logo
NBA insider reveals why Tom Thibodeau was fired by the New York Knicks

NBA insider reveals why Tom Thibodeau was fired by the New York Knicks

Daily Mail​2 days ago

NBA insider Brian Windhorst has revealed Tom Thibodeau was fired by the New York Knicks for making personnel changes too late into the season.
Thibodeau was shockingly fired by the Knicks on Tuesday, three days after their playoff elimination at the hands of the Indiana Pacers.
Now, as New York looks for a new coach in a hire that will have championship-or-bust expectations, Windhorst has shined a light on why there is a vacancy in Manhattan in the first place.
'What Tom Thibodeau did to his coaching strategy during the Eastern Conference finals might've assured his firing. What I mean by that is after falling down 2-0 in that series, he made a whole bunch of changes,' Windhorst said on 'Get Up'.
'He changed his starting lineup. Then he extended multiple players into his bench - something that players, team personnel, and people across the league had been begging him to do for months. He also changed some of his strategies within the coaching of the game, and it worked.'
Yet, the changes may have been a little too late, in moves that were reactive and not proactive, to keep him with the franchise.
For most of the season, Thibodeau stuck to his core rotation of seven players and did not dig into his bench.
It worked against the Pistons and Celtics, but bit them against the Pacers, who had the depth to tire out Jalen Brunson and the rest of Thibodeau's preferred players.
The Knicks will likely try to swing big with their hire, trying to court Dan Hurley or Jay Wright, before going for a more realistic option if the home-run option does not work.
Other names like Mike Malone and Johnnie Bryant have been tossed around to be the next Knicks coach, with the most important factor of the hire being someone who can maintain what Thibodeau built.
The next head coach in New York will have his legacy with the team directly tied to that of team president Leon Rose, who made the decision, with the backing of owner James Dolan, to fire Thibodeau.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans call for an end to Trump-Musk feud: ‘I hope it doesn't distract us'
Republicans call for an end to Trump-Musk feud: ‘I hope it doesn't distract us'

The Independent

time9 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Republicans call for an end to Trump-Musk feud: ‘I hope it doesn't distract us'

As the Republican Party anticipates potential fallout from Donald Trump's public dispute with Elon Musk, prominent lawmakers and conservative voices are calling for reconciliation, wary of the repercussions of a sustained conflict. The animosity between the two figures could pose challenges for the Republican agenda, particularly concerning tax and border spending legislation championed by Trump but criticised by Musk. Representative Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington, expressed hope that the disagreement would not impede progress on critical tasks. Speaking on the matter, Newhouse said: "I hope it doesn't distract us from getting the job done that we need to. I think that it will boil over and they'll mend fences." As of Friday afternoon, Musk had refrained from further engagement, focusing instead on promoting his various companies on social media. Senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, voiced optimism for a resolution, telling Fox News that, "I hope that both of them come back together because when the two of them are working together, we'll get a lot more done for America than when they're at cross purposes". Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, sounded almost pained on social media as Trump and Musk volleyed insults at each other, sharing a photo composite of the two men and writing, "But … I really like both of them.' 'Who else really wants @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump to reconcile?' Lee posted, later adding: 'Repost if you agree that the world is a better place with the Trump-Musk bromance fully intact.' So far, the feud between Trump and Musk is probably best described as a moving target, with plenty of opportunities for escalation or detente. One person familiar with the president's thinking said Musk wants to speak with Trump, but that the president doesn't want to do it – or at least do it on Friday. The person requested anonymity to disclose private matters. In a series of conversations with television anchors Friday morning, Trump showed no interest in burying the hatchet. Asked on ABC News about reports of a potential call between him and Musk, the president responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump added in the ABC interview that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk at the moment. Still, others remained hopeful that it all would blow over. 'I grew up playing hockey and there wasn't a single day that we played hockey or basketball or football or baseball, whatever we were playing, where we didn't fight. And then we'd fight, then we'd become friends again,' Hannity said on his show Thursday night. Acknowledging that it 'got personal very quick,' Hannity nonetheless added that the rift was 'just a major policy difference.' House Speaker Mike Johnson projected confidence that the dispute would not affect prospects for the tax and border bill. 'Members are not shaken at all,' the Louisiana Republican said. 'We're going to pass this legislation on our deadline.' He added that he hopes Musk and Trump reconcile, saying 'I believe in redemption' and 'it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' But he also had something of a warning for the billionaire entrepreneur. 'I'll tell you what, do not doubt and do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. "He is the leader of the party. He's the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era.'

Pictured: Meghan and Harry take Archie and Lilibet to Disneyland
Pictured: Meghan and Harry take Archie and Lilibet to Disneyland

Telegraph

time11 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Pictured: Meghan and Harry take Archie and Lilibet to Disneyland

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have marked Princess Lilibet's fourth birthday by taking their children to Disneyland. Meghan Markle, 43, shared a carefully curated glimpse into her family's 'pure joy' on social media by posting a montage of photographs and video clips of the two-day trip to the theme park in California. They included images of Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet enjoying rides and meeting Disney characters, while Prince Harry and Meghan were shown wearing Mickey Mouse-style ears. The birthday girl appeared to have received Mickey and Minnie plush toys as gifts during the holiday, while she was also treated to a towering Little Mermaid-themed cake, according to the Instagram post. The Duke and Duchess were also seen appearing to scream while riding Disneyland's Space Mountain indoor rollercoaster. In one of the video clips, Princess Lilibet is seen taking her mother's hand and jogging excitedly alongside her parents. She and her brother, six, are then taken into a room to meet a woman dressed as Elsa, a character from the popular animated film Frozen, who waves and holds the Princess's hands. The Duchess posted love-heart emojis to cover the faces of her children in every photograph. 'Thank you @disneyland for giving our family two days of pure joy!' she captioned the post. It was the fourth Instagram post the Duchess had shared in the past week to mark her daughter turning four on June 4. A throwback video posted on the Princess's birthday showed the Duchess twerking while pregnant as Prince Harry danced around her in a hospital room before their daughter's birth. Another post featured tender moments between Prince Harry and 'Daddy's little girl and favourite adventurer'. 'The sweetest bond to watch unfold,' she wrote below photographs which included one of Harry cradling the newborn Princess. Another post included black and white portraits of Meghan holding her infant daughter, as well as a more recent one of the pair hugging during a trip to the beach. 'Happy birthday to our beautiful girl!' Meghan wrote in a caption alongside two black-and-white portraits of herself with Lilibet. 'Four years ago today she came into our lives – and each day is brighter and better because of it.' In the picture, Princess Lilibet's eyes and the top half of her face can be seen, in a departure from the Duchess's usual rule of only showing the children from the back in order to preserve their privacy.

Foreign exposure to US assets may be lower than feared
Foreign exposure to US assets may be lower than feared

Reuters

time19 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Foreign exposure to US assets may be lower than feared

ORLANDO, Florida, June 3 (Reuters) - It is widely believed that investors around the world have a disproportionately high exposure to U.S. assets, particularly stocks, an imbalance that could roil U.S. markets if corrected. But what if these fears are overblown? Several eye-popping statistics suggest that America's weight in world financial markets is even greater than its outsized economic might. Most strikingly, the U.S. net international investment position (NIIP), or foreign investors' holdings of U.S. assets less U.S. investors' holdings of overseas assets, at the end of 2024 was $26 trillion. That's nearly 24% of global GDP, up from 16% only two years earlier, a surge driven by foreigners' insatiable appetite for U.S. equities, mainly "Big Tech". Demand was so hot that, by some measures, the value of U.S.-listed stocks at the turn of the year represented 74% of total global market cap. That share was 60% six years ago, and less than half in 2011. But the attractiveness of dollar-denominated assets is now being questioned, as the often erratic policies of U.S. President Donald Trump have upset longstanding economic and geopolitical norms, making governments and investors question whether Washington is still a reliable partner on the global stage. The concern is that this eroding confidence triggers a reversal of the massive flows into Wall Street seen in recent years that has damaging spillover effects. Such a correction may not require outright selling. Given the scale of the flows involved, just less buying among foreign investors could be enough to cast a shadow over the world's most important stock market. And the running assumption is foreign investors don't have the capacity or willingness to increase their exposure to U.S. assets, creating a significant long-term downside risk for Wall Street, Treasuries and the dollar. "A structural shift is underway: the slow erosion of US economic dominance," analysts at Deutsche Bank wrote on Monday. But looked at another way, foreign exposure to U.S. assets may not be as high as initially meets the eye. That's the view of analysts at JP Morgan, who measure portfolio investment in U.S. bonds and equities as a share of countries' total household sector financial assets. They use a broad definition for a country's "household" sector, covering investments by institutions like insurance companies and pension funds that are ultimately made on behalf of households. Using a broad range of data, from central banks, U.S. Treasury and OECD household financial asset flows, they measure the ratio of U.S. equity and bond holdings relative to household financial assets in each country. They find that "relative to the total financial assets of households in the rest of the world, the allocations to U.S. assets typically stand at around 10-20%." As a result, they are "skeptical of the idea that foreign investors hold too much of U.S. assets." Given that U.S. equities account for more than 70% of the MSCI global market cap and dollar-denominated bonds represent around 50% of global bond indices, according to JP Morgan estimates, the 10-20% exposure of foreign investors to U.S. assets does appear surprisingly low. And the 10-20% figure would be even lower were it not for the outsized U.S. equity holdings at the Swiss National Bank and Norway's sovereign wealth fund. On the bond side, foreigners' footprint in the U.S. Treasury market is shrinking. Data shows that they owned 31% of the $28.55 trillion outstanding Treasury debt at the end of last year. That share has been declining steadily since the Global Financial Crisis. In 2008, the figure was approaching 60%. Overseas investors' share of the T-bill market has shrunk even more. In December, it was under 20%, near its lowest level on record and sharply down from 50% a decade before. Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou and his team at JP Morgan aren't arguing investors will or should ramp up their purchases of U.S. assets. And in cases where allocations are high - such as the Taiwanese exposure to U.S. bonds or Canadians' holdings of U.S. stocks - diversification would hardly be a surprise. But there is "little indication" of broad-based selling of U.S. assets by foreign investors so far this year, they note. And if that selling does materialize, it may be far lighter than many expect. (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store