British jets bomb Houthi military target in Yemen
Defence Secretary John Healey said the raid was in response to the Houthi threat to shipping in the Red Sea, which was causing 'regional instability and risking economic security for families in the UK'.
Overnight, @RoyalAirForce Typhoons conducted strikes against a Houthi military target in Yemen to defend freedom of navigation, strengthen regional stability, protect UK economic security, and reduce the Houthis' capacity to launch further attacks. https://t.co/Hlu2Yhk3Oi pic.twitter.com/gppCNZTgQt
— Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧 (@DefenceHQ) April 29, 2025
The Houthis have targeted shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, busy sea lanes on the route from Asia to Europe using the Suez Canal.
The attacks have led to vessels being diverted around the southern tip of Africa, adding delays and costs to shipments of goods.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said the action was part of a joint operation alongside US forces, who have struck more than 800 Houthi targets since March.
It is the first time the RAF has stuck Houthi targets in Yemen since May 2024 under Rishi Sunak's administration.
The MoD said 'careful intelligence analysis' identified a cluster of buildings used by the Houthis to manufacture drones around fifteen miles south of Sanaa.
The strikes were conducted by Royal Air Force Typhoon FGR4s, which used Paveway IV precision-guided bombs.
Mr Healey said: 'This Government will always act in the interests of our national and economic security.
'Royal Air Force Typhoons have successfully conducted strikes against a Houthi military target in Yemen and all UK aircraft and personnel have returned safely to base.
'We conducted these strikes, supported by the US, to degrade Houthi capabilities and prevent further attacks against UK and international shipping.
'This action was taken in response to a persistent threat from the Houthis to freedom of navigation.
'A 55% drop in shipping through the Red Sea has already cost billions, fuelling regional instability and risking economic security for families in the UK.
'The Government is steadfast in our commitment to reinforcing global stability and protecting British working people.
'I am proud of the dedication and professionalism shown by the servicemen and women involved in this operation.'
📸 The 2025 Carrier Strike Group at sea, led by HMS Prince of Wales 🇬🇧
An 8-month, 4,500-strong task group—supported by @NATO & allies—has entered the Med and will sail to the Western Pacific, reaffirming the UK's commitment to Med & Indo-Pacific security, trade & industry. pic.twitter.com/tgAmIToGBk
— Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧 (@DefenceHQ) April 29, 2025
The strikes come ahead of the expected passage of the Royal Navy's flagship HMS Prince of Wales through the Red Sea.
The aircraft carrier and its escorts are conducting exercises in the Mediterranean before heading to the Indo-Pacific later this year.
In a sign that even highly-sophisticated warships are at risk in the Red Sea, the US Navy aircraft carrier USS Harry S Truman lost one of its F/A-18 jets earlier this month when it fell overboard, reportedly as the vessel executed a sharp turn to avoid a Houthi attack.
The Houthis claim their actions are in response to Israel's war on Hamas in Gaza, an assertion dismissed by the UK and allies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
UK cities '90 minutes from being destroyed by missiles' warns former Army chief
The Ministry of Defence has been urged to adopt cutting-edge technology such as AI, robots, and lasers in order to stay ahead and avoid suffering the fate of Ukraine's towns and cities Cruise missiles could obliterate a British city in just 90 minutes, the author of the Strategic Defence Review has warned. Former British Army chief General Sir Richard Barrons said in a stark warning that UK towns and cities could suffer devastation on the scale of Ukraine 's war-ravaged urban centres in the event of full-scale conflict. Speaking on Sky News's Politics Hub, he said: "Right now, we should be very concerned about countries like Russia and how they might try and effect our daily national life. You look at the damage done to places like Kyiv, by missiles and air attack. Those are the same missiles and bombs that could do the same damage to London, Birmingham, Liverpool or Newcastle if we don't take steps to deter that." "We should absolutely be prepared to exist in a world where things like precision missiles can range the UK and do great harm," he added. "That's not to say it's about to happen or imminent, but in terms of the capability, a cruise missile is only 90 minutes away from the UK." Russia is "an immediate and pressing threat", with the invasion of Ukraine making it "unequivocally clear its willingness to use force to achieve its goals", the Strategic Review concluded. China is eanwhile a "sophisticated and persistent challenge [...] "likely to continue seeking advantage through espionage and cyber attacks" - and have 1,000 nuclear warheads by 2030. Iran and North Korea are also flagged as regional disruptors. The Defence Review urges the Ministry of Defence to adopt cutting-edge technology - AI, robots, and lasers - to stay ahead. In a Commons statement, Defence Secretary John Healey said: "The threats we face are now more serious and less predictable than at any time since the end of the Cold War. We face war in Europe, growing Russian aggression, new nuclear risks, and daily cyber-attacks at home. Our adversaries are working more in alliance with one another, while technology is changing the way war is fought. We are in a new era of threat, which demands a new era for UK defence." Lord Dannatt, another former Army chief, likened the UK's slow military build-up to "asking Adolf Hitler not to attack until 1946." His damning comparison came as the Prime Minister launched a campaign to make Britain "war-ready"- but refused to commit to raising defence spending to 3% of GDP. "I am not, as the Prime Minister of a Labour government, going to make a commitment as to the precise date until I can be sure precisely where the money is coming from," he said. He warned the UK must ramp up spending amid the mounting threat from Russia and allies, includin gIran and North Korea. During his speech Sir Keir said: "First, we are moving to war-fighting readiness as the central purpose of our armed forces. "When we are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, the most effective way to deter them is to be ready, and frankly, to show them that we're ready to deliver peace through strength." Asked if he was committed to spending the necessary money to deliver everything in the review, he said: "We are committed to spending what we need to deliver this. That is the basis on which the terms of reference were set and that is the terms on which the review was published. Everything that can be done will be done within the spending envelope that we have." The PM vowed to build "world leading drone capabilities" and invest £15 billion in the UK's nuclear warhead programme, pledging the UK's armed forces will be ten times stronger by 2035. Lord Dannatt told Times Radio: "This rather vague commitment to move to 3% [of GDP on defence] by the end of the next parliament, 2034, it just doesn't stack up. "It's a little bit like saying in 1938 to Adolf Hitler 'please don't attack us until 1946 because we are not going to be ready'."
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
What was the point of the Strategic Defence Review?
This weekend has not been a masterclass in political communications by the government. Selected morsels of the Strategic Defence Review were dropped over several days, concluding with an anodyne launch by the prime minister at BAE Systems in Govan. The result: the prime minister and the defence secretary contradicting each other on defence spending, a rightly furious tirade from the speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, for neglecting Parliament and an urgent question from the Opposition. They are not good at this. It is plainly unacceptable that some journalists had sight of the full text of the SDR five hours before Members of Parliament could obtain copies. But is the 144-page review itself, emetically subtitled 'Making Britain Safer: secure at home, strong abroad, the defence moment of a generation' an actual 'plan for transformation', as Defence Secretary John Healey told the House of Commons? Nae danger, as my Glaswegian grandmother would have said.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Mull of Kintyre crash: Wife's 'anger' at 1994 helicopter tragedy
The wife of a senior police officer killed in an RAF Chinook helicopter crash in 1994 has said she is still "angry" at the government's stance on the Susan Phoenix's husband Ian was among leading security personnel killed when the helicopter went down in foggy conditions over the Mull of Kintyre in of the 29 people killed have said they are launching legal action against the Ministry of Defence (MoD) for not ordering a public inquiry. The government has said the crash was a "tragic accident".Dr Phoenix, 77, who now lives in Portland, Dorset, said the case had been an "obscenity of justice". The helicopter was carrying 25 passengers - made up of personnel from MI5, the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) and the Army - and four crew from RAF Aldergrove in Northern Ireland to a conference at Fort George near Inverness on 2 June the crash, pilots Flt Lt Jonathan Tapper, from Norfolk, and Flt Lt Richard Cook, from Hampshire, were accused of gross negligence, but this verdict was overturned by the UK government 17 years later.A subsequent review by Lord Philip set out "numerous concerns" raised by those who worked on the MoD's testing centre at Boscombe Down in Wiltshire declared the Chinook Mk2 helicopters "unairworthy" prior to the crash. Dr Phoenix, whose husband Ian was a detective superintendent in the RUC, has joined with other families to campaign for a "judge-led objective inquiry"."It really is heart breaking. We stuck in there and fought for the pilots - who were the cream of the air force and trying to make do with a faulty piece of kit," she said."We now know the aircraft was not airworthy, but the government are constantly re-iterating that it was just a tragic accident."Whatever happened on that night we may never know that, but we certainly know they should not have been flying it and they did not want to fly it."The families of the victims want a High Court judge to review information that they say was not included in previous investigations and could offer new information on the airworthiness of the Phoenix said the tragedy had been "locked up in cover up" over the 31 years since the crash."I wasn't even angry at the time. I was consumed in heart-wrenching grief," she said."Now listening to the young families paying tribute to their fathers... so now I'm angry."Let's give these young people back a sense of pride - they knew their dads were doing great jobs. "We though our men would be protected by the government - they weren't."The MoD has said that records held in The National Archives contain personal information and early release of those documents would breach their data protection MoD spokesperson said: "The Mull of Kintyre crash was a tragic accident and our thoughts and sympathies remain with the families, friends and colleagues of all those who died." You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
