Yoon will have to grapple with a deepening economic downturn, some of the world's lowest birth rates and a soaring cost of living.
He will also have to navigate a mounting superpower standoff between the United States, Seoul's traditional security guarantor, and China, its largest trade partner.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Albanese rejects US defence demand
Albanese rejects US defence demand

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Albanese rejects US defence demand

Samantha Donovan: The Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has rejected a demand from the United States for Australia to spend an additional $40 billion a year on defence. The US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth is urging Australia to boost its spending to 3.5% of GDP up from the current level of 2%. He's of the view Australia needs to be doing more in the Indo-Pacific region to counter the rise of China. But Mr Albanese insists his government is already ramping up its investment in the military. Isabel Moussalli has more. US Isabel Moussalli: Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth made the most of his time in the spotlight at the weekend Shangri-La Dialogue, a global security conference in Singapore. Pete Hegseth: I urge all of our allies and partners to seize this moment with us. Our defence spending must reflect the dangers and threats that we face today. Isabel Moussalli: In his speech he reassures allies they won't be left alone to face increasing military and economic pressure from China, but asks them to ramp up spending. And if Asian countries need an example, he says thanks to President Donald Trump, European nations are boosting their spending. Pete Hegseth: NATO members are pledging to spend 5% of their GDP on defence, even Germany. So it doesn't make sense for countries in Europe to do that while key allies in Asia spend less on defence in the face of an even more formidable threat, not to mention North Korea. Isabel Moussalli: And then there's Australia, which got a specific mention later on. The US Department of Defence published a statement saying Secretary Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5% of its GDP as soon as possible. Australia's current defence spending is about 2% of GDP, so meeting that request would cost Australia tens of billions of dollars more per year. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been quick to brush off that demand. Anthony Albanese: What you should do in defence is decide what you need, your capability, and then provide for it. That's what my government's doing, investing in our capability and investing in our relationships. We've provided an additional $10 billion of investment into defence over the forward estimates. That adds up to 2.3% of GDP is where defence spending will rise. Isabel Moussalli: Jennifer Parker from the Australian National University's National Security College says the US pushing for more defence spending isn't surprising, but she raises questions about the way it's been handled. Jennifer Parker: The way it was pushed out really looks like it was trying to wedge Australia, given the recent debates in Australia about defence spending, which makes you ask questions about how close we are in the nature of our relationship. Isabel Moussalli: Dr Elizabeth Buchanan agrees. She's a senior fellow with the Australian Strategic Policy Institute and the former head of Navy research at the Department of Defence. Elizabeth Buchanan: So it shouldn't be a surprise that we've been asked to spend more. I think it is a surprise in terms of just how brash the US has been about this request. And I really do think the untidiness of how the US Secretary of Defence read out is a real clear signal that Canberra definitely isn't in the driver's seat in this relationship, and we might have known that. Isabel Moussalli: Dr Buchanan doesn't believe Australia will get anywhere near even 3% GDP, let alone 3.5% in the next decade. She cautions against lifting defence spending for the sake of it. Elizabeth Buchanan: So I think Australia very quickly will need to start reminding Washington that we have Pine Gap, we have Northwest Cape, we have MRFTI, so our marine rotational force up in Darwin. We do quite a lot that might not be fiscally valuable to Washington, but it does enable US forces throughout the region. So I think it's time that we sit down at a table and just really discuss about what we offer the alliance. Isabel Moussalli: Dr Buchanan says she hopes those hard discussions happen soon. Samantha Donovan: Isabel Moussalli

Australian journalist Cheng Lei relives ‘torture' of China's secret jails in documentary
Australian journalist Cheng Lei relives ‘torture' of China's secret jails in documentary

News.com.au

time5 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Australian journalist Cheng Lei relives ‘torture' of China's secret jails in documentary

An Australian journalist has relived the 'mental torture' of her time in one of China's notorious RSDL black jail cells in a harrowing documentary detailing ordeal. It has been little more than one-and-a-half-years since Cheng Lei landed safely in Australia after spending nearly three in Chinese custody. She was a prominent business anchor for a Chinese state broadcaster when Ministry of State Security officers unexpectedly raided her Beijing apartment in August, 2020. After hunting through her belongings and seizing all her electronic devices, they blindfolded Cheng and disappeared her into China's web of secret prisons. Now a Sky News presenter based in her hometown of Melbourne, Cheng has delved into the brutality of her detention in a documentary for the network titled Cheng Lei: My Story. She shares heart-wrenching details of the darkest period of her life and offers a rare glimpse into one of the most ruthless justice systems on the planet. Cheng was held in solitary confinement for nearly six months after being accused of endangering China's national security. Chinese authorities never fully clarified the allegation, but that did not stop them holding her for 177 days before her official arrest. 'RSDL is the Chinese spelling for hell,' Cheng said in the documentary. 'It stands for Residential Surveillance at a Designated Location, which makes you think it's house arrest. 'But in reality, it's mental torture.' Little is known about RSDL in China. But Safeguard Defenders, which tracks disappearances in China, has scraped enough together to paint a deeply disturbing picture. Detainees are kept at unknown locations for up to six months in cells 'designed to prevent suicide', according to the human rights not-for-profit. Witnesses have told the group they were denied legal counsel or contact with the outside world and 'regularly subjected to torture and forced to confess' — experiences hauntingly similar to Cheng's. Faced with a recreation of her cell, Cheng became emotional and said the months she spent inside were 'as close to dying and wanting to die as I ever got'. 'Yeah, this is where I spent six months,' she said as she entered the mock cell. 'Just sitting like this, thinking I was never gonna get out and absolutely helpless.' The room was simple — blank, cream walls, a bed and a stool for the guards that watched over her 24/7. She was forbidden from talking or making the 'slightest movement', and had to receive permission before so much as scratching herself, she explained. 'So you're in a bare room, and you are guarded and watched at all times by two guards,' Cheng said. 'One stands in front of me, one sits next to me, and they take turns with the standing and sitting. 'I have to sit on the edge of the bed and have my hands on my lap. 'Not allowed to cross the ankles or cross the legs, not allowed to close the eyes, no talking, no laughing, no sunshine, no sky, no exercise, no requests, no colour — just fear, desperation, isolation and utter boredom.' She says she sat like that for 13 hours each day. 'I hated having to sit still, not being able to do anything,' Cheng said. 'How do they come up with this — just nothingness? Nothingness, but also a sea of pain. 'I had no idea what was happening, or how long I would be here.' Outside, fierce diplomatic efforts were underway to gain consular access to her, with Australian officials fighting to get information to her loved ones — including her two children in Melbourne — about where she was and what her condition was. Safeguard Defenders has estimated as many as 113,407 people have been placed into RSDL and later faced trial. After she was formally arrested, Cheng was taken out of RSDL and moved into a larger cell with three other women. She stayed there for the remainder of her detention. Cheng and her cellmates were still subjected to 24-hour surveillance, but at least she was not alone, and a clearer picture was forming of what had landed her in custody. 'Eight words' As a senior journalist working for state media, she had access to Chinese government releases before they were published, including a major announcement that Beijing was not setting a 2020 GDP target due to uncertainty from the Covid-19 pandemic. Cheng was close friends with a reporter at Bloomberg, Haze Fan. The journalists shared their sources with each other. Cheng said Fan had been pushing for a 'series of government reports from me that hadn't been published in order to break the story at Bloomberg'. 'And I wanted to help her, because she had helped me,' Cheng said. 'When I told her the eight words which were 'no growth target', 'GDP', nine million jobs target' at 7:23am, I thought that would help her break the story, which they did.' She sent the text just seven minutes before the announcement was published. 'The charge was supplying state secrets to foreign entities, which boils down to texting eight words, seven minutes before the embargo (lifted), to my friend at Bloomberg,' Cheng said. Cheng was detained during a low point in Australia's relationship with China. Former prime minister Scott Morrison had infuriated Beijing when he backed an inquiry into the origins of coronavirus. China's ambassador at the time warned Australia's push for a probe was 'dangerous'. Soon after, tariffs were slapped on Australian goods, leading to a years-long trade war that has only recently eased, with the Albanese government unlocking $20bn worth of trade. Cheng's incarceration has been broadly seen as being part of China's efforts to pressure Australia. She was only released as ties with China began to normalise in late 2023. Cheng made clear the suffering she endured as a pawn in a geopolitical game. 'You don't know if you'll ever see your family again, because you don't know what they (the Chinese government) want,' she said. 'You don't know how everything you've done that you thought was good was now possibly criminal. 'Everything that made you happy or gave you pleasure now just was so far, is so removed from you. It was a cause of pain.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store